Cahill Loses Appeal

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

ohjimmyjimmy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4108
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)

Cahill Loses Appeal

Post by ohjimmyjimmy » Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:20 pm

Steady boys...don't all faint at once.

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 03,00.html
The Football Association has rejected Bolton defender Gary Cahill's appeal for wrongful dismissal against Arsenal.

Cahill was controversially shown a straight red card by referee Stuart Attwell for a challenge from behind on Marouane Chamakh at Emirates Stadium during Bolton's 4-1 defeat.

Bolton boss Owen Coyle was hopeful of having the red card overturned after being infuriated by the decision last Saturday.

However, the FA has rejected Bolton's appeal and it means Cahill will be forced to serve a three-game ban.

It means Cahill will miss this weekend's clash with former club Aston Villa, the home game with Manchester United and the Carling Cup tie against Lancashire rivals Burnley.
Last edited by ohjimmyjimmy on Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:21 pm

He's doing well in convincing Capello to select him. :roll:

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:22 pm

At least he didn't get a fourth game for frivolity.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:34 pm

I don't see anyway they could have overturned it.

They can only do so when there is a clear mistake.

For example if Cahill was adjudged to have handled the ball but it hit his nose. Or something like that.

They can't interpret whether a red card challenge should only be a yellow or a freekick anymore. It can only be for clear obvious and demonstrable mistakes. Not for errors in judgement.

ohjimmyjimmy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4108
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)

Post by ohjimmyjimmy » Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:41 pm

Why bother appealing it then?

Seems strange, we must have had some belief. I think even Ferguson declined to appeal something recently, so why would we bother?

Anyhoo, rightly or wrongly, no surprise.

User avatar
Gary the Enfield
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8610
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Enfield

Post by Gary the Enfield » Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:48 pm

Knight and O'Brien then for the next few. Ricketts for cover? Joey O?

Tombwfc
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2912
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 5:37 pm

Post by Tombwfc » Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:19 pm

ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Why bother appealing it then?

Seems strange, we must have had some belief. I think even Ferguson declined to appeal something recently, so why would we bother?

Anyhoo, rightly or wrongly, no surprise.
Just for the sake of it I suppose. It cost about a days worth of Riga's wages and the Premier League are so woefully inconsistent with these kind of things you just never know.

And as far as I was aware Ricketts earnt his spot as back-up centre half. I don't see why he would've lost it.

User avatar
Gary the Enfield
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8610
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Enfield

Post by Gary the Enfield » Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:41 pm

Tombwfc wrote:
ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Why bother appealing it then?

Seems strange, we must have had some belief. I think even Ferguson declined to appeal something recently, so why would we bother?

Anyhoo, rightly or wrongly, no surprise.
Just for the sake of it I suppose. It cost about a days worth of Riga's wages and the Premier League are so woefully inconsistent with these kind of things you just never know.

And as far as I was aware Ricketts earnt his spot as back-up centre half. I don't see why he would've lost it.
O'Brien came on on Saturday to replace Cahill, though. Ricketts on the bench?

SonsOfThunder
Promising
Promising
Posts: 337
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 9:43 pm
Location: NYC, USA

Post by SonsOfThunder » Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:16 pm

Was wondering that myself, what has Ricketts done to fall off the face of the earth? Or was he not on the bench this past Saturday? He most definitely earned his keep when Cahill was out last season.

hisroyalgingerness
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Post by hisroyalgingerness » Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:17 pm

I'd slightly side with Ricketts. Thought of AOB chasing Agbonlahor frightens me more than nuclear war

fatshaft
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2124
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:04 pm
Location: Aberdeen
Contact:

Post by fatshaft » Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:42 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:I don't see anyway they could have overturned it.

They can only do so when there is a clear mistake..
There's the John Terry precedent. Perhaps they hoped Cahill's new found international status could swing it liike it did for that c*nt.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13656
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Post by Hoboh » Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:51 pm

hisroyalgingerness wrote:I'd slightly side with Ricketts. Thought of AOB chasing Agbonlahor frightens me more than nuclear war
There there don't worry I'll text you before hitting the button and you can get all tucked up in bed, shut the curtains and windows it'll be over before you know jack about it, all painless and we can all visit uncle lucifer for a beer or two.

Athers
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3350
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:19 am
Location: Manchester

Post by Athers » Tue Sep 14, 2010 6:24 pm

AOB has history of not keeping up with Agbonlahor either.

He can be stopped by intelligent defending but that still needs the movement of someone younger than AOB for me.
http://www.twitter.com/dan_athers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

NorthernSoulBWFC
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:38 pm

Post by NorthernSoulBWFC » Tue Sep 14, 2010 9:31 pm

It wasn't a red card, but at the same time there was NO way they would overturn it. It would be seen as majorly undermining the referee's original decision which they would never do. That's the problem with having a 12 year old referee though, disgraceful decision but unless the original red card is quite clearly a mistake then they never overturn it. At least one game is the Carling Cup game against Burnley which Cahill might have been dropped for anyway.
Keep The Faith

User avatar
officer_dibble
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15295
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Leeds

Post by officer_dibble » Tue Sep 14, 2010 10:12 pm

Got to be ricketts in at centre half. Fearfull it will be AOB picked though...

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:00 pm

Gary the Enfield wrote:
Tombwfc wrote:
ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Why bother appealing it then?

Seems strange, we must have had some belief. I think even Ferguson declined to appeal something recently, so why would we bother?

Anyhoo, rightly or wrongly, no surprise.
Just for the sake of it I suppose. It cost about a days worth of Riga's wages and the Premier League are so woefully inconsistent with these kind of things you just never know.

And as far as I was aware Ricketts earnt his spot as back-up centre half. I don't see why he would've lost it.
O'Brien came on on Saturday to replace Cahill, though. Ricketts on the bench?
yes, he was
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13656
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Post by Hoboh » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:14 pm

Full house

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Post by Lord Kangana » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:18 pm

Short lived victory you mean.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13656
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Post by Hoboh » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:23 pm

:fingers:

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13656
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Post by Hoboh » Wed Sep 15, 2010 12:10 am

Top of the shop!!! :mrgreen:

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: TANGODANCER and 34 guests