creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Jennings out, LBW playing no shot.
The fact he is even picked for this test is utterly ridiculous. He's already had at least 3 chances too many. Blokes utterly incompetent at test level. His technique is absolutely flawed.
He can never, ever, ever play for England again now. Total and utter failure.
The fact he is even picked for this test is utterly ridiculous. He's already had at least 3 chances too many. Blokes utterly incompetent at test level. His technique is absolutely flawed.
He can never, ever, ever play for England again now. Total and utter failure.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Interested to know who you would replace him with.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
36-4. Again.
None of our top 4 score 20.
Again.
Abject failure. Again
No doubt Tango will be along to enlighten me as to why a batting lineup that fails consistently isn't actually a bad batting line up....
Boycott in full rant mode. He's absolutely right. Our test batting is the worst around right now.
None of our top 4 score 20.
Again.
Abject failure. Again
No doubt Tango will be along to enlighten me as to why a batting lineup that fails consistently isn't actually a bad batting line up....
Boycott in full rant mode. He's absolutely right. Our test batting is the worst around right now.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Burns I agree is worth a go, and surely the next cab off the rank. Hildreth is a curious one - scored heavily for 8 or 9 years but for some reason has never been picked. Edit to add he’ll be 34 next week, but could be a reasonable 12 month stop gap.
Ideally we need two openers and a number 3. I just don’t think they’re out there.
Ideally we need two openers and a number 3. I just don’t think they’re out there.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Wow. We have to find a top order from somewhere. Bairstow at 4 is ludicrous. Also, Moeen bats at 3 and makes a double ton, we over promote everyone and shove him in at 7. Bizarre. Especially with Rashid there.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
One thing when your number 8 is your highest scorer. Another when you aren't remotely surprised.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Far be it from me to stop a good wailing session. Carry on...BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Thu Aug 30, 2018 12:36 pm36-4. Again.
None of our top 4 score 20.
Again.
Abject failure. Again
No doubt Tango will be along to enlighten me as to why a batting lineup that fails consistently isn't actually a bad batting line up....
Boycott in full rant mode. He's absolutely right. Our test batting is the worst around right now.

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
And when you are that number 8 how must you feel? Young lad, man of the match at Edgbaston, hits 40 and takes a wicket at Lords, looks very much like he's our new bright young thing then gets dropped for Trent Bridge?BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Thu Aug 30, 2018 3:28 pmOne thing when your number 8 is your highest scorer. Another when you aren't remotely surprised.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
That was a scandal. Especially when you think serial failures are picked time and time again.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Thu Aug 30, 2018 4:09 pmAnd when you are that number 8 how must you feel? Young lad, man of the match at Edgbaston, hits 40 and takes a wicket at Lords, looks very much like he's our new bright young thing then gets dropped for Trent Bridge?BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Thu Aug 30, 2018 3:28 pmOne thing when your number 8 is your highest scorer. Another when you aren't remotely surprised.
Having said that Woakes did well, so its a tough one. We have 1000000000 number 6's who can bowl effectively in different ways.
We need a top order. Perhaps Curran should work on his batting as he has better technique than Jennings already.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Aggers saying pretty much the same.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Thu Aug 30, 2018 4:14 pmThat was a scandal. Especially when you think serial failures are picked time and time again.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Thu Aug 30, 2018 4:09 pmAnd when you are that number 8 how must you feel? Young lad, man of the match at Edgbaston, hits 40 and takes a wicket at Lords, looks very much like he's our new bright young thing then gets dropped for Trent Bridge?BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Thu Aug 30, 2018 3:28 pmOne thing when your number 8 is your highest scorer. Another when you aren't remotely surprised.
Having said that Woakes did well, so its a tough one. We have 1000000000 number 6's who can bowl effectively in different ways.
We need a top order. Perhaps Curran should work on his batting as he has better technique than Jennings already.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/45363176
May the bridges I burn light your way
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Gets even more bonkers now that it appears Stokes isn't fit to bowl AT ALL. And we're bowling Jennings. FFS.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Fri Aug 31, 2018 12:41 pmAggers saying pretty much the same.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Thu Aug 30, 2018 4:14 pmThat was a scandal. Especially when you think serial failures are picked time and time again.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Thu Aug 30, 2018 4:09 pmAnd when you are that number 8 how must you feel? Young lad, man of the match at Edgbaston, hits 40 and takes a wicket at Lords, looks very much like he's our new bright young thing then gets dropped for Trent Bridge?BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Thu Aug 30, 2018 3:28 pmOne thing when your number 8 is your highest scorer. Another when you aren't remotely surprised.
Having said that Woakes did well, so its a tough one. We have 1000000000 number 6's who can bowl effectively in different ways.
We need a top order. Perhaps Curran should work on his batting as he has better technique than Jennings already.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/45363176
Stokes if not fit at all to bowl could have made way for an out and out batsman as I personally do not think he's good enough as a pick for his batting alone. He probably is in the right team but not ours with a non-existent top order.
Agree with Boycott for once that our coaching setup only care and know about 1 day stuff and don't understand test cricket.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Anything we can do...
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Back to more or less evens and India were all about Pujara (132 not out.). Up to us now to grab the win and the series.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Looks like Insaney will get his wish. Cook gone already, and a commentary opinion it may be for good. Not sure what happened with him, a once great batsman gone to pot.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
He’s 33 and played 160 tests without a break. He’s just getting on a bit and isn’t as good any more. There’s no mystery to it.
If he does go, we’re in the position of having to find a 1, 2 and 3. No one we’ve tried there in the last 4 years has managed to avaerage over 30 (Hameed aside. Lol!) so the chances of us happening on some fresh untried talent is pretty slim.
If he does go, we’re in the position of having to find a 1, 2 and 3. No one we’ve tried there in the last 4 years has managed to avaerage over 30 (Hameed aside. Lol!) so the chances of us happening on some fresh untried talent is pretty slim.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
No, sorry Jimbo, I'm not having that. 33 is no age fro a cricketer to talk tirendness. What about experience? Cricket is what he does and (unlike Insaney) I give bowlers great credit for being the batsman's downfall. Yesterday it was Moheen's day and I'm not quite sure whar Root was thinking puting him in at three. What happens mid innings? Who will the low order cavalry? I wouldn't write Cook off just yet until we have somebody chasing his spot.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
He’s been on a gradual decline for a couple of years, so I’m not sure how else you could explain it? He’s not all of a sudden become shit and his technique hasn’t changed. Sportsmen feel the effects of age at different times. For Cook who hasn’t had a break for 160 test matches it may be coming sooner. Others might still be scoring runs at 38.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
How many times has Cook been caught at slip by needlessly holding his bat out to a ball travelling down Off at rib cage height, as he once again just has? I'm absolutely sick to death of seeing him do it. It requires no skill from the bowler beyond knowing that Cook, as experienced as he may be, is continually 4ucking stupid enough to stick an outside edge on it if he sticks an outswinger in that area.
Cook's long since had it. One poor innings after another and enough's enough.
As discussed earlier though, we have no shortage of No. 6's but an absolute paucity of potential openers. What fert do?
Cook's long since had it. One poor innings after another and enough's enough.
As discussed earlier though, we have no shortage of No. 6's but an absolute paucity of potential openers. What fert do?
May the bridges I burn light your way
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
It'll be his eyes I reckon. Fine fine margins at that level. I'd wager in his pomp he had ludicrous eyesight. Once they faces even a touch it's hard, especially against a moving ball.jimbo wrote: ↑Sat Sep 01, 2018 12:41 pmHe’s been on a gradual decline for a couple of years, so I’m not sure how else you could explain it? He’s not all of a sudden become shit and his technique hasn’t changed. Sportsmen feel the effects of age at different times. For Cook who hasn’t had a break for 160 test matches it may be coming sooner. Others might still be scoring runs at 38.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests