The wonderful EU and Migration thread!

[Hoboh]

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... ess-attack" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Hide it in the cupboard, quick!

[Worthy4England]

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... ess-attack

Hide it in the cupboard, quick!

Imagine wanting to make white goods more energy efficient! Wankers!

The thought that they might still want to make stuff more efficient, maybe saving most of my leccy bills as I eat so much toast, after a referendum. Scandalous. I'm rushing to find the next Brexit meeting right now.

[Lord Kangana]

The human race deserves itself, it really does.

[Bruce Rioja]

[bobo the clown]

Those tattoos are a disgrace.

[Abdoulaye's Twin]

Never mind the tattoos. Digestives with no butter or tea to Dunk in. Hasn't the poor child suffered enough?

[Worthy4England]

Never mind the tattoos. Digestives with no butter or tea to Dunk in. Hasn't the poor child suffered enough?

[Abdoulaye's Twin]

Never mind the tattoos. Digestives with no butter or tea to Dunk in. Hasn't the poor child suffered enough?

They're dry as fvck, they need something.

[Worthy4England]

Never mind the tattoos. Digestives with no butter or tea to Dunk in. Hasn't the poor child suffered enough?

They're dry as fvck, they need something.

Well yeah - I'm with you there. But tea is it.

[Lost Leopard Spot]

If Spotty is undecided then so am I!!

You've decided.
I haven't.
Two facts.

[Lost Leopard Spot]

Errr right...you said you wouldn't be convinced to stay based on an economic argument around growth. I just said I hadn't mentioned the word...

But neither would I be convinced to leave on an economic argument around growth!. As all economic arguments involve growth, whether the word is used or not, I won't therefor be persuaded on economic grounds. Yet you're telling me that you know where my vote lies... You can't possibly know that, not on the assumptions you stated.

[Bruce Rioja]

Those tattoos are a disgrace.

They might be tights!

[Worthy4England]

Errr right...you said you wouldn't be convinced to stay based on an economic argument around growth. I just said I hadn't mentioned the word...

But neither would I be convinced to leave on an economic argument around growth!. As all economic arguments involve growth, whether the word is used or not, I won't therefor be persuaded on economic grounds. Yet you're telling me that you know where my vote lies... You can't possibly know that, not on the assumptions you stated.

No - go read what I put. As it happens you said

The more the argument is based in that direction, the stronger I'm heading into the Brexit camp

Sorta says that you're already in the Brexit camp and in your words heading into it stronger...

I responded

That said, I reckon I'd have had you in the leave camp anyhow

Which isn't me knowing where your vote is at all...it's my judgement of where your vote is. Not the same thing.

[Prufrock]

If Spotty is undecided then so am I!!

You've decided.
I haven't.
Two facts.

Yup

[Hoboh]

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... ge-osborne" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The warning by the G20 was seized on by George Osborne who said his fellow finance ministers had “given their unanimous verdict that a British exit from the EU would be a shock to the world economy”.

British officials said the warning about a UK exit was raised by the Chinese before the Shanghai meeting. But a diplomatic source from another G20 country challenged the Treasury account and said UK officials had proposed the Brexit warning in meetings in Shanghai before the chancellor arrived. The wording was then proposed by British officials.

The diplomatic source told the Guardian: “It was the British delegation who raised the issue both in drafting session and at ministerial level, and also them who proposed the wording for the communique.”

The suggestion by the diplomat would tally with a report in last Friday’s FT(£) which said the UK was pushing the G20 finance ministers to issue the warning.

https://euobserver.com/institutional/132445" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Why, if the issue is as clear cut as the Remainians would have us believe are they lying so fecking much?

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... ls-Cameron" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Or, trying to hide things?

[bobo the clown]

Fck me. We've got months of this yet.

[Hoboh]

Fck me. We've got months of this yet.

I promise to take one day a week off bombing the EU if others do the same and the US/Russia can verify it.

[Worthy4England]

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... ls-Cameron

Or, trying to hide things?

Well they've done a pretty good cover-up on that one. Bastards! It's a fcuking conspiracy.

[Hoboh]

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... ls-Cameron

Or, trying to hide things?

Well they've done a pretty good cover-up on that one. Bastards! It's a fcuking conspiracy.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... ls-Cameron" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Works for me?

[Worthy4England]

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... ls-Cameron

Or, trying to hide things?

Well they've done a pretty good cover-up on that one. Bastards! It's a fcuking conspiracy.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... ls-Cameron" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Works for me?

Oh...Curiouser and curiouser...

Might still be in your browser cache - I've tried on a couple of different browsers and it's telling me there's nowt there.