Cahill Loses Appeal
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Cahill Loses Appeal
Steady boys...don't all faint at once.
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 03,00.html
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 03,00.html
The Football Association has rejected Bolton defender Gary Cahill's appeal for wrongful dismissal against Arsenal.
Cahill was controversially shown a straight red card by referee Stuart Attwell for a challenge from behind on Marouane Chamakh at Emirates Stadium during Bolton's 4-1 defeat.
Bolton boss Owen Coyle was hopeful of having the red card overturned after being infuriated by the decision last Saturday.
However, the FA has rejected Bolton's appeal and it means Cahill will be forced to serve a three-game ban.
It means Cahill will miss this weekend's clash with former club Aston Villa, the home game with Manchester United and the Carling Cup tie against Lancashire rivals Burnley.
Last edited by ohjimmyjimmy on Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
I don't see anyway they could have overturned it.
They can only do so when there is a clear mistake.
For example if Cahill was adjudged to have handled the ball but it hit his nose. Or something like that.
They can't interpret whether a red card challenge should only be a yellow or a freekick anymore. It can only be for clear obvious and demonstrable mistakes. Not for errors in judgement.
They can only do so when there is a clear mistake.
For example if Cahill was adjudged to have handled the ball but it hit his nose. Or something like that.
They can't interpret whether a red card challenge should only be a yellow or a freekick anymore. It can only be for clear obvious and demonstrable mistakes. Not for errors in judgement.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8610
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
Just for the sake of it I suppose. It cost about a days worth of Riga's wages and the Premier League are so woefully inconsistent with these kind of things you just never know.ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Why bother appealing it then?
Seems strange, we must have had some belief. I think even Ferguson declined to appeal something recently, so why would we bother?
Anyhoo, rightly or wrongly, no surprise.
And as far as I was aware Ricketts earnt his spot as back-up centre half. I don't see why he would've lost it.
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8610
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
O'Brien came on on Saturday to replace Cahill, though. Ricketts on the bench?Tombwfc wrote:Just for the sake of it I suppose. It cost about a days worth of Riga's wages and the Premier League are so woefully inconsistent with these kind of things you just never know.ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Why bother appealing it then?
Seems strange, we must have had some belief. I think even Ferguson declined to appeal something recently, so why would we bother?
Anyhoo, rightly or wrongly, no surprise.
And as far as I was aware Ricketts earnt his spot as back-up centre half. I don't see why he would've lost it.
-
- Promising
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 9:43 pm
- Location: NYC, USA
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm
There there don't worry I'll text you before hitting the button and you can get all tucked up in bed, shut the curtains and windows it'll be over before you know jack about it, all painless and we can all visit uncle lucifer for a beer or two.hisroyalgingerness wrote:I'd slightly side with Ricketts. Thought of AOB chasing Agbonlahor frightens me more than nuclear war
AOB has history of not keeping up with Agbonlahor either.
He can be stopped by intelligent defending but that still needs the movement of someone younger than AOB for me.
He can be stopped by intelligent defending but that still needs the movement of someone younger than AOB for me.
http://www.twitter.com/dan_athers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:38 pm
It wasn't a red card, but at the same time there was NO way they would overturn it. It would be seen as majorly undermining the referee's original decision which they would never do. That's the problem with having a 12 year old referee though, disgraceful decision but unless the original red card is quite clearly a mistake then they never overturn it. At least one game is the Carling Cup game against Burnley which Cahill might have been dropped for anyway.
Keep The Faith
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
yes, he wasGary the Enfield wrote:O'Brien came on on Saturday to replace Cahill, though. Ricketts on the bench?Tombwfc wrote:Just for the sake of it I suppose. It cost about a days worth of Riga's wages and the Premier League are so woefully inconsistent with these kind of things you just never know.ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Why bother appealing it then?
Seems strange, we must have had some belief. I think even Ferguson declined to appeal something recently, so why would we bother?
Anyhoo, rightly or wrongly, no surprise.
And as far as I was aware Ricketts earnt his spot as back-up centre half. I don't see why he would've lost it.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: TANGODANCER and 34 guests