OC on goals on Sunday

Sir Nut · Post by **Sir Nut** » Thu Sep 09, 2010 9:41 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:
Sir Nut wrote:Dear Coyle, why is Kevin Davies undroppable? no matter what situation where in, no matter who we are playing he never gets subbed, i accept he has his strenghts but passing a ball and moving in the right position isnt one of them. Against some teams maybe it would be better to get it down and pass instead of launching it to Kevin Davies all the time. Im just annoyed i havnt got the chance to see Elmander or Klasnic with a different strike partner and no doubt them players feel the same way.
No! No! No! You sent it to Goalsonsunday@sky - not here - we already know your views.

Wow i didnt know that...................

General Mannerheim · Post by **General Mannerheim** » Thu Sep 09, 2010 11:56 pm

East Lower wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
East Lower wrote:
Il Pirate wrote: I didn't even know that he was into his football,

He's not. He's a wet spam fan......................Though he did impress me last week on soccer a.m. Doing all them press ups with Kammy.
I've only seen him doing girls TV whilst the wife has that GMTV crap on - he'll only get my seal of approval if he wallops Kamara.
The wife...yeah right.

Admit it, its you who watch GMTV every morning and when you're not in Sky + it.

On the other thread you're saying you watched "Midsomer Murders".

East lower. Best new poster we've had on here in ages! Welcome back batman!
Think Caps is right you must be a woman.
Police programmes are feminine now are they? Not sure about that. As for the wife, well, every now and then (when I let her out of her cage) I like to treat her to a bit of GMTV or whatever they're calling now that sourface Brummie tw*t and that stupid Irish slag present.

General Mannerheim · Post by **General Mannerheim** » Thu Sep 09, 2010 11:57 pm

I fecked that right up! You fix it.....

ohjimmyjimmy · Post by **ohjimmyjimmy** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 8:46 am

Who do you think we are, one big Jimmy Saville?

as · Post by as » Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:18 am

[quote="Sir Nut"]Dear Coyle, why is Kevin Davies undroppable? no matter what situation where in, no matter who we are playing he never gets subbed, i accept he has his strenghts but passing a ball and moving in the right position isnt one of them. Against some teams maybe it would be better to get it down and pass instead of launching it to Kevin Davies all the time. Im just annoyed i havnt got the chance to see Elmander or Klasnic with a different strike partner and no doubt them players feel the same way.[/quote]

superjohnmcginlay · Post by **superjohnmcginlay** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:45 am

I can never understand what the fook he says anyway. Too quiet, too fast and too jockish. Sometimes on skysports I can just about make it out when they've repeated it. But on GMR, no chance. We must have some bloody good translators.

BWFC_Wyles · Post by **BWFC_Wyles** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:31 pm

Sir Nut wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:
Sir Nut wrote:Dear Coyle, why is Kevin Davies undroppable? no matter what situation where in, no matter who we are playing he never gets subbed, i accept he has his strenghts but passing a ball and moving in the right position isnt one of them. Against some teams maybe it would be better to get it down and pass instead of launching it to Kevin Davies all the time. Im just annoyed i havnt got the chance to see Elmander or Klasnic with a different strike partner and no doubt them players feel the same way.
No! No! No! You sent it to Goalsonsunday@sky - not here - we already know your views.
Wow i didnt know that...................

Plus, that last comment was ridiculous anyway so I can't see Mr. Sheppard reading that question out.

Prufrock · Post by **Prufrock** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:24 pm

superjohnmcginlay wrote:I can never understand what the fook he says anyway. Too quiet, too fast and too jockish. Sometimes on skysports I can just about make it out when they've repeated it. But on GMR, no chance. We must have some bloody good translators.

"Certainly, no doubt, I do believe, we played well today, and that's what we're trying to do at this football club"

That's normally the gist of it.

TKIZ! · Post by **TKIZ!** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:41 pm

Just sent them some questions

“Does he feel his plan for Bolton Wanderers is on track in terms of the infrastructure, transfers and style of play?”

What is it about Bolton Wanderers that wanted to make him return as he played at Burnden Park rather than The Reebok?

Can you also ask him if he also told Barry Kilby at Burnley that he would only leave for Bolton or Celtic?

Lofthouse Lower · Post by **Lofthouse Lower** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:42 pm

TKIZ! wrote:Just sent them some questions

“Does he feel his plan for Bolton Wanderers is on track in terms of the infrastructure, transfers and style of play?”

What is it about Bolton Wanderers that wanted to make him return as he played at Burnden Park rather than The Reebok?

Can you also ask him if he also told Barry Kilby at Burnley that he would only leave for Bolton or Celtic?

Burnley fan friend of mine claims to be ITK and reckons that the 'only' reason Coyle rejected Celtic was because Kilby offered to double his wages.

TKIZ! · Post by **TKIZ!** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:44 pm

East Lower wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:Just sent them some questions

“Does he feel his plan for Bolton Wanderers is on track in terms of the infrastructure, transfers and style of play?”

What is it about Bolton Wanderers that wanted to make him return as he played at Burnden Park rather than The Reebok?

Can you also ask him if he also told Barry Kilby at Burnley that he would only leave for Bolton or Celtic?
Burnley fan friend of mine claims to be ITK and reckons that the 'only' reason Coyle rejected Celtic was because Kilby offered to double his wages.

Really? Oh well that's answered that question then. Thanks East Lower

Lofthouse Lower · Post by **Lofthouse Lower** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:45 pm

TKIZ! wrote:
East Lower wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:Just sent them some questions

“Does he feel his plan for Bolton Wanderers is on track in terms of the infrastructure, transfers and style of play?”

What is it about Bolton Wanderers that wanted to make him return as he played at Burnden Park rather than The Reebok?

Can you also ask him if he also told Barry Kilby at Burnley that he would only leave for Bolton or Celtic?
Burnley fan friend of mine claims to be ITK and reckons that the 'only' reason Coyle rejected Celtic was because Kilby offered to double his wages.
Really? Oh well that's answered that question then. Thanks East Lower

Could be bollocks, who knows!

As for your other questions= 1) Yes, 2) Cos we is ace

TKIZ! · Post by **TKIZ!** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:47 pm

East Lower wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:
East Lower wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:Just sent them some questions

“Does he feel his plan for Bolton Wanderers is on track in terms of the infrastructure, transfers and style of play?”

What is it about Bolton Wanderers that wanted to make him return as he played at Burnden Park rather than The Reebok?

Can you also ask him if he also told Barry Kilby at Burnley that he would only leave for Bolton or Celtic?
Burnley fan friend of mine claims to be ITK and reckons that the 'only' reason Coyle rejected Celtic was because Kilby offered to double his wages.
Really? Oh well that's answered that question then. Thanks East Lower
Could be bollocks, who knows!

As for your other questions= 1) Yes, 2) Cos we is ace

Hahahaha

boltonboris · Post by **boltonboris** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 2:59 pm

East Lower wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:Just sent them some questions

“Does he feel his plan for Bolton Wanderers is on track in terms of the infrastructure, transfers and style of play?”

What is it about Bolton Wanderers that wanted to make him return as he played at Burnden Park rather than The Reebok?

Can you also ask him if he also told Barry Kilby at Burnley that he would only leave for Bolton or Celtic?
Burnley fan friend of mine claims to be ITK and reckons that the 'only' reason Coyle rejected Celtic was because Kilby offered to double his wages.

One who happens to be bitter at his departure by any chance?

TKIZ! · Post by **TKIZ!** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 3:38 pm

boltonboris wrote:
East Lower wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:Just sent them some questions

“Does he feel his plan for Bolton Wanderers is on track in terms of the infrastructure, transfers and style of play?”

What is it about Bolton Wanderers that wanted to make him return as he played at Burnden Park rather than The Reebok?

Can you also ask him if he also told Barry Kilby at Burnley that he would only leave for Bolton or Celtic?
Burnley fan friend of mine claims to be ITK and reckons that the 'only' reason Coyle rejected Celtic was because Kilby offered to double his wages.
One who happens to be bitter at his departure by any chance?

Probably BB

fatshaft · Post by **fatshaft** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 3:53 pm

Sir Nut wrote:Dear Coyle, why is Kevin Davies undroppable? no matter what situation where in, no matter who we are playing he never gets subbed, i accept he has his strenghts but passing a ball and moving in the right position isnt one of them. Against some teams maybe it would be better to get it down and pass instead of launching it to Kevin Davies all the time. Im just annoyed i havnt got the chance to see Elmander or Klasnic with a different strike partner and no doubt them players feel the same way.

Mr Coyle to you.

as · Post by as » Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:06 pm

fatshaft wrote:
Sir Nut wrote:Dear Coyle, why is Kevin Davies undroppable? no matter what situation where in, no matter who we are playing he never gets subbed, i accept he has his strenghts but passing a ball and moving in the right position isnt one of them. Against some teams maybe it would be better to get it down and pass instead of launching it to Kevin Davies all the time. Im just annoyed i havnt got the chance to see Elmander or Klasnic with a different strike partner and no doubt them players feel the same way.
Mr Coyle to you.

I want them to ask that one.

Granted it'll start with 'and here's a question from the local village idiot'

Lofthouse Lower · Post by **Lofthouse Lower** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:18 pm

boltonboris wrote:
East Lower wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:Just sent them some questions

“Does he feel his plan for Bolton Wanderers is on track in terms of the infrastructure, transfers and style of play?”

What is it about Bolton Wanderers that wanted to make him return as he played at Burnden Park rather than The Reebok?

Can you also ask him if he also told Barry Kilby at Burnley that he would only leave for Bolton or Celtic?
Burnley fan friend of mine claims to be ITK and reckons that the 'only' reason Coyle rejected Celtic was because Kilby offered to double his wages.
One who happens to be bitter at his departure by any chance?

Aren't they all!

norm the jedi · Post by **norm the jedi** » Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:01 pm

Be an uncomfortable spot on the sofa after that mauling..

BWFC_Insane · Post by **BWFC_Insane** » Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:03 pm

norm the jedi wrote:Be an uncomfortable spot on the sofa after that mauling..

Hardly. He will point to the refereeing of the game

6-0 is a mauling. 4-1 away at Arsenal is just standard fare for teams like ourselves.

Connect with your social network account

OC on goals on Sunday

Who is online