Britains Got Talent...
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
In respect of the above, a question, and please let's keep this civil: Before this debate (and of course the auditions for the 2008 version of Oliver) if anyone had asked you to describe the character of of Nancy (indeed any of the characters in any Dickens novel) would you have contemplated her being anything other than English caucasian tavern wench and prostitute?communistworkethic wrote: Who is to say what Dickens had in mind, and to TD, why are you convinced Dickens would have said she was black? I'm pretty sure you have no specific insight in to his thoughts or perceptions of society. It is as reasonbale to suggest that she was indeed black and that he just didn't give it another thought as many such women inhabited the area of London he was writing about, or that in fact his description was somewhat euphemistic.
Then, there are of course again, the illustrations from Dickens's works which don't indicate any black characters and Dicken's penchant for good descriptions of his characters. Nowhere did he mention anything like this.
Given, to the best of my knowlege, no one ever suggesting anything other, why such a strong argument to the contrary all of a sudden? You see, if the show's producers wanted a black Nancy, then we'd be having one, unlikely or no, becuse that's the way of the world, where equality seems to be altering even standardised English classics in order to appear pc. I have not the slightest problem in imagining a black girl with great acting talents and a good singing voice making a good and believable job of the part. My only contention is ...why?
Bottom line of my argument is that the question of a black Nancy in the story of Oliver Twist has never before arisen. It did so because a black actress wanted a chance at the part in a modern produced version, not because anyone suddenly said,
"Oh, hey, how do we know Nancy wasn't black"? That, for me, isn't sufficient reason to change several generations of thinking for no apparent reason. A black actress can, and will no doubt, play the part one day. Fine by me, but to suggest the original character was black just to substantiate this has no foundation whatsoever.
Would we really want a white actor/actress playing in Porgy and Bess, Uncle Remus, Roots, Mandingo or someone from Uncle Tom's Cabin ? My contention is that we accepted and were happy with the originals. Why not with Dickens?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
again TD, who did those illustrations, not Dickens. And for about the third time did he describe her as black or white or neither?TANGODANCER wrote:In respect of the above, a question, and please let's keep this civil: Before this debate (and of course the auditions for the 2008 version of Oliver) if anyone had asked you to describe the character of of Nancy (indeed any of the characters in any Dickens novel) would you have contemplated her being anything other than English caucasian tavern wench and prostitute?communistworkethic wrote: Who is to say what Dickens had in mind, and to TD, why are you convinced Dickens would have said she was black? I'm pretty sure you have no specific insight in to his thoughts or perceptions of society. It is as reasonbale to suggest that she was indeed black and that he just didn't give it another thought as many such women inhabited the area of London he was writing about, or that in fact his description was somewhat euphemistic.
Then, there are of course again, the illustrations from Dickens's works which don't indicate any black characters and Dicken's penchant for good descriptions of his characters. Nowhere did he mention anything like this.
Given, to the best of my knowlege, no one ever suggesting anything other, why such a strong argument to the contrary all of a sudden? You see, if the show's producers wanted a black Nancy, then we'd be having one, unlikely or no, becuse that's the way of the world, where equality seems to be altering even standardised English classics in order to appear pc. I have not the slightest problem in imagining a black girl with great acting t
alents and a good singing voice making a good and believable job of the part. My only contention is ...why?
Bottom line of my argument is that the question of a black Nancy in the story of Oliver Twist has never before arisen. It did so because a black actress wanted a chance at the part in a modern produced version, not because anyone suddenly said,
"Oh, hey, how do we know Nancy wasn't black"? That, for me, isn't sufficient reason to change several generations of thinking for no apparent reason. A black actress can, and will no doubt, play the part one day. Fine by me, but to suggest the original character was black just to substantiate this has no foundation whatsoever.
Would we really want a white actor/actress playing in Porgy and Bess, Uncle Remus, Roots, Mandingo or someone from Uncle Tom's Cabin ? My contention is that we accepted and were happy with the originals. Why not with Dickens?
And congratulations at not only passing 175 years of age but also being present at evry single casting discussion about Nancy, those are some fetes.
You ask "why?" and I ask "why not?", so far you've presented no reasonable argument to support that position.
As for the final comment, are you being ridiculous for the sake of it or racist or ignorant or just bloody-minded avoiding about the fact I've already covered the reasoning for black actors in black roles?
There is absolutely no good reason that a black girl couldn't play Nancy, it has no bearing on the story.
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
this is one for you......CAPSLOCK wrote:Never mind all this
Has anybody got any pics of Sams norks?

reckon she may have been back to the pie shop since the second one
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
You really cannot, despite my request, present a civil post without some caustic, personal comments can you? Another- up to now- reasonable and interesting topic heading for the lock?communistworkethic wrote: again TD, who did those illustrations, not Dickens. And for about the third time did he describe her as black or white or neither?
And congratulations at not only passing 175 years of age but also being present at evry single casting discussion about Nancy, those are some fetes.
You ask "why?" and I ask "why not?", so far you've presented no reasonable argument to support that position.
As for the final comment, are you being ridiculous for the sake of it or racist or ignorant or just bloody-minded avoiding about the fact I've already covered the reasoning for black actors in black roles?
There is absolutely no good reason that a black girl couldn't play Nancy, it has no bearing on the story.
What you cover does not make some sort of law. You present your views and your views only. The whole thing has taken a ridiculous turn because you seem to be determined to prove, for some obscure reason, that a character that there was never any reason to suppose was black, is suddenly so in a Dickens novel. I ask why?
I never said anywhere that was a reason, good or otherwise, why a black girl couldn't play the part, just the opposite in fact if you bothered to read my post. I never said it had a bearing on the story what nationality she was, I don't do that now. What I did ask was why are we suddenly to assume that Nancy, the commonly accepted London prostitute of Dicken's novel, was black? Is there a reason to assume that anyone else in the story is black, Chinese, Oriental or anything other than the way Dickens portrayed them? The onus of proving such a supposition lies with the doubter, not me. I'm happy to believe that she was the Nancy I (and probably everyone else) has always seen her as.
Don't try to make a simple debate into something it never was with obnoxious comments about racism, ignorance or avoiding facts that you have already covered; facts that are nothing more than your personal opinion. These, like everything else are just your opinions. It might help if you actually did read the whole posts instead of adopting your usual method of seizing on snippets of it. I asked you a couple of questions, you ignored them by changing track to indicate silly accusations of my age, the fact that Dickens didn't illustrate his own novels and how ignorant and racist I am. What sort of debating is that? Put your personal opinions of me aside and stick with the debate by proving your own facts. Up to now you haven't given one good reason for your argument.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Ah ha, I see the honourable gentleman has dusted off his leather-bound copy of the Encyclopedia Wiki! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrival_of ... _in_Londoncommunistworkethic wrote:there has been a black community in London since it was Londinium. More widespread during the 15th&16th centuries until most were arrested under orders from the Queen IIRC.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Perhaps my own library is not as extensive as the honourable gentleman's and he might be kind enough to direct me to a helpful volume?communistworkethic wrote: are you suggesting that a down to earth scrubber in a ropey area of london in dickensian England could under no realist circumstances have been black? I respectfully suggest the gentleman refers back to his history books forthwith.
From the 17th century black people were most common around the large ports, of which London was one, where they were crew, former crew and families of crew of the ships.
Given the time period over which there has been a black representationin london, it is not impossible that some, if not many, were chirpy cockerney sparras, much to the chagrin of future west ham supporters.
As has been pointed out Dickens is less that specific when it comes to the appearance of Nancy, you as with many others, have been indoctrinated by years of romantic interpretations in celluloid of the time and the characters, the majority of which were made during a period when black actors/actresses had little chance of gaining such a role - mickey rooney as chinaman, the aforementioned Larry Lovey as Othello.
Who is to say what Dickens had in mind, and to TD, why are you convinced Dickens would have said she was black? I'm pretty sure you have no specific insight in to his thoughts or perceptions of society. It is as reasonbale to suggest that she was indeed black and that he just didn't give it another thought as many such women inhabited the area of London he was writing about, or that in fact his description was somewhat euphemistic.
I share TD's conviction (as surely any sane person would) that Dickens' description of Nancy is overwhelmingly suggestive of a caucasian woman, and further that, given the time he was writing, he would have made a big deal of a black character's colour, were he to include one.
Last edited by mummywhycantieatcrayons on Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
I guess there probably isn't a right or wrong here. I probably on Tango's side of the fence, in that I suspect (can't prove) that Dickens probably conceived Nancy as white hooker.
For me, her being played by an Irish person (I think was the lead in) or a coloured person, or Oliver being a different colour to white would not change the story so, for me, it would still work fine, I wouldn't be distracted by the colour of the person playing the role, as it's not relevent to the story and in all honesty I probably wouldn't notice.
For others I guess it's different. All part of life's rich tapestry.
I'm still intrigued to find out if Dickens actually refers to her colour....
For me, her being played by an Irish person (I think was the lead in) or a coloured person, or Oliver being a different colour to white would not change the story so, for me, it would still work fine, I wouldn't be distracted by the colour of the person playing the role, as it's not relevent to the story and in all honesty I probably wouldn't notice.
For others I guess it's different. All part of life's rich tapestry.
I'm still intrigued to find out if Dickens actually refers to her colour....

-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
nobody has made that assumption, but you have made the assumption she's white.TANGODANCER wrote:You really cannot, despite my request, present a civil post without some caustic, personal comments can you? Another- up to now- reasonable and interesting topic heading for the lock?communistworkethic wrote: again TD, who did those illustrations, not Dickens. And for about the third time did he describe her as black or white or neither?
And congratulations at not only passing 175 years of age but also being present at evry single casting discussion about Nancy, those are some fetes.
You ask "why?" and I ask "why not?", so far you've presented no reasonable argument to support that position.
As for the final comment, are you being ridiculous for the sake of it or racist or ignorant or just bloody-minded avoiding about the fact I've already covered the reasoning for black actors in black roles?
There is absolutely no good reason that a black girl couldn't play Nancy, it has no bearing on the story.
What you cover does not make some sort of law. You present your views and your views only. The whole thing has taken a ridiculous turn because you seem to be determined to prove, for some obscure reason, that a character that there was never any reason to suppose was black, is suddenly so in a Dickens novel. I ask why?
I never said anywhere that was a reason, good or otherwise, why a black girl couldn't play the part, just the opposite in fact if you bothered to read my post. I never said it had a bearing on the story what nationality she was, I don't do that now. What I did ask was why are we suddenly to assume that Nancy, the commonly accepted London prostitute of Dicken's novel, was black? Is there a reason to assume that anyone else in the story is black, Chinese, Oriental or anything other than the way Dickens portrayed them? The onus of proving such a supposition lies with the doubter, not me. I'm happy to believe that she was the Nancy I (and probably everyone else) has always seen her as.
Don't try to make a simple debate into something it never was with obnoxious comments about racism, ignorance or avoiding facts that you have already covered; facts that are nothing more than your personal opinion. These, like everything else are just your opinions. It might help if you actually did read the whole posts instead of adopting your usual method of seizing on snippets of it. I asked you a couple of questions, you ignored them by changing track to indicate silly accusations of my age, the fact that Dickens didn't illustrate his own novels and how ignorant and racist I am. What sort of debating is that? Put your personal opinions of me aside and stick with the debate by proving your own facts. Up to now you haven't given one good reason for your argument.
Your final comments...
Nobody questioned slavery for years, did it make it right? Your argument that - that's the way it always has been, so that 's the way it should be , is up there with the best 5-year old's arguments - it's just a form of ignorance and bigotry - the comment "no reason to suppose she was black", in your mind, with your perceptions, biases, maybe. You don't speak for every one - your word isn't law. Thankfully. Clearly, plenty have and do consider it reasonable to cast someone who is black as Nancy, a non-race specific character in a role that race has no bearing on.Bottom line of my argument is that the question of a black Nancy in the story of Oliver Twist has never before arisen. It did so because a black actress wanted a chance at the part in a modern produced version, not because anyone suddenly said,
"Oh, hey, how do we know Nancy wasn't black"? That, for me, isn't sufficient reason to change several generations of thinking for no apparent reason. A black actress can, and will no doubt, play the part one day. Fine by me, but to suggest the original character was black just to substantiate this has no foundation whatsoever.
Would we really want a white actor/actress playing in Porgy and Bess, Uncle Remus, Roots, Mandingo or someone from Uncle Tom's Cabin ? My contention is that we accepted and were happy with the originals. Why not with Dickens
The final line deserved the contempt with which it was treated. Are you suggesting that any of those characters are not specifically black or that the story isn't fundmentally about the dynamics of their race and that of other protagonists and/or based on historical scenarios they are there to illustrate? There is no paralled between Nancy, who could without any question be black, white, yellow or brown, and Kunta Kinte an african slave, transported to work on cotton plantation in the dramatisation of historical events. Suggesting otherwise is plainly silly.
the "bottom line" is that the colour of nancy is irrelevant whereas that is absolutely not the case in every production, where race can be the core of the plot - as it is in all your examples.
and what is really obnoxious is your pious hypocrisy, setting aside your Daily Mail politics, you like to accuse people of making it personal when you're more than happy to throw the insults around yourself. Just my opinion, of course.
Last edited by communistworkethic on Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Just a thought.... isn't there a passage in OT in which Nancy disguises herself as Oliver's sister?!
I'm sure I don't need to explain where my line of reasoning is heading next...
(Surely I've nailed it here, Tango!
)
I'm sure I don't need to explain where my line of reasoning is heading next...
(Surely I've nailed it here, Tango!

Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
yeah cos "disguise" means showing that you don't look anything like someone doesn' it?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Just a thought.... isn't there a passage in OT in which Nancy disguises herself as Oliver's sister?!
I'm sure I don't need to explain where my line of reasoning is heading next...
(Surely I've nailed it here, Tango!)
shouldn't you be stood in a grow-bag somewhere?
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
We still haven't established the Oliver is necessarily white eithermummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Just a thought.... isn't there a passage in OT in which Nancy disguises herself as Oliver's sister?!
I'm sure I don't need to explain where my line of reasoning is heading next...
(Surely I've nailed it here, Tango!)

-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Worthy4England wrote:We still haven't established the Oliver is necessarily white eithermummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Just a thought.... isn't there a passage in OT in which Nancy disguises herself as Oliver's sister?!
I'm sure I don't need to explain where my line of reasoning is heading next...
(Surely I've nailed it here, Tango!)

Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
Good one, one of the three Olivers is black........Worthy4England wrote:We still haven't established the Oliver is necessarily white eithermummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Just a thought.... isn't there a passage in OT in which Nancy disguises herself as Oliver's sister?!
I'm sure I don't need to explain where my line of reasoning is heading next...
(Surely I've nailed it here, Tango!)
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Don't think so.communistworkethic wrote:Good one, one of the three Olivers is black........Worthy4England wrote:We still haven't established the Oliver is necessarily white eithermummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Just a thought.... isn't there a passage in OT in which Nancy disguises herself as Oliver's sister?!
I'm sure I don't need to explain where my line of reasoning is heading next...
(Surely I've nailed it here, Tango!)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/oliver/news/2008/05/29/55231.shtml
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests