Website Design Help
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2479
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:23 pm
- Location: Dr. Alban's
Website Design Help
Whenever I ask for advice like this on a web forum, I always feel like I'm putting my head over the parapet in order for sneering comment after sneering comment by people who are much more savvy than I.
So here goes:
I've designed my own website for my company, www.mini-medallists.co.uk I've used MIcrosoft Publisher, because (1) It's free, and (2) it's a DTP package I know through my days at Tripe N Trotters. Now, on IE it looks the dog's kahunas. However, I've just viewed it on Firefox and it looks amateur. There are lines under all links, even in the navigation bar. I can't get rid of them. The text alignment looks wrong as well.
Is that because of compatibility between Publisher and IE? Is it a Firefox issue? Or is it easy to fix? I've spent all afternoon fixing the issues the site had with IE, only to find that this happens.
Please, sensible offers only. "I've got advice: Use Dreamweaver" is not what I want, even if it is the best advice.
So here goes:
I've designed my own website for my company, www.mini-medallists.co.uk I've used MIcrosoft Publisher, because (1) It's free, and (2) it's a DTP package I know through my days at Tripe N Trotters. Now, on IE it looks the dog's kahunas. However, I've just viewed it on Firefox and it looks amateur. There are lines under all links, even in the navigation bar. I can't get rid of them. The text alignment looks wrong as well.
Is that because of compatibility between Publisher and IE? Is it a Firefox issue? Or is it easy to fix? I've spent all afternoon fixing the issues the site had with IE, only to find that this happens.
Please, sensible offers only. "I've got advice: Use Dreamweaver" is not what I want, even if it is the best advice.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2479
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:23 pm
- Location: Dr. Alban's
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2479
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:23 pm
- Location: Dr. Alban's
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
never having used frontpage - does it use CSS - csacading style sheets?
if so - the code should look something like.. remove the stars - i had to put them in to stop it spazzing up the BBcode!
*<style>
<a>
*</style>
bollox - it still spazzes up the code!
there are 2 ways described here - that i just wasted 10mins typing out - one of you are using olde-style html and one of you are using style-sheets (which I presume you must be)
http://forums.techguy.org/web-design-de ... em-ie.html
the "none" next to text decoration means nothing new happens to the text if it is visited or hovered over or clicked on... if you set them all as "none" then that should work for firefox. I suspect IE takes no value as "none" and firefox makes a different assumption...
I hope this makes sense...
if so - the code should look something like.. remove the stars - i had to put them in to stop it spazzing up the BBcode!
*<style>
<a>
*</style>
bollox - it still spazzes up the code!
there are 2 ways described here - that i just wasted 10mins typing out - one of you are using olde-style html and one of you are using style-sheets (which I presume you must be)
http://forums.techguy.org/web-design-de ... em-ie.html
the "none" next to text decoration means nothing new happens to the text if it is visited or hovered over or clicked on... if you set them all as "none" then that should work for firefox. I suspect IE takes no value as "none" and firefox makes a different assumption...
I hope this makes sense...
had a look at your source code...
I don't understand the code that frontpage is using here - I guess it is special to microsoft - and hence why IE reads it ansd other browsers that use propeer code don't!)
anyway - nowt to lose - try replacing the sextion in your style code that reads..
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
b\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
with
a:link {
color: #FF0000;
text-decoration: none;
}
a:visited {
text-decoration: none;
color: #FFFF00;
}
a:hover {
text-decoration: none;
color: #0000FF;
}
a:active {
text-decoration: none;
color: #000000;
}
if it doesn't work - then paste it back again - nothing lost... but i don't see why it wouldn't..
I don't understand the code that frontpage is using here - I guess it is special to microsoft - and hence why IE reads it ansd other browsers that use propeer code don't!)
anyway - nowt to lose - try replacing the sextion in your style code that reads..
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
b\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
with
a:link {
color: #FF0000;
text-decoration: none;
}
a:visited {
text-decoration: none;
color: #FFFF00;
}
a:hover {
text-decoration: none;
color: #0000FF;
}
a:active {
text-decoration: none;
color: #000000;
}
if it doesn't work - then paste it back again - nothing lost... but i don't see why it wouldn't..
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2479
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:23 pm
- Location: Dr. Alban's
You can shorten this down to:thebish wrote:had a look at your source code...
...
if it doesn't work - then paste it back again - nothing lost... but i don't see why it wouldn't..
a:link, a:visited, a:active {
color: #FF0000;
text-decoration: none;
}
a:hover {
text-decoration: none;
color: #0000FF;
}
The text alignment looks good to me, which part are you talking about?
Bruno wrote:He's never here. There are others qualified to help on here.
Because some of us are too busy working!
keveh wrote:You can shorten this down to:thebish wrote:had a look at your source code...
...
if it doesn't work - then paste it back again - nothing lost... but i don't see why it wouldn't..
a:link, a:visited, a:active {
color: #FF0000;
text-decoration: none;
}
a:hover {
text-decoration: none;
color: #0000FF;
}
The text alignment looks good to me, which part are you talking about?
Bruno wrote:He's never here. There are others qualified to help on here.
Because some of us are too busy working!
ahh - neat code-collapsing!! CSS is not my strong-suit - it was just line-by-line HTML when I designed websites... (but leave out the )
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:23 pm
I know you said you didn't want "use dreamweaver" advice, but I'm afraid I'll have to take that risk.
The reason that happened is simple - you used Publisher - an outdated piece of software whose coding probably only conforms to Microsoft Products, namely IE. This is just why your site failed in Firefox. Microsoft is the worst company for web developers.
I'd start looking at HTML and CSS tutorials and building your own from scratch. What you're doing now is exactly how I started web development. HTML/CSS tutorials is seriously the best way you can go. You get a smugger sense of satisfaction from it
That way you can go into microsoft notepad and do everything in there. Dreamweaver is a great piece of software as well.
Again, sorry to do exactly what you told us not to do, but after having a shitty career in it for 5 years, I felt I should pass that on.
The reason that happened is simple - you used Publisher - an outdated piece of software whose coding probably only conforms to Microsoft Products, namely IE. This is just why your site failed in Firefox. Microsoft is the worst company for web developers.
I'd start looking at HTML and CSS tutorials and building your own from scratch. What you're doing now is exactly how I started web development. HTML/CSS tutorials is seriously the best way you can go. You get a smugger sense of satisfaction from it

That way you can go into microsoft notepad and do everything in there. Dreamweaver is a great piece of software as well.
Again, sorry to do exactly what you told us not to do, but after having a shitty career in it for 5 years, I felt I should pass that on.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2479
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:23 pm
- Location: Dr. Alban's
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31629
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Just remember that some people wont upgrade their Firefox automatically.KeeeeeeeBaaaaaaab wrote:Thanks for the advice, everyone. All academic, apparently - the new version of Firefox will have ironed out the issue and is to be compatible with Publisher and Front Page. Cheers, Technology!
I've reverted back to the older version because the new one is full of bugs with extensions I use.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31629
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
The latest versions of Firefox - and there seem to have been a slew of them - have caused all our work computers to crash more regularly than Maureen Davies after a bottle of sherry.
We've tried switching back to Safari but the content management systems were built for Firefox, which leaves us in a hole, crashing "unexpectedly" every five minutes. Or using two separate browsers, which is hardly ideal, especially as they've grown to resemble each other so much.
We've tried switching back to Safari but the content management systems were built for Firefox, which leaves us in a hole, crashing "unexpectedly" every five minutes. Or using two separate browsers, which is hardly ideal, especially as they've grown to resemble each other so much.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2479
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:23 pm
- Location: Dr. Alban's
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests