Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28812
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Think we'll also see Mascoll, but maybe for Delf
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9130
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
We've been very poor this half. Individually and collectively.
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36387
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Hickman needs to get on because he can cross a ball. 4 at the back. Hickman wide right for me.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:23 pmThink we'll also see Mascoll, but maybe for Delf
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Not according to the boss man!BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:24 pmHickman needs to get on because he can cross a ball. 4 at the back. Hickman wide right for me.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:23 pmThink we'll also see Mascoll, but maybe for Delf
...
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36387
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Not sure we’ve put a single cross in today. Can’t score goals if you don’t get the thing in the box.LeverEnd wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:26 pmNot according to the boss man!BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:24 pmHickman needs to get on because he can cross a ball. 4 at the back. Hickman wide right for me.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:23 pmThink we'll also see Mascoll, but maybe for Delf
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Gordon fails to get away again. He's not even an athlete.
...
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28812
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Sarce is good at buying fouls 25 yards out.
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9130
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Have we worked their keeper this half?
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28812
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Crawford off for Gnahoua, who was passing as he's on his way to the shops
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28812
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
81st minute...
We still just don't know what to do in the final third, or maybe quarter, of the pitch.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36387
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Pass it you massive lump of turd...
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9130
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
We get a free kick outside the box and it ends up back with Crellin. Get it in the feckin box!Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:40 pm81st minute...
We still just don't know what to do in the final third, or maybe quarter, of the pitch.
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28812
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
I mean it was towards halfway but even so. That's insane.Harry Genshaw wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:42 pmWe get a free kick outside the box and it ends up back with Crellin. Get it in the feckin box!Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:40 pm81st minute...
We still just don't know what to do in the final third, or maybe quarter, of the pitch.
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
This referee is bobbins.
How many free kicks for holding all game? 2?
How many free kicks for holding all game? 2?
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28812
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Yon Top-knot in their defence can shut his f*ckin mither
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
He must struggle to cross a fecking street!
May the bridges I burn light your way
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
We've got nowhere near Bilboe's Baggins.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Former prem ref who got sacked after a ref colleague grassed him off for making a private joke about disability.
Seen a lot worse. Tend to think ours should rough them up a bit as well.
...
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36387
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Be good if more than two players could get close to a 5/10 performance.
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Sarcevic doesn't half like a dive. Embarrassing.
...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 50 guests