General Chit Chat
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: General Chit Chat
Yes, they are. However, you asked if some presumed business had slipped in to the judicial system. The presumed business comes before this question is answered.Bruce Rioja wrote:Sorry, Monty. I'll make this easier.Montreal Wanderer wrote:The presumption of innocence has been part of common law for centuries, and can be found in Justinian's code. It is quite an important concept as well as an ancient one. The presumption is before the jury renders a verdict. Put another way, we say "Innocent until proven guilty".Bruce Rioja wrote:Let me get this right.
Has our judicial system slipped some 'presumed' business in somewhere?
The Jury are asked, as far as I know, do you find the accused to be;
A: Guilty?
B: Not Guilty
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
Re: General Chit Chat
I don't think so. It's a response to the large number of f*ckwits over here who have decided she must be a lying slag who has gone after him and this vote is an affirmation that he is in fact a good guy.Montreal Wanderer wrote:Okay, though it seems to he is implying to us non-legal types that Evans could be guilty despite the verdict. The author said the prosecution has no right of appeal. Is this correct? I thought the Crown could appeal verdicts on various grounds.Prufrock wrote:Well yes, I agree, but there's nothing in that piece to suggest otherwise.
As for appeals, it's a while since I did criminal procedure but I dont think there is any P appeal against an acquittal.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: General Chit Chat
Even if the judge gives quite erroneous instructions to the jury? Oops! Apparently not. I read:Prufrock wrote:I don't think so. It's a response to the large number of f*ckwits over here who have decided she must be a lying slag who has gone after him and this vote is an affirmation that he is in fact a good guy.Montreal Wanderer wrote:Okay, though it seems to he is implying to us non-legal types that Evans could be guilty despite the verdict. The author said the prosecution has no right of appeal. Is this correct? I thought the Crown could appeal verdicts on various grounds.Prufrock wrote:Well yes, I agree, but there's nothing in that piece to suggest otherwise.
As for appeals, it's a while since I did criminal procedure but I dont think there is any P appeal against an acquittal.
Emphasis mine. So I guess you are correct, Pru.Section 58 allows the prosecution to appeal a ruling by the judge that:
relates to one or more offences included in the indictment;
was made at any time until the start of the judge's summing up;
has the effect of terminating the trial.
There is, therefore, no right of appeal against a judge misdirecting a jury in his summing up.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: General Chit Chat
Innocent until proven guilty
Are you guilty?
No.
So you're innocent - In the eyes of the law
Are you guilty?
No.
So you're innocent - In the eyes of the law
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: General Chit Chat
That's about right.boltonboris wrote:Innocent until proven guilty
Are you proven guilty?
No.
So you're innocent - In the eyes of the law
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
Re: General Chit Chat
Poor, desparate, 'children' arrive in the UK from the jungle camp!




My ass!




My ass!
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: General Chit Chat
That bottom one is Ronaldo, he was just there to keep the spirits up
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Re: General Chit Chat
Figures released yesterday reveal that two-thirds of ‘child’ refugees who were quizzed by the Home Office about their age were found to be adults.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: General Chit Chat
I'd wager most middle eastern children can't swim. So as a solution to this, and a quick way of verifying their ages, perhaps tie a smallish weight to their feet and throw them into some deep water. If they drown to their death then we know they were a genuine child. If they manage to swim and survive they are clearly an adult so can be deported immediately or shot. Whichever.Hoboh wrote:Figures released yesterday reveal that two-thirds of ‘child’ refugees who were quizzed by the Home Office about their age were found to be adults.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: General Chit Chat
The key here, given this is the Daily Heil at it's best, is "two thirds of those quizzed"...From the same data set, there were 29,024 Asylum Applicants, 590 had their age disputed (2%), 371 of those were found to be adults (1.2%).BWFC_Insane wrote:I'd wager most middle eastern children can't swim. So as a solution to this, and a quick way of verifying their ages, perhaps tie a smallish weight to their feet and throw them into some deep water. If they drown to their death then we know they were a genuine child. If they manage to swim and survive they are clearly an adult so can be deported immediately or shot. Whichever.Hoboh wrote:Figures released yesterday reveal that two-thirds of ‘child’ refugees who were quizzed by the Home Office about their age were found to be adults.
So 98.8% weren't lying about their age from the whole shebang.
Re: General Chit Chat
I'd much rather they got proper people on the ground checking these fcukers than the lefty aligned bunch that seem to be there now!BWFC_Insane wrote:I'd wager most middle eastern children can't swim. So as a solution to this, and a quick way of verifying their ages, perhaps tie a smallish weight to their feet and throw them into some deep water. If they drown to their death then we know they were a genuine child. If they manage to swim and survive they are clearly an adult so can be deported immediately or shot. Whichever.Hoboh wrote:Figures released yesterday reveal that two-thirds of ‘child’ refugees who were quizzed by the Home Office about their age were found to be adults.
One of the latest arrivals apparently has, according to facial recognition software, the features of a 38yr old

Re: General Chit Chat
So we had 29,024 'child' asylum applications then eh worthy?Worthy4England wrote:The key here, given this is the Daily Heil at it's best, is "two thirds of those quizzed"...From the same data set, there were 29,024 Asylum Applicants, 590 had their age disputed (2%), 371 of those were found to be adults (1.2%).BWFC_Insane wrote:I'd wager most middle eastern children can't swim. So as a solution to this, and a quick way of verifying their ages, perhaps tie a smallish weight to their feet and throw them into some deep water. If they drown to their death then we know they were a genuine child. If they manage to swim and survive they are clearly an adult so can be deported immediately or shot. Whichever.Hoboh wrote:Figures released yesterday reveal that two-thirds of ‘child’ refugees who were quizzed by the Home Office about their age were found to be adults.
So 98.8% weren't lying about their age from the whole shebang.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: General Chit Chat
How ever anyone might like to divide the stats, at the end of the day, those poor, beleaguered children that we've just let in are in actual fact a bunch of fecking blokes!
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: General Chit Chat
No - about 2,500 - I thought you were trying to get Immigration down from 327,000+?Hoboh wrote:So we had 29,024 'child' asylum applications then eh worthy?Worthy4England wrote:The key here, given this is the Daily Heil at it's best, is "two thirds of those quizzed"...From the same data set, there were 29,024 Asylum Applicants, 590 had their age disputed (2%), 371 of those were found to be adults (1.2%).BWFC_Insane wrote:I'd wager most middle eastern children can't swim. So as a solution to this, and a quick way of verifying their ages, perhaps tie a smallish weight to their feet and throw them into some deep water. If they drown to their death then we know they were a genuine child. If they manage to swim and survive they are clearly an adult so can be deported immediately or shot. Whichever.Hoboh wrote:Figures released yesterday reveal that two-thirds of ‘child’ refugees who were quizzed by the Home Office about their age were found to be adults.
So 98.8% weren't lying about their age from the whole shebang.
Don't get me wrong, taking 373 off that number (65% of the 574 who had age assessments and were found to be over 18) will all help.

- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: General Chit Chat
Grandson took us to the clinic at Frederick Street Farnworth today for the wife to have the staples out of her knee. We came out to a ding dong row between a woman and an Asian taxi driver on he car park. He was screaming it was her fault until a bloke who had seen the whole thing said he was lying and he had reversed into her. Woman took a pic of his vehicle and registration number and staff from the clinic got involved with talk of police. The taxi driver then offered the woman money for repairs and confessed he had no insurance....we left at that point... 

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: General Chit Chat
A friend of ours is a head teacher of a primary school in a poor area of her town. They recently had an Iraqi child turn up to school, but 5 minutes after his arrival, the teacher called our friend into the classroom. Not only did he have the hairiest legs she'd ever seen on an 8 year old, but he couldn't physically get his knees under the desk. His parents explained that him being nearly 2 feet taller than his classmates just meant that he was a large boy. They tried to have his age re-evaluated, but he's still in the same class. His PE kit is an adult medium size.
About 5 years ago, my son played in a local under 14's footie team. One Saturday morning, they played a team from Walkden who had 2 lads up front from DR Congo who'd make Bruce look like a stunted waif. Both scored over a hundred goals that season. I got talking to a bloke from the League who reckoned that most Manchester boys teams now have at least one striker or centre half who is somewhere between 18 and 23. Can't blame the parents for doing the best to get their kids an education.
My lad, a keeper, took out one of the strikers in the first 5 minutes during a one on one. The kid buckled like a cheap bike wheel and had to be carried off. I'm not sure if I've ever been prouder.
About 5 years ago, my son played in a local under 14's footie team. One Saturday morning, they played a team from Walkden who had 2 lads up front from DR Congo who'd make Bruce look like a stunted waif. Both scored over a hundred goals that season. I got talking to a bloke from the League who reckoned that most Manchester boys teams now have at least one striker or centre half who is somewhere between 18 and 23. Can't blame the parents for doing the best to get their kids an education.
My lad, a keeper, took out one of the strikers in the first 5 minutes during a one on one. The kid buckled like a cheap bike wheel and had to be carried off. I'm not sure if I've ever been prouder.
Uma mesa para um, faz favor. Obrigado.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: General Chit Chat
Surely most of that (the sport side of things) has gone on for ever? I can remember certain Rugby and Cricket Teams we'd play coming up through the age groups used to have "blokes with full beards" at unfeasibly young ages - pretty much all white - almost certainly at least one age group too old, and on occasion 2 or 3...Bijou Bob wrote:A friend of ours is a head teacher of a primary school in a poor area of her town. They recently had an Iraqi child turn up to school, but 5 minutes after his arrival, the teacher called our friend into the classroom. Not only did he have the hairiest legs she'd ever seen on an 8 year old, but he couldn't physically get his knees under the desk. His parents explained that him being nearly 2 feet taller than his classmates just meant that he was a large boy. They tried to have his age re-evaluated, but he's still in the same class. His PE kit is an adult medium size.
About 5 years ago, my son played in a local under 14's footie team. One Saturday morning, they played a team from Walkden who had 2 lads up front from DR Congo who'd make Bruce look like a stunted waif. Both scored over a hundred goals that season. I got talking to a bloke from the League who reckoned that most Manchester boys teams now have at least one striker or centre half who is somewhere between 18 and 23. Can't blame the parents for doing the best to get their kids an education.
My lad, a keeper, took out one of the strikers in the first 5 minutes during a one on one. The kid buckled like a cheap bike wheel and had to be carried off. I'm not sure if I've ever been prouder.
At the time the Rugby team I played for was recognised as being pretty good, so at U16 level, we'd generally see a couple of ringers in the oppo's sides - next step up would make them 18 and then it was U21 (so not quite 23

- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: General Chit Chat
Just to add to some letters apparently we have an LBGTQA network at work....I can get as far as T without making non-politically correct stuff up about the last 2...
Re: General Chit Chat
Q is queer. It's been reclaimed. A could be Asexual or Ally.Worthy4England wrote:Just to add to some letters apparently we have an LBGTQA network at work....I can get as far as T without making non-politically correct stuff up about the last 2...
Here is the full list, all completely valid. Of course. LGBTTQQIAAP (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, transsexual, queer, questioning, intersex, asexual, ally, pansexual)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests