No Jackett required?
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: No Jackett required?
So many questions!!Worthy4England wrote:Can we have a list of who's asked what questions and to who they've asked them.....
Here's one, Ream looks like a reasonably intelligent footballer to me, what causes the kind of lapse he had for their goal and how does one go about preventing the like happening again?
Actually that's two, but I don't ask many.
And it's open to the floor!
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1469
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 1:05 pm
Re: No Jackett required?
My question is, I know Ream isn't fantastic and yes, he dropped a clanger for their goal on Saturday, but for those who are slating him, what do they suggest we do?
What a hero, What a man...... Ooooh, what a bad foul...
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: No Jackett required?
Is anyone slating him?Andy Waller wrote:My question is, I know Ream isn't fantastic and yes, he dropped a clanger for their goal on Saturday, but for those who are slating him, what do they suggest we do?
Re: No Jackett required?
Worthy4England wrote:Is anyone slating him?Andy Waller wrote:My question is, I know Ream isn't fantastic and yes, he dropped a clanger for their goal on Saturday, but for those who are slating him, what do they suggest we do?
I don't think so - but I'm not sure if anyone is asking me!
Re: No Jackett required?
Did anyone else notice the absence of a poppy on the Millwall shirts? Or was it on there and I just missed it?
Not sure if it's mandatory?
Not sure if it's mandatory?
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: No Jackett required?
If it's about his ability to read the game, that can be coached.Enoch wrote:So many questions!!Worthy4England wrote:Can we have a list of who's asked what questions and to who they've asked them.....
Here's one, Ream looks like a reasonably intelligent footballer to me, what causes the kind of lapse he had for their goal and how does one go about preventing the like happening again ?
If it's fitness or speed, then you can only be what you are once fully fit.
If it's about a mind which occasionally switches off now & again ... I don't think you can prevent that happening. I think, unfortunately, that it is this. The error on Saturday was due to that and, worse, his reaction once it happened suggested he remained switched off even as play continued.
I was one who utterly wrote him off previously and I'm happy to eat my words. He has shown remarkable progress. But he's hardly Bobby Moore and he does have mistakes in him. I tend to think his best position remains the 'Campo' role, but our need at CD is greater and that's where he'll be for a while. He has created a good link-up with Mills (who seems to have lost a lot of timber recently, or am I mistaking his shape previously). I hope it grows and develops.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
Re: No Jackett required?
Oh don't start with the poppy Nazism
.
And as for Ream i'd still be picking him, I just think it's important that, for all the recent improvements, we remember there's a liability in there trying to come out if he doesn't concentrate!

And as for Ream i'd still be picking him, I just think it's important that, for all the recent improvements, we remember there's a liability in there trying to come out if he doesn't concentrate!
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Re: No Jackett required?
I, for one, am deeply saddened that nobody on here has changed their avatar to a poppy!Prufrock wrote:Oh don't start with the poppy Nazism.
And as for Ream i'd still be picking him, I just think it's important that, for all the recent improvements, we remember there's a liability in there trying to come out if he doesn't concentrate!
Re: No Jackett required?
I've already done my Facebook page, so I can't be advised of not thinking about it!
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Re: No Jackett required?
You know nothing Jon Snow.Prufrock wrote:Oh don't start with the poppy Nazism.
...
-
- Promising
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:20 pm
- Location: Bolton
Re: No Jackett required?
Love that, can see Beckford's cheeky chip better from that angle.thebish wrote:GET IN!!! goal-cam-tastic!!
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: No Jackett required?
Proper strikers goal that..
Really pleased with how he's come on the last few weeks.. Gutted he didn't add to it though when he rounded the keeper
Really pleased with how he's come on the last few weeks.. Gutted he didn't add to it though when he rounded the keeper
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: No Jackett required?
The first shows very well that the keeper had absolutely zero chance against it. Impressive viewpoint ... though the nets got in the way !!
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
Re: No Jackett required?
Was in the middle of criticising Beckford for his lack of will to get involved when he scored 
Just glad he's scoring because if he doesn't, it's not only that but he hurts the chances of anyone else scoring. All's well that finishes well though.

Just glad he's scoring because if he doesn't, it's not only that but he hurts the chances of anyone else scoring. All's well that finishes well though.
http://www.twitter.com/dan_athers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: No Jackett required?
Didn't his flick out to Lee create the first?Athers wrote:Was in the middle of criticising Beckford for his lack of will to get involved when he scored
Just glad he's scoring because if he doesn't, it's not only that but he hurts the chances of anyone else scoring. All's well that finishes well though.
Sto ut Serviam
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: No Jackett required?
Yes indeed. And a very good through ball it was too!CAPSLOCK wrote:Didn't his flick out to Lee create the first?Athers wrote:Was in the middle of criticising Beckford for his lack of will to get involved when he scored
Just glad he's scoring because if he doesn't, it's not only that but he hurts the chances of anyone else scoring. All's well that finishes well though.
Had it been N'gog, folks had have been telling us that justified picking him until Christmas.
Re: No Jackett required?
Am I alone in thinking that Moritz looked like a more active version of Klasnic in the way he took his goal?
Re: No Jackett required?
LeverEnd wrote:You know nothing Jon Snow.Prufrock wrote:Oh don't start with the poppy Nazism.

In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], sonicthewhite, The_Gun and 34 guests