George Galloway
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9130
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
And quite rightly. That doesnt make him anti Jewish. He's Anti Israeli undoubtedly.communistworkethic wrote:actually he's slagged off Israel plenty.Harry Genshaw wrote:I realise Galloway isnt everybodys cup of tea - although I quite like the bloke - but to suggest he is a 'Jew Hater' because he slags off a Politician who happens to be Jewish seems to be a bit disingenuous to me. Is he a 'white hater' or a 'Scots hater' because he's slagged off Tony Blair in the past?
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9130
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
It being the Jewish homeland, I'd say at best he's walking a very tight line.Harry Genshaw wrote:And quite rightly. That doesnt make him anti Jewish. He's Anti Israeli undoubtedly.communistworkethic wrote:actually he's slagged off Israel plenty.Harry Genshaw wrote:I realise Galloway isnt everybodys cup of tea - although I quite like the bloke - but to suggest he is a 'Jew Hater' because he slags off a Politician who happens to be Jewish seems to be a bit disingenuous to me. Is he a 'white hater' or a 'Scots hater' because he's slagged off Tony Blair in the past?
He claims to be anti-zionist rather than anti-jewish but supporting Hezbollah, an organisation who has vowed to wipe jews from the face of the earth, might be considered slighty anti-jewish.
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:10 pm
- Location: Guantanamo Bay Departure Lounge
I guess i wouldnt be the first person to refer to you as a racist? .......c*nt.a1 wrote:oh shit ! its the police ..Harry Genshaw wrote:
Evidence please. The Jew hating bit obviously.
alright , he's not actually the end of a cock ...
but i'm sure if that german facist from the 40's was gasing both "pakis" and "hooknoses" he'd only be arsed about one set dying...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norm_Coleman [might be a dick too] but he's a jew
http://blogfiles.wfmu.org/AK
/George_Galloway_-_Slamming_Norm_Coleman_(05-17-05)_(full).mp3
he's also a question dodging bastard , by the sounds of it too ..
the bent fücker
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43330
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
wha.... the pakis hooknoses bit was for effect , hence the quote marks round sed words - if idve gone 'making "northwesternly sub asians" and "wandering people with no homeland" lives expire by making them breathe non-oxygen gases' it wouldve bin mealy mouthed ambiguous-ness ..The Bullett wrote:
I guess i wouldnt be the first person to refer to you as a racist? .......c*nt.
i think george galloway is racist against jews , and i'd pour petrol on the hypocritical c*nt if he was on fire ..
why is he not mp for prestwich ?
racism is bad , but " i'm not racist - except i dont like them jews* " type people , might be worse ..
* or whoever
its like a paradox ..
them jews get it from both sides ... and theres only what 15 million of them .. makes no difference to me if israels there ...
Last edited by a1 on Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:05 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1163
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 6:44 pm
- Location: Up, around the bend...
i played it a bit far back further up.. once again ? it was almost straight away.. and after a few posts more , the thread had 'died' like all threads do ... it got dragged back up with a view that i might be racist.. and a c*nt ..InsaneApache wrote:Once again, the race card is played to stifle debate.
Pillock.
talking about george galloway and not mentioning race is like talking about george bush and not mentioning iraq ..
and anyway , george galloway is the wagging-est member of parliment there is ... banning him will only mean his wage to vote ratio goes even lower , lock the fuccker to the seats and make sure he never leaves ...
haddock
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1163
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 6:44 pm
- Location: Up, around the bend...
Crossed posts. I wasn't referring to you.a1 wrote:i played it a bit far back further up.. once again ? it was almost straight away.. and after a few posts more , the thread had 'died' like all threads do ... it got dragged back up with a view that i might be racist.. and a c*nt ..InsaneApache wrote:Once again, the race card is played to stifle debate.
Pillock.
talking about george galloway and not mentioning race is like talking about george bush and not mentioning iraq ..
and anyway , george galloway is the wagging-est member of parliment there is ... banning him will only mean his wage to vote ratio goes even lower , lock the fuccker to the seats and make sure he never leaves ...
haddock
Here I stand foot in hand...talkin to my wall....I'm not quite right at all...am I?
I'm somewhat sympathetic with some of Galloway's views on the media, the war and government in general, but the less said about the 'Respect' party the better. That said, regardless how dubious his politics is, he's one of the world's most powerful speakers. I find him very compelling to listen to, if only to appreciate his demagogic talents.
Watching him savage yet another obnoxious 'media liberal' dolly is always good for a laugh too:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=249JaIaubVw
Watch out for the outstanding last tirade.
Watching him steamroller the Senate was extraordinary:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=HrdFFCnYtbk
Watching him savage yet another obnoxious 'media liberal' dolly is always good for a laugh too:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=249JaIaubVw
Watch out for the outstanding last tirade.
