The Politics Thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
no shit! double-dip here we come... then the savings made by hiring credit reference agencies to combat benefit fraud will be dwarfed 100-fold by the increase in the welfare budget from those genuinely unemployed....BWFC_Insane wrote:It seems that Gordon Brown's warning that trying to cut the deficit too quicky and causing too much uncertainty over jobs could risk the recovery and take the country back into recession was more or less, bob on.
Aye but you both forgot convienently about Browns solution of not cutting but continueing to spend, wherewould that leave us?thebish wrote:no shit! double-dip here we come... then the savings made by hiring credit reference agencies to combat benefit fraud will be dwarfed 100-fold by the increase in the welfare budget from those genuinely unemployed....BWFC_Insane wrote:It seems that Gordon Brown's warning that trying to cut the deficit too quicky and causing too much uncertainty over jobs could risk the recovery and take the country back into recession was more or less, bob on.
with a carefull managed growth-led solution alongside cuts rather than a slash-and-burn jobs clearance....Hoboh wrote:Aye but you both forgot convienently about Browns solution of not cutting but continueing to spend, wherewould that leave us?thebish wrote:no shit! double-dip here we come... then the savings made by hiring credit reference agencies to combat benefit fraud will be dwarfed 100-fold by the increase in the welfare budget from those genuinely unemployed....BWFC_Insane wrote:It seems that Gordon Brown's warning that trying to cut the deficit too quicky and causing too much uncertainty over jobs could risk the recovery and take the country back into recession was more or less, bob on.
anyway - relax - cameron promised us he would not lead us into a double dip recession - so, nowt to worry about...
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38861
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Call me old fashioned but I think that having taken us successfully out of a recession their aim was not to plunge us back into one.Hoboh wrote:Aye but you both forgot convienently about Browns solution of not cutting but continueing to spend, wherewould that leave us?thebish wrote:no shit! double-dip here we come... then the savings made by hiring credit reference agencies to combat benefit fraud will be dwarfed 100-fold by the increase in the welfare budget from those genuinely unemployed....BWFC_Insane wrote:It seems that Gordon Brown's warning that trying to cut the deficit too quicky and causing too much uncertainty over jobs could risk the recovery and take the country back into recession was more or less, bob on.
Hey whadda I know?
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:21 pm
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
BWFC_Insane wrote:Call me old fashioned but I think that having taken us successfully out of a recession their aim was not to plunge us back into one.Hoboh wrote:Aye but you both forgot convienently about Browns solution of not cutting but continueing to spend, wherewould that leave us?thebish wrote:no shit! double-dip here we come... then the savings made by hiring credit reference agencies to combat benefit fraud will be dwarfed 100-fold by the increase in the welfare budget from those genuinely unemployed....BWFC_Insane wrote:It seems that Gordon Brown's warning that trying to cut the deficit too quicky and causing too much uncertainty over jobs could risk the recovery and take the country back into recession was more or less, bob on.
Hey whadda I know?
OUT????
Call me old fashioned but I think that we were slap bang in the middle of a recession that was looking seriously like it was going to get like the Greeks!!! No money to pay anyone!
Hey whadda I know?
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38861
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Ermm not much. Because we weren't in a recession and thats a fact.Hoboh wrote:BWFC_Insane wrote:Call me old fashioned but I think that having taken us successfully out of a recession their aim was not to plunge us back into one.Hoboh wrote:Aye but you both forgot convienently about Browns solution of not cutting but continueing to spend, wherewould that leave us?thebish wrote:no shit! double-dip here we come... then the savings made by hiring credit reference agencies to combat benefit fraud will be dwarfed 100-fold by the increase in the welfare budget from those genuinely unemployed....BWFC_Insane wrote:It seems that Gordon Brown's warning that trying to cut the deficit too quicky and causing too much uncertainty over jobs could risk the recovery and take the country back into recession was more or less, bob on.
Hey whadda I know?
OUT????
Call me old fashioned but I think that we were slap bang in the middle of a recession that was looking seriously like it was going to get like the Greeks!!! No money to pay anyone!
Hey whadda I know?
Chances are we're about to plunge back into one.
Whilst I do not profess to be an economic expert of ANY sort Hoboh your last post is a bit of an embarrassment really.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38861
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Brown warned that Tory policy would lead to a double dip recession.Bruce Rioja wrote:Given the current measuring system then yes, you are factually correct. But in reality I think it poor for the left to be trying to take some sort of highground here.BWFC_Insane wrote: Ermm not much. Because we weren't in a recession and thats a fact.
That appears to be what is happening.
Nobody is taking the "highground". What I'm worried about is the country ending up in a depression, which if the Government carry on as they are is a very real possibility.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
BWFC_Insane wrote: Ermm not much. Because we weren't in a recession and thats a fact.
Chances are we're about to plunge back into one.

Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Worthy4England wrote:Labour has accused David Cameron of committing a gaffe by mistakenly claiming Iran has a nuclear weapon. Asked why he was backing Turkey to join the EU he said it could help solve the world's problems, "like the Middle East peace process, like the fact that Iran has got a nuclear weapon".British Prime Minister David Cameron has warned Pakistan not to have any relationship with groups that "promote the export of terror". He said that he would be raising the issue with his Indian counterpart Manmohan Singh when they held talks in Delhi on Thursday.Where angels fear to tread. Clueless fecker.David Cameron has been criticised after mistakenly saying the UK was the "junior partner" in the allied World War II fight against Germany in 1940.
CAPSLOCK wrote:Worthy, forgetting number 1 (as I think that's best) I don't see your problem with number 2 and re 3 in whose view was he mistaken?
I read this last week, but not on my computer.
I actually didn't have a problem with 2/3 either, but with number 3 being the one that grated with me.
Number one was just an understandable slip of the tongue and it was absolutely clear he was talking about Iran's potential to have a nuclear weapon one day (given their pursuit of one, which is not disputed by many). And for feck's sake, he was speaking to a few voters in Brighton, not at the UN.
Number two - seems fair enough to me! I was shocked by the Pakistani reaction... I think he's been right to stand by those worse, no matter how many DC effigies those civilised Pakistantis burn in the street.
Number three - ok, this was a bad one... obviously nobody doubts that we're the junior partner in general, but to make that mistake about 1940, even if we understand the context that he was trying to ingratiate himself to his diplomatic hosts... well it's not ideal, put it that way. Nobody really believes it springs from a fundamental ignorance of the history though, do they?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38861
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
When Labour left power we weren't in a recession. They'd pulled us out of one.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:BWFC_Insane wrote: Ermm not much. Because we weren't in a recession and thats a fact.
Chances are we're about to plunge back into one.
I'd have thought that was fairly simple.
The Tories are now through their slash and burn policies are in danger of dragging us back down into one, and potentially further down the line into a depression.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Politicians are mathematicians, not historians. History is the last four years. Ancient history goes back as far as Margaret Thatcher.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: Number three - ok, this was a bad one... obviously nobody doubts that we're the junior partner in general, but to make that mistake about 1940, even if we understand the context that he was trying to ingratiate himself to his diplomatic hosts... well it's not ideal, put it that way. Nobody really believes it springs from a fundamental ignorance of the history though, do they?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
no - they are not.TANGODANCER wrote:Politicians are mathematicians, not historians. History is the last four years. Ancient history goes back as far as Margaret Thatcher.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: Number three - ok, this was a bad one... obviously nobody doubts that we're the junior partner in general, but to make that mistake about 1940, even if we understand the context that he was trying to ingratiate himself to his diplomatic hosts... well it's not ideal, put it that way. Nobody really believes it springs from a fundamental ignorance of the history though, do they?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests