Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24831
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by Prufrock » Sat Feb 01, 2025 4:56 pm

Lots of good from that. And lots of bad.

Aaron had one of those days. Randall was poor. Etete...Christ.

Should have been out of sight. Can't win if you don't score.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

nicholaldo
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2638
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2018 8:23 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by nicholaldo » Sat Feb 01, 2025 4:57 pm

I'm aghast.

What is Markham seeing?

Spartan2
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 722
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 11:53 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by Spartan2 » Sat Feb 01, 2025 4:58 pm

Did no-one watch any of his games before signing him, what's the criteria oh he's tall he'll do fecking HELL! Everyone involved in that signing should be sacked tonight. fecking disgraceful. Markham can feck off.

User avatar
GhostoftheBok
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8666
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:51 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by GhostoftheBok » Sat Feb 01, 2025 4:58 pm

How the feck have we contrived to lose that football match?

At least Schumacher knows he has a job on.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38809
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Feb 01, 2025 4:58 pm

Yeah feel like Schumacher has a lot to do here. First is to go back to how Darby had us setup because I think we aren’t good enough to play this sort of game quite. Not yet.

Etete is another Markham special. He looks months off being anywhere near ready to play first team football to me. But being young it’s harder as his confidence will be shot to pieces by that.

We are I think a compact side who plays in behind teams I don’t think we are quite good enough to execute this, maybe with an addition or two.

User avatar
dave the minion
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 896
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 9:41 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by dave the minion » Sat Feb 01, 2025 4:58 pm

Spartan2 wrote:
Sat Feb 01, 2025 4:50 pm
What the actual feck. Who the feck picks these donkey fecking signings, Markham has to go.
Absolutely brilliant!!

Who can we blame for this? Evatt? Nope, gone already. Santos? Oh, injured and not playing. JDC? Off the pitch....

Damn. Need to think of someone else quick. That's it, Markham out! Markham out! Markham out!!!

Priceless...

User avatar
Mar
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7012
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:23 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by Mar » Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:00 pm

Well a 1-0 defeat for the new manager thanks to his first signing Etete.

He's had 45 minutes of football this season, not going to write him off so early on in his Bolton career, but he needs to kick that crap out of his game. Reminds me of one of Cameron Jerome's performances that where he gave away a penalty.

Some positive signs to be had there, but not enough to win it. Collins had a shocker in terms of being clinical, did most things right barring getting shots off.


Lovely to see JDC putting in a good performance, same for Forrester. Don't deserve to come away with 0 points from that, but it doesn't always work out the ideal way.

Hopefully Kion 'cost us a point' Etete can turn that around and perform a lot better than that.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24831
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by Prufrock » Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:01 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Sat Feb 01, 2025 4:58 pm
Yeah feel like Schumacher has a lot to do here. First is to go back to how Darby had us setup because I think we aren’t good enough to play this sort of game quite. Not yet.

Etete is another Markham special. He looks months off being anywhere near ready to play first team football to me. But being young it’s harder as his confidence will be shot to pieces by that.

We are I think a compact side who plays in behind teams I don’t think we are quite good enough to execute this, maybe with an addition or two.
I mean Collins should have scored four, and they've created nothing until that brain dead penalty.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
DJBlu
Site Admin
Posts: 10253
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:38 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by DJBlu » Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:02 pm

So frustrating,

Collins. Missing glorious chances topped off by Etete using his arm instead of his head.

Julian Darby said we'd lose when playing well.

Don't know if that was it.

User avatar
brommers95
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 936
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2018 3:10 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by brommers95 » Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:03 pm

Well that result was bound to happen with all the optimism built up within the club over the past week and Reading on a three game losing streak 😑

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38809
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:05 pm

We definitely need a grafting midfield type and a striker who knows where the goal is before Monday’s window closes. I think everything else will have to do. But those two are essential if we want to have any sort of a go this season. You can’t rely on Collins alone and we have nowt else with any threat. Vic had another very good game in support - no issues at all but we need another option - a Charles replacement.

And midfield is horribly lightweight. I just think a runner who wins the ball would change us significantly. Without one I don’t think we can play like we did today. And whilst we have Matete I don’t feel like he’s that front foot aggressive type.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38809
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:07 pm

Prufrock wrote:
Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:01 pm
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Sat Feb 01, 2025 4:58 pm
Yeah feel like Schumacher has a lot to do here. First is to go back to how Darby had us setup because I think we aren’t good enough to play this sort of game quite. Not yet.

Etete is another Markham special. He looks months off being anywhere near ready to play first team football to me. But being young it’s harder as his confidence will be shot to pieces by that.

We are I think a compact side who plays in behind teams I don’t think we are quite good enough to execute this, maybe with an addition or two.
I mean Collins should have scored four, and they've created nothing until that brain dead penalty.
I get that but the same thing happens too frequently when we setup like that for it to be a coincidence. We do ok lack control miss chances and pay the price. It’s a pattern and I don’t think it’s just bad luck. I think when we don’t have control in games we struggle to take chances and to keep clean sheets.

Spartan2
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 722
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 11:53 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by Spartan2 » Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:11 pm

dave the minion wrote:
Sat Feb 01, 2025 4:58 pm
Spartan2 wrote:
Sat Feb 01, 2025 4:50 pm
What the actual feck. Who the feck picks these donkey fecking signings, Markham has to go.
Absolutely brilliant!!

Who can we blame for this? Evatt? Nope, gone already. Santos? Oh, injured and not playing. JDC? Off the pitch....

Damn. Need to think of someone else quick. That's it, Markham out! Markham out! Markham out!!!

Priceless...
Someone is to blame for signing that donkey and you can add Randall to that as well. Our signings this season can only be described as a complete disaster. We've gone backwards. Whoever is responsible should be sacked. All the rest exists solely in your own mind.

User avatar
GhostoftheBok
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8666
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:51 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by GhostoftheBok » Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:15 pm

We're looking at Collins to win us games every week and he's bound to have off days.

At the minute nobody else is confident enough to smash the ball in. We could use another lad who will put his foot through it when he has half a chance.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24831
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by Prufrock » Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:16 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:07 pm
Prufrock wrote:
Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:01 pm
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Sat Feb 01, 2025 4:58 pm
Yeah feel like Schumacher has a lot to do here. First is to go back to how Darby had us setup because I think we aren’t good enough to play this sort of game quite. Not yet.

Etete is another Markham special. He looks months off being anywhere near ready to play first team football to me. But being young it’s harder as his confidence will be shot to pieces by that.

We are I think a compact side who plays in behind teams I don’t think we are quite good enough to execute this, maybe with an addition or two.
I mean Collins should have scored four, and they've created nothing until that brain dead penalty.
I get that but the same thing happens too frequently when we setup like that for it to be a coincidence. We do ok lack control miss chances and pay the price. It’s a pattern and I don’t think it’s just bad luck. I think when we don’t have control in games we struggle to take chances and to keep clean sheets.
I mean the answer is taking your chances. I'll snap your arm off if we can have that balance of chances in every game until the end of the season.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
GhostoftheBok
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8666
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:51 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by GhostoftheBok » Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:17 pm

Spartan2 wrote:
Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:11 pm
Someone is to blame for signing that donkey and you can add Randall to that as well. Our signings this season can only be described as a complete disaster. We've gone backwards. Whoever is responsible should be sacked. All the rest exists solely in your own mind.
Oh, behave yourself. The other lad you're all claiming is a "disaster" has scored 7 and set up two great chances to win it off the bench today.

Go have a pint.

User avatar
DJBlu
Site Admin
Posts: 10253
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:38 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by DJBlu » Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:23 pm

Just like Schumacher, I don't think it's fair to make an opinion of a player after 20 minutes and one result.

Nerves and other mitigating circumstances at play.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38809
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:27 pm

DJBlu wrote:
Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:23 pm
Just like Schumacher, I don't think it's fair to make an opinion of a player after 20 minutes and one result.

Nerves and other mitigating circumstances at play.
Not a judgement on the player but a 23 year old coming back from injury with barely any football this season is unlikely to fire us up at least not for a few months. That’s not his fault it’s just hard to see him making a contribution in time and today only solidified that.

User avatar
GhostoftheBok
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8666
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:51 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by GhostoftheBok » Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:30 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:27 pm
Not a judgement on the player but a 23 year old coming back from injury with barely any football this season is unlikely to fire us up at least not for a few months. That’s not his fault it’s just hard to see him making a contribution in time and today only solidified that.
It seems like an odd choice, especially given he signed a new deal and so isn't a "loan to a freebie" with an eye on next season.

However, we have until Monday night. Let's see what they do in that time. If the answer is nothing then you'd guess they've agreed to "give it a go" this season, but their eyes are mainly on the summer and then a proper go at 25/26. If they go out and spend then Kion may just be a cheap Plan B option.

nicholaldo
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2638
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2018 8:23 pm

Re: Not a Leap Year, who says so? Away to Reading , Sat, Feb 1st 3-0'clock.

Post by nicholaldo » Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:38 pm

It was a big improvement on our previous performances away from home (obviously excepting last Saturday).

The other side of it, though, is that we still too often turned over possession in dangerous areas, and I'm sure Schumacher will look to address that.

Obviously, it wouldn't have mattered today if we'd had more composure in front of goal.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 9 guests