creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34763
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Go Swanny.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Sat here wishing I'd had a drive over, now.thebish wrote:Finn's having a good spell!![]()
and - Headingley - on a Sunny sunday afternoon - test cricket - and it's not full???
booooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Yorkshire!!
Swann's on fire, the lad.

May the bridges I burn light your way
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34763
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Not sure about no follow on.
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
As the ninth wicket fell the BBC expert sated the following:
Expert indeed.BBC Test Match Special's Jeremy Coney
"That was a serviceable ball on a goodish line and length, Broad has found McCullum's outside edge and with Boult coming out, you would think that would be New Zealand's last resistance. To be bowled out in little more than a session... well, that's why they're eighth in the world."
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
They seem to want to get some batting in before the Ashes and feel the series is won against NZ.Worthy4England wrote:Not sure about no follow on.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Nor I. In fact, I'm wracking my brains as to why? All I can see from this will be NZ padding out for a draw. Get the 4uckers in then get it won, for me.Worthy4England wrote:Not sure about no follow on.

May the bridges I burn light your way
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34763
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Well I guess if they go off like a train, which they seem to be doing and leave themselves 4/5 sessions they'll be reet. Forgot it started Friday not Thursday....Bruce Rioja wrote:Nor I. In fact, I'm wracking my brains as to why? All I can see from this will be NZ padding out for a draw. Get the 4uckers in then get it won, for me.Worthy4England wrote:Not sure about no follow on.

- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Decent display all round. Bang a few more runs then stick them in and go for it.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
It's going to piss it down from lunchtime today, apparently. Another reason why we shouldv'e stuck 'em back in!
May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Exactly this. It's almost as if he made a TV & crowd pleasing decision rather than the sporting one of going or the jugular.Bruce Rioja wrote:It's going to piss it down from lunchtime today, apparently. Another reason why we shouldv'e stuck 'em back in!
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
What's it like over Bill's Mother's?thebish wrote:429 ahead at lunch - and no sign of a declaration...
May the bridges I burn light your way
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38867
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
I think the TV and crowd wanted him to stick em back in.bobo the clown wrote:Exactly this. It's almost as if he made a TV & crowd pleasing decision rather than the sporting one of going or the jugular.Bruce Rioja wrote:It's going to piss it down from lunchtime today, apparently. Another reason why we shouldv'e stuck 'em back in!
Mind boggling, we are 429 ahead against a side that can't bat and seemingly will still bat on.
Pathetic.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
wouldn't go THAT far!! and - wasn't it you who said our batting was "piss poor"? If that's the case - then you of all people should be applauding the decision to get as many batting hours as possible, surely???BWFC_Insane wrote:I think the TV and crowd wanted him to stick em back in.bobo the clown wrote:Exactly this. It's almost as if he made a TV & crowd pleasing decision rather than the sporting one of going or the jugular.Bruce Rioja wrote:It's going to piss it down from lunchtime today, apparently. Another reason why we shouldv'e stuck 'em back in!
Mind boggling, we are 429 ahead against a side that can't bat and seemingly will still bat on.
Pathetic.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
You call 429 ahead in a test match pathetic? Perhaps a historic and glorious loss would be more noble?BWFC_Insane wrote:I think the TV and crowd wanted him to stick em back in.bobo the clown wrote:Exactly this. It's almost as if he made a TV & crowd pleasing decision rather than the sporting one of going or the jugular.Bruce Rioja wrote:It's going to piss it down from lunchtime today, apparently. Another reason why we shouldv'e stuck 'em back in!
Mind boggling, we are 429 ahead against a side that can't bat and seemingly will still bat on.
Pathetic.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
BWFC_Insane wrote:I think the TV and crowd wanted him to stick em back in.bobo the clown wrote:Exactly this. It's almost as if he made a TV & crowd pleasing decision rather than the sporting one of going or the jugular.Bruce Rioja wrote:It's going to piss it down from lunchtime today, apparently. Another reason why we shouldv'e stuck 'em back in!
Mind boggling, we are 429 ahead against a side that can't bat and seemingly will still bat on.
Pathetic.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Trott's out now... i imagine we'll declare soon..
and - they'll be so crushed and demoralised at knowing there is no chance they can win - can we really see them having the patience/skill/attitude to block out however many overs we might have left?? I can't...
and - they'll be so crushed and demoralised at knowing there is no chance they can win - can we really see them having the patience/skill/attitude to block out however many overs we might have left?? I can't...
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34763
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
The worst we're going to do from here is draw the test and win the series.
I guess if they want some batting practice, then why not.
I guess if they want some batting practice, then why not.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38867
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
You have to try and win the match. This is just tedious. How many balls did Trott take to make 9 runs last night?thebish wrote:wouldn't go THAT far!! and - wasn't it you who said our batting was "piss poor"? If that's the case - then you of all people should be applauding the decision to get as many batting hours as possible, surely???BWFC_Insane wrote:I think the TV and crowd wanted him to stick em back in.bobo the clown wrote:Exactly this. It's almost as if he made a TV & crowd pleasing decision rather than the sporting one of going or the jugular.Bruce Rioja wrote:It's going to piss it down from lunchtime today, apparently. Another reason why we shouldv'e stuck 'em back in!
Mind boggling, we are 429 ahead against a side that can't bat and seemingly will still bat on.
Pathetic.
If you're going back in to bat, make quick runs. Don't just hang around for 2 hours doing nowt.
It's going to rain, everybody knows it. New Zealand can't bat so we might have even wrapped this up by now, had we made them follow on.
How many runs do you think we need?
Botham had it spot on yesterday when he said there was not one reason he could think of not to enforce the follow on.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
See, I've been entertaining this very thought and have arrived, handily, at a question.Worthy4England wrote:
I guess if they want some batting practice, then why not.
If we require batting practice then which is the better option;
(a) Continue with the test against NZ, batting against a poor attack that's becoming more demoralised and less interested?
Or
(b) Get this game out of the way and get some serious nets sessions in against better bowlers, thus giving our bowlers more practice too?
May the bridges I burn light your way
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests