Empire Magazine Top 500 Greatest Films
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
Empire Magazine Top 500 Greatest Films
nice looking site: http://www.empireonline.com/500/1.asp
Predictable and boring top ten though! just shows how much of the great British public lack any class or imagination!
Probably why there are so many scum fans knocking about!?
Predictable and boring top ten though! just shows how much of the great British public lack any class or imagination!
Probably why there are so many scum fans knocking about!?
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 805
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:08 pm
- Location: Burnden Terrace
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38809
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Empire Magazine Top 500 Greatest Films
I can't see past 100!General Mannerheim wrote:nice looking site: http://www.empireonline.com/500/1.asp
Predictable and boring top ten though! just shows how much of the great British public lack any class or imagination!
Probably why there are so many scum fans knocking about!?
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:15 pm
- Location: Cromwell Country
Anything that involves asking the public for their view degrades the rankings.
Harry Potter ranks 471, but The Wicker Man ranks 485. Deer Hunter (467) and Full Metal Jacket (457), yet Indiana Jones And The Temple Of Doom (233)
See what I mean! People who think Harry Potter is a good film, will undoubtedly never have seen some of the better films made, yet vote for Harry Potter as a cinematic great. Indiana Jones is a good film but as good as the other 2?
Harry Potter ranks 471, but The Wicker Man ranks 485. Deer Hunter (467) and Full Metal Jacket (457), yet Indiana Jones And The Temple Of Doom (233)
See what I mean! People who think Harry Potter is a good film, will undoubtedly never have seen some of the better films made, yet vote for Harry Potter as a cinematic great. Indiana Jones is a good film but as good as the other 2?
Professionalism, the last refuge of the talentless
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7042
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: HULL, BABY!
- Contact:
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:15 pm
- Location: Cromwell Country
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38809
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
But its why its impossible to judge.David Lee's Hair wrote:Anything that involves asking the public for their view degrades the rankings.
Harry Potter ranks 471, but The Wicker Man ranks 485. Deer Hunter (467) and Full Metal Jacket (457), yet Indiana Jones And The Temple Of Doom (233)
See what I mean! People who think Harry Potter is a good film, will undoubtedly never have seen some of the better films made, yet vote for Harry Potter as a cinematic great. Indiana Jones is a good film but as good as the other 2?
Indiana Jones films are classics and brilliant films for what they are.
But how can you judge them alongside films in different genres that perhaps are more significant in other ways?
You can't unless you accept that the vote is based on the films that are most popular amongst the general public.
Otherwise we could just have a panel of Jonathan Woss, Germaine Greer and Jo Whiney telling us "what we should regard as the best films".
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:15 pm
- Location: Cromwell Country
Oh the Indiana Jones films are great don't get me wrong, but are they as good as say Deer Hunter, as a cinematic great?BWFC_Insane wrote:But its why its impossible to judge.
Indiana Jones films are classics and brilliant films for what they are.
But how can you judge them alongside films in different genres that perhaps are more significant in other ways?
You can't unless you accept that the vote is based on the films that are most popular amongst the general public.
Otherwise we could just have a panel of Jonathan Woss, Germaine Greer and Jo Whiney telling us "what we should regard as the best films".
Probably not. Greatness shouldn't just comprise of public popularity, which as soon as 95% of the vote comes into the equation it would unfortunately become.
95% of the British public would probably say that the Spice Girls are greater than Beethoven. But are they really?
I agree with you in a round-about kind of way, but I just never think once the public get involved you can take much credence by it.
Professionalism, the last refuge of the talentless
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1979
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 10:09 am
- Location: Enfield.....Duh!
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38809
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Ermm but surely the only judge of whether a film is a "great" or a classic is your own personal opinion of it?David Lee's Hair wrote:Oh the Indiana Jones films are great don't get me wrong, but are they as good as say Deer Hunter, as a cinematic great?BWFC_Insane wrote:But its why its impossible to judge.
Indiana Jones films are classics and brilliant films for what they are.
But how can you judge them alongside films in different genres that perhaps are more significant in other ways?
You can't unless you accept that the vote is based on the films that are most popular amongst the general public.
Otherwise we could just have a panel of Jonathan Woss, Germaine Greer and Jo Whiney telling us "what we should regard as the best films".
Probably not. Greatness shouldn't just comprise of public popularity, which as soon as 95% of the vote comes into the equation it would unfortunately become.
95% of the British public would probably say that the Spice Girls are greater than Beethoven. But are they really?
I agree with you in a round-about kind of way, but I just never think once the public get involved you can take much credence by it.
I don't want someone to tell me what is or isn't a good film, I'll make my own mind up.
And therefore the ONLY way you can survey these things is to ask enough of the general populous to find a consensus?
A classic in one persons eyes may be absolutely shi.te in anothers.
Like music, its personal and some films appeal to more people than others. I like some films that the critics "panned". So what? Doesn't make them good or bad, just means I like them.
For example, Schindlers list is a great film (IMO) and it is a very important film in terms of defining some horific historical events.
However, if I sit down on a Saturday evening, its not something I'd particularly choose to watch. But I might re-vist star wars or indiana jones. Therefore if someone asked me for my top 10 films or whatever, I probably wouldn't select Schindlers list. Even though I think its a great film.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
The way i think about it is if someone said your going down for murder and you could take 10 dvd's with you, what films would you take? none of the ones in that top ten for sure! they are all good granted, but i would not like to watch any of them again right now, never mind regularly for the next 30 years!
Last edited by General Mannerheim on Wed Sep 24, 2008 1:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
BWFC_Insane wrote:Ermm but surely the only judge of whether a film is a "great" or a classic is your own personal opinion of it?David Lee's Hair wrote:Oh the Indiana Jones films are great don't get me wrong, but are they as good as say Deer Hunter, as a cinematic great?BWFC_Insane wrote:But its why its impossible to judge.
Indiana Jones films are classics and brilliant films for what they are.
But how can you judge them alongside films in different genres that perhaps are more significant in other ways?
You can't unless you accept that the vote is based on the films that are most popular amongst the general public.
Otherwise we could just have a panel of Jonathan Woss, Germaine Greer and Jo Whiney telling us "what we should regard as the best films".
Probably not. Greatness shouldn't just comprise of public popularity, which as soon as 95% of the vote comes into the equation it would unfortunately become.
95% of the British public would probably say that the Spice Girls are greater than Beethoven. But are they really?
I agree with you in a round-about kind of way, but I just never think once the public get involved you can take much credence by it.
I don't want someone to tell me what is or isn't a good film, I'll make my own mind up.
And therefore the ONLY way you can survey these things is to ask enough of the general populous to find a consensus?
A classic in one persons eyes may be absolutely shi.te in Batmans.
Like music, its personal and some films appeal to more people than others. I like some films that the critics "panned". So what? Doesn't make them good or bad, just means I like them.
For example, Schindlers list is a great film (IMO) and it is a very important film in terms of defining some horific historical events.
However, if I sit down on a Saturday evening, its not something I'd particularly choose to watch. But I might re-vist star wars or indiana jones. Therefore if someone asked me for my top 10 films or whatever, I probably wouldn't select Schindlers list. Even though I think its a great film.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1979
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 10:09 am
- Location: Enfield.....Duh!
The Shawshank RedemptionGeneral Mannerheim wrote:The way i think about it is if someone said your going down for murder and you could take 10 dvd's with you, what films would you take? none of the ones in that top ten for sure! they are all good granted, but i would not like to watch any of them again right now, never mind regularly for the next 30 years!
The Rock
Escape from Colditz
Birdman of Alcatraz
The Great Escape
Prison Break Series 1
Prison Break Series 2
Prison Break Series 3
The Dukes of Hazard Series 1
Scum
"You're Gemini, and I don't know which one I like the most!"
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31610
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 36 guests