Watching him steamroller the Senate was extraordinary:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=HrdFFCnYtbk
“Crime, once exposed, has no refuge but in audacity” - Tacitus
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32704
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Problem is - I give some superb speeches in my Local...just that the policy makers don't listen. So I might as well not have bothered. If he can't get any policy changes through, then it matters not one jot in realistic terms. (regardless of whether you view him as being "right" or "wrong"). I'm struggling to think of any major policy change that George Galloway has bought about or been instrumental in. Powerful speakers get their rhetoric through into policy by winning the battle for hearts and minds - which Galloway singularly fails to do.
As a sideshow sport, I'm all for watching jumped up asswipes getting savaged. So I guess that's where I rate GG - as a sideshow.
As a sideshow sport, I'm all for watching jumped up asswipes getting savaged. So I guess that's where I rate GG - as a sideshow.
Not really. He earned his seat in parliament. Doesn't he cast one of the 646 votes which shape our precious democracy? Well - no, unfortunately, but this is hardly the fault of George Galloway. A backbencher could never dream of influencing government policy in this whipped, partisan parliament. A cabinet minister barely has any influence, so I don't think Old George has got much of a chance of calling off the war. I think that's why he never bothers showing up.Worthy4England wrote:Powerful speakers get their rhetoric through into policy by winning the battle for hearts and minds - which Galloway singularly fails to do.
You're right though, he's pretty much just a side-show. A bloody entertaining one anyway, in contrast to the scary drones and technocrats.
“Crime, once exposed, has no refuge but in audacity” - Tacitus
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32704
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Maybe if he made the right connections - he wouldn't be a backbencher (I'm talking his old Lab days here). I could argue that he's front bench in his own party50sQuiff wrote:Not really. He earned his seat in parliament. Doesn't he cast one of the 646 votes which shape our precious democracy? Well - no, unfortunately, but this is hardly the fault of George Galloway. A backbencher could never dream of influencing government policy in this whipped, partisan parliament. A cabinet minister barely has any influence, so I don't think Old George has got much of a chance of calling off the war. I think that's why he never bothers showing up.Worthy4England wrote:Powerful speakers get their rhetoric through into policy by winning the battle for hearts and minds - which Galloway singularly fails to do.
You're right though, he's pretty much just a side-show. A bloody entertaining one anyway, in contrast to the scary drones and technocrats.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
Earned his seat? With one of the most cynical pieces of electioneering in modern history,perhaps.50sQuiff wrote:Not really. He earned his seat in parliament. Doesn't he cast one of the 646 votes which shape our precious democracy? Well - no, unfortunately, but this is hardly the fault of George Galloway. A backbencher could never dream of influencing government policy in this whipped, partisan parliament. A cabinet minister barely has any influence, so I don't think Old George has got much of a chance of calling off the war. I think that's why he never bothers showing up.Worthy4England wrote:Powerful speakers get their rhetoric through into policy by winning the battle for hearts and minds - which Galloway singularly fails to do.
You're right though, he's pretty much just a side-show. A bloody entertaining one anyway, in contrast to the scary drones and technocrats.
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:10 pm
- Location: Guantanamo Bay Departure Lounge
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:10 pm
- Location: Guantanamo Bay Departure Lounge
Look, you fecking moron, when you finally find the intelligence to distinguish between the state of Isreal and 'Jews', i may take you seriously.a1 wrote:wha.... the pakis hooknoses bit was for effect , hence the quote marks round sed words - if idve gone 'making "northwesternly sub asians" and "wandering people with no homeland" lives expire by making them breathe non-oxygen gases' it wouldve bin mealy mouthed ambiguous-ness ..The Bullett wrote:
I guess i wouldnt be the first person to refer to you as a racist? .......c*nt.
i think george galloway is racist against jews , and i'd pour petrol on the hypocritical c*nt if he was on fire ..
why is he not mp for prestwich ?
racism is bad , but " i'm not racist - except i dont like them jews* " type people , might be worse ..
* or whoever
its like a paradox ..
them jews get it from both sides ... and theres only what 15 million of them .. makes no difference to me if israels there ...
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:10 pm
- Location: Guantanamo Bay Departure Lounge
Nice piece of rhetoric. Its sadly reaching the stage where you cant pick some one up for being racist without the'race card' being played.InsaneApache wrote:Once again, the race card is played to stifle debate.
Pillock.
Rather ironic that he refers to me as a pillock, there are not many lower than a racist in society.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5043
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
- Location: 200 miles darn sarf
Bullett,
You've now referred to another member of the forum as a c*nt and a fecking moron within this thread.
A1
I really don't know where your "argument" is going.
All I do know is, if you do not refrain from the personal abuse, you will both receive a temporary ban from the site. Further transgressions could result in a permanent ban.
If you really need to carry this argument further then do it by PM. You see, the rest of us don't care!
You've now referred to another member of the forum as a c*nt and a fecking moron within this thread.
A1
I really don't know where your "argument" is going.
All I do know is, if you do not refrain from the personal abuse, you will both receive a temporary ban from the site. Further transgressions could result in a permanent ban.
If you really need to carry this argument further then do it by PM. You see, the rest of us don't care!
God's country! God's county!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?
COME ON YOU WHITES!!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?
COME ON YOU WHITES!!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests