What are you watching tonight?
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Look forward to exchanging views on it. I'm sitting here chuckling at memories of some of the more grossly sentimental scenes.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Haven't seen it, but if it really is unmissable on the terms you suggest then I might investigate!William the White wrote: Do you have any views on 'Australia'? You couldn't get a mainstream hollywood movie much further away from Crash than that.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Ok, am sat here at 1am, having just watched Wolf Creek... decent horror film.
But I'm not going to write about that...
There being nothing else on, I stumbled across BBC Parliament, on which Jamie Oliver is busting a gut talking to a dour Parliamentary committee about school meals.
Top marks to that man. It's easy for a cynic to write off his documentaries as being all about cultivating the Jamie Oliver brand. But he's just as passionate and diligent when it is in an arena that nobody in their right minds would be watching.
A depressing reminder of how slow progress can be in our cumbersome, lumbering democracy, however. And when what's on the table for debate is something that might deliver health improvements 20 years down the line, but that requires significant investment now, it is a reminder of how the incentives in the game of politics align to produce a certain myopia.
But I'm not going to write about that...
There being nothing else on, I stumbled across BBC Parliament, on which Jamie Oliver is busting a gut talking to a dour Parliamentary committee about school meals.
Top marks to that man. It's easy for a cynic to write off his documentaries as being all about cultivating the Jamie Oliver brand. But he's just as passionate and diligent when it is in an arena that nobody in their right minds would be watching.
A depressing reminder of how slow progress can be in our cumbersome, lumbering democracy, however. And when what's on the table for debate is something that might deliver health improvements 20 years down the line, but that requires significant investment now, it is a reminder of how the incentives in the game of politics align to produce a certain myopia.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
That's a decidedly frank admission Mummy - I'm now starting to understand your political leanings a little bettermummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: Top marks to that man. It's easy for a cynic to write off his documentaries as being all about cultivating the Jamie Oliver brand. But he's just as passionate and diligent when it is in an arena that nobody in their right minds would be watching.
A depressing reminder of how slow progress can be in our cumbersome, lumbering democracy, however. And when what's on the table for debate is something that might deliver health improvements 20 years down the line, but that requires significant investment now, it is a reminder of how the incentives in the game of politics align to produce a certain myopia.

On the more fundamental point, it's always going to be difficult to get "significant investment" for anything that has a RoI > 5 years - such is the way of politics. There's always going to be that view that "if it's not going to benefit me as a politician then why should I do it?" - don't think that view is specific to a single party.
It's also compounded by the issue that anything taking greater than 5 years, could be cancelled by an incoming Government of a different colour (as it sometimes genuinely doesn't fit with their policies or proposed budget structures). The party that then started the project are typically lambasted for being "misguided fools" which is *obviously* the reason that the said project was cancelled....
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Well, I'm only joking really. All I'm saying is that it's not exactly prime time TV is it... would that people were more interested in watching the proceedings of Parliamentary committees on BBC Parliament!Worthy4England wrote:That's a decidedly frank admission Mummy - I'm now starting to understand your political leanings a little bettermummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: Top marks to that man. It's easy for a cynic to write off his documentaries as being all about cultivating the Jamie Oliver brand. But he's just as passionate and diligent when it is in an arena that nobody in their right minds would be watching.
A depressing reminder of how slow progress can be in our cumbersome, lumbering democracy, however. And when what's on the table for debate is something that might deliver health improvements 20 years down the line, but that requires significant investment now, it is a reminder of how the incentives in the game of politics align to produce a certain myopia.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1979
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 10:09 am
- Location: Enfield.....Duh!
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31616
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1979
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 10:09 am
- Location: Enfield.....Duh!
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38814
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
QT and This Week don't run during the Parliamentary recess, I think...Bruce Rioja wrote:Yes, yes, yes. That's all well and good but why wasn't Question Time on?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests