The Ashes 2009
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38813
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Aye looking at how tired our bowlers are, good job we didn't enforce the follow on.Worthy4England wrote:See if we'd made 'em bat again, they'd have been all out for 150 and we'd all have gone home by now.
Still interesting tomorrow methinks.
They could easily have set us 250-350 to win on the final day!
Could be nervy tomorrow if these two survive the first 45 minutes or so!
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
How tired our bowlers look? On the back of what? 11 Overs apiece? Jesus fecking Christ!BWFC_Insane wrote:Aye looking at how tired our bowlers are, good job we didn't enforce the follow on.Worthy4England wrote:See if we'd made 'em bat again, they'd have been all out for 150 and we'd all have gone home by now.
Still interesting tomorrow methinks.
They could easily have set us 250-350 to win on the final day!
Could be nervy tomorrow if these two survive the first 45 minutes or so!

We've let the Aussies back into this game by not enforcing the follow-on. Big time!
May the bridges I burn light your way
Theres no reason to suggest they wouldn't have scored at this rate and for this number of wickets yesterdayBruce Rioja wrote:How tired our bowlers look? On the back of what? 11 Overs apiece? Jesus fecking Christ!BWFC_Insane wrote:Aye looking at how tired our bowlers are, good job we didn't enforce the follow on.Worthy4England wrote:See if we'd made 'em bat again, they'd have been all out for 150 and we'd all have gone home by now.
Still interesting tomorrow methinks.
They could easily have set us 250-350 to win on the final day!
Could be nervy tomorrow if these two survive the first 45 minutes or so!![]()
We've let the Aussies back into this game by not enforcing the follow-on. Big time!
So, in effect, they'd have been 100 or so for 5
If you really think they can get another 220 for 4 or less, you're accepting they'd have set us around 350
Sto ut Serviam
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Hypothetical claptrap, my man. We had them on the hook and we've taken them off of it.CAPSLOCK wrote:Bruce Rioja wrote:How tired our bowlers look? On the back of what? 11 Overs apiece? Jesus fecking Christ!BWFC_Insane wrote:Aye looking at how tired our bowlers are, good job we didn't enforce the follow on.Worthy4England wrote:See if we'd made 'em bat again, they'd have been all out for 150 and we'd all have gone home by now.
Still interesting tomorrow methinks.
They could easily have set us 250-350 to win on the final day!
Could be nervy tomorrow if these two survive the first 45 minutes or so!![]()
We've let the Aussies back into this game by not enforcing the follow-on. Big time!
Theres no reason to suggest they wouldn't have scored at this rate and for this number of wickets yesterday
So, in effect, they'd have been 100 or so for 5
If you really think they can get another 220 for 4 or less, you're accepting they'd have set us around 350
They've sensed the chance that we've quite unbelievably afforded them and are taking it.
Believe you me, we will not win this test and I'll be laying the blame at Strauss's door for his piss poor decision.
May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:15 pm
- Location: Cromwell Country
Plus, had we enforced the follow-on, Flintoff would have been unable to walk in the second innings which leaves us a key bowler down. Following on Australia could have easily got 450 with Saturday being such a perfect batting day. That would have left our fragile line-up needing 200-250 on the last day to win.CAPSLOCK wrote:No
My position is based way more on fact than yours
The Aussies HAVE scored 300-5
YOU reckon theyre going to score another 200+
So, absolutely nowt to suggest they not have set us 300+
Unless you don't actually believe they can get the 200 or so they need.........
Batting again was the right decision. How can you say smashing a few runs to build up a lead of over 500 before letting them have another go isn't pressure?
forecast is light showers - I think there will be plenty of play - and blue-sky sunshine for at least the first hour... no swing and runs galore....David Lee's Hair wrote:Current forecast is to piss it down all day down here tomorrow.
Draw all over.
Shame should have put them in on the follow on but it did bugger all yesterday morning so you can kind of understand the decision to put them in again.
my prediction? many bitten nails!
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:15 pm
- Location: Cromwell Country
Serves me right for believing the local weatherthebish wrote:forecast is light showers - I think there will be plenty of play - and blue-sky sunshine for at least the first hour... no swing and runs galore....
my prediction? many bitten nails!

A few showers and a bit of swing may be beneficial though
Professionalism, the last refuge of the talentless
I agree with that, we could easily lose this unless we get these two out very quickly.CAPSLOCK wrote:Suppose the question to be asked with hindsight is should we have batted another hour
If the weather stays fair, the answer is definitely yes
Depression is just a state of mind, supporting Bolton is also a state of mind hence supporting Bolton must be depressing QED
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests