Benitez .... prick

bobo the clown · Post by **bobo the clown** » Tue Sep 29, 2009 11:48 pm

H. Pedersen wrote:Shock! Benitez and Wenger opposed to new home-grown player quota system!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/footbal ... 258032.stm

Interesting stat here:

Benitez, whose Liverpool squad has the highest percentage of expatriate players in Europe - with 90%

You may want to change your avatar before getting into this particular arguement HP !!

anyway ... 0-2 tonight, he'll be off looking for Spanish kids whose parents once visited the UK I expect.

He is a prick though, isn't he ?

James B · Post by **James B** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 8:10 am

johnson and insua ripped a new one first half

Hoboh · Post by **Hoboh** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 8:30 am

The mighty European team

H. Pedersen · Post by **H. Pedersen** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 8:55 am

It's really not that bad of a loss. Fiorentina are a good team. Bit of an Anglo-centric attitude here.

boltonboris · Post by **boltonboris** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 9:17 am

H. Pedersen wrote:It's really not that bad of a loss. Fiorentina are a good team. Bit of an Anglo-centric attitude here.

Indeed

James B wrote:johnson and insua ripped a new one first half

As usual

Bruno · Post by **Bruno** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:45 am

boltonboris wrote:
H. Pedersen wrote:It's really not that bad of a loss. Fiorentina are a good team. Bit of an Anglo-centric attitude here.
Indeed

James B wrote:johnson and insua ripped a new one first half
As usual

£17m for Johnson was the biggest joke of the Summer

seanworth · Post by **seanworth** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:46 am

Bruno wrote:
boltonboris wrote:
H. Pedersen wrote:It's really not that bad of a loss. Fiorentina are a good team. Bit of an Anglo-centric attitude here.
Indeed

James B wrote:johnson and insua ripped a new one first half
As usual
£17m for Johnson was the biggest joke of the Summer

How much was Lescott?

Bruno · Post by **Bruno** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:48 am

Fair point!

Two shit defenders for the price of Kaka. Nice.

seanworth · Post by **seanworth** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:49 am

Bruno wrote:Fair point!

Two shit defenders for the price of Kaka. Nice.

Kind of scary when put that way.

H. Pedersen · Post by **H. Pedersen** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:08 am

I really don't think Lescott is shit.

seanworth · Post by **seanworth** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:13 am

H. Pedersen wrote:I really don't think Lescott is shit.

23M???????

Bruno · Post by **Bruno** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:19 am

H. Pedersen wrote:I really don't think Lescott is shit.

Not saying he is, but £24m is a joke. That was the point.

H. Pedersen · Post by **H. Pedersen** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:36 am

Money is no object to City. They could (and would) have shelled out £50 million for Vidic, Terry, Nesta, or any other world-class defender, but those players wouldn't have accepted. So they got the best defender they could, for whatever Everton were willing to sell him for.

Now, Johnson for £17 million was a different and entirely more retarded matter. Liverpool do not have that kind of money so Lord knows why they approved that.

Zulus Thousand of em · Post by **Zulus Thousand of em** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:39 pm

H. Pedersen wrote:Now, Johnson for £17 million was a different and entirely more retarded matter. Liverpool do not have that kind of money so Lord knows why they approved that.

Because Benitez is a prick - I'm guessing.

seanworth · Post by **seanworth** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:54 pm

H. Pedersen wrote:Money is no object to City. They could (and would) have shelled out £50 million for Vidic, Terry, Nesta, or any other world-class defender, but those players wouldn't have accepted. So they got the best defender they could, for whatever Everton were willing to sell him for.

Now, Johnson for £17 million was a different and entirely more retarded matter. Liverpool do not have that kind of money so Lord knows why they approved that.

Fine but I felt Lescott was the 3rd best defender on Everton last season. The previous season he was their best defender.

boltonboris · Post by **boltonboris** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:16 pm

seanworth wrote:
H. Pedersen wrote:Money is no object to City. They could (and would) have shelled out £50 million for Vidic, Terry, Nesta, or any other world-class defender, but those players wouldn't have accepted. So they got the best defender they could, for whatever Everton were willing to sell him for.

Now, Johnson for £17 million was a different and entirely more retarded matter. Liverpool do not have that kind of money so Lord knows why they approved that.
Fine but I felt Lescott was the 3rd best defender on Everton last season. The previous season he was their best defender.

When he played left back.

Little Green Man · Post by **Little Green Man** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:48 pm

H. Pedersen wrote:Liverpool do not have that kind of money so Lord knows why they approved that.

They might do soon if that Prince Fazakh Ali bin Dippah invests in the club.

H. Pedersen · Post by **H. Pedersen** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:06 am

Ancelotti > El Prick.

rockthereebok · Post by **rockthereebok** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:49 pm

H. Pedersen wrote:
Now, Johnson for £17 million was a different and entirely more retarded matter. Liverpool do not have that kind of money so Lord knows why they approved that.

Well over the summer they actually spent very little overall, given the sales of Alonso and Arbeloa - in fact they may even have made a profit so that's why.

If we sold someone for £30million I'm sure we'd be allowed to sign someone else for £17million.

On another note, Chelsea are looking pretty good for the title at the minute, with Utd dropping points as well, they're now comfortable favourites according to this Premier League betting article.

Still a long way to go though and everyone seems to be dropping points all over the shop - so much so that I wouldn't be too surprised if we managed a point or 3 against utd.

H. Pedersen · Post by **H. Pedersen** » Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:08 am

rockthereebok wrote:
H. Pedersen wrote:
Now, Johnson for £17 million was a different and entirely more retarded matter. Liverpool do not have that kind of money so Lord knows why they approved that.
Well over the summer they actually spent very little overall, given the sales of Alonso and Arbeloa - in fact they may even have made a profit so that's why.

If we sold someone for £30million I'm sure we'd be allowed to sign someone else for £17million.

He also spent around £20 million on Aquliani, who won't be fit until mid-October. By which point they'll probably be out of the title race, as usual.

Connect with your social network account

Benitez .... prick

Who is online