creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34735
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Isn't that usually when the bowler heads round the wicket to cut out the escape route?Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 3:45 pmThe cynic in me thinks that SA are already trying to pad this one out.
Something that just made me grin was Stokes being described as 'medium pace'. He'd deffo have me running away![]()

- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Bowlers / Goalkeepers. 4ucking mental, mateWorthy4England wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 5:00 pmIsn't that usually when the bowler heads round the wicket to cut out the escape route?Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 3:45 pmThe cynic in me thinks that SA are already trying to pad this one out.
Something that just made me grin was Stokes being described as 'medium pace'. He'd deffo have me running away![]()
![]()

May the bridges I burn light your way
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34735
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
I'd refute mental - they're generally quite calculating (bowlers)Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 5:29 pmBowlers / Goalkeepers. 4ucking mental, mateWorthy4England wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 5:00 pmIsn't that usually when the bowler heads round the wicket to cut out the escape route?Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 3:45 pmThe cynic in me thinks that SA are already trying to pad this one out.
Something that just made me grin was Stokes being described as 'medium pace'. He'd deffo have me running away![]()
![]()
![]()
Outside of out and out short pitched stuff, the ideal for bunnies, is hitting that gap between the top of the pad and the bottom of the thigh pad. Umpire can't call you for scaring the bunny. That limits mobility so the Yorker to the boot is coming next to try and cause further lack of mobility. Once the rabbit's been immobilized, then you can come round the wicket at 'em. Their natural inclination (to step away to leg) is then no longer a viable plan.

- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Moeen Ali is such a wonderful cricketer, yet never seems to get mentioned with the greats. It puzzles me.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34735
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
His bowling lets him down a bit - especially if you have only one spinner slot. He averages 35 with the bat and 42 with the ball. If you compare to a Botham (33 with bat and 28 with ball) or Flintoff (31 with the bat and 32 with the ball), he's there with the batting, but a way off bowling.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2017 12:07 pmMoeen Ali is such a wonderful cricketer, yet never seems to get mentioned with the greats. It puzzles me.
He's certainly better than he's often given credit for, though.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Stunning catch by Stokes, and the vital wicket of de Kock. Our fielding positions have been top notch.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
See, this statistic of 'took however many wickets', against who and where in the batting line up? All well and good seeing off the tail against someone crap. It's like Rooney claiming to be England's leading goalscorer. Bobby Charlton (a midfielder lest we forget) didn't get to score penalties against San Marino.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2017 12:36 pmHis bowling lets him down a bit - especially if you have only one spinner slot. He averages 35 with the bat and 42 with the ball. If you compare to a Botham (33 with bat and 28 with ball) or Flintoff (31 with the bat and 32 with the ball), he's there with the batting, but a way off bowling.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2017 12:07 pmMoeen Ali is such a wonderful cricketer, yet never seems to get mentioned with the greats. It puzzles me.
He's certainly better than he's often given credit for, though.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
And here's a thing - If Alastair Cook turns round to Root and says "I think we should do this", what happens?
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34735
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Yeah but, no but. An average, over time is an average against all batting whether you've come on early to pin the openers down or late to try and polish off the tail. The reality is they get an average of 420 against Moeen and 280 against Beefy. They also score a run an over faster against Ali than both Beefy and Freddie. So not only do they get more, they get them quicker leaving them more time to bowl you out.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2017 2:33 pmSee, this statistic of 'took however many wickets', against who and where in the batting line up? All well and good seeing off the tail against someone crap. It's like Rooney claiming to be England's leading goalscorer. Bobby Charlton (a midfielder lest we forget) didn't get to score penalties against San Marino.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2017 12:36 pmHis bowling lets him down a bit - especially if you have only one spinner slot. He averages 35 with the bat and 42 with the ball. If you compare to a Botham (33 with bat and 28 with ball) or Flintoff (31 with the bat and 32 with the ball), he's there with the batting, but a way off bowling.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2017 12:07 pmMoeen Ali is such a wonderful cricketer, yet never seems to get mentioned with the greats. It puzzles me.
He's certainly better than he's often given credit for, though.
I'm not being critical of him particularly - I think he's a very good cricketer - but you asked why he wasn't mentioned with the greats, and I reckon it's because his bowling ain't good enough.

- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
119-1 at close and that means 216 ahead. Steady as she goes looking the maxim. Keep it up lads.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
If he was playing in a better team would he have to bowl? Got in for his spinning but worth it without?Worthy4England wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2017 2:57 pmYeah but, no but. An average, over time is an average against all batting whether you've come on early to pin the openers down or late to try and polish off the tail. The reality is they get an average of 420 against Moeen and 280 against Beefy. They also score a run an over faster against Ali than both Beefy and Freddie. So not only do they get more, they get them quicker leaving them more time to bowl you out.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2017 2:33 pmSee, this statistic of 'took however many wickets', against who and where in the batting line up? All well and good seeing off the tail against someone crap. It's like Rooney claiming to be England's leading goalscorer. Bobby Charlton (a midfielder lest we forget) didn't get to score penalties against San Marino.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2017 12:36 pmHis bowling lets him down a bit - especially if you have only one spinner slot. He averages 35 with the bat and 42 with the ball. If you compare to a Botham (33 with bat and 28 with ball) or Flintoff (31 with the bat and 32 with the ball), he's there with the batting, but a way off bowling.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2017 12:07 pmMoeen Ali is such a wonderful cricketer, yet never seems to get mentioned with the greats. It puzzles me.
He's certainly better than he's often given credit for, though.
I'm not being critical of him particularly - I think he's a very good cricketer - but you asked why he wasn't mentioned with the greats, and I reckon it's because his bowling ain't good enough.![]()
Anyway, got to be winning from here. Solid first session to keep the scoreboard going, then let the middle order have their fun then chuck em inn just before tea.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38827
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Broadly I agree worthy. Ali is a spinner who can take wickets on a turning pitch in the right conditions. But he's not exactly setting the world alight otherwise. He's a limited bowler. However, what I would say is comparing stats of a spinner in the modern game to Botham is probably a bit unfair. All but the very best one or two in the world get knocked around the park every now and again.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2017 2:57 pmYeah but, no but. An average, over time is an average against all batting whether you've come on early to pin the openers down or late to try and polish off the tail. The reality is they get an average of 420 against Moeen and 280 against Beefy. They also score a run an over faster against Ali than both Beefy and Freddie. So not only do they get more, they get them quicker leaving them more time to bowl you out.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2017 2:33 pmSee, this statistic of 'took however many wickets', against who and where in the batting line up? All well and good seeing off the tail against someone crap. It's like Rooney claiming to be England's leading goalscorer. Bobby Charlton (a midfielder lest we forget) didn't get to score penalties against San Marino.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2017 12:36 pmHis bowling lets him down a bit - especially if you have only one spinner slot. He averages 35 with the bat and 42 with the ball. If you compare to a Botham (33 with bat and 28 with ball) or Flintoff (31 with the bat and 32 with the ball), he's there with the batting, but a way off bowling.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2017 12:07 pmMoeen Ali is such a wonderful cricketer, yet never seems to get mentioned with the greats. It puzzles me.
He's certainly better than he's often given credit for, though.
I'm not being critical of him particularly - I think he's a very good cricketer - but you asked why he wasn't mentioned with the greats, and I reckon it's because his bowling ain't good enough.![]()
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Hmmm - not quite as confident now. 145 / 5. The lead's still around 250, but the wicket's dying.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34735
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Atishoo, atishoo we all fall down.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Incredible isn't it?! There was talk of the declaration this morning

May the bridges I burn light your way
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
The plan didn't go according to....then. Interesting is the buzz word now....
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Indeed. I honestly can't decide who's in the better position.TANGODANCER wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2017 1:14 pmThe plan didn't go according to....then. Interesting is the buzz word now....
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34735
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Well runs on the board means they have to get 'em... Over 300 won't be a stroll... (or shouldn't be)
Time for Moeen to spin them out in the fourth innings.
Time for Moeen to spin them out in the fourth innings.

- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34735
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
There's only around 30 occasions in circa 2000 tests that >300 has been successfully chased...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 4 guests