Transfer Window + Squad

thebish · Post by **thebish** » Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:45 pm

ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Meh, i'm not sure having a 31 year old Eider Gudjohnsen in the side will suddenly alter the fact that they will struggle.

I wouldn't dream of nit-picking.... but it's Eidur!

Gary the Enfield · Post by **Gary the Enfield** » Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:46 pm

Prufrock wrote:
ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Ranting is never good.

Replying to nit-pickers is never good.
First of all ranting is sometimes good, go check out the angry thread

And it wasn't nit-picking. You have an opinion that Stoke will struggle. Your using playground rhetoric 101 doesn't make it any more likely. It certainly isn't a 'fact'. It's an opinion, and people presenting their opinions as facts makes me want to rant.

You're.

thebish · Post by **thebish** » Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:47 pm

Gary the Enfield wrote:
Prufrock wrote:
ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Ranting is never good.

Replying to nit-pickers is never good.
First of all ranting is sometimes good, go check out the angry thread

And it wasn't nit-picking. You have an opinion that Stoke will struggle. Your using playground rhetoric 101 doesn't make it any more likely. It certainly isn't a 'fact'. It's an opinion, and people presenting their opinions as facts makes me want to rant.
You're.

I think not Gary.....

boltonboris · Post by **boltonboris** » Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:55 pm

Gary the Enfield wrote:
Prufrock wrote:
ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Ranting is never good.

Replying to nit-pickers is never good.
First of all ranting is sometimes good, go check out the angry thread

And it wasn't nit-picking. You have an opinion that Stoke will struggle. Your using playground rhetoric 101 doesn't make it any more likely. It certainly isn't a 'fact'. It's an opinion, and people presenting their opinions as facts makes me want to rant.
You're.

Tut, tut. You're gonna get pulled up on that one sir!

Hard Lines!

Gary the Enfield · Post by **Gary the Enfield** » Thu Sep 02, 2010 5:03 pm

boltonboris wrote:
Gary the Enfield wrote:
Prufrock wrote:
ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Ranting is never good.

Replying to nit-pickers is never good.
First of all ranting is sometimes good, go check out the angry thread

And it wasn't nit-picking. You have an opinion that Stoke will struggle. Your using playground rhetoric 101 doesn't make it any more likely. It certainly isn't a 'fact'. It's an opinion, and people presenting their opinions as facts makes me want to rant.
You're.
Tut, tut. You're gonna get pulled up on that one sir!

Hard Lines!

What about starting a sentence with 'and'. Can I redeem myself there?

as · Post by as » Thu Sep 02, 2010 5:19 pm

Prufrock wrote:
jmjhb wrote:Stoke needed to invest, can see them struggling this season.
Define struggle, coz if you mean go down you're off your rocker. Teams Stoke are better than:

Us, Wolves, Newcastle, Sunderland, Blackpool, West Brom, West Ham, Wigan. And there's not much between Blackburn, Fulham, Brum and them.

Still doesn't make £8million for Kenwyne Jones not f*cking mental though.

Sunderland puzzle me, they've spent more money in the last 3/4 years than we have in our entire history (probably), and I still think we'll finish higher

seanworth · Post by **seanworth** » Thu Sep 02, 2010 5:41 pm

How financially sound are Stoke. It seems they are taking some big financial risks.

boltonboris · Post by **boltonboris** » Thu Sep 02, 2010 5:52 pm

seanworth wrote:How financially sound are Stoke. It seems they are taking some big financial risks.

The guy who owns Stoke is fecki' loaded apparently! 25th richest man in British Sport.... Not bad, that!

He owns Bet365 amongst other firms

TKIZ! · Post by **TKIZ!** » Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:11 pm

Maybe 188bet will buy us out? How they doing for money?

boltonboris · Post by **boltonboris** » Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:22 pm

TKIZ! wrote:Maybe 188bet will buy us out? How they doing for money?

Hmmm.. They're owned by 'Cube Limited' who are a company registered in the Isle of Man. I wonder if there any Eddie Davies links?

Gaz Tomorrow · Post by **Gaz Tomorrow** » Thu Sep 02, 2010 7:00 pm

boltonboris wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:Maybe 188bet will buy us out? How they doing for money?
Hmmm.. They're owned by 'Cube Limited' who are a company registered in the Isle of Man. I wonder if there any Eddie Davies links?

#

What is Eddie Davies' money actually in?

boltonboris · Post by **boltonboris** » Thu Sep 02, 2010 7:22 pm

Gaz Tomorrow wrote:
boltonboris wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:Maybe 188bet will buy us out? How they doing for money?
Hmmm.. They're owned by 'Cube Limited' who are a company registered in the Isle of Man. I wonder if there any Eddie Davies links?
#

What is Eddie Davies' money actually in?

Something about Electrical connectors in Household appliances.. Pretty lucrative stuff.. Hardly Oil, but still a decent business

Gaz Tomorrow · Post by **Gaz Tomorrow** » Thu Sep 02, 2010 7:40 pm

Prufrock wrote:
jmjhb wrote:Stoke needed to invest, can see them struggling this season.
Define struggle, coz if you mean go down you're off your rocker. Teams Stoke are better than:

Us, Wolves, Newcastle, Sunderland, Blackpool, West Brom, West Ham, Wigan. And there's not much between Blackburn, Fulham, Brum and them.

Still doesn't make £8million for Kenwyne Jones not f*cking mental though.

Everyone is better than West Ham

Gaz Tomorrow · Post by **Gaz Tomorrow** » Thu Sep 02, 2010 7:42 pm

boltonboris wrote:
Gaz Tomorrow wrote:
boltonboris wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:Maybe 188bet will buy us out? How they doing for money?
Hmmm.. They're owned by 'Cube Limited' who are a company registered in the Isle of Man. I wonder if there any Eddie Davies links?
#

What is Eddie Davies' money actually in?
Something about Electrical connectors in Household appliances.. Pretty lucrative stuff.. Hardly Oil, but still a decent business

cool thanks. Yeah i dream of the day Chelsea and Man City go tits up because the oil fields go dry

CAPSLOCK · Post by **CAPSLOCK** » Thu Sep 02, 2010 7:43 pm

http://www.strix.com/

Bruce Rioja · Post by **Bruce Rioja** » Thu Sep 02, 2010 8:18 pm

boltonboris wrote:
Gary the Enfield wrote:
Prufrock wrote:
ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Ranting is never good.

Replying to nit-pickers is never good.
First of all ranting is sometimes good, go check out the angry thread

And it wasn't nit-picking. You have an opinion that Stoke will struggle. Your using playground rhetoric 101 doesn't make it any more likely. It certainly isn't a 'fact'. It's an opinion, and people presenting their opinions as facts makes me want to rant.
You're.
Tut, tut. You're gonna get pulled up on that one sir!

Hard Lines!

that one, Sir.

H. Pedersen · Post by **H. Pedersen** » Thu Sep 02, 2010 8:28 pm

Stoke have comfortably avoided relegation the past two seasons and don't seem to have lost anybody valuable. No shakeups in management. Added some decent players. Why would they struggle this term?

Bruce Rioja · Post by **Bruce Rioja** » Thu Sep 02, 2010 8:36 pm

H. Pedersen wrote:Stoke have comfortably avoided relegation the past two seasons and don't seem to have lost anybody valuable. No shakeups in management. Added some decent players. Why would they struggle this term?

Indeed, and there's plenty more to them than just Stretch Armstrong's throw-ins.

Gaz Tomorrow · Post by **Gaz Tomorrow** » Thu Sep 02, 2010 8:39 pm

H. Pedersen wrote:Stoke have comfortably avoided relegation the past two seasons and don't seem to have lost anybody valuable. No shakeups in management. Added some decent players. Why would they struggle this term?

Huge fan base too, well it seems that way, they always fill the britannia! What capacity is it?

hisroyalgingerness · Post by **hisroyalgingerness** » Thu Sep 02, 2010 8:43 pm

They sound noisy buggers put it that way, however many they put on

Connect with your social network account

Transfer Window + Squad

Who is online