Your England XI
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 14092
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Your England XI
Particularly when his DM competition is also centre half cover.
Re: Your England XI
Aye. And f*ck knows what the point of taking Rashford is. What possible set of circumstances are there where he plays?!
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 14092
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Your England XI
Centre half when smalling gets sent off, cahill is injured and wilsheres broke again. Roys a tit!
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Your England XI
Jack W had an impeccable season. Every start he made Arsenal won. What's wrong with you man ??officer_dibble wrote:Henderson, Sturridge, but most gallingly Jack 'permacrock' Wilshere all in. For f*ckssake Roy!!
... & why wouldn't you take Sturridge AND Rashford for when Sturridge get's injured ?
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Your England XI
We'll be out of the competition by the time Smalling's ban comes into play. Get positive ffs.officer_dibble wrote:Centre half when smalling gets sent off, cahill is injured and wilsheres broke again. Roys a tit!
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Your England XI
Me too, but what remarkably good grace he's shown in accepting the decision when he must be gutted.Worthy4England wrote:Aye. Feel sorry for Drinkwater..officer_dibble wrote:Henderson, Sturridge, but most gallingly Jack 'permacrock' Wilshere all in. For f*ckssake Roy!!
Of the three you mention, to take one of them - yep, fair enough. To take two's pushing it, but to take all three at the expense of Drinkwater and Townsend, I think, is fecking ridiculous.
For me it was always a choice between Rashford and Sturridge, never the pair of them together.
May the bridges I burn light your way
Re: Your England XI
You're not alone in that thought. Hodgson needed to choose one of them, but it appears as though he's taken the easy option and selected both of them at the expense of one of the midfield positions. Drinkwater wouldn't be in my starting eleven but he should be there as the back-up in case either Henderson or Wilshere get injured, or Dier has to move to centre-back.Bruce Rioja wrote:Me too, but what remarkably good grace he's shown in accepting the decision when he must be gutted.Worthy4England wrote:Aye. Feel sorry for Drinkwater..officer_dibble wrote:Henderson, Sturridge, but most gallingly Jack 'permacrock' Wilshere all in. For f*ckssake Roy!!
Of the three you mention, to take one of them - yep, fair enough. To take two's pushing it, but to take all three at the expense of Drinkwater and Townsend, I think, is fecking ridiculous.
For me it was always a choice between Rashford and Sturridge, never the pair of them together.
'Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.'
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32699
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Your England XI
^^ I don't get how you pick someone who's had 16 starts in the last two seasons, most of 'em, best part of 2 years ago. Makes no sense to me, even if I think Wilshere is potentially a better player.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43326
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Your England XI
Having seen the squad I pretty much agree with the comments here. Rashford seems to have been fast-forwarded and could be a plus or a minus? I'd never have had him MOTM against Australia, scoring or no. I'm not even 100% sure Stirling is a great choice as (own opinion only based on England games) and doesn't seem fully committed. Neither are much in the muscle department and that might count for a lot in a tournament of this class. In that respect I'm glad Barkley and Wilshire are in. Don't know too much about Drinkwater, I'll go off folk's opinions on that, but Townsend has done enough in England appearances to have warranted a place. I still think Rooney is one of our best options but not sure I'd have taken James Milner. Sturridge on form fitness wise is a must...but will he be fit for the long haul?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36384
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Your England XI
Drinkwater has been the best English central midfield player this season.
He should have started with Dier. Woy is clueless and just a suit for the FA to control like a puppet.
How many strikers do we need when only one or two max will start?
Wilshere is permanently injured and shouldn't be going.
Henderson isn't fit to lace Drinkwater's boots, neither is Milner.
Fecking ridiculous.
Woy out, the senile old fecker...
He should have started with Dier. Woy is clueless and just a suit for the FA to control like a puppet.
How many strikers do we need when only one or two max will start?
Wilshere is permanently injured and shouldn't be going.
Henderson isn't fit to lace Drinkwater's boots, neither is Milner.
Fecking ridiculous.
Woy out, the senile old fecker...
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43326
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Your England XI
Funny that really, his track record for England is pretty decent, plus something like ten wins out of ten in the Erro qualifier.BWFC_Insane wrote:Drinkwater has been the best English central midfield player this season.
He should have started with Dier. Woy is clueless and just a suit for the FA to control like a puppet.
How many strikers do we need when only one or two max will start?
Wilshere is permanently injured and shouldn't be going.
Henderson isn't fit to lace Drinkwater's boots, neither is Milner.
Fecking ridiculous.
Woy out, the senile old fecker...
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2438
- Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 5:56 am
- Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Re: Your England XI
Drinkwater is still ranked below career also-rans like Milner and Henderson. Even the Premier League Title can't elevate him above the 8th placed team.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36384
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Your England XI
England managers are judged on their tournaments. Remind me how the last World Cup went?TANGODANCER wrote:Funny that really, his track record for England is pretty decent, plus something like ten wins out of ten in the Erro qualifier.BWFC_Insane wrote:Drinkwater has been the best English central midfield player this season.
He should have started with Dier. Woy is clueless and just a suit for the FA to control like a puppet.
How many strikers do we need when only one or two max will start?
Wilshere is permanently injured and shouldn't be going.
Henderson isn't fit to lace Drinkwater's boots, neither is Milner.
Fecking ridiculous.
Woy out, the senile old fecker...
He should have been sacked immediately after that.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43326
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Your England XI
Ah, so if a team doesn't win the World Cup, sack the manager then? Does that only apply to England or should all the managers bar the winners be sacked?BWFC_Insane wrote:
England managers are judged on their tournaments. Remind me how the last World Cup went? He should have been sacked immediately after that.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Abdoulaye's Twin
- Legend
- Posts: 9282
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
- Location: Skye high
Re: Your England XI
England managers always pick the players at so called big clubs. Every England manager I can remember has picked name/prestige over form and fitness. This us why I don't watch or bother with it.
Re: Your England XI
Yeah TD, that was the problem last tube, we didn't win the world cup.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: Your England XI
Well maybe if we're dead lucky and play really well we'll win the world cup next tube instead.
Businesswoman of the year.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36384
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Your England XI
You're right. Because there isn't anything in between looking woefully underprepared and failing to progress past the group in a pretty pathetic manner and winning the world cup. Nothing at all.....TANGODANCER wrote:Ah, so if a team doesn't win the World Cup, sack the manager then? Does that only apply to England or should all the managers bar the winners be sacked?BWFC_Insane wrote:
England managers are judged on their tournaments. Remind me how the last World Cup went? He should have been sacked immediately after that.
Woy has done an ok job. But he's not brave enough or strong enough to really make a difference. He's in the same trap as previous managers have been in, picking half fit players who've done feck all for the past season, purely because they're at Liverpool or Arsenal. There isn't a single piece of justification for not taking Drinkwater. He'd have had to leave out Wilshere or Sturridge but who cares? Neither are properly fit and frankly Wilshere isn't that amazing of a player anyway. He's good but certainly not good enough to be taking half fit.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Your England XI
I expect much better from you than this, Sir.BWFC_Insane wrote: Woy
May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 3935
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:35 pm
- Location: Swashbucklin in Brooklyn
Re: Your England XI
Sterling. Really? Awful season for City, doesn't work hard enough in an England shirt, little if any final product and doesn't use his only asset, pace. How anyone can leave Townsend out to give us some width is beyond me. We've given other teams an easy tactical advantage jn some ways. Load the centre of midfield and we're going nowhere.
Uma mesa para um, faz favor. Obrigado.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests