The Ashes 2009
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
At the risk of upsetting the great man, our 1st innings was ok, but will be best judged after their first innings...I can see a possibility that it looks "not quite as good" when they're finished...BWFC_Insane wrote:Fantastic score now.
Boycott reckons that 370 was a good score that could possibly set up a win and we're well in excess of that now.
Yesterday was definitely Englands day no matter what anyone says!
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Of course but any score over 400 hundred in England ain't bad. Its up to the bowlers now to do their job!Worthy4England wrote:At the risk of upsetting the great man, our 1st innings was ok, but will be best judged after their first innings...I can see a possibility that it looks "not quite as good" when they're finished...BWFC_Insane wrote:Fantastic score now.
Boycott reckons that 370 was a good score that could possibly set up a win and we're well in excess of that now.
Yesterday was definitely Englands day no matter what anyone says!
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
I've corrected what you meant to sayBWFC_Insane wrote:Of course but any score over 400 hundred by England ain't bad. Its up to the bowlers now to do their job!Worthy4England wrote:At the risk of upsetting the great man, our 1st innings was ok, but will be best judged after their first innings...I can see a possibility that it looks "not quite as good" when they're finished...BWFC_Insane wrote:Fantastic score now.
Boycott reckons that 370 was a good score that could possibly set up a win and we're well in excess of that now.
Yesterday was definitely Englands day no matter what anyone says!

What I'm saying is, is indeed that 400+ gives you a good something to bowl at, but it's only a good total if their team don't score 600+ on the same track...
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
If the spinners bowl properly no way is this a 600+ track.Worthy4England wrote:I've corrected what you meant to sayBWFC_Insane wrote:Of course but any score over 400 hundred by England ain't bad. Its up to the bowlers now to do their job!Worthy4England wrote:At the risk of upsetting the great man, our 1st innings was ok, but will be best judged after their first innings...I can see a possibility that it looks "not quite as good" when they're finished...BWFC_Insane wrote:Fantastic score now.
Boycott reckons that 370 was a good score that could possibly set up a win and we're well in excess of that now.
Yesterday was definitely Englands day no matter what anyone says!
What I'm saying is, is indeed that 400+ gives you a good something to bowl at, but it's only a good total if their team don't score 600+ on the same track...
Mind thats relying on Panesar to be consistent. Oh you may have a point.....
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:21 pm
And Broad not to give loads of runs away like he is doing.BWFC_Insane wrote:If the spinners bowl properly no way is this a 600+ track.Worthy4England wrote:I've corrected what you meant to sayBWFC_Insane wrote:Of course but any score over 400 hundred by England ain't bad. Its up to the bowlers now to do their job!Worthy4England wrote:At the risk of upsetting the great man, our 1st innings was ok, but will be best judged after their first innings...I can see a possibility that it looks "not quite as good" when they're finished...BWFC_Insane wrote:Fantastic score now.
Boycott reckons that 370 was a good score that could possibly set up a win and we're well in excess of that now.
Yesterday was definitely Englands day no matter what anyone says!
What I'm saying is, is indeed that 400+ gives you a good something to bowl at, but it's only a good total if their team don't score 600+ on the same track...
Mind thats relying on Panesar to be consistent. Oh you may have a point.....
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:21 pm
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Afraid it was my main fear.superjohnmcginlay wrote:We're struggling. Our bowling attack's fooking pish.
Broad is a 3rd choice bowler and we're opening with him.
Anderson is wank when its not beaming all over the place.
Flintoff can't bowl long spells consistently (or at least shouldn't).
Panesar is inconsistent and generally wank IMO!
Swann is a good bowler but hardly a genuine strike bowler.
When the pitch isn't doing much Flintoff is our only genuine strike bowler and he can only bowl so much!
Far cry from Harmison, Hoggard, Jones and Flintoff!
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:21 pm
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
When the Boston Red Sox only had two decent pitchers the fans used the refrain "Spahn and Sain and pray for rain". It's beginning to look like some inclement weather could be helpful in this test.superjohnmcginlay wrote:Anderson 8.0 0 35 0
Broad 10.0 0 52 0
Swann 10.0 5 17 0
Flintoff 6.0 2 15 1
Panesar 5.0 0 17 0
Bowling figures at tea. Not too clever except for Flintoff.

"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Anyone still not considering the possibility that this is a 600 track?
Edit: Oh and while we're at it - anyone still want to tell me that Anderson and Broad are world class?
Double Edit: Oh and Tango, I know there's another team out there making it difficult for them - that's the idea behind team sports
Edit: Oh and while we're at it - anyone still want to tell me that Anderson and Broad are world class?
Double Edit: Oh and Tango, I know there's another team out there making it difficult for them - that's the idea behind team sports

Last edited by Worthy4England on Thu Jul 09, 2009 5:01 pm, edited 2 times in total.
I think Anderson is, although he's not doing my case any favours today (though he's on now, so maybe he'll do something). Broad isn't and will never be, if he couldn't bat he'd never be anywhere near the England team. I'd gladly trade whatever runs he got today for Harmison bowling now.Worthy4England wrote:Anyone still not considering the possibility that this is a 600 track?
Edit: Oh and while we're at it - anyone still want to tell me that Anderson and Broad are world class?
Double Edit: Oh and Tango, I know there's another team out there making it difficult for them - that's the idea behind team sports
The pitch best start crumbling quickly, otherwise this one is going to trundle on to an inevitable draw. It might be turning, but it's so slow even if you play the wrong shot and look like missing it, you could get back up, go for a coffee, come back and then play it away.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
I'll give you Anderson as being "sometimes good enough" at the top level (Aus and the Saffers) but only occasionally world class. Broad, I've always had me doubts about....Tombwfc wrote:I think Anderson is, although he's not doing my case any favours today (though he's on now, so maybe he'll do something). Broad isn't and will never be, if he couldn't bat he'd never be anywhere near the England team. I'd gladly trade whatever runs he got today for Harmison bowling now.Worthy4England wrote:Anyone still not considering the possibility that this is a 600 track?
Edit: Oh and while we're at it - anyone still want to tell me that Anderson and Broad are world class?
Double Edit: Oh and Tango, I know there's another team out there making it difficult for them - that's the idea behind team sports
The pitch best start crumbling quickly, otherwise this one is going to trundle on to an inevitable draw. It might be turning, but it's so slow even if you play the wrong shot and look like missing it, you could get back up, go for a coffee, come back and then play it away.
They will be world-class, but only if we win the SeriesWorthy4England wrote:I'll give you Anderson as being "sometimes good enough" at the top level (Aus and the Saffers) but only occasionally world class. Broad, I've always had me doubts about....Tombwfc wrote:I think Anderson is, although he's not doing my case any favours today (though he's on now, so maybe he'll do something). Broad isn't and will never be, if he couldn't bat he'd never be anywhere near the England team. I'd gladly trade whatever runs he got today for Harmison bowling now.Worthy4England wrote:Anyone still not considering the possibility that this is a 600 track?
Edit: Oh and while we're at it - anyone still want to tell me that Anderson and Broad are world class?
Double Edit: Oh and Tango, I know there's another team out there making it difficult for them - that's the idea behind team sports
The pitch best start crumbling quickly, otherwise this one is going to trundle on to an inevitable draw. It might be turning, but it's so slow even if you play the wrong shot and look like missing it, you could get back up, go for a coffee, come back and then play it away.
Was right all along
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
There's a whole debate about "form" v "class" I'm sureBruno wrote:They will be world-class, but only if we win the SeriesWorthy4England wrote:I'll give you Anderson as being "sometimes good enough" at the top level (Aus and the Saffers) but only occasionally world class. Broad, I've always had me doubts about....Tombwfc wrote:I think Anderson is, although he's not doing my case any favours today (though he's on now, so maybe he'll do something). Broad isn't and will never be, if he couldn't bat he'd never be anywhere near the England team. I'd gladly trade whatever runs he got today for Harmison bowling now.Worthy4England wrote:Anyone still not considering the possibility that this is a 600 track?
Edit: Oh and while we're at it - anyone still want to tell me that Anderson and Broad are world class?
Double Edit: Oh and Tango, I know there's another team out there making it difficult for them - that's the idea behind team sports
The pitch best start crumbling quickly, otherwise this one is going to trundle on to an inevitable draw. It might be turning, but it's so slow even if you play the wrong shot and look like missing it, you could get back up, go for a coffee, come back and then play it away.

-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Anderson has always had a suspect action and suffers terribly from inconsistency. Putting the Lancs allegiance to one side, I'm not really convinced he's a front-line test bowler. He does it now and then,but its not frequent enough. In keeping with my usual pearls of wisdom, I'm now expecting a fivefor off him.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Think I'm sort of there too.Lord Kangana wrote:Anderson has always had a suspect action and suffers terribly from inconsistency. Putting the Lancs allegiance to one side, I'm not really convinced he's a front-line test bowler. He does it now and then,but its not frequent enough. In keeping with my usual pearls of wisdom, I'm now expecting a fivefor off him.
His series averages against top sides is indifferent to say the least
Saffers 2003 - 40ish
Saffers 2005 - 75
Aussies 06/7 - 83
Sri Lanka 07/08 - 84
Saffers 08 - 34
India 08 - 54
Windies 08/09 - 38
Broad is just up at about 40 overall...with a couple of good series against pub teams.
Think Boycott summed it up in a line today - it's not that England's bowlers are any worse or doing any less, they are in fact better. It's just that Australia are batting a hell of a lot more sensibly and making good bowling look average. It's one of those tracks from the looks of things that if you apply yourself it'll take something special to get you out. Sadly we didn't do that batting and are now paying the price.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Think there's plenty in that Jimbo, but even on the flattest of shirt fronts, you've sometimes still got to mix it up to buy a wicket, like Johnson did with Bopara. Boycs will generally point to the fact that no-one has batted anything like as good as he could - as per.jimbo wrote:Think Boycott summed it up in a line today - it's not that England's bowlers are any worse or doing any less, they are in fact better. It's just that Australia are batting a hell of a lot more sensibly and making good bowling look average. It's one of those tracks from the looks of things that if you apply yourself it'll take something special to get you out. Sadly we didn't do that batting and are now paying the price.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Prufrock and 15 guests