Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38814
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
Great questions. And you aren't asking me for a tenner to ask them on my behalf without actually asking me.TKIZ! wrote:In response to BWFCST having questions about the bid, I have 10 questions for them:
1/ What's at the end of the stick, Vic?
2/ Who you gonna call?
3/ Can you feel the love tonight?
4/ You know how to whistle, don't you, Steve?
5/ Do you feel lucky, Punk?
6/ What is it has a trunk, but no key, weighs 2,000 pounds and lives in a circus?
7/ Where is my mind?
8/How much wood can a woodchuck chuck?
9/ Is that a gun in your pocket or are you happy to see me?
10/Do you understand what NDA stands for?
So you are single handedly beating out the trust in my book!
Re: Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
Cancelled mine when all this "democratic" supporters crap started.Gary the Enfield wrote:jonnycooper wrote:I find it a wee bit strange that the st are being promoted on the official BWFC website!Rjs37 wrote:One of those three parties will almost certainly be the supporters trust. They would never have survived the scandal of the profit of supporters' investment going to Eddie Davies' pockets.
But post administration, you can bet they'd be chomping at the bit again.
I find it odd they've been allowed to partner with the BWDA and are now dictating terms on the Lifeline money/ membership. I didn't vote for that.
Re: Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
So, I'm the new democratically elected official spokesman for The Wanderer? Get in!BWFC_Insane wrote:Great questions. And you aren't asking me for a tenner to ask them on my behalf without actually asking me.TKIZ! wrote:In response to BWFCST having questions about the bid, I have 10 questions for them:
1/ What's at the end of the stick, Vic?
2/ Who you gonna call?
3/ Can you feel the love tonight?
4/ You know how to whistle, don't you, Steve?
5/ Do you feel lucky, Punk?
6/ What is it has a trunk, but no key, weighs 2,000 pounds and lives in a circus?
7/ Where is my mind?
8/How much wood can a woodchuck chuck?
9/ Is that a gun in your pocket or are you happy to see me?
10/Do you understand what NDA stands for?
So you are single handedly beating out the trust in my book!
Pfffft.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
You'll be getting your own transfer thread next!
As for Plymouth's "we'll get promoted this season" transfer thread, we currently couldn't finish higher than 5th so I'm starting to doubt a little whether our late run will be good enough to go up.
As for Plymouth's "we'll get promoted this season" transfer thread, we currently couldn't finish higher than 5th so I'm starting to doubt a little whether our late run will be good enough to go up.
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
Worthy4England wrote:You'll be getting your own transfer thread next!
As for Plymouth's "we'll get promoted this season" transfer thread, we currently couldn't finish higher than 5th so I'm starting to doubt a little whether our late run will be good enough to go up.
Ssssush
I thought everyone forgot about that!
Least mine had signings, shit ones!! signings all the same. Wish the same could be said of LLS thread

Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
Re: Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
I read that as an invitation rather than an admission.Worthy4England wrote:I'm not sure the ST really launched a bid for the Club either, in fairness. On the plus side, at least you've found something to make you laugh.BWFC_Insane wrote:Find it hilarious that the ST are clamouring for SS to be more open with supporters....
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38814
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
Way Nixon and Iles are talking I'm beginning to wonder if this thing will get past the football league. Nixon thinks the amount needed for next season went up after the court appearance and the final deal with ED and that is where the issue lies.
Iles reckons administrators have already been identified.
Iles reckons administrators have already been identified.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
We've got 22 playing staff out of contract in the summer and Nixon thinks that the amount needed for next season is going to go up. He's a know nowt bullshitting cockend of the highest order.
Businesswoman of the year.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38814
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
Income goes down by 5M. And end of the day it is the Football League that want this evidence.CrazyHorse wrote:We've got 22 playing staff out of contract in the summer and Nixon thinks that the amount needed for next season is going to go up. He's a know nowt bullshitting cockend of the highest order.
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8610
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
Re: Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
BWFC_Insane wrote:Income goes down by 5M. And end of the day it is the Football League that want this evidence.CrazyHorse wrote:We've got 22 playing staff out of contract in the summer and Nixon thinks that the amount needed for next season is going to go up. He's a know nowt bullshitting cockend of the highest order.
Really? How come you've never mentioned this before?
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
Didn't E.D promise only a couple of weeks ago that he would make sure the club survived to honour Phil Gartside's memory (or something of that ilk) ?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
This season was the last of parachute payments. So yeah, that's what it'll be.throwawayboltonian wrote:Devil's advocate: Without crunching any numbers, could that because of our expected loss of £5m(?) in sponsorship and TV revenue?CrazyHorse wrote:We've got 22 playing staff out of contract in the summer and Nixon thinks that the amount needed for next season is going to go up. He's a know nowt bullshitting cockend of the highest order.
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9404
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
Re: Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
The world of high finance is a mystery to me and I'm particularly stumped as to what the attraction is to SS to complete now.
We're going down so loss of TV revenue is a given. SS were paying £15m for us? I don't get why they don't just walk away until the summer. Leave all the wages for ED to worry about and pick us up for a song in administration
We're going down so loss of TV revenue is a given. SS were paying £15m for us? I don't get why they don't just walk away until the summer. Leave all the wages for ED to worry about and pick us up for a song in administration
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
Re: Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
It maybe the fact all that would be left would be the name with everything else sold off to pay creditors.Harry Genshaw wrote:The world of high finance is a mystery to me and I'm particularly stumped as to what the attraction is to SS to complete now.
We're going down so loss of TV revenue is a given. SS were paying £15m for us? I don't get why they don't just walk away until the summer. Leave all the wages for ED to worry about and pick us up for a song in administration
Must admit admin crossed my mind if the potential purchasers were up to speed on how to rescue most of the package, if possible.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38814
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
Widely reported that it takes 15-20M just to keep us going from now till the end of next season. Why would investors want to pay that for a league one side who would require further money to progress further?Harry Genshaw wrote:The world of high finance is a mystery to me and I'm particularly stumped as to what the attraction is to SS to complete now.
We're going down so loss of TV revenue is a given. SS were paying £15m for us? I don't get why they don't just walk away until the summer. Leave all the wages for ED to worry about and pick us up for a song in administration
That is the question I keep asking but can't come up with an answer for. I can see why a rich Bolton fan might want to take it on. Anyone else, I don't think it makes much sense.
Last edited by BWFC_Insane on Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
Coz there's no guarantee there'll be anything left to buy, and if so what. If we go into admin, it's not inconceivable that someone could buy the stadium for a song, ready to rent it back to the club forever. Or the other training ground could go and we'd be training in Queen's Park. There's no consideration of whether they're taking the piss, just sell what we can to pay off what we can asap. See you Clough. And Vela. And Holding. Any any other asset that moves, or indeed doesn't.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- TonyDomingos
- Passionate
- Posts: 3098
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:27 pm
- Location: Sarf East London
Re: Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
Is admin still an option? I thought HMRC wanted to liquidate us rather than just recoup what's owed to the creditors. I'd assumed that if everything wasn't sorted by Monday morning, then that would be the end (barring another adjournment).
Às armas, às armas!
Sobre a terra, sobre o mar,
Às armas, às armas!
Pela Pátria lutar!
Contra os canhões marchar, marchar!
Sobre a terra, sobre o mar,
Às armas, às armas!
Pela Pátria lutar!
Contra os canhões marchar, marchar!
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38814
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
If you're an investor though you can just buy something else that offers better value.Prufrock wrote:Coz there's no guarantee there'll be anything left to buy, and if so what. If we go into admin, it's not inconceivable that someone could buy the stadium for a song, ready to rent it back to the club forever. Or the other training ground could go and we'd be training in Queen's Park. There's no consideration of whether they're taking the piss, just sell what we can to pay off what we can asap. See you Clough. And Vela. And Holding. Any any other asset that moves, or indeed doesn't.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
Unless they're blind and daft, they will almost certainly have known that months ago...BWFC_Insane wrote:If you're an investor though you can just buy something else that offers better value.Prufrock wrote:Coz there's no guarantee there'll be anything left to buy, and if so what. If we go into admin, it's not inconceivable that someone could buy the stadium for a song, ready to rent it back to the club forever. Or the other training ground could go and we'd be training in Queen's Park. There's no consideration of whether they're taking the piss, just sell what we can to pay off what we can asap. See you Clough. And Vela. And Holding. Any any other asset that moves, or indeed doesn't.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38814
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Sports Shield - New Owners (Probably)
Think it is clear that ED's demands didn't help. I suspect though the killer is having had the assets sold off, new owners will still have to pick up old debt, including the rather pressing tax bill.throwawayboltonian wrote:Which might be why there's persistent rumours of a few parties who are still interested, but only if we go into administration. Wasn't the phrase something like they refuse to deal with ED's current terms?Worthy4England wrote:Unless they're blind and daft, they will almost certainly have known that months ago...
In theory after administration there shouldn't be debt in the business and the initial costs should be reduced. The problem of course as Nixon points out, is that the biggest ongoing cost is the wage bill and administration at this stage won't alter that.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 30 guests