West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

[Zulus Thousand of em]

Where does it state on there that we are a very big club? Anyway, I never been to Bolton - so I can't comment on that - but wouldn't you rather visit the clubs listed, instead of Wigan et al?

Also, one poster doesn't speak for all of us.

Now then, where do we start, my Pearly Queen? The article implies that you are a big club, otherwise you'd be lumped in with Bolton , Wigan et al. I would rather visit sides that are at the top level of English football, due to results achieved on the field, not due to the fact that they get bigger attendances.

Oh, and it wasn't one poster - it was two. They received general approval from the rest of the knuckle dragging denizens of KUMB.

Anyway, don't disturb me this week. I'm too busy watching the Wetspam / Kia / Stretford Redsox saga unfold. Lots of mileage in this one yet. Catch-22 come to life. Surely your backsides must be ready to drop off with the potential fallout from the dodgy deal? What fun!

[blurred]

There is nothing 'pantomime' about your villain status. Everyone just seriously hates you.

Erm... nope.

Scousers don't count.

I ain't no scouser...

[Zulus Thousand of em]

Oh, by the way fozzy, another contributor to KUMB sums up your current muddle quite succinctly, in my view.

In the eyes of the PL, why would WHU simply hand over Tevez's registration? Whilst we gave Masch's registration to the scouse (because Pardew and Curbs don't know their feck* arse from a world class midfielder when they see one, but that's a different arguement) the clubs management never saw a future for Mascherano at the club and he wanted to move on, it suited all concearned to pass it over.
Now the PL are asking why WHU would hand over a striker that hit very good form at the back of the season, has world class potential and (although it's not the players fault) dragged the PL, WHU and all concerned through the mud with the transfer saga.
We told the PL that Kia's 3rd party involvement on the 27th April ceased to exist and was cleared to play the lil fella against Wigan away and for the rest of the season. Now all of a sudden, the player has been touted around behind our backs and agreed a deal with old red nose. Exactly the opposite of the offending clause in Tevez's original contract. As others have said on here, the club really are in a no win situation. We can either hand over Tevez's registration for nowt to ManUSA and have the PL breathing down our necks, or we play ball with Scudamore and withold Tevez's registration being released and face a court battle with the Iranian c*nt.
It seems the Egg man is taking the latter option and would rather face Kia in court than have a possible future points deduction or even worse, relegation for blatently telling porkies on the 27th April.
Given the Egg man has many contacts in UEFA and probably FIFA, I think the Iranian has bitten off more than he can chew

Which all does point to you being a bunch of cheating pikey no-marks, doesn't it?

[bobby5]

In all honesty, West Ham, the players, the ground etc should all be packed off to Division 3. The Tevez affair is a major ces pit. If West Ham gain any sort of success next season, be it a top 6 finish or win a cup comp. then for me then....... can't really find the words. The FA have f*cked up big time. Complete wasters!

[communistworkethic]

as was pointed out by a lawyer on R5 live yesterday - Westham say they tore up the agreement with Kia Pride or whatever his name is but that's utter bollocks because both parties have to agree.

What all this proves is that WHAM are c*nts and the FA don't know their arses from their elbows.

FIFA should ban Tevez from playing until his ownership is defined in a court of law.

[superjohnmcginlay]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 290492.stm

What a fooking mess. Cheating pikey c*nts.

[fozzy]

First up, it was the Premier League - not the FA, not Trevor Brooking - who initiated proceedings. The FA may now get involved as they oversee transfers.

Secondly, it was Eggy who suspected something was wrong, and submitted the relevant documentation.

Thirdly, the people who did the deal - Brown and Aldridge - no longer work at the club.

[Bench]

First up, it was the Premier League - not the FA, not Trevor Brooking - who initiated proceedings. The FA may now get involved as they oversee transfers.

Secondly, it was Eggy who suspected something was wrong, and submitted the relevant documentation.

Thirdly, the people who did the deal - Brown and Aldridge - no longer work at the club.

I get the feeling that you just want to be loved. Right?

[Soldier_Of_The_White_Army]

First up, it was the Premier League - not the FA, not Trevor Brooking - who initiated proceedings. The FA may now get involved as they oversee transfers.

Secondly, it was Eggy who suspected something was wrong, and submitted the relevant documentation.

Thirdly, the people who did the deal - Brown and Aldridge - no longer work at the club.

Seriously pxss poor!

Still, you're Captain has pleaded to be transferred, you could lose Tevez to Manure for nothing, lost Mascherano to Liverpool because you had no idea how to play him. Signed Craig 'Barndoor' Bellamy for a stupid amount of money as a replacement for a world class striker, and fined 5.5m for something you are OBVIOUSLY innocent of, due to you’re factual defence of you’re magnificent club.

West Ham are NOT complete failures, and we should NOT laugh at them!!!!!!!!!

[warthog]

Still not convinced? Look at the list of 'celebrity' fans...internet star Leslie Grantham, TV racist Jo O'Meara, wifebeater Frank Bruno and Billy sodding Mitchell (the most rubbish of all the Mitchells) and tell me you want Sunderland or Derby relegated instead.

They missed off one of West Ham's most famous sons - Alf Garnett. I know he wasn't real, but probably a fair reflection in its day...

Warren Mitchell, the actor who played Alf Garnett, is a Spurs fan. I suspect it was his idea to have a racist bigot support West Ham.

[fozzy]

First up, it was the Premier League - not the FA, not Trevor Brooking - who initiated proceedings. The FA may now get involved as they oversee transfers.

Secondly, it was Eggy who suspected something was wrong, and submitted the relevant documentation.

Thirdly, the people who did the deal - Brown and Aldridge - no longer work at the club.

Seriously pxss poor!

Still, you're Captain has pleaded to be transferred, you could lose Tevez to Manure for nothing, lost Mascherano to Liverpool because you had no idea how to play him. Signed Craig 'Barndoor' Bellamy for a stupid amount of money as a replacement for a world class striker, and fined 5.5m for something you are OBVIOUSLY innocent of, due to you’re factual defence of you’re magnificent club.

West Ham are NOT complete failures, and we should NOT laugh at them!!!!!!!!!

Seriously piss poor for stating facts? Chr*t, you've completely ignored all the facts.

Reo Coker. Bought for £275k. Sold for £8.5m. He wanted to go, and we all felt the same. A disruptive influence for the team.

Tevez. The lack of transfer fee doesn't bother me.

Bellamy. A punt, I'll give you that, but I think he'll do well.

The charge. We pleaded guilty, remember? Now, about Sam's son...

Wow. Racism in football in the 70s and 80s. Next you'll be telling me people threw bananas onto the pitch.

[Soldier_Of_The_White_Army]

First up, it was the Premier League - not the FA, not Trevor Brooking - who initiated proceedings. The FA may now get involved as they oversee transfers.

Secondly, it was Eggy who suspected something was wrong, and submitted the relevant documentation.

Thirdly, the people who did the deal - Brown and Aldridge - no longer work at the club.

Seriously pxss poor!

Still, you're Captain has pleaded to be transferred, you could lose Tevez to Manure for nothing, lost Mascherano to Liverpool because you had no idea how to play him. Signed Craig 'Barndoor' Bellamy for a stupid amount of money as a replacement for a world class striker, and fined 5.5m for something you are OBVIOUSLY innocent of, due to you’re factual defence of you’re magnificent club.

West Ham are NOT complete failures, and we should NOT laugh at them!!!!!!!!!

Seriously piss poor for stating facts? Chr*t, you've completely ignored all the facts.

No, the fact that you're 'facts' hardly resolve anything. Eggy suspected something was wrong, and submitted the relevant documentation? Or Eggy knew what was coming and decided to prempt. I can't be convinced that someone who has made much overwelming amounts of money, bought a club that had two world class players suddenly appear out of thin air, and has had folk stratching their heads (including you're manager) since the start of the season. Then, suddenly at the END of the season, when rumour starts from the other clubs around you fighting for relegation, Egghead suddenly suspects 'something is wrong'. Come on!!

Reo Coker. Bought for £275k. Sold for £8.5m. He wanted to go, and we all felt the same. A disruptive influence for the team.

disruptive influence for the team!?!?! He was you're fxcking Captain!!!


Tevez. The lack of transfer fee doesn't bother me.

Aye, I'd sneeze at 20m as well!

Bellamy. A punt, I'll give you that, but I think he'll do well.

Why? You playing him at left back? It shows how irresponsible West Ham are with their money when they are spending 8.5m on a punt. So, you have sold a player for 8.5m because he was a disruptive influence for the team, and then spent the same amount of money on Craig '3 wood' Bellamy!


The charge. We pleaded guilty, remember? Now, about Sam's son...

Shoot!

Wow. Racism in football in the 70s and 80s. Next you'll be telling me people threw bananas onto the pitch.

Which was addressed by me were?????????

[Worthy4England]

First up, it was the Premier League - not the FA, not Trevor Brooking - who initiated proceedings. The FA may now get involved as they oversee transfers.

Secondly, it was Eggy who suspected something was wrong, and submitted the relevant documentation.

Thirdly, the people who did the deal - Brown and Aldridge - no longer work at the club.

Errr legally, the club did the deal not Brown and Aldridge - so the fact that they've left is completely irrelevant...

Eggy suspected something was wrong - two world class Argentinians sign for West Ham in "less than transparent" circumstances - for fook sake everyone suspected something was wrong from the off.."Eggy" just thought he'd play a get out of jail free card as he was new to the club.

I don't care who initiated proceedings - something ain't right and it needs sorting out...

Bottom line is West Ham (not Brown and Aldridge) signed these players and if they did it in breach of rules, they should receive an appropriate punishment.

[fozzy]

Bottom line is West Ham (not Brown and Aldridge) signed these players and if they did it in breach of rules, they should receive an appropriate punishment.

So, that means if Big Sam and/or his son are found guilty of taking bungs, we should punish Bolton?

[Puskas]

Bottom line is West Ham (not Brown and Aldridge) signed these players and if they did it in breach of rules, they should receive an appropriate punishment.

So, that means if Big Sam and/or his son are found guilty of taking bungs, we should punish Bolton?

No. Because if they were, they would have been doing it for themselves - the club would have had no benefit (indeed, would probably have lost money, as the alleged bung-takers would have been pocketing it for themselves, rather than spending it on more transfers, or whatever).
West Ham's case is that former employees broke the rules to benefit West Ham. There's quite a clear distinction there.

[communistworkethic]

fozzy argue all you want you (wham) lied in the first place, were found guilty, got away relatively scot free and now it is appearing that you basically lied again about tevez's contract/ownership after being found guilty!!

[Worthy4England]

Bottom line is West Ham (not Brown and Aldridge) signed these players and if they did it in breach of rules, they should receive an appropriate punishment.

So, that means if Big Sam and/or his son are found guilty of taking bungs, we should punish Bolton?

Yes "we" should in the case of Big Sam. As far as I know his son was never an employee of the Club....

[Soldier_Of_The_White_Army]

fozzy argue all you want you (wham) lied in the first place, were found guilty, got away relatively scot free and now it is appearing that you basically lied again about tevez's contract/ownership after being found guilty!!

Oh now come on Commie, that's a complete lie, and a total slap in the face for the SPAM supporter!

I'm afraid as an impartial and fair member of the Admin, I'm going to have to fine you 5p.

I thought all the T-W members were all acting suspiciously when the thread first started, but seeing as Fozzy is clearly onto something I've decided to take action now.

[H. Pedersen]

as was pointed out by a lawyer on R5 live yesterday - Westham say they tore up the agreement with Kia Pride or whatever his name is but that's utter bollocks because both parties have to agree.

That always seemed suspect to me as well, why would Tevez's people agree to forfeit their rights to a hell of a lot of money? The PL has gotten so much flak (deservedly) for letting West Ham off the hook, they may be looking for an excuse to send them down at this point.

[Montreal Wanderer]

It's beginning to look to me as if the Premier League should have declared the Terez contract null and void and suspended him until he had a legal contract by PL standards (at the same time giving WHam the points deduction). Tearing up a contract that remains in force because the other party still has an enforceable copy strikes me as bizarre - how the PL bought that line I cannot possibly imagine. It is easy to be wise after the event but the PL must have highly paid legal advisers who could have told them what to do. They have come across as incredibly naive - 'Oh, you tore up the contract - that's okay then!'. Anyway it takes their minds off bungs (not that we care any more).