chelsea banned from signing players till 2011
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
chelsea banned from signing players till 2011
some dodgy deal for a french kid from lens involved
oh dear
oh dear
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 5:53 am
- Location: New York City / Barcelona
Sorry but I take a dim view of this!!! Its an English Premier league club, you know the sort of club that keeps filling up 3 out of 4 semi final places in Europes elite compition.
It stinks of the hand of a frog!!!!
FFS R Madrid are real Bastions of fair play in transfer markets ain't they!!
Platini and his like will eventually drive some clubs to go for the SKY Champions cup!! would be funny as hell when Uefa want us to compete in their champions league
It stinks of the hand of a frog!!!!
FFS R Madrid are real Bastions of fair play in transfer markets ain't they!!
Platini and his like will eventually drive some clubs to go for the SKY Champions cup!! would be funny as hell when Uefa want us to compete in their champions league
I see your point but I think it has more to do with the players age. Not sure it is so much anti English or simply making it clear to football clubs that fiddling with minors is not allowed.hoboh2o wrote:Sorry but I take a dim view of this!!! Its an English Premier league club, you know the sort of club that keeps filling up 3 out of 4 semi final places in Europes elite compition.
It stinks of the hand of a frog!!!!
FFS R Madrid are real Bastions of fair play in transfer markets ain't they!!
Platini and his like will eventually drive some clubs to go for the SKY Champions cup!! would be funny as hell when Uefa want us to compete in their champions league
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28825
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
While I'm broadly in agreement with Platini that no country should have too many all-powerful clubs and that clubs shouldn't be allowed to sally around with £750m debts, this embargo was a decision by FIFA, not UEFA. And not the first time they've imposed such a sanction - a Swiss side was banned for one transfer window for a dodgy transfer.hoboh2o wrote:Sorry but I take a dim view of this!!! Its an English Premier league club, you know the sort of club that keeps filling up 3 out of 4 semi final places in Europes elite compition.
It stinks of the hand of a frog!!!!
FFS R Madrid are real Bastions of fair play in transfer markets ain't they!!
Platini and his like will eventually drive some clubs to go for the SKY Champions cup!! would be funny as hell when Uefa want us to compete in their champions league
Chelsea can appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, who take months, so they'll probably be allowed to buy in January with the sentence suspended until a decision is reached. So, of course, they'll rampantly over-buy to be on the safe side...
More here
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 4:58 pm
They might not be at the moment but just wait til next summer. Their squad is ageing and I reckon Ancelotti's gonna be regretting his lack of signings now.seanworth wrote:Would be funny if it does though, not like they are in desperate need of any right now.Village_Idiot2 wrote:I'd be surprised if it stands.
I hope it stands, it's about time teams started getting proper punishments for misdemeanours. Fine's for a club of Chelsea's size are completely pointless.
- Dujon
- Passionate
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 1:37 am
- Location: Australia, near Sydney, NSW
- Contact:
Whether or not this will stick, or whether any appeal will result in a reduced penalty I don't know - but I did have a chuckle when I read the report about this alleged infraction of the rules.
Rules are rules, whoever you are (not that you'd know that by watching some of the on-field antics), so I'd be more than pleased if this case, if proven, results in Chelsea being penalised. Not totally because it's Chelsea but because it will confirm that the powers that be do in fact have teeth and will use them as and when necessary, regardless of the so-called status of the club involved.
Rules are rules, whoever you are (not that you'd know that by watching some of the on-field antics), so I'd be more than pleased if this case, if proven, results in Chelsea being penalised. Not totally because it's Chelsea but because it will confirm that the powers that be do in fact have teeth and will use them as and when necessary, regardless of the so-called status of the club involved.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2234
- Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 12:03 am
- Location: Portland, Maine USA
Hard to know what to say. It's FIFA having done this, and I hate them. Seems odd with what else goes on in the game that they picked this out. The FA should just leave FIFA or encourage UEFA to leave. It's bad enough in the Prem, but when I think about the tossers in charge at UEFA and FIFA I get depressed.
Somehow I doubt that Chelsea's infraction was the worst or even only transfer irregularity. It's just Europe getting their knickers in a twist.
Somehow I doubt that Chelsea's infraction was the worst or even only transfer irregularity. It's just Europe getting their knickers in a twist.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2438
- Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 5:56 am
- Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Surely it's related to Chelsea's previous infractions. Cole has been mentioned, but don't forget the illegal approach for Arnesen from Tottenham. When you have as much money as Abramovich does, FIFA can't punish you with fines.americantrotter wrote:Somehow I doubt that Chelsea's infraction was the worst or even only transfer irregularity. It's just Europe getting their knickers in a twist.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2234
- Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 12:03 am
- Location: Portland, Maine USA
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 4:58 pm
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28825
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 5:53 am
- Location: New York City / Barcelona
I hope this helps straightening up the youth player market. These clubs that bother to scout and develop these players deserve their compensation, although since this centers on a very clear transgression (breach of contract), not sure how it will affect the general market (i.e., Barça and Madrid usually pilfer players for free since people under 16 can't really be legally tied to a contract in Spain, that's how we got Iniesta and lost Cesc Fàbregas).
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 14095
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
I read one of the writers today whose comments went along the lines of saying football was finally starting to hand out reasonable punishments, y'know the kind that might deter offenders from repeating. So hopefully it stands, or gets made longer. Its the only hope clubs like ours will have - academies, and keeping hold of kids.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests