Travel to West Brom
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Not if you count the Northern Premier League as a league....CAPSLOCK wrote:Oh aye, its fcuking freezing there, too
Perhaps come as a surprise but it's the highest league ground in the country

"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
-
- Promising
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 6:18 pm
- Location: Devon
Brum's got plenty of pubs & clubs, its quite a vibrant city, avoid west bromwich my mate lives near there and says that time and the council have forgotton about it ?Odelay wrote:I'm an Aussie that's been traveling for the last seven months, so another city under the belt is always good. Everyone keeps saying how bad Brum is. What's the reason? What makes Manchester and London so much better??General Mannerheim wrote:travelling on the club coaches is SHITE.
Jump on a train from Manc to Wolverhampton, then get a connection to Smethwick Galton Bridge. bosh.
or if you wanted to you could train it to Brum a bit earlier, have a scout round then catch a train to SGB or The Hawthorns from there - although I have no idea why the hell you would actually want to visit Birmingham?
one of my more favoured away grounds also, although the locals weren’t reet friendly after that playoff 2nd leg! what a game that was btw!
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
The good points about the coach are you don't get lost, you don't have to worry about parking, you usually arrive in plenty of time to find a boozer, and you are straight outta there after the game! Might not be too bad for this reasonably close fixture actually. Besides, nobody can tell that your bottle of evian is actually gin! 

-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
There were no 'race riots' in Handsworth as far as I know - that term describes rioting between races/attacks by one on another... The riots in Handsworth were in a pattern of rioting that, surprisingly, took place in most of the poorest areas of English cities and some smaller towns.CAPSLOCK wrote:West Bromwich is better than its neighbour, Handsworth
But only just
Handsworth was the site of race riots (I use the term loosely..it was mainly a load of blacks taking the chance to loot the place) in the early 80s when we wasted our opportunity to nuke the place
In Handsworth in the early 80s almost half the population was unemployed, and, amongst young, black men the proportion was massively higher... Sit on people hard enough and eventually they are likely to bite your fat arse...
It doesn't necessarily take a sociologist to work out the connections...
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
I had understood, William, that the unemployed, sat upon, black youth were angry at Asians who owned business and were prospering. There were apparently racial sides in the riot, so it is not a huge stretch to call it a race riot. However, this was all second hand from our media and may be quite wrong.William the White wrote:There were no 'race riots' in Handsworth as far as I know - that term describes rioting between races/attacks by one on another... The riots in Handsworth were in a pattern of rioting that, surprisingly, took place in most of the poorest areas of English cities and some smaller towns.CAPSLOCK wrote:West Bromwich is better than its neighbour, Handsworth
But only just
Handsworth was the site of race riots (I use the term loosely..it was mainly a load of blacks taking the chance to loot the place) in the early 80s when we wasted our opportunity to nuke the place
In Handsworth in the early 80s almost half the population was unemployed, and, amongst young, black men the proportion was massively higher... Sit on people hard enough and eventually they are likely to bite your fat arse...
It doesn't necessarily take a sociologist to work out the connections...
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
no - I think you (wiki?) have it wrong...
The Handsworth riots were sparked by heavy handed policing - IIRC a huge mixed crowd - White, Asian & Black started to protest the arrest of a black guy - and the protest descended into rioting and looting...
the conditions were created by the Thatcher govt of the time - seething resentment... it didn't need that much to ignite it.
later theories about Asian/Black tension are, I think, an attempt at an explanation after the event...
The Handsworth riots were sparked by heavy handed policing - IIRC a huge mixed crowd - White, Asian & Black started to protest the arrest of a black guy - and the protest descended into rioting and looting...
the conditions were created by the Thatcher govt of the time - seething resentment... it didn't need that much to ignite it.
later theories about Asian/Black tension are, I think, an attempt at an explanation after the event...
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
No, me not wiki I'm afraid. My memory is not what it was and I probably mixed it up with other media pictures from Toxteth - hell it was 30 years ago. I've just looked at wiki and even they don't claim that was the reason (just attribute it to some sources) and give many different perspectives.thebish wrote:no - I think you (wiki?) have it wrong...
The Handsworth riots were sparked by heavy handed policing - IIRC a huge mixed crowd - White, Asian & Black started to protest the arrest of a black guy - and the protest descended into rioting and looting...
the conditions were created by the Thatcher govt of the time - seething resentment... it didn't need that much to ignite it.
later theories about Asian/Black tension are, I think, an attempt at an explanation after the event...
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
thebish wrote: the conditions were created by the Thatcher govt of the time - seething resentment... it didn't need that much to ignite it
The first riots were summer 81, by which time Thatcher had been PM for about 18 months
It certainly wasn't the fault of Thatcher or the police
It was lawless blacks trashing the streets, following the lead set in London and Liverpool
IMO
Sto ut Serviam
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
not ONE of the riots was just black people.CAPSLOCK wrote:thebish wrote: the conditions were created by the Thatcher govt of the time - seething resentment... it didn't need that much to ignite it
The first riots were summer 81, by which time Thatcher had been PM for about 18 months
It certainly wasn't the fault of Thatcher or the police
It was lawless blacks trashing the streets, following the lead set in London and Liverpool
IMO
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
I'm sure it wasn't justthebish wrote:not ONE of the riots was just black people.CAPSLOCK wrote:thebish wrote: the conditions were created by the Thatcher govt of the time - seething resentment... it didn't need that much to ignite it
The first riots were summer 81, by which time Thatcher had been PM for about 18 months
It certainly wasn't the fault of Thatcher or the police
It was lawless blacks trashing the streets, following the lead set in London and Liverpool
IMO
But my statement comes a sight nearer the truth than you putting it down to Thatcher
Sto ut Serviam
so - when you said "It was lawless blacks trashing the streets" you actually meant "It was lawless blacks and whites trashing the streets"?CAPSLOCK wrote:I'm sure it wasn't justthebish wrote:not ONE of the riots was just black people.CAPSLOCK wrote:thebish wrote: the conditions were created by the Thatcher govt of the time - seething resentment... it didn't need that much to ignite it
The first riots were summer 81, by which time Thatcher had been PM for about 18 months
It certainly wasn't the fault of Thatcher or the police
It was lawless blacks trashing the streets, following the lead set in London and Liverpool
IMO
But my statement comes a sight nearer the truth than you putting it down to Thatcher
and - I maintain that Thatcher was a large factor in setting the atmosphere that led to it...
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31694
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Didn't realise there was an 18-month embargo on protesting against unpopular leadersCAPSLOCK wrote:The first riots were summer 81, by which time Thatcher had been PM for about 18 monthsthebish wrote:the conditions were created by the Thatcher govt of the time - seething resentment... it didn't need that much to ignite it
Perhaps that should have invoked at BWFC until April 2009
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
You should go and rewatch the 'Constable Savage' sketch from Not the Nine O'Clock News. Whatever the truth or not about 'lawless blacks' the police sus laws at the time didn't exactly help good community relations.CAPSLOCK wrote:thebish wrote: the conditions were created by the Thatcher govt of the time - seething resentment... it didn't need that much to ignite it
The first riots were summer 81, by which time Thatcher had been PM for about 18 months
It certainly wasn't the fault of Thatcher or the police
It was lawless blacks trashing the streets, following the lead set in London and Liverpool
IMO
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Not a chance. Thatcher trashed the streets of Britain much more thoroughly than any rioters of any shade... the shells of empty factories, boarded up shops, the piles of bricks where once things had been made and sold and exported... the destruction of working class communities, the exponential growth of crime and the slow torture of the NHS... No greater vandal has ever drawn breath in this country...CAPSLOCK wrote:I'm sure it wasn't justthebish wrote:not ONE of the riots was just black people.CAPSLOCK wrote:thebish wrote: the conditions were created by the Thatcher govt of the time - seething resentment... it didn't need that much to ignite it
The first riots were summer 81, by which time Thatcher had been PM for about 18 months
It certainly wasn't the fault of Thatcher or the police
It was lawless blacks trashing the streets, following the lead set in London and Liverpool
IMO
But my statement comes a sight nearer the truth than you putting it down to Thatcher
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests