Bands you don't "get".
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Little Green Man
- Icon
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:34 pm
- Location: Justin Edinburgh
Re: Bands you don't "get".
Brandish a comb at it, then the fecker will rue the day!thebish wrote: there's a rat in mi kitchen, what am I gonna do, I'm gonna fix that rat that's what I'm gonna do,
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 11:35 am
Re: Bands you don't "get".
Any of this dull Indie shite like The Courteeners and Mumford and Sons.
Also Oasis. Its not that I don'e get them, I just think they're wank.
Also Oasis. Its not that I don'e get them, I just think they're wank.
''Amazing! Out of nothing Bolton are level. A quick throw, Kevin Nolan keeps play alive in the box and finds Kevin Davies on the left who lashes a shot under Oliver Kahn.''
Re: Bands you don't "get".
There are some good small bands but there is not many bands that I could name and many of you would go oh yeah there quite good and be able to name me even 1 of their songs. Maximo park are good but not exactly famous are they now.Beefheart wrote:Mmm, I can understand not liking The Beatles, but when you think Oasis are the only 'great' band of the the last 20 years it sounds a bit odd, Dan.Bruce Rioja wrote:So, you don't get the Beatles, however, Beatles tribute act Oasis are a great band?bwfcdan94 wrote:TBH though their hasn't been a great band since Oasis, Kasabian are good but by no stretch of the imagination great. Music is rubbish now deal with it.
Righty oh.
Not all music now is rubbish either, if you can't find anything good you aren't looking hard enough!
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.
Re: Bands you don't "get".
Exactly find me an interview where either Liam or Noel goes oh year we based our music on the Beatles I could certainly find you some where Liam says he has no interest ion the Beatles.Jakerbeef wrote:I've never gotten the Beatles and Oasis comparisons. I'm willing to cut Dan some slack on this one.
But people having a pop at Springsteen, Queen, Rush, Black Sabbath and Iron Maiden...are you allergic to stupendous Rock or summat?
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Bands you don't "get".
Seriously, Dan, I haven't even the faintest idea as to what it is that you're attempting to say there.bwfcdan94 wrote: There are some good small bands but there is not many bands that I could name and many of you would go oh yeah there quite good and be able to name me even 1 of their songs.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Bands you don't "get".
Yep, the comparison's are drawn by what they say in interviews. 4ucking genius.bwfcdan94 wrote:Exactly find me an interview where either Liam or Noel goes oh year we based our music on the Beatles I could certainly find you some where Liam says he has no interest ion the Beatles.Jakerbeef wrote:I've never gotten the Beatles and Oasis comparisons. I'm willing to cut Dan some slack on this one.
But people having a pop at Springsteen, Queen, Rush, Black Sabbath and Iron Maiden...are you allergic to stupendous Rock or summat?

May the bridges I burn light your way
Re: Bands you don't "get".
Are you joking?bwfcdan94 wrote:Exactly find me an interview where either Liam or Noel goes oh year we based our music on the Beatles I could certainly find you some where Liam says he has no interest ion the Beatles.Jakerbeef wrote:I've never gotten the Beatles and Oasis comparisons. I'm willing to cut Dan some slack on this one.
But people having a pop at Springsteen, Queen, Rush, Black Sabbath and Iron Maiden...are you allergic to stupendous Rock or summat?
'Noel Gallagher has said that Liam showed little interest in music until his late teens.[5] Liam became confident in his abilities to sing and began listening to bands like The Stone Roses, The Who, The Kinks, The Jam, T.Rex and The Beatles. In the process he forged a lifelong obsession with John Lennon; Liam would later claim to be Lennon re-incarnated, despite being born eight years prior to Lennon's death'
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
Re: Bands you don't "get".
youre a pervert if you dont like reggae, im mean proper reggae, not ub40 or Bob Marleys greatest hits.
play Babylon, 'Thank you for the many things youve done' if that doesnt change your mind, youre a pervert.
play Babylon, 'Thank you for the many things youve done' if that doesnt change your mind, youre a pervert.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: Bands you don't "get".
YesWorthy4England wrote:I think I'd probably be in agreement for that one - just a hunch.Wandering Willy wrote:Tiny feck Templar
Is he related to Tynchy Stryder or Tinie Tempah or Tempah T?
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Bands you don't "get".
Good call.Bruce Rioja wrote:Seriously. A feeling that's lasted since around the 2nd year at school. Read also - Reggae.thebish wrote:now you've gone too far!!Bruce Rioja wrote:Ocean Colour Scene.
The Specials (In fact, any of that Ska / Rude Boy / Two-tone stuff).
Sorry but UB40 are in the list for me as well.
Re: Bands you don't "get".
I take it back Blur are not halve bad but again they are not a "great" band.
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
- Location: Bolton
Re: Bands you don't "get".
Oasis are/were better......bwfcdan94 wrote:I take it back Blur are not halve bad but again they are not a "great" band.
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 11:35 am
Re: Bands you don't "get".
Annoyed Grunt wrote:Oasis are/were better......bwfcdan94 wrote:I take it back Blur are not halve bad but again they are not a "great" band.
''Amazing! Out of nothing Bolton are level. A quick throw, Kevin Nolan keeps play alive in the box and finds Kevin Davies on the left who lashes a shot under Oliver Kahn.''
Re: Bands you don't "get".
Gilbert and Sullivan
and - for that matter - Gilbert O'Sullivan...
and - for that matter - Gilbert O'Sullivan...
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Bands you don't "get".
If we can go back to the OP and the point of not 'getting' rather than simply not 'liking', and on the subject of Blur, although I've never liked it either, I sure as shit never 'got' Song Two. I've never understood its utter admiration by some. There used to be an absolute clamour towards the dancefloor whenever it came on down the old indie disco's, and I'd be stood there shrugging my shoulders before utilising the opportunity to go to the bar.Annoyed Grunt wrote:Oasis are/were better......bwfcdan94 wrote:I take it back Blur are not halve bad but again they are not a "great" band.
May the bridges I burn light your way
Re: Bands you don't "get".
I never got the whole blur vs oasis thing... I mean - did anyone really give a toss??Bruce Rioja wrote:If we can go back to the OP and the point of not 'getting' rather than simply not 'liking', and on the subject of Blur, although I've never liked it either, I sure as shit never 'got' Song Two. I've never understood its utter admiration by some. There used to be an absolute clamour towards the dancefloor whenever it came on down the old indie disco's, and I'd be stood there shrugging my shoulders before utilising the opportunity to go to the bar.Annoyed Grunt wrote:Oasis are/were better......bwfcdan94 wrote:I take it back Blur are not halve bad but again they are not a "great" band.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
- Location: Bolton
Re: Bands you don't "get".
Yep, people did.......thebish wrote:I never got the whole blur vs oasis thing... I mean - did anyone really give a toss??Bruce Rioja wrote:If we can go back to the OP and the point of not 'getting' rather than simply not 'liking', and on the subject of Blur, although I've never liked it either, I sure as shit never 'got' Song Two. I've never understood its utter admiration by some. There used to be an absolute clamour towards the dancefloor whenever it came on down the old indie disco's, and I'd be stood there shrugging my shoulders before utilising the opportunity to go to the bar.Annoyed Grunt wrote:Oasis are/were better......bwfcdan94 wrote:I take it back Blur are not halve bad but again they are not a "great" band.
Re: Bands you don't "get".
did they?? blimey! I thought it was just a big bag of publicity wank put about by the media!
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
- Location: Bolton
Re: Bands you don't "get".
I worked in Woolworths at the time it was going on, people got really into the battle.
Blur (Country House) beat Oasis (Roll With It) as the barcode on Roll With It didn't scan, so a lot of stores just put it through as a £1.99 single.....which didn't count towards the chart positions..
Blur (Country House) beat Oasis (Roll With It) as the barcode on Roll With It didn't scan, so a lot of stores just put it through as a £1.99 single.....which didn't count towards the chart positions..
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Bands you don't "get".
It was exactly that. Some punters actually took it seriously though, which was quite incredible.thebish wrote:did they?? blimey! I thought it was just a big bag of publicity wank put about by the media!
May the bridges I burn light your way
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests