The Politics Thread

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply

Who will you be voting for?

Labour
13
41%
Conservatives
12
38%
Liberal Democrats
2
6%
UK Independence Party (UKIP)
0
No votes
Green Party
3
9%
Plaid Cymru
0
No votes
Other
1
3%
Planet Hobo
1
3%
 
Total votes: 32

General Mannerheim
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6343
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm

Post by General Mannerheim » Thu May 06, 2010 5:29 pm

I voted today for the first time in my 29 years!

nah not really, couldn't be arsed.

fatshaft
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2124
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:04 pm
Location: Aberdeen
Contact:

Post by fatshaft » Thu May 06, 2010 5:40 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:Nice debating skills on show here by the BNP's candidate for Romford :shock:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/ ... 663681.stm
Fire with fire n all that
Bit extreme for a wannabe politician, but the little gobbing bastard deserved a slap right enough.

Athers
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3350
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:19 am
Location: Manchester

Post by Athers » Thu May 06, 2010 6:39 pm

Well, of the couple dozen people at the polling station just now, nearly everyone was under 30.. So that's good I guess.
http://www.twitter.com/dan_athers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Thu May 06, 2010 7:41 pm

Rumour is that Ed Balls' constituency could well serve up tonight's Portillo moment.

That would be enjoyable.

Jacqui Smith even more vulnerable and even an outside chance of Darling going down... neither as exciting as Balls though.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Post by Lord Kangana » Thu May 06, 2010 7:43 pm

Ok, I'm bored, so whats everyone's completely unscientific gut feeling? I'm going with a small Conservative majority that wil lead to a rerun within a couple of years to attempt a greater majority.

http://blogs.ft.com/westminster/2010/05 ... l-tonight/
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Thu May 06, 2010 7:46 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:Ok, I'm bored, so whats everyone's completely unscientific gut feeling? I'm going with a small Conservative majority that wil lead to a rerun within a couple of years to attempt a greater majority.

http://blogs.ft.com/westminster/2010/05 ... l-tonight/
Ratbert has said exactly what I'm thinking.
ratbert wrote:
I'll predict the Conservatives short by between 25 and 9 seats and Brown trying to strike a deal with the Lib Dems tomorrow whilst the Tories say they have first dibs on power.

Whatever happens it won't be dull!
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

fatshaft
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2124
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:04 pm
Location: Aberdeen
Contact:

Post by fatshaft » Thu May 06, 2010 7:52 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:Ok, I'm bored, so whats everyone's completely unscientific gut feeling? I'm going with a small Conservative majority that wil lead to a rerun within a couple of years to attempt a greater majority.

http://blogs.ft.com/westminster/2010/05 ... l-tonight/
Ratbert has said exactly what I'm thinking.
ratbert wrote:
I'll predict the Conservatives short by between 25 and 9 seats and Brown trying to strike a deal with the Lib Dems tomorrow whilst the Tories say they have first dibs on power.

Whatever happens it won't be dull!
I'm much the same, Tories with c.300 seats, but to be the largest party. UKIP to make a decent move in the popular vote, but of course unable to secure a seat.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Post by Lord Kangana » Thu May 06, 2010 7:55 pm

I think all the fringe parties will poll well this time. Sadly I fear this particular window of opportunity to implement a fairer more representative voting system will slam shut for another generation.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Thu May 06, 2010 8:02 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:I think all the fringe parties will poll well this time. Sadly I fear this particular window of opportunity to implement a fairer more representative voting system will slam shut for another generation.
I so hope not - but the last polls indicated the shakiness of the Lib Dem vote, and that has to hold up if the current parliament is to be well and truly hung...

I want PR like I want the whites to win the FA Cup... :wink:

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Post by TANGODANCER » Thu May 06, 2010 8:09 pm

Athers wrote:Well, of the couple dozen people at the polling station just now, nearly everyone was under 30.. So that's good I guess.
Why exactly?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Post by Lord Kangana » Thu May 06, 2010 8:11 pm

In a Logans run sort of way I guess.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Thu May 06, 2010 8:17 pm

So... those of you who want PR - who would you have liked to vote for?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Post by bobo the clown » Thu May 06, 2010 8:18 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
Athers wrote:Well, of the couple dozen people at the polling station just now, nearly everyone was under 30.. So that's good I guess.
Why exactly?
Yeah ... why ??

"Oldies of the World Unite ... we've nothing to lose but our zimmers".
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Post by Lord Kangana » Thu May 06, 2010 8:20 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:So... those of you who want PR - who would you have liked to vote for?
hats a largley irrelevant question. The political parties we have at present reflect the system they operate within. Change the system, change the parties.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Thu May 06, 2010 8:21 pm

I think Athers is pleased with his narrow sample of evidence that the group that traditionally has the lowest turnout appears to have been engaged by this election.

:conf:
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Thu May 06, 2010 8:23 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:So... those of you who want PR - who would you have liked to vote for?
hats a largley irrelevant question. The political parties we have at present reflect the system they operate within. Change the system, change the parties.
Yes, I accept that a changed system would mean changed parties.

I'm still interested in who you would have voted for, given what's on offer now.

But the next question is obviously - what is it that you would like a changed system to produce for you to vote for?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Thu May 06, 2010 8:27 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:So... those of you who want PR - who would you have liked to vote for?
A new party to the left of Labour which would certainly emerge as it has elsewhere in Europe, prioritising environmental concerns, social justice and human rights. I think it's possible to imagine a group like this obtaining just over a notional 5% 'threshold'.

You know, me and my mates, the usual motley collection of tree huggers, bleeding hearts, do gooders and nanny-staters who only advocate political correctness gone mad and obscene violence on the streets against the friendly hymn-singers of the EDL and BNP.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Post by Lord Kangana » Thu May 06, 2010 8:29 pm

In a constituency based polling system, only major parties can ever hope to have a say in government. Which leads to tactical voting and all its idiocy. I understand exactly why the Tories are running scared from it, despite all the gloss and spin of their argument, its because the majority of this country vote for left of centre and left wing, vaguely social democratic parties. With PR, the Tories would be wiped out as a major force in a heartbeat. Ergo, our present system is unrepresentative of the majority wish of our country.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

hisroyalgingerness
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Post by hisroyalgingerness » Thu May 06, 2010 8:36 pm

Perhaps you could call it the (I dunno) GREEN party??

hisroyalgingerness
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Post by hisroyalgingerness » Thu May 06, 2010 8:41 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:In a constituency based polling system, only major parties can ever hope to have a say in government. Which leads to tactical voting and all its idiocy. I understand exactly why the Tories are running scared from it, despite all the gloss and spin of their argument, its because the majority of this country vote for left of centre and left wing, vaguely social democratic parties. With PR, the Tories would be wiped out as a major force in a heartbeat. Ergo, our present system is unrepresentative of the majority wish of our country.
Read an opinion in a paper today against proportional representation which basically said "6% of voters are BNP and if we adopted proportional representation they'd get 30 seats" or whatever.

Big "so what". If that represents how the country thinks so be it. You can't fudge the counting of votes to ensure the big two swing power from side to side.

And all the scaremongering for hung parliament. Same again. If no party and their scallywag policies have earned a majority then why should they have the power.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests