Drop Fat Frankie?

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Drop Fat Frankie?

Yes - he's stealing a living, the chubby little bastard
25
74%
No - he's the second best footballer on the planet!
9
26%
 
Total votes: 34

50sQuiff
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 610
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:15 am
Location: London

Drop Fat Frankie?

Post by 50sQuiff » Mon Jun 26, 2006 12:35 am

Every right-thinking England fan knows what needs to happen if we're going to get the best out of our squad.

Dr.Karl
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 573
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:58 pm
Location: The Gun Capital/The Pastie Capital
Contact:

Post by Dr.Karl » Mon Jun 26, 2006 12:50 am

In a four man midfield yes. I wouldn't drop him in a five man midfield, who would you replace him with? Jenas? No thank you.
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind - Gandhi

A cynic is man who knows the price of everything but the value of nothing - Wilde

I have a fax in my pocket - Gartside

50sQuiff
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 610
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:15 am
Location: London

Post by 50sQuiff » Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:32 am

We can't play 4-5-1 and 3-5-2 at this point is far too radical a change. Drop Fat Frankie.

Dr.Karl
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 573
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:58 pm
Location: The Gun Capital/The Pastie Capital
Contact:

Post by Dr.Karl » Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:34 am

If we're persisting with this five man midfield then you have to keep him in there, one of his bobbled shots may go in. I agree we should revert back to a 4-4-2 with Hargreaves and Gerrard playing in the centre. Crouch should come instead of Lampard, no questions about it.
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind - Gandhi

A cynic is man who knows the price of everything but the value of nothing - Wilde

I have a fax in my pocket - Gartside

Athers
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3350
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:19 am
Location: Manchester

Post by Athers » Mon Jun 26, 2006 2:29 am

You sound like a Liverpool fan Quiff!

I suspect that with Portugal's 4-2-3-1 passing through the middle will be fairly fruitless and so we'll have to get it wide. As Karl says that probably means no place for Lampard, dropping him might wake him up a bit..
http://www.twitter.com/dan_athers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

FaninOz
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1444
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 4:24 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Post by FaninOz » Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:27 am

I voted NO, because he has to score sometime doesn't he? And next Saturday would be a good time. What I don't understand is that he is excellent for Chelsea but NEVER plays the same way for England, similar for Gerrard! It can't just be the formation that England play that makes them so poor.
Depression is just a state of mind, supporting Bolton is also a state of mind hence supporting Bolton must be depressing QED

communistworkethic
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7404
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
Location: in your wife's dreams
Contact:

Post by communistworkethic » Mon Jun 26, 2006 7:56 am

drop Frank, bring beckham in from the right and put Lennon out there.
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely

kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house

ratbert
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3067
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:15 pm

Post by ratbert » Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:57 am

communistworkethic wrote:drop Frank, bring beckham in from the right and put Lennon out there.
Agreed, though Lennon seems to work best as a late burst of energy in the second half. Both games he's come on have seem a massive improvement.

keveh
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4421
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 12:00 pm
Location: Stuck in the Forums

Post by keveh » Mon Jun 26, 2006 10:05 am

I think that Lampard is an amazing player, but him and Gerrard can't play in the same team.

There's no doubt in who I would select to start.
Image

Raven
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2004
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 10:04 pm
Location: Near Coventry but originally from Kent

Post by Raven » Mon Jun 26, 2006 12:38 pm

communistworkethic wrote:drop Frank, bring beckham in from the right and put Lennon out there.
I agree and if Beckham again does not perform get him off (and not in the lat mins either)

50sQuiff
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 610
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:15 am
Location: London

Post by 50sQuiff » Mon Jun 26, 2006 12:40 pm

communistworkethic wrote:drop Frank, bring beckham in from the right and put Lennon out there.
That in theory is the best possible solution. But to do that would require belief that we are actually a great team capable of playing great football! I'll settle for a 'water-carrier' like Hargreaves.
keveh wrote:I think that Lampard is an amazing player, but him and Gerrard can't play in the same team.

There's no doubt in who I would select to start.
I taunt the Chelsea fans I know, half-seriously, that Lampard is a luxury player that flatters to deceive, scores deflections and penalties late on in a game that has already been ground out by the real footballers like Makalele and co. I also suggest to them that Fat Frank goes MIA in any big game, for this very reason. From what I can see, despite Lampard clearly being a superb player, my taunts actually got more accurate over the course of the season, with every game in Europe or for England. This is much to my amusement in the office, but less so when it comes to supporting England.

But most importantly, when you select Fat Frank, you do so at the expense of Gerrard. Which one looks like a World Cup winner to you? Gerrard sometimes exudes the ability to win trophies on his own. We have to give him complete license to play.

Dormski
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 10:43 am

FAT FRANK

Post by Dormski » Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:59 pm

We told you what he was like - did you listen?

His shoot on sight policy will reap it's reward sooner or later and everyone will :pray: over him again, yet at the expense of how many better opportunities?

In future you should listen to us - we know what we are on about and Fatty simply aint up to it.

Zulus Thousand of em
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5043
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
Location: 200 miles darn sarf

Re: FAT FRANK

Post by Zulus Thousand of em » Mon Jun 26, 2006 2:02 pm

Dormski wrote:We told you what he was like - did you listen?

His shoot on sight policy will reap it's reward sooner or later and everyone will :pray: over him again, yet at the expense of how many better opportunities?

In future you should listen to us - we know what we are on about and Fatty simply aint up to it.
Who are "we"? Not another clique, surely to God? :shock:
God's country! God's county!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?

COME ON YOU WHITES!!

Dormski
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 10:43 am

wq

Post by Dormski » Mon Jun 26, 2006 2:05 pm

West 'Am mate. :mrgreen:

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Mon Jun 26, 2006 2:05 pm

I think this belongs with the poll in the World cup forum.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

Zulus Thousand of em
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5043
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
Location: 200 miles darn sarf

Re: wq

Post by Zulus Thousand of em » Mon Jun 26, 2006 2:07 pm

Dormski wrote:West 'Am mate. :mrgreen:
You'll be rooting for that ladyboy Etherington presumably?
God's country! God's county!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?

COME ON YOU WHITES!!

Gertie
Stalker
Stalker
Posts: 1355
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 9:49 am
Contact:

Post by Gertie » Mon Jun 26, 2006 2:20 pm

I'm not sure about Frank being fat.....

If so then perhaps some folks around here are positively obese???

He looks in good shape to me :?

communistworkethic
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7404
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
Location: in your wife's dreams
Contact:

Post by communistworkethic » Mon Jun 26, 2006 2:33 pm

50sQuiff wrote:
communistworkethic wrote:drop Frank, bring beckham in from the right and put Lennon out there.
That in theory is the best possible solution. But to do that would require belief that we are actually a great team capable of playing great football! I'll settle for a 'water-carrier' like Hargreaves.
I was assuming the 5 man midfield with Hargreaves in the holding role, which clearly is his strength. I don't want to take anything away from a creditable show at right back on sunday but I'd prefer it if Gary Neville were back there.

Line up as

Robinson
Neville Ferdinand Terry A Cole
Hargreaves
Lennon Beckham Gerrard J Cole
Rooney


I think this would give Gerrard and Cole much more freedom and be a more fluid to support Rooney. I don't think that this gets the best from Rooney, his strength is playing behind a striker with a free role but it's the best formation in the circumstances.
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely

kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house

Soldier_Of_The_White_Army
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7042
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 10:36 am
Location: HULL, BABY!
Contact:

Post by Soldier_Of_The_White_Army » Mon Jun 26, 2006 6:34 pm

communistworkethic wrote:
50sQuiff wrote:
communistworkethic wrote:drop Frank, bring beckham in from the right and put Lennon out there.
That in theory is the best possible solution. But to do that would require belief that we are actually a great team capable of playing great football! I'll settle for a 'water-carrier' like Hargreaves.
I was assuming the 5 man midfield with Hargreaves in the holding role, which clearly is his strength. I don't want to take anything away from a creditable show at right back on sunday but I'd prefer it if Gary Neville were back there.

Line up as

Robinson
Neville Ferdinand Terry A Cole
Hargreaves
Lennon Beckham Gerrard J Cole
Rooney


I think this would give Gerrard and Cole much more freedom and be a more fluid to support Rooney. I don't think that this gets the best from Rooney, his strength is playing behind a striker with a free role but it's the best formation in the circumstances.
That actually looks quite a balanced side, with Lennon and Cole much more adapted the support Rooney upfront. With Beckham in the middle it gives him the opportunity to use his passing skills to sweep the ball to either wing, instead of everything going straight to Rooney. It also gives Gerrard his chance to really push forward as Lampard took that role against Ecuador leaving Gerrard to play the midfield engine role.

As I stated in another thread, we have without doubt missed Neville at right back, especially when the right back was needed to push forward and overlap (something Neville does very well)

If that side ran out on Saturday, I would be more then happy.
YOU CLIMB OBSTACLES LIKE OLD PEOPLE FXCK!!!!!!!!!!!

Crouch > Davies
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 244
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 10:27 am
Location: St Helens
Contact:

Post by Crouch > Davies » Mon Jun 26, 2006 6:40 pm

communistworkethic wrote:drop Frank, bring beckham in from the right and put Lennon out there.
That's what I'd do if I were Sven. Lennon causes a threat, Beckham can't do any worse than Lampard.

But of course, we know that isn't going to happen.
Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 35 guests