No Jackett required?

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
Enoch
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4269
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:08 pm
Location: The Garden of England.

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Enoch » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:19 am

Worthy4England wrote:Can we have a list of who's asked what questions and to who they've asked them.....
So many questions!!

Here's one, Ream looks like a reasonably intelligent footballer to me, what causes the kind of lapse he had for their goal and how does one go about preventing the like happening again?

Actually that's two, but I don't ask many.

And it's open to the floor!

Andy Waller
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1469
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 1:05 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Andy Waller » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:29 am

My question is, I know Ream isn't fantastic and yes, he dropped a clanger for their goal on Saturday, but for those who are slating him, what do they suggest we do?
What a hero, What a man...... Ooooh, what a bad foul...

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Worthy4England » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:54 am

Andy Waller wrote:My question is, I know Ream isn't fantastic and yes, he dropped a clanger for their goal on Saturday, but for those who are slating him, what do they suggest we do?
Is anyone slating him?

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by CAPSLOCK » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:54 am

Sack the manager
Sto ut Serviam

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by thebish » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:57 am

Worthy4England wrote:
Andy Waller wrote:My question is, I know Ream isn't fantastic and yes, he dropped a clanger for their goal on Saturday, but for those who are slating him, what do they suggest we do?
Is anyone slating him?

I don't think so - but I'm not sure if anyone is asking me!

enrdentw
Promising
Promising
Posts: 448
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:05 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by enrdentw » Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:13 am

Did anyone else notice the absence of a poppy on the Millwall shirts? Or was it on there and I just missed it?

Not sure if it's mandatory?

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by bobo the clown » Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:32 am

Enoch wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:Can we have a list of who's asked what questions and to who they've asked them.....
So many questions!!

Here's one, Ream looks like a reasonably intelligent footballer to me, what causes the kind of lapse he had for their goal and how does one go about preventing the like happening again ?
If it's about his ability to read the game, that can be coached.

If it's fitness or speed, then you can only be what you are once fully fit.

If it's about a mind which occasionally switches off now & again ... I don't think you can prevent that happening. I think, unfortunately, that it is this. The error on Saturday was due to that and, worse, his reaction once it happened suggested he remained switched off even as play continued.

I was one who utterly wrote him off previously and I'm happy to eat my words. He has shown remarkable progress. But he's hardly Bobby Moore and he does have mistakes in him. I tend to think his best position remains the 'Campo' role, but our need at CD is greater and that's where he'll be for a while. He has created a good link-up with Mills (who seems to have lost a lot of timber recently, or am I mistaking his shape previously). I hope it grows and develops.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Prufrock » Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:44 am

Oh don't start with the poppy Nazism :D.

And as for Ream i'd still be picking him, I just think it's important that, for all the recent improvements, we remember there's a liability in there trying to come out if he doesn't concentrate!
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by thebish » Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:48 am

Prufrock wrote:Oh don't start with the poppy Nazism :D.

And as for Ream i'd still be picking him, I just think it's important that, for all the recent improvements, we remember there's a liability in there trying to come out if he doesn't concentrate!
I, for one, am deeply saddened that nobody on here has changed their avatar to a poppy!

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Prufrock » Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:06 pm

I've already done my Facebook page, so I can't be advised of not thinking about it!
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by thebish » Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:14 pm

GET IN!!! goal-cam-tastic!!


LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by LeverEnd » Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:17 pm

Prufrock wrote:Oh don't start with the poppy Nazism :D.
You know nothing Jon Snow.
...

NiceHotCuppaTea
Promising
Promising
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:20 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by NiceHotCuppaTea » Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:23 pm

thebish wrote:GET IN!!! goal-cam-tastic!!

Love that, can see Beckford's cheeky chip better from that angle.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by boltonboris » Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:26 pm

Proper strikers goal that..

Really pleased with how he's come on the last few weeks.. Gutted he didn't add to it though when he rounded the keeper
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by bobo the clown » Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:36 pm

The first shows very well that the keeper had absolutely zero chance against it. Impressive viewpoint ... though the nets got in the way !!
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

Athers
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3350
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:19 am
Location: Manchester

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Athers » Mon Nov 11, 2013 1:00 pm

Was in the middle of criticising Beckford for his lack of will to get involved when he scored :lol:

Just glad he's scoring because if he doesn't, it's not only that but he hurts the chances of anyone else scoring. All's well that finishes well though.
http://www.twitter.com/dan_athers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by CAPSLOCK » Mon Nov 11, 2013 1:07 pm

Athers wrote:Was in the middle of criticising Beckford for his lack of will to get involved when he scored :lol:

Just glad he's scoring because if he doesn't, it's not only that but he hurts the chances of anyone else scoring. All's well that finishes well though.
Didn't his flick out to Lee create the first?
Sto ut Serviam

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Worthy4England » Mon Nov 11, 2013 1:11 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:
Athers wrote:Was in the middle of criticising Beckford for his lack of will to get involved when he scored :lol:

Just glad he's scoring because if he doesn't, it's not only that but he hurts the chances of anyone else scoring. All's well that finishes well though.
Didn't his flick out to Lee create the first?
Yes indeed. And a very good through ball it was too!

Had it been N'gog, folks had have been telling us that justified picking him until Christmas.

Bruno3
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 542
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:02 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Bruno3 » Mon Nov 11, 2013 1:39 pm

Am I alone in thinking that Moritz looked like a more active version of Klasnic in the way he took his goal?

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Prufrock » Mon Nov 11, 2013 1:45 pm

LeverEnd wrote:
Prufrock wrote:Oh don't start with the poppy Nazism :D.
You know nothing Jon Snow.
:pray: Bravo!
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abdoulaye's Twin, DJBlu, Google [Bot], The_Gun and 36 guests