The Ashes 2009

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:13 pm

how about an attacking field for a bit Straussy?

Tombwfc
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2912
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 5:37 pm

Post by Tombwfc » Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:41 pm

Never before have I been so glad to come off when trying to bowl a side out.

Get in, rest the bowlers, let the batsmen sleep on it, and come back tommorow. Those two would've been out there all night.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Post by Worthy4England » Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:39 pm

See if we'd made 'em bat again, they'd have been all out for 150 and we'd all have gone home by now.

Still interesting tomorrow methinks.

Tombwfc
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2912
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 5:37 pm

Post by Tombwfc » Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:42 pm

Don't worry about it. We've got plenty.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Post by Worthy4England » Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:46 pm

Tombwfc wrote:Don't worry about it. We've got plenty.
Gotcha, we just want to make sure that the paying public get a full test match...

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38820
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:02 pm

Worthy4England wrote:See if we'd made 'em bat again, they'd have been all out for 150 and we'd all have gone home by now.

Still interesting tomorrow methinks.
Aye looking at how tired our bowlers are, good job we didn't enforce the follow on.

They could easily have set us 250-350 to win on the final day!

Could be nervy tomorrow if these two survive the first 45 minutes or so!

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:08 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:See if we'd made 'em bat again, they'd have been all out for 150 and we'd all have gone home by now.

Still interesting tomorrow methinks.
Aye looking at how tired our bowlers are, good job we didn't enforce the follow on.

They could easily have set us 250-350 to win on the final day!

Could be nervy tomorrow if these two survive the first 45 minutes or so!
How tired our bowlers look? On the back of what? 11 Overs apiece? Jesus fecking Christ! :shock:

We've let the Aussies back into this game by not enforcing the follow-on. Big time!
May the bridges I burn light your way

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:09 pm

Suppose the question to be asked with hindsight is should we have batted another hour

If the weather stays fair, the answer is definitely yes
Sto ut Serviam

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:13 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:See if we'd made 'em bat again, they'd have been all out for 150 and we'd all have gone home by now.

Still interesting tomorrow methinks.
Aye looking at how tired our bowlers are, good job we didn't enforce the follow on.

They could easily have set us 250-350 to win on the final day!

Could be nervy tomorrow if these two survive the first 45 minutes or so!
How tired our bowlers look? On the back of what? 11 Overs apiece? Jesus fecking Christ! :shock:

We've let the Aussies back into this game by not enforcing the follow-on. Big time!
Theres no reason to suggest they wouldn't have scored at this rate and for this number of wickets yesterday

So, in effect, they'd have been 100 or so for 5

If you really think they can get another 220 for 4 or less, you're accepting they'd have set us around 350
Sto ut Serviam

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:22 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:See if we'd made 'em bat again, they'd have been all out for 150 and we'd all have gone home by now.

Still interesting tomorrow methinks.
Aye looking at how tired our bowlers are, good job we didn't enforce the follow on.

They could easily have set us 250-350 to win on the final day!

Could be nervy tomorrow if these two survive the first 45 minutes or so!
How tired our bowlers look? On the back of what? 11 Overs apiece? Jesus fecking Christ! :shock:

We've let the Aussies back into this game by not enforcing the follow-on. Big time!

Theres no reason to suggest they wouldn't have scored at this rate and for this number of wickets yesterday

So, in effect, they'd have been 100 or so for 5

If you really think they can get another 220 for 4 or less, you're accepting they'd have set us around 350
Hypothetical claptrap, my man. We had them on the hook and we've taken them off of it.

They've sensed the chance that we've quite unbelievably afforded them and are taking it.

Believe you me, we will not win this test and I'll be laying the blame at Strauss's door for his piss poor decision.
May the bridges I burn light your way

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:27 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
Believe you me, we will not win this test and I'll be laying the blame at Strauss's door for his piss poor decision.

a bold statement... and if we win it who will you be praising? (my guess you'll say we were lucky!)

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:28 pm

No

My position is based way more on fact than yours

The Aussies HAVE scored 300-5

YOU reckon theyre going to score another 200+

So, absolutely nowt to suggest they not have set us 300+

Unless you don't actually believe they can get the 200 or so they need.........
Sto ut Serviam

hisroyalgingerness
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Post by hisroyalgingerness » Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:34 pm

A nervy day, no doubts about that. And what a psychological edge for the eventual winner. If the Aussies win, Ponting has one up based on captaincy, if we win then we have an edge on the basis of being more ruthless. Either way, I expect a winner tomorrow rather than a draw so hold on for the ride

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Post by Worthy4England » Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:39 pm

The other thing is we actually only got two legitimate wickets all day. Two catches that weren't and a wicket off a no-ball...

David Lee's Hair
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2422
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:15 pm
Location: Cromwell Country

Post by David Lee's Hair » Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:56 pm

Current forecast is to piss it down all day down here tomorrow.

Draw all over.

Shame should have put them in on the follow on but it did bugger all yesterday morning so you can kind of understand the decision to put them in again.
Professionalism, the last refuge of the talentless

jimbo
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3248
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:34 am

Post by jimbo » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:57 am

CAPSLOCK wrote:No

My position is based way more on fact than yours

The Aussies HAVE scored 300-5

YOU reckon theyre going to score another 200+

So, absolutely nowt to suggest they not have set us 300+

Unless you don't actually believe they can get the 200 or so they need.........
Plus, had we enforced the follow-on, Flintoff would have been unable to walk in the second innings which leaves us a key bowler down. Following on Australia could have easily got 450 with Saturday being such a perfect batting day. That would have left our fragile line-up needing 200-250 on the last day to win.

Batting again was the right decision. How can you say smashing a few runs to build up a lead of over 500 before letting them have another go isn't pressure?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:11 am

David Lee's Hair wrote:Current forecast is to piss it down all day down here tomorrow.

Draw all over.

Shame should have put them in on the follow on but it did bugger all yesterday morning so you can kind of understand the decision to put them in again.
forecast is light showers - I think there will be plenty of play - and blue-sky sunshine for at least the first hour... no swing and runs galore....

my prediction? many bitten nails!

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Post by TANGODANCER » Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:29 am

I'm all up for a good win. I think an early wicket, a bit of defiance but a comfortable win in the end. Will somebody help me out, as I've tied myself in knots crossing everything?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

David Lee's Hair
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2422
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:15 pm
Location: Cromwell Country

Post by David Lee's Hair » Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:31 am

thebish wrote:forecast is light showers - I think there will be plenty of play - and blue-sky sunshine for at least the first hour... no swing and runs galore....

my prediction? many bitten nails!
Serves me right for believing the local weather :mrgreen:

A few showers and a bit of swing may be beneficial though
Professionalism, the last refuge of the talentless

FaninOz
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1444
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 4:24 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Post by FaninOz » Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:01 am

CAPSLOCK wrote:Suppose the question to be asked with hindsight is should we have batted another hour

If the weather stays fair, the answer is definitely yes
I agree with that, we could easily lose this unless we get these two out very quickly.
Depression is just a state of mind, supporting Bolton is also a state of mind hence supporting Bolton must be depressing QED

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests