Ferguson and McGregor

There ARE other teams(we'd have no-one to play otherwise) and here's where all-comers can discuss the wider world of football......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Post by Prufrock » Tue Apr 07, 2009 9:05 pm

FD wrote:How many children will have seen and read about what they did Profrock?

I'm sorry, but what they did is unnacceptable.
You can't even spell my name correctly!!

As for the thing. For a start it should never have been let go this far. Burley apparently caved into player pressure to have them on the bench instead of suspending them, but I'm sorry, if being a nob was a reason to suspend footballers, there'd be none left. The children argument doesn't work.How many time have you seen Rooney gesticulating, shouting and swearing . Life ban? Noooo. Footballers drink driving. Footballers being charged with affray. They should be punished, but to me, a life ban is MENTAL.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

hisroyalgingerness
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Post by hisroyalgingerness » Tue Apr 07, 2009 9:25 pm

I see Gers are after selling em both. Got Big Sam or Newcastle all over it that

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Tue Apr 07, 2009 9:32 pm

Prufrock wrote:
FD wrote:How many children will have seen and read about what they did Profrock?

I'm sorry, but what they did is unnacceptable.
You can't even spell my name correctly!!

As for the thing. For a start it should never have been let go this far. Burley apparently caved into player pressure to have them on the bench instead of suspending them, but I'm sorry, if being a nob was a reason to suspend footballers, there'd be none left. The children argument doesn't work.How many time have you seen Rooney gesticulating, shouting and swearing . Life ban? Noooo. Footballers drink driving. Footballers being charged with affray. They should be punished, but to me, a life ban is MENTAL.
Surely a life ban is only until whoever handed it out changes their mind, my dear Prufrock. It could be changed next month.
Last edited by Montreal Wanderer on Tue Apr 07, 2009 9:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

FD
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1388
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 4:50 pm

Post by FD » Tue Apr 07, 2009 9:40 pm

Prufrock wrote:You can't even spell my name correctly!!
Jesus, I'm so sorry! I've ammended my horrendous error.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Post by Prufrock » Tue Apr 07, 2009 9:44 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:
Prufrock wrote:
FD wrote:How many children will have seen and read about what they did Profrock?

I'm sorry, but what they did is unnacceptable.
You can't even spell my name correctly!!

As for the thing. For a start it should never have been let go this far. Burley apparently caved into player pressure to have them on the bench instead of suspending them, but I'm sorry, if being a nob was a reason to suspend footballers, there'd be none left. The children argument doesn't work.How many time have you seen Rooney gesticulating, shouting and swearing . Life ban? Noooo. Footballers drink driving. Footballers being charged with affray. They should be punished, but to me, a life ban is MENTAL.
Surely a life ban is only until whoever handed it out changes their mind, my dear Prufuck. It could be changed next month.
Very true, but surely that cheapens the idea of such a thing, and makes it a farce. For what it's worth, each may well have played their last game for both Scotland and Rangers,but only because neither is young, but is anybody honestly arguing that their admittedly stupid and punishment deserving actions are so much worse than anything footballers get away with normally to deserve a life ban? They need a bollocking and their feeting dragging back down to earth, but a life ban for behaving like spoilt children...puhlease.

Should Ferdinand be banned for life for screaming down the ear of Alan Green following match long taunts the other day? (for my money he should be knighted). Both were responding to journalistic provocation, both reacted. Admittedly F&McG had already behaved like fools, but a life ban is so far off the scale.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Tue Apr 07, 2009 9:47 pm

FD wrote:
Prufrock wrote:You can't even spell my name correctly!!
Jesus, I'm so sorry! I've ammended my horrendous error.
Oh gosh! So did I.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Post by Prufrock » Tue Apr 07, 2009 9:50 pm

*stealthily gives a v-sign to Monty and FD, hoping to avoid the cameras and thus a lifetime TW ban*
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Post by Prufrock » Tue Apr 07, 2009 9:51 pm

Oh...and I'm still right, it's an unbalanced, unprecedented over reaction :D



Though that said they're still both idiots.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Tue Apr 07, 2009 10:16 pm

Prufrock wrote:Oh...and I'm still right, it's an unbalanced, unprecedented over reaction :D



Though that said they're still both idiots.
Who? Me and FD? Mods!!!!
:lmfao:
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Post by Prufrock » Tue Apr 07, 2009 10:35 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:
Prufrock wrote:Oh...and I'm still right, it's an unbalanced, unprecedented over reaction :D



Though that said they're still both idiots.
Who? Me and FD? Mods!!!!
:lmfao:
:D

I'm normally loathe to use the group of letters 'lol', but in this case I did laugh out loud. Very good Uncle Monty.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

fatshaft
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2124
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:04 pm
Location: Aberdeen
Contact:

Post by fatshaft » Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:24 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:
Prufrock wrote:
FD wrote:How many children will have seen and read about what they did Profrock?

I'm sorry, but what they did is unnacceptable.
You can't even spell my name correctly!!

As for the thing. For a start it should never have been let go this far. Burley apparently caved into player pressure to have them on the bench instead of suspending them, but I'm sorry, if being a nob was a reason to suspend footballers, there'd be none left. The children argument doesn't work.How many time have you seen Rooney gesticulating, shouting and swearing . Life ban? Noooo. Footballers drink driving. Footballers being charged with affray. They should be punished, but to me, a life ban is MENTAL.
Surely a life ban is only until whoever handed it out changes their mind, my dear Prufrock. It could be changed next month.
The life ban was from the SFA not Burley.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Post by Prufrock » Mon Apr 20, 2009 2:59 pm

fatshaft wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:
Prufrock wrote:
FD wrote:How many children will have seen and read about what they did Profrock?

I'm sorry, but what they did is unnacceptable.
You can't even spell my name correctly!!

As for the thing. For a start it should never have been let go this far. Burley apparently caved into player pressure to have them on the bench instead of suspending them, but I'm sorry, if being a nob was a reason to suspend footballers, there'd be none left. The children argument doesn't work.How many time have you seen Rooney gesticulating, shouting and swearing . Life ban? Noooo. Footballers drink driving. Footballers being charged with affray. They should be punished, but to me, a life ban is MENTAL.
Surely a life ban is only until whoever handed it out changes their mind, my dear Prufrock. It could be changed next month.
The life ban was from the SFA not Burley.
Back to ludicrous overeaction then. What are your views on it as a sweaty, Fatty (I sound horrible there!), has everyone calmed down north of the border or should they still be hung drawn and quartered?
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

fatshaft
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2124
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:04 pm
Location: Aberdeen
Contact:

Post by fatshaft » Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:55 pm

Prufrock wrote:
fatshaft wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:
Prufrock wrote:
FD wrote:How many children will have seen and read about what they did Profrock?

I'm sorry, but what they did is unnacceptable.
You can't even spell my name correctly!!

As for the thing. For a start it should never have been let go this far. Burley apparently caved into player pressure to have them on the bench instead of suspending them, but I'm sorry, if being a nob was a reason to suspend footballers, there'd be none left. The children argument doesn't work.How many time have you seen Rooney gesticulating, shouting and swearing . Life ban? Noooo. Footballers drink driving. Footballers being charged with affray. They should be punished, but to me, a life ban is MENTAL.
Surely a life ban is only until whoever handed it out changes their mind, my dear Prufrock. It could be changed next month.
The life ban was from the SFA not Burley.
Back to ludicrous overeaction then. What are your views on it as a sweaty, Fatty (I sound horrible there!), has everyone calmed down north of the border or should they still be hung drawn and quartered?
H, D & Q. Right decision, although the general opinion is that Watty only acted as he did becasue he wants rid of Ferguson in particular, and has chosen a populist issue to get the (Hun) fans behind him against a generally popular player. Seems Le Guen was right, but his timing wasn't. Ferguson and his drinking club run Ibrox, he tried to change it and lost, this issue might have given Walter the chance to do something about it.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests