The Ashes 2009
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Presumably they may not exist, Bruce, because the proper ones have other citizenship. Not that I have a clue - the last live test I saw, Brian Statham opened the attack with Freddie Trueman.Bruce Rioja wrote:Such as? You were naming names up until your main point.BWFC_Insane wrote:The total was fine, its the fact we have a shite bowling attack thats the problem.Worthy4England wrote:435 is starting to look like a not so good total
"ooo it didn't swing so we couldn't take any wickets".
Bowlers who can only bowl when the ball is swinging shouldn't be in test sides IMO.
Why can't we have people who can bowl threatening line and length consistently even whent he conditions aren't favouring bowling?
Broad is not a front line test bowler.
Anderson isn't much better unless it swings.
Flintoff should be first change bowler.
We need two proper openers. Without that our attack will be toothless unless it beams around all over the show!

"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Exactly, Monty. We can all say that we need two proper openers, but what do we do? Magic them in from the ether? If they don't exist then we have to do what we can with what we have and spouting ideology hardly helps. Had we put the Aussies in after winning the toss rather than having chose to bat then the ball would've been moving for our attack on Wednesday instead and it'd have been them bowling flat 85/90 mph balls at us on Thursday. Still, hindsight and all of that.Montreal Wanderer wrote:Presumably they may not exist, Bruce, because the proper ones have other citizenship. Not that I have a clue - the last live test I saw, Brian Statham opened the attack with Freddie Trueman.Bruce Rioja wrote:Such as? You were naming names up until your main point.BWFC_Insane wrote:The total was fine, its the fact we have a shite bowling attack thats the problem.Worthy4England wrote:435 is starting to look like a not so good total
"ooo it didn't swing so we couldn't take any wickets".
Bowlers who can only bowl when the ball is swinging shouldn't be in test sides IMO.
Why can't we have people who can bowl threatening line and length consistently even whent he conditions aren't favouring bowling?
Broad is not a front line test bowler.
Anderson isn't much better unless it swings.
Flintoff should be first change bowler.
We need two proper openers. Without that our attack will be toothless unless it beams around all over the show!
May the bridges I burn light your way
BWFC_Insane wrote:The total was fine, its the fact we have a shite bowling attack thats the problem.Worthy4England wrote:435 is starting to look like a not so good total
"ooo it didn't swing so we couldn't take any wickets".
Bowlers who can only bowl when the ball is swinging shouldn't be in test sides IMO.
Why can't we have people who can bowl threatening line and length consistently even whent he conditions aren't favouring bowling?
Broad is not a front line test bowler. correct
Anderson isn't much better unless it swings. wrong
Flintoff should be first change bowler.correct
We need two proper openers. Without that our attack will be toothless unless it beams around all over the show!
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Got to give some sizeable credit to the Aussies and Ponting in particular. They're on foreign turf and competing, as always , like tigers. A draw will seem like a loss to them and a very lucky escape for us. I'd love to see us win on an equal footing without praying for rain to intervene. Let's get this one over with a lucky draw at best and concentrate on giving them some competition in the next one.Worthy4England wrote:So we discussed the bowling at some length and (hopefully) established that knocking over the New Zealanders doesn't make you world class.
Anyone want to talk about the batting?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Amazing how all the stick seems to be focused on KP, when there's a good few batsmen in that line-up who are consistently found wanting against the really good sides. Alistair Cook hasn't got a hundred against a decent side since the last Ashes.Worthy4England wrote:So we discussed the bowling at some length and (hopefully) established that knocking over the New Zealanders doesn't make you world class.
Anyone want to talk about the batting?
The problem with the batting is, I don't see who's banging on the door. Shah is all over the place in International cricket and I'm in better form than Ian Bell. At least with the bowling you can say there's Onions, Harmison, Rashid and Sidebottom knocking about with some form of International experience.
Micheal Vaughan must be thinking he should've left it a fortnight.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Aye, Ricky P was a bit frustrated at the end. Credit to the tail end and plaudits to Collingwood. Pressure must have been intense at the death so well done Swann, Anderson and Monty too. Touch of the great escape, but it's a four test Ashes now. Bring on Lords.Verbal wrote:MBE? Give collingwood a fecking knighthood in the art of irking aussies.
God, a draw hasn't felt this good in a while.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Little Green Man
- Icon
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:34 pm
- Location: Justin Edinburgh
Amazing, and proof (if ever was needed) that Test cricket at is best is a million miles ahead of what 20/20 could ever hope to be.
I've been critical of Brigadier Block in the past, but I'll not say a bad word about him from now on. I thought he'd blown it at the end, but otherwise an absolute hero. Credit to Swann, Jimmy and Monty too. If only the openers had shown that kind of bottle.
If Anderson isn't world class and needs shipping out, what the feck does that make Mitchell Johnson? He's ranked third in the world and, regardless of what his figures show, was all over the shop when it really mattered today.
Anyway, well done (in the end) England, feck off Ponting.
I've been critical of Brigadier Block in the past, but I'll not say a bad word about him from now on. I thought he'd blown it at the end, but otherwise an absolute hero. Credit to Swann, Jimmy and Monty too. If only the openers had shown that kind of bottle.
If Anderson isn't world class and needs shipping out, what the feck does that make Mitchell Johnson? He's ranked third in the world and, regardless of what his figures show, was all over the shop when it really mattered today.
Anyway, well done (in the end) England, feck off Ponting.

- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
As I've said before, I don't get cricket at all, but feck me, scabbing a fluke of the ozzies is sweet at anything. Sat massively smashed, not knowing quite what was going on but cheering every block. Ace.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests