QPR thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: QPR thread
lovethesmellofnapalm wrote:irie Cee Bee wrote:Great 3 points. When Boggers made that brilliant "save", I thought to myself, our luck is about to change and it did. Long it continues.
Credit to OC. he had the guts to play Pratley and it worked. He had the guts to go 4-4-2 at the risk of being slaugthered by us fans if it failed.. and it worked.
As far as playing 4-4-2 from the start...naw. We need Holden to do that. RC and Moo together give us nothing going forward in that formation. Our forwards and wingers would be starved. Changing it up in a game is fine, but keep it tight from the start. We are in a scrap. Nuff said.![]()
difficult for QPR to replace w@nker Warnock like for like but they've made a decent fist of it in Hughes
his managerial stock seems to be in irretreviable decline
good
It's amusing how a month or two ago Hughes was considered by many on here to be our potential saviour – "if only we could afford him".
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: QPR thread
So, to sum up the QPR game ( or at least as the media see it) :
It was a tragedy they lost and didn't get the three points (even if the "no goal" had been allowed they wouldn't have done that), it's okay for them to get corners that weren't, and score from offside positions, the officials were useless, they should have had two penalties and Mark Hughes and his team of terrific (and highly expensive) players were robbed. About Bolton, a few words from Bogdan which they see as confirming it all. About Bolton as a team who scored two goals and beat them, scarcely a word. Popular, ain't we just.
It was a tragedy they lost and didn't get the three points (even if the "no goal" had been allowed they wouldn't have done that), it's okay for them to get corners that weren't, and score from offside positions, the officials were useless, they should have had two penalties and Mark Hughes and his team of terrific (and highly expensive) players were robbed. About Bolton, a few words from Bogdan which they see as confirming it all. About Bolton as a team who scored two goals and beat them, scarcely a word. Popular, ain't we just.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: QPR thread
How he is performing at QPR is no indication as to how he might have done at Bolton.Sponge wrote:lovethesmellofnapalm wrote:irie Cee Bee wrote:Great 3 points. When Boggers made that brilliant "save", I thought to myself, our luck is about to change and it did. Long it continues.
Credit to OC. he had the guts to play Pratley and it worked. He had the guts to go 4-4-2 at the risk of being slaugthered by us fans if it failed.. and it worked.
As far as playing 4-4-2 from the start...naw. We need Holden to do that. RC and Moo together give us nothing going forward in that formation. Our forwards and wingers would be starved. Changing it up in a game is fine, but keep it tight from the start. We are in a scrap. Nuff said.![]()
difficult for QPR to replace w@nker Warnock like for like but they've made a decent fist of it in Hughes
his managerial stock seems to be in irretreviable decline
good
It's amusing how a month or two ago Hughes was considered by many on here to be our potential saviour – "if only we could afford him".
Martin O'Neill would have been another potential saviour - "if only we could afford him". He isn't doing too bad.
Re: QPR thread
Megson could be a saviour and he's free (when he's finished Brucie's garden)
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: QPR thread
Oh aye?Worthy4England wrote:
How he is performing at QPR is no indication as to how he might have done at Bolton.
Martin O'Neill would have been another potential saviour - "if only we could afford him". He isn't doing too bad.
So what yardstick were you using when you wanted him here?
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Re: QPR thread
He wasn't the bloke who thought we could get away with 4-4-2 against some of the best in Europe
That does it for me
That does it for me
Sto ut Serviam
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: QPR thread
Just that he's better than the current incumbent.Wandering Willy wrote:Oh aye?Worthy4England wrote:
How he is performing at QPR is no indication as to how he might have done at Bolton.
Martin O'Neill would have been another potential saviour - "if only we could afford him". He isn't doing too bad.
So what yardstick were you using when you wanted him here?
That do you?
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: QPR thread
Worthy4England wrote:Just that he's better than the current incumbent.Wandering Willy wrote:Oh aye?Worthy4England wrote:
How he is performing at QPR is no indication as to how he might have done at Bolton.
Martin O'Neill would have been another potential saviour - "if only we could afford him". He isn't doing too bad.
So what yardstick were you using when you wanted him here?
That do you?
Silly me. Of course he is.
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: QPR thread
Excluding his time at City, Hughes averages 1.47 points per game. Coyle averages 1.18.Wandering Willy wrote:Worthy4England wrote:Just that he's better than the current incumbent.Wandering Willy wrote:Oh aye?Worthy4England wrote:
How he is performing at QPR is no indication as to how he might have done at Bolton.
Martin O'Neill would have been another potential saviour - "if only we could afford him". He isn't doing too bad.
So what yardstick were you using when you wanted him here?
That do you?
Silly me. Of course he is.
Silly you, indeed.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: QPR thread
Which brings us back to:Worthy4England wrote:
Excluding his time at City, Hughes averages 1.47 points per game. Coyle averages 1.18.
Silly you, indeed.
Which one is it?How he is performing at QPR is no indication as to how he might have done at Bolton.

They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 860
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:53 pm
Re: QPR thread
Hughes would never, ever have come to Bolton because that move would never, ever have allowed him the opportunity of staking his claim for his football management nirvana- replacing the Govan one at MUFC.
spending shed loads of cash at QPR to get them in to the top half/challenging for Europe was a much more likely avenue.
good to see he is (thus far) making an arse of it.
spending shed loads of cash at QPR to get them in to the top half/challenging for Europe was a much more likely avenue.
good to see he is (thus far) making an arse of it.
"A child of five would understand this- send someone to fetch a child of five"
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: QPR thread
I answered that.Wandering Willy wrote:Which brings us back to:Worthy4England wrote:
Excluding his time at City, Hughes averages 1.47 points per game. Coyle averages 1.18.
Silly you, indeed.
Which one is it?How he is performing at QPR is no indication as to how he might have done at Bolton.

He's the better Manager.
Let's compare a 10? game run at QPR and pretend that Hughes has no track record. Yeah that works.

-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: QPR thread
Let's do that.
Don't forget the arguably much better squad, certainly more expensive, and the £15 million spent when he came in - none of which he'd have at Bolton.
The saviour.
Don't forget the arguably much better squad, certainly more expensive, and the £15 million spent when he came in - none of which he'd have at Bolton.
The saviour.
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: QPR thread
You don't think Hughes has a much better record than Coyle in the Prem? (Keep City out of the equation for a while.Wandering Willy wrote:Let's do that.
Don't forget the arguably much better squad, certainly more expensive, and the £15 million spent when he came in - none of which he'd have at Bolton.
The saviour.

Re: QPR thread
Anyway, best thing about that 'decision' was it denied Clint Hill his first ever Prem goal. Dirty Tranmere. Dirty.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:17 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: QPR thread
Did I hear right in that some bookies are still paying out for Clint Hill in the first goal/any time markets?? Doesn't sound like sumat them penny pinchers would usually do. Saying that there cant have been that much money riding on it...Prufrock wrote:Anyway, best thing about that 'decision' was it denied Clint Hill his first ever Prem goal. Dirty Tranmere. Dirty.
Re: QPR thread
Worthy4England wrote:
Excluding his time at City, Hughes averages 1.47 points per game. Coyle averages 1.18.
Silly you, indeed.
excluding the games that he's lost or drawn, Coyle has a career average of 3pts per game... so ner!
Re: QPR thread
he damaged those prospects a million times more than managing bolton ever would by taking the city job x years ago.lovethesmellofnapalm wrote:Hughes would never, ever have come to Bolton because that move would never, ever have allowed him the opportunity of staking his claim for his football management nirvana- replacing the Govan one at MUFC.
spending shed loads of cash at QPR to get them in to the top half/challenging for Europe was a much more likely avenue.
good to see he is (thus far) making an arse of it.
his choice of agent probably does more harm to that, too. possibly.
Last edited by a1 on Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: QPR thread
Hughes will always be the "nearly man" as a managera1 wrote:he damaged those prospects a million times more than managing bolton ever would by taking the city job x years ago.lovethesmellofnapalm wrote:Hughes would never, ever have come to Bolton because that move would never, ever have allowed him the opportunity of staking his claim for his football management nirvana- replacing the Govan one at MUFC.
spending shed loads of cash at QPR to get them in to the top half/challenging for Europe was a much more likely avenue.
good to see he is (thus far) making an arse of it.
Re: QPR thread
Warnock for Bolton!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], sonicthewhite and 31 guests