General Chit Chat

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Sun Oct 16, 2016 2:05 am

Bruce Rioja wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:Let me get this right.


Has our judicial system slipped some 'presumed' business in somewhere?
The presumption of innocence has been part of common law for centuries, and can be found in Justinian's code. It is quite an important concept as well as an ancient one. The presumption is before the jury renders a verdict. Put another way, we say "Innocent until proven guilty".
Sorry, Monty. I'll make this easier.

The Jury are asked, as far as I know, do you find the accused to be;

A: Guilty?

B: Not Guilty
Yes, they are. However, you asked if some presumed business had slipped in to the judicial system. The presumed business comes before this question is answered.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24831
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Prufrock » Sun Oct 16, 2016 11:23 am

Montreal Wanderer wrote:
Prufrock wrote:Well yes, I agree, but there's nothing in that piece to suggest otherwise.
Okay, though it seems to he is implying to us non-legal types that Evans could be guilty despite the verdict. The author said the prosecution has no right of appeal. Is this correct? I thought the Crown could appeal verdicts on various grounds.
I don't think so. It's a response to the large number of f*ckwits over here who have decided she must be a lying slag who has gone after him and this vote is an affirmation that he is in fact a good guy.

As for appeals, it's a while since I did criminal procedure but I dont think there is any P appeal against an acquittal.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Sun Oct 16, 2016 4:26 pm

Prufrock wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:
Prufrock wrote:Well yes, I agree, but there's nothing in that piece to suggest otherwise.
Okay, though it seems to he is implying to us non-legal types that Evans could be guilty despite the verdict. The author said the prosecution has no right of appeal. Is this correct? I thought the Crown could appeal verdicts on various grounds.
I don't think so. It's a response to the large number of f*ckwits over here who have decided she must be a lying slag who has gone after him and this vote is an affirmation that he is in fact a good guy.

As for appeals, it's a while since I did criminal procedure but I dont think there is any P appeal against an acquittal.
Even if the judge gives quite erroneous instructions to the jury? Oops! Apparently not. I read:
Section 58 allows the prosecution to appeal a ruling by the judge that:
relates to one or more offences included in the indictment;
was made at any time until the start of the judge's summing up;
has the effect of terminating the trial.

There is, therefore, no right of appeal against a judge misdirecting a jury in his summing up.
Emphasis mine. So I guess you are correct, Pru.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by boltonboris » Mon Oct 17, 2016 1:10 pm

Innocent until proven guilty

Are you guilty?

No.

So you're innocent - In the eyes of the law
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Mon Oct 17, 2016 2:34 pm

boltonboris wrote:Innocent until proven guilty

Are you proven guilty?

No.

So you're innocent - In the eyes of the law
That's about right.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13655
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Hoboh » Mon Oct 17, 2016 7:43 pm

Poor, desparate, 'children' arrive in the UK from the jungle camp!

Image

Image

Image

Image

My ass!

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by boltonboris » Tue Oct 18, 2016 11:45 am

That bottom one is Ronaldo, he was just there to keep the spirits up
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13655
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Hoboh » Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:14 am

Figures released yesterday reveal that two-thirds of ‘child’ refugees who were quizzed by the Home Office about their age were found to be adults.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38814
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:20 am

Hoboh wrote:
Figures released yesterday reveal that two-thirds of ‘child’ refugees who were quizzed by the Home Office about their age were found to be adults.
I'd wager most middle eastern children can't swim. So as a solution to this, and a quick way of verifying their ages, perhaps tie a smallish weight to their feet and throw them into some deep water. If they drown to their death then we know they were a genuine child. If they manage to swim and survive they are clearly an adult so can be deported immediately or shot. Whichever.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Worthy4England » Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:29 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Hoboh wrote:
Figures released yesterday reveal that two-thirds of ‘child’ refugees who were quizzed by the Home Office about their age were found to be adults.
I'd wager most middle eastern children can't swim. So as a solution to this, and a quick way of verifying their ages, perhaps tie a smallish weight to their feet and throw them into some deep water. If they drown to their death then we know they were a genuine child. If they manage to swim and survive they are clearly an adult so can be deported immediately or shot. Whichever.
The key here, given this is the Daily Heil at it's best, is "two thirds of those quizzed"...From the same data set, there were 29,024 Asylum Applicants, 590 had their age disputed (2%), 371 of those were found to be adults (1.2%).

So 98.8% weren't lying about their age from the whole shebang.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13655
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Hoboh » Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:31 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Hoboh wrote:
Figures released yesterday reveal that two-thirds of ‘child’ refugees who were quizzed by the Home Office about their age were found to be adults.
I'd wager most middle eastern children can't swim. So as a solution to this, and a quick way of verifying their ages, perhaps tie a smallish weight to their feet and throw them into some deep water. If they drown to their death then we know they were a genuine child. If they manage to swim and survive they are clearly an adult so can be deported immediately or shot. Whichever.
I'd much rather they got proper people on the ground checking these fcukers than the lefty aligned bunch that seem to be there now!

One of the latest arrivals apparently has, according to facial recognition software, the features of a 38yr old :roll:

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13655
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Hoboh » Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:32 am

Worthy4England wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Hoboh wrote:
Figures released yesterday reveal that two-thirds of ‘child’ refugees who were quizzed by the Home Office about their age were found to be adults.
I'd wager most middle eastern children can't swim. So as a solution to this, and a quick way of verifying their ages, perhaps tie a smallish weight to their feet and throw them into some deep water. If they drown to their death then we know they were a genuine child. If they manage to swim and survive they are clearly an adult so can be deported immediately or shot. Whichever.
The key here, given this is the Daily Heil at it's best, is "two thirds of those quizzed"...From the same data set, there were 29,024 Asylum Applicants, 590 had their age disputed (2%), 371 of those were found to be adults (1.2%).

So 98.8% weren't lying about their age from the whole shebang.
So we had 29,024 'child' asylum applications then eh worthy?

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Bruce Rioja » Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:34 am

How ever anyone might like to divide the stats, at the end of the day, those poor, beleaguered children that we've just let in are in actual fact a bunch of fecking blokes!
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Worthy4England » Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:42 am

Hoboh wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Hoboh wrote:
Figures released yesterday reveal that two-thirds of ‘child’ refugees who were quizzed by the Home Office about their age were found to be adults.
I'd wager most middle eastern children can't swim. So as a solution to this, and a quick way of verifying their ages, perhaps tie a smallish weight to their feet and throw them into some deep water. If they drown to their death then we know they were a genuine child. If they manage to swim and survive they are clearly an adult so can be deported immediately or shot. Whichever.
The key here, given this is the Daily Heil at it's best, is "two thirds of those quizzed"...From the same data set, there were 29,024 Asylum Applicants, 590 had their age disputed (2%), 371 of those were found to be adults (1.2%).

So 98.8% weren't lying about their age from the whole shebang.
So we had 29,024 'child' asylum applications then eh worthy?
No - about 2,500 - I thought you were trying to get Immigration down from 327,000+?

Don't get me wrong, taking 373 off that number (65% of the 574 who had age assessments and were found to be over 18) will all help. :roll:

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by TANGODANCER » Wed Oct 19, 2016 3:20 pm

Grandson took us to the clinic at Frederick Street Farnworth today for the wife to have the staples out of her knee. We came out to a ding dong row between a woman and an Asian taxi driver on he car park. He was screaming it was her fault until a bloke who had seen the whole thing said he was lying and he had reversed into her. Woman took a pic of his vehicle and registration number and staff from the clinic got involved with talk of police. The taxi driver then offered the woman money for repairs and confessed he had no insurance....we left at that point... :|
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Bruce Rioja » Thu Oct 20, 2016 1:10 pm

Image
May the bridges I burn light your way

Bijou Bob
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4051
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:35 pm
Location: Swashbucklin in Brooklyn

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Bijou Bob » Fri Oct 21, 2016 12:29 pm

A friend of ours is a head teacher of a primary school in a poor area of her town. They recently had an Iraqi child turn up to school, but 5 minutes after his arrival, the teacher called our friend into the classroom. Not only did he have the hairiest legs she'd ever seen on an 8 year old, but he couldn't physically get his knees under the desk. His parents explained that him being nearly 2 feet taller than his classmates just meant that he was a large boy. They tried to have his age re-evaluated, but he's still in the same class. His PE kit is an adult medium size.

About 5 years ago, my son played in a local under 14's footie team. One Saturday morning, they played a team from Walkden who had 2 lads up front from DR Congo who'd make Bruce look like a stunted waif. Both scored over a hundred goals that season. I got talking to a bloke from the League who reckoned that most Manchester boys teams now have at least one striker or centre half who is somewhere between 18 and 23. Can't blame the parents for doing the best to get their kids an education.

My lad, a keeper, took out one of the strikers in the first 5 minutes during a one on one. The kid buckled like a cheap bike wheel and had to be carried off. I'm not sure if I've ever been prouder.
Uma mesa para um, faz favor. Obrigado.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Worthy4England » Fri Oct 21, 2016 12:41 pm

Bijou Bob wrote:A friend of ours is a head teacher of a primary school in a poor area of her town. They recently had an Iraqi child turn up to school, but 5 minutes after his arrival, the teacher called our friend into the classroom. Not only did he have the hairiest legs she'd ever seen on an 8 year old, but he couldn't physically get his knees under the desk. His parents explained that him being nearly 2 feet taller than his classmates just meant that he was a large boy. They tried to have his age re-evaluated, but he's still in the same class. His PE kit is an adult medium size.

About 5 years ago, my son played in a local under 14's footie team. One Saturday morning, they played a team from Walkden who had 2 lads up front from DR Congo who'd make Bruce look like a stunted waif. Both scored over a hundred goals that season. I got talking to a bloke from the League who reckoned that most Manchester boys teams now have at least one striker or centre half who is somewhere between 18 and 23. Can't blame the parents for doing the best to get their kids an education.

My lad, a keeper, took out one of the strikers in the first 5 minutes during a one on one. The kid buckled like a cheap bike wheel and had to be carried off. I'm not sure if I've ever been prouder.
Surely most of that (the sport side of things) has gone on for ever? I can remember certain Rugby and Cricket Teams we'd play coming up through the age groups used to have "blokes with full beards" at unfeasibly young ages - pretty much all white - almost certainly at least one age group too old, and on occasion 2 or 3...

At the time the Rugby team I played for was recognised as being pretty good, so at U16 level, we'd generally see a couple of ringers in the oppo's sides - next step up would make them 18 and then it was U21 (so not quite 23 :-) ), but could still be 5 years older than a 16 year old and not all our U16's were 16 - I played for them at 14 so there could easily be a 5/6/7 year gap.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Worthy4England » Fri Oct 21, 2016 1:07 pm

Just to add to some letters apparently we have an LBGTQA network at work....I can get as far as T without making non-politically correct stuff up about the last 2...

Beefheart
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2918
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:36 pm

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Beefheart » Fri Oct 21, 2016 1:38 pm

Worthy4England wrote:Just to add to some letters apparently we have an LBGTQA network at work....I can get as far as T without making non-politically correct stuff up about the last 2...
Q is queer. It's been reclaimed. A could be Asexual or Ally.

Here is the full list, all completely valid. Of course. LGBTTQQIAAP (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, transsexual, queer, questioning, intersex, asexual, ally, pansexual)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Prufrock and 12 guests