Christening
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
and your next earth shattering revelation?? What ever next white muslims???? Bhuddists that aren't "slitty eyed"??TANGODANCER wrote:Well, apart from your own (which I assume was just a joke) comment about mosques, I was actually replying to LK's Islamic comment "quote: ive a hunch that Islamic attendance at churches now pushes christian denominations. unquote. which, due to him using the word "Islamic", ie as opposed to Christian or other, I took to mean attendences at mosques. Strict Muslims would not attend churches of the cross, so there must be a Christian element among Asian people.thebish wrote:Nobody said Asians only go to the mosque did they??? Such a thought would be utterly preposterous....TANGODANCER wrote:It demonstrates that some people do go to church and that Asians attend other churches than the mosque . More than anything it proves that some people believe in God. It wasn't meant to be a world-shattering point, just a mention in keeping with the general conversation.. Next?communistworkethic wrote:so? not sure what, if anything, this proves or demonstratesTANGODANCER wrote: As an aside, Our Lady of Lourdes Church in Farnworth always has a decent turn out on Sundays, and I've personally seen several Asian families coming out after services.

"church of the cross"? there's no other type.
as for the rather trite "no athiests in foxholes", again nonsense unless any who'd ever been in a situation of stress was question as to whether they'd prayed. Even then they'd be nothing other than agnostic, falling to the Jasper Carrot 'buying a watchtower' scenario - someone's got to be right so why take a chance?
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Jasper Carrot? Er, yes, peace be with you..communistworkethic wrote:and your next earth shattering revelation?? What ever next white muslims???? Bhuddists that aren't "slitty eyed"??TANGODANCER wrote:Well, apart from your own (which I assume was just a joke) comment about mosques, I was actually replying to LK's Islamic comment "quote: ive a hunch that Islamic attendance at churches now pushes christian denominations. unquote. which, due to him using the word "Islamic", ie as opposed to Christian or other, I took to mean attendences at mosques. Strict Muslims would not attend churches of the cross, so there must be a Christian element among Asian people.thebish wrote:Nobody said Asians only go to the mosque did they??? Such a thought would be utterly preposterous....TANGODANCER wrote:It demonstrates that some people do go to church and that Asians attend other churches than the mosque . More than anything it proves that some people believe in God. It wasn't meant to be a world-shattering point, just a mention in keeping with the general conversation.. Next?communistworkethic wrote: so? not sure what, if anything, this proves or demonstrates![]()
"church of the cross"? there's no other type.
as for the rather trite "no athiests in foxholes", again nonsense unless any who'd ever been in a situation of stress was question as to whether they'd prayed. Even then they'd be nothing other than agnostic, falling to the Jasper Carrot 'buying a watchtower' scenario - someone's got to be right so why take a chance?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
Don't really buy into the whole 'moral guide' aspect myself personally, I find it unlikely that people go round to their friends' houses for a cup of tea and a chat with someone else's child about not telling lies or studying hard at school. Perhaps this happens and I'm wrong?
FWIW I was thankfully not Christened as a child and therefore I don't think I'd be technically allowed to accept a Godparent role if I wanted to or not.
FWIW I was thankfully not Christened as a child and therefore I don't think I'd be technically allowed to accept a Godparent role if I wanted to or not.
http://www.twitter.com/dan_athers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Cool, law of dimishing returns will see this practice all but extinguished in a few years thenAthers wrote:Don't really buy into the whole 'moral guide' aspect myself personally, I find it unlikely that people go round to their friends' houses for a cup of tea and a chat with someone else's child about not telling lies or studying hard at school. Perhaps this happens and I'm wrong?
FWIW I was thankfully not Christened as a child and therefore I don't think I'd be technically allowed to accept a Godparent role if I wanted to or not.

-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
gonna go for this i reckon, although its gonna cost 80 rips to get it here on time
http://www.craftuk.co.uk/childschair.htm

http://www.craftuk.co.uk/childschair.htm
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
General Mannerheim wrote:gonna go for this i reckon, although its gonna cost 80 rips to get it here on time![]()
http://www.craftuk.co.uk/childschair.htm

chair - Ikea £10
Marker pens - whsmith £5
stamps - post office £5
total £20
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
sorry to drag this up, but this time it my turn. (i just made the below comment on some other forum) but thought id bring it here...
Been having this dilemma recently, whether to have our baby christened. I’ve always said I wouldn’t do it, why should I, just to conform to what society says we should do? The amount of times ive stood at christenings listening to parents & godparents promise to guide the baby in the ways of the church, believe in Jesus & repent all sins yadda yadda yadda – absoulte bollocks. I flat out don’t believe in any of it, and thus would feel like a complete hypocrite if we had one. (but i would not lose any sleep over it, and ive been a godfather a couple of times and made such promises, you cant say no can you?)
However, I know it would make the grandparents happy, and its nice for the prospective godparents to be asked, the baby would get some nice keepsakes for when she’s older, and it’s also a decent excuse for a get together & lash up.
so my dilemma is; should I stop being such a miserable bastard and just have a christening like everyone else, or do I stick to my moral guns!?
And I don’t want one of these new wave farty civil naming ceremonies or owt like that. It’s a church job or not. Have read about blessings actually, where your basically saying thanks for her safe arrival in the world, without us making any promises on her behalf. If she wants to be baptised when she is older and more able to understand what it’s all about, then fair enough. might look into doing that.
Been having this dilemma recently, whether to have our baby christened. I’ve always said I wouldn’t do it, why should I, just to conform to what society says we should do? The amount of times ive stood at christenings listening to parents & godparents promise to guide the baby in the ways of the church, believe in Jesus & repent all sins yadda yadda yadda – absoulte bollocks. I flat out don’t believe in any of it, and thus would feel like a complete hypocrite if we had one. (but i would not lose any sleep over it, and ive been a godfather a couple of times and made such promises, you cant say no can you?)
However, I know it would make the grandparents happy, and its nice for the prospective godparents to be asked, the baby would get some nice keepsakes for when she’s older, and it’s also a decent excuse for a get together & lash up.
so my dilemma is; should I stop being such a miserable bastard and just have a christening like everyone else, or do I stick to my moral guns!?
And I don’t want one of these new wave farty civil naming ceremonies or owt like that. It’s a church job or not. Have read about blessings actually, where your basically saying thanks for her safe arrival in the world, without us making any promises on her behalf. If she wants to be baptised when she is older and more able to understand what it’s all about, then fair enough. might look into doing that.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5043
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
- Location: 200 miles darn sarf
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:26 pm
- Location: North London, originally Farnworth
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
- Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.
Who are you thanking? The hospital? The doctors/nurses/midwife?General Mannerheim wrote: Have read about blessings actually, where your basically saying thanks for her safe arrival in the world, without us making any promises on her behalf. If she wants to be baptised when she is older and more able to understand what it’s all about, then fair enough. might look into doing that.
I'm sure they'd prefer a bottle of wine, or something.
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
You'd act out that whole charade for the sake of some trinkets the baby will NEVER care about and because the prospective godparents would enjoy being asked?
What a waste of everyone's time and money.
Come on General, you know what you need to do really...
What a waste of everyone's time and money.
Come on General, you know what you need to do really...
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
It's your world and your choice. You'll do as you think best as parents, because the child isn't able to make decisions for herself. That's what it's all about really. I'm not making fun of you as it's your life, but if it's all bollox, I just wondered where the blessing would come from and who you're actually giving thanks to? Bit catch 22.General Mannerheim wrote: a get together & lash up.
And I don’t want one of these new wave farty civil naming ceremonies or owt like that. It’s a church job or not. Have read about blessings actually, where your basically saying thanks for her safe arrival in the world, without us making any promises on her behalf. If she wants to be baptised when she is older and more able to understand what it’s all about, then fair enough. might look into doing that.

Whatever, I wish you well as a family and hope you all have a good life.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Picked this one to respond to, but could have picked a few others. It's clearly nothing to do with belief/faith, if you don't believe or have faith.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:You'd act out that whole charade for the sake of some trinkets the baby will NEVER care about and because the prospective godparents would enjoy being asked?
What a waste of everyone's time and money.
Come on General, you know what you need to do really...

So I think this all boils down to how much fall-out there would be with the grandparents (or other family members) if you don't. If it's worth the hassle, then don't bother.
If they're going to cut you out of your £20m inheritance, then probably worth thinking about...
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Fair enough, if it's a pragmatic financial calculation then that's something I can get behind!Worthy4England wrote:Picked this one to respond to, but could have picked a few others. It's clearly nothing to do with belief/faith, if you don't believe or have faith.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:You'd act out that whole charade for the sake of some trinkets the baby will NEVER care about and because the prospective godparents would enjoy being asked?
What a waste of everyone's time and money.
Come on General, you know what you need to do really...
So I think this all boils down to how much fall-out there would be with the grandparents (or other family members) if you don't. If it's worth the hassle, then don't bother.
If they're going to cut you out of your £20m inheritance, then probably worth thinking about...
Seriously though, how much 'fall-out' would there be in most families these days, just for the personal choice not to have a christening?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Depends on the families surely. "Fall-out" is a bit too strong a term. God believing families will prefer it, others won't. Personal choice, as you say, as long as neither side tries to dominate the others' views.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: Seriously though, how much 'fall-out' would there be in most families these days, just for the personal choice not to have a christening?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
There would be no fall out at all. There would probably be more fallouts if we had one as we have both got divorced/remarried parents - so thats four sets of grandparents there who dont like wach other very much, and have never been in a room together before! 
but im pleased to say your putting me off it. another thing i just considered is how much i hate other peoples christenings! so why would they wanna come to ours? buts thats probably just the misanthropist in me.

but im pleased to say your putting me off it. another thing i just considered is how much i hate other peoples christenings! so why would they wanna come to ours? buts thats probably just the misanthropist in me.
do i?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
Come on General, you know what you need to do really...
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Yes! I think the general tone of your comments suggest you know it's a pointless pantomime really...General Mannerheim wrote:There would be no fall out at all. There would probably be more fallouts if we had one as we have both got divorced/remarried parents - so thats four sets of grandparents there who dont like wach other very much, and have never been in a room together before!
but im pleased to say your putting me off it. another thing i just considered is how much i hate other peoples christenings! so why would they wanna come to ours? buts thats probably just the misanthropist in me.
do i?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
Come on General, you know what you need to do really...
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Have a "Thanks to Charles Darwin" ceremony, or maybe a quick prayer to Science for your child to have a long and happy life. That should do it.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: Yes! I think the general tone of your comments suggest you know it's a pointless pantomime really...

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
- Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.
Tango - in your occasional, dull and repetitive posts on subjects like this, you always confuse rationality with simply replacing one form of superstition for another. It isn't. It's about evidence and questioning. I know you're not very good with those concepts, but do try to deal with them, rather than making your tedious remarks like the above one, eh?TANGODANCER wrote:Have a "Thanks to Charles Darwin" ceremony, or maybe a quick prayer to Science for your child to have a long and happy life. That should do it.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: Yes! I think the general tone of your comments suggest you know it's a pointless pantomime really...
Or don't comment on them at all - it's not as if it's adding anything useful.
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests