Freedman out!

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Freedman out!

Post by Lord Kangana » Sun Jan 19, 2014 10:07 pm

I'm absolutely lost on this issue about Dawson.

Are we now saying that its ok, even desirable, to loan in other teams young players?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Freedman out!

Post by bobo the clown » Sun Jan 19, 2014 10:17 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:I'm absolutely lost on this issue about Dawson.

Are we now saying that its ok, even desirable, to loan in other teams young players?
Well, if he IS saying that, then that's what WON'T be happening ... if DF stays to form !!
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

Armchair Wanderer
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1967
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am

Re: Freedman out!

Post by Armchair Wanderer » Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:08 pm

LeverEnd wrote:I don't know if the 2nd bit refers to me, but I was fully behind him until 10 games into this season as every new manager deserves a chance and some support. Then I realised he was clueless. I also think the vast majority of fans have been supportive of him, especially given the dross he's served up.
The bit on the end was just a general thing. I think I have issues concerning people criticizing publicly over trivial matters such as post-match wording, hairstyle, accent. Might need to look into some therapy about it :)
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.

Sponge
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1980
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:17 am

Re: Freedman out!

Post by Sponge » Mon Jan 20, 2014 2:16 am

LeverEnd wrote:I just think that he and backroom team have brought a negativity to the club and it's got to the players. He seems to think everything should be clinical and stifles any momentum as soon as it starts to build. It's hard to know what's wrong but it's awful to watch, unsuccessful and should result in a series of sackings.

Right, 'cause there was no negativity at the club when he arrived...

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13656
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: Freedman out!

Post by Hoboh » Mon Jan 20, 2014 3:02 am

Sponge wrote:
LeverEnd wrote:I just think that he and backroom team have brought a negativity to the club and it's got to the players. He seems to think everything should be clinical and stifles any momentum as soon as it starts to build. It's hard to know what's wrong but it's awful to watch, unsuccessful and should result in a series of sackings.

Right, 'cause there was no negativity at the club when he arrived...
Been there since Megson.

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: Freedman out!

Post by LeverEnd » Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:12 am

Sponge wrote:
LeverEnd wrote:I just think that he and backroom team have brought a negativity to the club and it's got to the players. He seems to think everything should be clinical and stifles any momentum as soon as it starts to build. It's hard to know what's wrong but it's awful to watch, unsuccessful and should result in a series of sackings.

Right, 'cause there was no negativity at the club when he arrived...
I meant in terms of style of play.
...

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Freedman out!

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:17 am

Personally I think there needs to be a reality check amongst Bolton fans.

When Freedman came we were shite. Primarily because we had a lot of overpaid players who had never satisfactorily performed for the club on a regular basis. Knight, NGog, Sordell, Andrews, Mears, Eagles, Mills, Ream etc...for whatever reason those players simply did not perform to a consistently good enough level. Some offered more in spells than others but as a whole none of them had been good enough up to that point to achieve what the club wanted them to. We also had injuries to some key players who might have made a difference.

We had a brief respite from being shite last season, it could have been down to Dawson, it could have been down to Eagles being superb for a period, might have been inspired management, it might have simply been a bit of luck, but whatever, as I've come to expect with these players it doesn't take a whole lot for the whole thing to go into reverse at alarming speed.

Now, reading the Bolton News today it appears we've been circulating names of these players trying to get rid, and have only had a couple of bites and then once the interested party heard what the player earned the interest was dropped as quickly as an oven hot scone from a greedy childs hand. Tells you just about everything you need to know about how these players are viewed in football in general and how much we've paid them.

Now, that doesn't mean mistakes haven't been made since. Far from it. Spearing looks poor for our only real money signing and you have to question if Beckford, despite a decent scoring record here has brought in the right qualities in terms of adding some desire and fight to a squad desperately lacking in it. And at times I think we might have benefitted from going back to basics and leaving out all the fripperies and fairies and giving teams a good clouting. In fact we should do that now, put 11 grafters in and kick our way to some sort of safety. Because NGog, Eagles, Lee, Moritz etc etc are NOT the fighters and scrappers and battlers this club needs. They aren't going to dig deep and pull us out of a hole. We know that. So it might be worth adopting a dog of war approach and I'm a little disappointed that hasn't happened.

However, to assume that players that have never performed for us, that on top of that aren't wanted elsewhere, will be fixed and suddenly "perform" for a new manager is IMO hoping for a miracle. By all means change the manager, but we're going to need to similarly move out these players whatever. And we cannot do that till their contracts expire. And even should we do that we still have the £40+M to save before we can start to use the manager's term "recruiting".

In short, I believe things are going to get a lot, lot worse, irrespective before they can get better. And the best we can hope for is that whatever longer term plans the club as a whole beds in now and over the next year or two are damn good ones. Because frankly I don't see any scenario that doesn't see us scrapping to stay in this league and possibly/probably falling into the next one over the next 4/5 years.

Its going to get messy, it isn't going to be very pleasant. But heck we had 11 years of top flight football that few of us expected and two European campaigns that I'd say none of us expected. That was great. This is the pay-off and is when our club really needs us to get behind it, I'd argue at least!

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Freedman out!

Post by Lord Kangana » Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:23 am

We're still shite.

16 months and enough new players signed by Freedman to make a team (most of whom, by the way, he doesn't f*cking play) and we're still shite.

In fact, we're worse than shite. This season is worse than last. We're lower than when he took over. Not last week, in 2012. Its 2014 now.

The only thing that will get messy is your mind, when you realise he isn't the next Sam Allardyce, but the next Roy McFarland.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: Freedman out!

Post by jaffka » Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:40 am

Another massive insano u-turn

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Freedman out!

Post by boltonboris » Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:49 am

Spearing
Moritz
Beckford
Danns
Craig Davies
White
Wilkinson
Tierney
Hall
Baptiste
Bolger
Lee-Baratt
Medo

That's 13 players currently in the squad that Freedman has signed. 1 of them is long term injured. 1 of them has a short term injury.

Only 3 of them play regularly.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Freedman out!

Post by thebish » Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:52 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:Personally I think there needs to be a reality check amongst Bolton fans.

When Freedman came we were shite. Primarily because we had a lot of overpaid players who had never satisfactorily performed for the club on a regular basis. Knight, NGog, Sordell, Andrews, Mears, Eagles, Mills, Ream etc...for whatever reason those players simply did not perform to a consistently good enough level. Some offered more in spells than others but as a whole none of them had been good enough up to that point to achieve what the club wanted them to. We also had injuries to some key players who might have made a difference.

We had a brief respite from being shite last season, it could have been down to Dawson, it could have been down to Eagles being superb for a period, might have been inspired management, it might have simply been a bit of luck, but whatever, as I've come to expect with these players it doesn't take a whole lot for the whole thing to go into reverse at alarming speed.

Now, reading the Bolton News today it appears we've been circulating names of these players trying to get rid, and have only had a couple of bites and then once the interested party heard what the player earned the interest was dropped as quickly as an oven hot scone from a greedy childs hand. Tells you just about everything you need to know about how these players are viewed in football in general and how much we've paid them.

Now, that doesn't mean mistakes haven't been made since. Far from it. Spearing looks poor for our only real money signing and you have to question if Beckford, despite a decent scoring record here has brought in the right qualities in terms of adding some desire and fight to a squad desperately lacking in it. And at times I think we might have benefitted from going back to basics and leaving out all the fripperies and fairies and giving teams a good clouting. In fact we should do that now, put 11 grafters in and kick our way to some sort of safety. Because NGog, Eagles, Lee, Moritz etc etc are NOT the fighters and scrappers and battlers this club needs. They aren't going to dig deep and pull us out of a hole. We know that. So it might be worth adopting a dog of war approach and I'm a little disappointed that hasn't happened.

However, to assume that players that have never performed for us, that on top of that aren't wanted elsewhere, will be fixed and suddenly "perform" for a new manager is IMO hoping for a miracle. By all means change the manager, but we're going to need to similarly move out these players whatever. And we cannot do that till their contracts expire. And even should we do that we still have the £40+M to save before we can start to use the manager's term "recruiting".

In short, I believe things are going to get a lot, lot worse, irrespective before they can get better. And the best we can hope for is that whatever longer term plans the club as a whole beds in now and over the next year or two are damn good ones. Because frankly I don't see any scenario that doesn't see us scrapping to stay in this league and possibly/probably falling into the next one over the next 4/5 years.

Its going to get messy, it isn't going to be very pleasant. But heck we had 11 years of top flight football that few of us expected and two European campaigns that I'd say none of us expected. That was great. This is the pay-off and is when our club really needs us to get behind it, I'd argue at least!

that sounds like a reasonable summary of where we are to me...

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Freedman out!

Post by boltonboris » Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:52 am

The guy has spent over £6m in a shade over a year. And all he has to show for it, is pretty much the same starting 11 that the last bloke was using.

Which he now reckons is shit. Well done Dougie. You've flushed £6m English pounds down the toilet
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Freedman out!

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:57 am

boltonboris wrote:The guy has spent over £6m in a shade over a year. And all he has to show for it, is pretty much the same starting 11 that the last bloke was using.

Which he now reckons is shit. Well done Dougie. You've flushed £6m English pounds down the toilet
I think you're probably being a bit creative to get to £6M to be honest. I know what you're saying but looking at your list of 13 even there are several youngsters on there an emergency keeper for cover and a couple of injuries.

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: Freedman out!

Post by jaffka » Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:58 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
boltonboris wrote:The guy has spent over £6m in a shade over a year. And all he has to show for it, is pretty much the same starting 11 that the last bloke was using.

Which he now reckons is shit. Well done Dougie. You've flushed £6m English pounds down the toilet
I think you're probably being a bit creative to get to £6M to be honest. I know what you're saying but looking at your list of 13 even there are several youngsters on there an emergency keeper for cover and a couple of injuries.
Sho you think he has been shit hot in the transfer market then.

Sponge
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1980
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:17 am

Re: Freedman out!

Post by Sponge » Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:58 am

boltonboris wrote:Spearing
Moritz
Beckford
Danns
Craig Davies
White
Wilkinson
Tierney
Hall
Baptiste
Bolger
Lee-Baratt
Medo

That's 13 players currently in the squad that Freedman has signed. 1 of them is long term injured. 1 of them has a short term injury.

Only 3 of them play regularly.
I assume Wilkinson, Bolger, White, and Hall were all brought in for "the future". Lee-Baratt is a back-up keeper.

So discounting those five and the injured player, that's three of seven who are regular starters. All of them are squad regulars. Not quite as disastrous as your original post implies.

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: Freedman out!

Post by LeverEnd » Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:01 am

boltonboris wrote:The guy has spent over £6m in a shade over a year. And all he has to show for it, is pretty much the same starting 11 that the last bloke was using.

Which he now reckons is shit. Well done Dougie. You've flushed £6m English pounds down the toilet
A far more succint and accurate summary I'd say. No new manager gets a totally clean slate. He's had a pretty reasonable, if not ideal, crack of the whip and has taken us backwards.
...

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31631
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Freedman out!

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:18 am

boltonboris wrote:That's 13 players currently in the squad that Freedman has signed. 1 of them is long term injured. 1 of them has a short term injury. Only 3 of them play regularly.
boltonboris wrote:The guy has spent over £6m in a shade over a year. And all he has to show for it, is pretty much the same starting 11 that the last bloke was using. Which he now reckons is shit. Well done Dougie. You've flushed £6m English pounds down the toilet
It's an interesting list. As noted, despite Hall's first-team appearances he, White, Wilkinson and Bolger are to a greater than lesser extent "ones for the future" - which has always been a hit-and-miss affair (Mickael Kaprelian, Emanuele Morini, Lubomir Michalik, etc). Lee-Barratt is an emergency signing for buttons. Tierney would be playing if he were fit, Baptiste hasn't been bad. Danns seems to have the right stuff. Spearing was a popular loanee most fans wanted to sign permanently, although now many would rather pick Medo. Craig Davies was a cheap punt and brings something different up front. Beckford and Moritz are our top scorers, when they're allowed to play.

I honestly think we've got the bones of a good team, when you add in a few pre-Dougie players (Mark Davies, Eagles/CYL, even arguably Mills-and-Ream who looked solid as a partnership). The problem is they're not playing well, and when it goes on for so long with so many different permutations you have to question the manager.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Freedman out!

Post by Lord Kangana » Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:04 am

Whilst we're on the subject, he also handed a new contract to Wheater.

Or doesn't that count for the sake of the argument?

Anyway, evidence the Sordell signing, what the hell are you doing signing boys when you say you need men?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

coffeymagic
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 934
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 11:18 pm
Location: east kilbride
Contact:

Re: Freedman out!

Post by coffeymagic » Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:36 am

Yet again Dougie tells us that he 'knows what the problem is'. Apart from pointing the finger at the past what's he doing about it?

How many more chances is he going to get?

Watching the goals on FLS just about summed up our season. Their fifth was a cracker with Bolton players falling over the ball and running into each other like a tribute to the Keystone Kops.

What a shambles.

I've got my train tickets for Saturday. My missues may be pulling the plug on that due to something she calls 'family commitments'.

I've got my fingers crossed.
I'm not asking you to 'think outside the box' I just wish you'd have a rummage around in it once in a while.

http://www.coffeymagic.blogspot.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
twitter @thetonycoffey

StaffsTrotter
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 839
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: Freedman out!

Post by StaffsTrotter » Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:30 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
boltonboris wrote:That's 13 players currently in the squad that Freedman has signed. 1 of them is long term injured. 1 of them has a short term injury. Only 3 of them play regularly.
boltonboris wrote:The guy has spent over £6m in a shade over a year. And all he has to show for it, is pretty much the same starting 11 that the last bloke was using. Which he now reckons is shit. Well done Dougie. You've flushed £6m English pounds down the toilet
It's an interesting list. As noted, despite Hall's first-team appearances he, White, Wilkinson and Bolger are to a greater than lesser extent "ones for the future" - which has always been a hit-and-miss affair (Mickael Kaprelian, Emanuele Morini, Lubomir Michalik, etc). Lee-Barratt is an emergency signing for buttons. Tierney would be playing if he were fit, Baptiste hasn't been bad. Danns seems to have the right stuff. Spearing was a popular loanee most fans wanted to sign permanently, although now many would rather pick Medo. Craig Davies was a cheap punt and brings something different up front. Beckford and Moritz are our top scorers, when they're allowed to play.

I honestly think we've got the bones of a good team, when you add in a few pre-Dougie players (Mark Davies, Eagles/CYL, even arguably Mills-and-Ream who looked solid as a partnership). The problem is they're not playing well, and when it goes on for so long with so many different permutations you have to question the manager.
Pretty good summary with the honourable exception of the views on Baptiste who I maintain has been routinely targeted by the oppostion to great effect throughout the season - yes Mears would have been better.

On paper and by previous experience etc we have a good set of players - top end challengers .Think the no interest in them is a bit of a red herring. The only likely buyers would be lower prem and below. Which teams shell out transfer fees these days. As has been noted, we have paid well which again limits the market. No matter the church mouse spiel this has continued recently e.g. incredulous comments by Nigel Clough wrt wages we were offering Baptiste (I don't have an obessession with the guy honest)

Think the Dawson is an interesting one. He was solid but slow ( a bit like wheater but perhaps with more organisational abilities and good enough for were we are), but I do wonder whether the number of goals he scored (never to be repeated I suspect) and the run it co-incided with, has slightly rose tinted peoples opinions of him.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 33 guests