The Great Art Debate
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Great Art Debate
He you go - this shite has just won the Turner Prize. 



May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: The Great Art Debate
What the feck is it?
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Re: The Great Art Debate
In fairness that is an angle to show it lookin stupid.
Here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/ ... ize-winner" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Isn't that..... great?
Here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/ ... ize-winner" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Isn't that..... great?
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Prufrock wrote:In fairness that is an angle to show it lookin stupid.
Here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/ ... ize-winner" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Isn't that..... great?
Pru???His acceptance of the award at the Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art in Gateshead, from fashion photographer Mario Testino, was briefly delayed when a streaker, clad seemingly in only a pink tutu and with the words "study this" scrawled on his chest, invaded the stage before being tackled to the ground and removed by security guards.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: The Great Art Debate
Again...
what the feck is it?
what the feck is it?
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Pretty obvious Boris, it's a quietly atmospheric, lyrically autumnal sculptural installation recalling a melancholy urban park with its metallic trees and scattered paper leaves,boltonboris wrote:Again...
what the feck is it?
Bruce gave the key to understanding art a while back. You just stroke your chin with one hand, tilt your head and nod, and it all falls into place. Still looks like a pile of shite though.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: The Great Art Debate
It looks like it could be a table..
A shit table, that only a pretentious wanker would buy. but yet it isn't actually a table.
So it's probably just a 'thing' that only a pretentious wanker would buy.. Is that 'art'?
A shit table, that only a pretentious wanker would buy. but yet it isn't actually a table.
So it's probably just a 'thing' that only a pretentious wanker would buy.. Is that 'art'?
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
Unlikely to find a 'pretentious wanker' to buy it unless they had a very big spare room, since the whole thing is created in a large studio, using every part of it, and the section of the installation being focussed on here (understandably) is only a small part of it.
I watched the (disappointingly short) C4 documentary on the short list that preceded the announcement of the winner. There was enough there to make me interested in going to the Baltic to find out more.
I watched the (disappointingly short) C4 documentary on the short list that preceded the announcement of the winner. There was enough there to make me interested in going to the Baltic to find out more.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: The Great Art Debate
I'm sure there's plenty of pretentious wankers with very large spare rooms out there.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: The Great Art Debate
Does anybody actually know what it's supposed to be yet?
It looks like it could be a piano, but with no keys..
A shit piano with no keys that only a pretentious wa.......
It looks like it could be a piano, but with no keys..
A shit piano with no keys that only a pretentious wa.......
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Re: The Great Art Debate
I believe Tango answered that for you above!boltonboris wrote:Does anybody actually know what it's supposed to be yet?
It looks like it could be a piano, but with no keys..
A shit piano with no keys that only a pretentious wa.......
Re: The Great Art Debate
It's a work bench you can hang stuff on.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
I only quoted the article. Personally, I thought it was Chris Evans waiting for his order in a chip shop.thebish wrote:I believe Tango answered that for you above!boltonboris wrote:Does anybody actually know what it's supposed to be yet?
It looks like it could be a piano, but with no keys..
A shit piano with no keys that only a pretentious wa.......

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: The Great Art Debate
If I had the money I'd buy it.
Then I'd cut it up and make something useful.
Then I'd cut it up and make something useful.
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Wandering Willy wrote:If I had the money I'd buy it.
Then I'd cut it up and make something useful.
this piece of art doesn't really float my boat - maybe the photos don't do it justice...
but.. the world would be a poorer place if everything's value were judged by a standard of "usefulness"
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Great Art Debate
If you cut this thing up then you'd have several 'works of art' and could coin it in.thebish wrote:Wandering Willy wrote:If I had the money I'd buy it.
Then I'd cut it up and make something useful.
this piece of art doesn't really float my boat - maybe the photos don't do it justice...
but.. the world would be a poorer place if everything's value were judged by a standard of "usefulness"

May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: The Great Art Debate
Fair point and I wouldn't suggest that at all.thebish wrote:Wandering Willy wrote:If I had the money I'd buy it.
Then I'd cut it up and make something useful.
this piece of art doesn't really float my boat - maybe the photos don't do it justice...
but.. the world would be a poorer place if everything's value were judged by a standard of "usefulness"
In this instance we are well into "Emperor's New Clothes" territory, so it's cut the bastard thing up for me.

They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34735
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The Great Art Debate
Is it Frankie Boyle? In an odd shaped telly?boltonboris wrote:Again...
what the feck is it?
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: The Great Art Debate
It's a copy anyway, and not a good one.
Here's the original:

Here's the original:
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests