6 games in...
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34762
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
We often draw 0-0 with Fulham - check
We often beat West Ham - check
We often beat Brum - no check - minus 2 points
We always get beat at the emirates - check
We have a recent history of getting beat at Villa, heavily - plus one point
We nearly always get shafted off the red-shite - plus one point.
So with 11 mean all game against Brum, we might have done better, but I think in points terms, we're probably where you would expect us to be.
We often beat West Ham - check
We often beat Brum - no check - minus 2 points
We always get beat at the emirates - check
We have a recent history of getting beat at Villa, heavily - plus one point
We nearly always get shafted off the red-shite - plus one point.
So with 11 mean all game against Brum, we might have done better, but I think in points terms, we're probably where you would expect us to be.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
It looks better. Check
I feel better about it. Check
The crowd around me seem happier. Check
The players seem more up for it. Check
Results are certainly no worse than the last couple of seasons. Check.
Job done for me.
I feel better about it. Check
The crowd around me seem happier. Check
The players seem more up for it. Check
Results are certainly no worse than the last couple of seasons. Check.
Job done for me.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2479
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:23 pm
- Location: Dr. Alban's
I'm of the view that, with 11 men against Birmingham, we might have actually done worse. We were a completely different, improved, galvanised team when we went down to ten, even though Birmingham scored again. Our shorter game wasn't working, so we changed tact to get it up to our strikers early, and that paid off. Would we have done the same with 11?Worthy4England wrote:So with 11 mean all game against Brum, we might have done better, but I think in points terms, we're probably where you would expect us to be.
Of course, we'd be straying into Auntie's Bollocks territory if we started to attempt answers to that question. But let it be said that we've come out of what everyone perceived to be our sticky period of the season's start with momentum. OK, so have West Brom and Stoke, but it's a relatively alien concept to us recently, and I feel like we're the team out of the three to suffer from complacency less.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Elmander miss v Villa - two points missed out onWorthy4England wrote:We often draw 0-0 with Fulham - check
We often beat West Ham - check
We often beat Brum - no check - minus 2 points
We always get beat at the emirates - check
We have a recent history of getting beat at Villa, heavily - plus one point
We nearly always get shafted off the red-shite - plus one point.
So with 11 mean all game against Brum, we might have done better, but I think in points terms, we're probably where you would expect us to be.
Elmander miss v ManU - Ditto

May the bridges I burn light your way
hmmm... but if you can count our misses - you should also take into account theirs.... in which case - a point gained...Bruce Rioja wrote:Elmander miss v Villa - two points missed out onWorthy4England wrote:We often draw 0-0 with Fulham - check
We often beat West Ham - check
We often beat Brum - no check - minus 2 points
We always get beat at the emirates - check
We have a recent history of getting beat at Villa, heavily - plus one point
We nearly always get shafted off the red-shite - plus one point.
So with 11 mean all game against Brum, we might have done better, but I think in points terms, we're probably where you would expect us to be.
Elmander miss v ManU - Ditto
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34762
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Indeed - we could have been doing a fair bit better with some luck (or better finishing if you prefer), but overall we'd probably expect in recent years, to get 7 points from those games, and that's what we've got.Bruce Rioja wrote:Elmander miss v Villa - two points missed out onWorthy4England wrote:We often draw 0-0 with Fulham - check
We often beat West Ham - check
We often beat Brum - no check - minus 2 points
We always get beat at the emirates - check
We have a recent history of getting beat at Villa, heavily - plus one point
We nearly always get shafted off the red-shite - plus one point.
So with 11 mean all game against Brum, we might have done better, but I think in points terms, we're probably where you would expect us to be.
Elmander miss v ManU - Ditto
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14516
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
I know it may seem like a pointless observation, but would we have 'expected' those points with Megson in charge? Regardless if we'd gotten them or not? Would we have been happy?Worthy4England wrote:Indeed - we could have been doing a fair bit better with some luck (or better finishing if you prefer), but overall we'd probably expect in recent years, to get 7 points from those games, and that's what we've got.Bruce Rioja wrote:Elmander miss v Villa - two points missed out onWorthy4England wrote:We often draw 0-0 with Fulham - check
We often beat West Ham - check
We often beat Brum - no check - minus 2 points
We always get beat at the emirates - check
We have a recent history of getting beat at Villa, heavily - plus one point
We nearly always get shafted off the red-shite - plus one point.
So with 11 mean all game against Brum, we might have done better, but I think in points terms, we're probably where you would expect us to be.
Elmander miss v ManU - Ditto
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38864
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
7 points with potential for more is better than 7 points and thats it.
By that I mean we could make a case for deserving more than we have and over the season if we carry on as we are then the extra ones should come.
I do get the whole "if Elmander had scored there" stuff, but all sides can do that. If we hadn't conceeded a second against Man Utd equally we'd have won but we didn't. Scoring goals on the whole doesn't seem to be our main issue. Keeping clean sheets does.
I'm not sure there is an awful lot we can do as it is to improve the number of goals we're scoring but I do think we could work on conceeding a few less.
By that I mean we could make a case for deserving more than we have and over the season if we carry on as we are then the extra ones should come.
I do get the whole "if Elmander had scored there" stuff, but all sides can do that. If we hadn't conceeded a second against Man Utd equally we'd have won but we didn't. Scoring goals on the whole doesn't seem to be our main issue. Keeping clean sheets does.
I'm not sure there is an awful lot we can do as it is to improve the number of goals we're scoring but I do think we could work on conceeding a few less.
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Coyle out! Bring back BSA.BWFC_Insane wrote:7 points with potential for more is better than 7 points and thats it.
By that I mean we could make a case for deserving more than we have and over the season if we carry on as we are then the extra ones should come.
I do get the whole "if Elmander had scored there" stuff, but all sides can do that. If we hadn't conceeded a second against Man Utd equally we'd have won but we didn't. Scoring goals on the whole doesn't seem to be our main issue. Keeping clean sheets does.
I'm not sure there is an awful lot we can do as it is to improve the number of goals we're scoring but I do think we could work on conceeding a few less.

"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Indeed, I think we're something like joint-4th highest scorers. So we can nail the idea that a certain flamehair was trying to propogate that we're not scoring.BWFC_Insane wrote: Scoring goals on the whole doesn't seem to be our main issue.
As it is, we've also kept two clean sheets so far, a season-on-season improvement. I think its clear to see that we're a team in the ascendancy, and whilst there'll be bumps along the way, and the we're nowhere near the finished article yet, the fact we're dissapointed not to have beaten United at home and Villa away suggests theres something there. I call it positivity.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38864
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Agree with a lot of that though I will say that the "clean sheets" we've kept need to be placed into context. Fulham on the opening day who were shocking and Southampton away a league one side, who were only kept to nought because they couldn't finish and Bogdan made some cracking saves.Lord Kangana wrote:Indeed, I think we're something like joint-4th highest scorers. So we can nail the idea that a certain flamehair was trying to propogate that we're not scoring.BWFC_Insane wrote: Scoring goals on the whole doesn't seem to be our main issue.
As it is, we've also kept two clean sheets so far, a season-on-season improvement. I think its clear to see that we're a team in the ascendancy, and whilst there'll be bumps along the way, and the we're nowhere near the finished article yet, the fact we're dissapointed not to have beaten United at home and Villa away suggests theres something there. I call it positivity.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
That'd be Fulham who haven't lost a game yet. They're a decent side. And as I say, we have to compare ourselves to where we've come from. Theres a definite direction to us now. I'm confident enough to say there will be other clean sheets before christmas, at the very least.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
fair enough... but - only up to a point - to claim a clean sheet is not really valid because the goalie did his job is a little but absurd!BWFC_Insane wrote:Agree with a lot of that though I will say that the "clean sheets" we've kept need to be placed into context. Fulham on the opening day who were shocking and Southampton away a league one side, who were only kept to nought because they couldn't finish and Bogdan made some cracking saves.Lord Kangana wrote:Indeed, I think we're something like joint-4th highest scorers. So we can nail the idea that a certain flamehair was trying to propogate that we're not scoring.BWFC_Insane wrote: Scoring goals on the whole doesn't seem to be our main issue.
As it is, we've also kept two clean sheets so far, a season-on-season improvement. I think its clear to see that we're a team in the ascendancy, and whilst there'll be bumps along the way, and the we're nowhere near the finished article yet, the fact we're dissapointed not to have beaten United at home and Villa away suggests theres something there. I call it positivity.

According to Chalkboards he made 5 tackles and only won 3.enrdentw wrote:Does anyone know how many tackles Holden won against Man U? I know he was second top tackler in the league at the start of the weekend (with 18?) but he must be top now... IIRC he made at least 4/5 solid, ball winning tackles.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/chalkboards/create
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38864
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
No I agree but my point was we weren't looking "solid" and inpenetrable at Southampton.thebish wrote:fair enough... but - only up to a point - to claim a clean sheet is not really valid because the goalie did his job is a little but absurd!BWFC_Insane wrote:Agree with a lot of that though I will say that the "clean sheets" we've kept need to be placed into context. Fulham on the opening day who were shocking and Southampton away a league one side, who were only kept to nought because they couldn't finish and Bogdan made some cracking saves.Lord Kangana wrote:Indeed, I think we're something like joint-4th highest scorers. So we can nail the idea that a certain flamehair was trying to propogate that we're not scoring.BWFC_Insane wrote: Scoring goals on the whole doesn't seem to be our main issue.
As it is, we've also kept two clean sheets so far, a season-on-season improvement. I think its clear to see that we're a team in the ascendancy, and whilst there'll be bumps along the way, and the we're nowhere near the finished article yet, the fact we're dissapointed not to have beaten United at home and Villa away suggests theres something there. I call it positivity.
Nor have we since.
Elmander goals v West Ham - two points gained.Bruce Rioja wrote:Elmander miss v Villa - two points missed out onWorthy4England wrote:We often draw 0-0 with Fulham - check
We often beat West Ham - check
We often beat Brum - no check - minus 2 points
We always get beat at the emirates - check
We have a recent history of getting beat at Villa, heavily - plus one point
We nearly always get shafted off the red-shite - plus one point.
So with 11 mean all game against Brum, we might have done better, but I think in points terms, we're probably where you would expect us to be.
Elmander miss v ManU - Ditto
Elmander assist v ManU - one point gained.
So using this over-simplified bollocks method, Johan is singularly responsible for half our points this season, and near enough half of our goals.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
As well as, not instead of. Blimey, there's people that can't even get over-simplified bollocks right.Tombwfc wrote:Elmander goals v West Ham - two points gained.Bruce Rioja wrote:Elmander miss v Villa - two points missed out onWorthy4England wrote:We often draw 0-0 with Fulham - check
We often beat West Ham - check
We often beat Brum - no check - minus 2 points
We always get beat at the emirates - check
We have a recent history of getting beat at Villa, heavily - plus one point
We nearly always get shafted off the red-shite - plus one point.
So with 11 mean all game against Brum, we might have done better, but I think in points terms, we're probably where you would expect us to be.
Elmander miss v ManU - Ditto
Elmander assist v ManU - one point gained.
So using this over-simplified bollocks method, Johan is singularly responsible for half our points this season, and near enough half of our goals.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
I remember saying that before one of them passed it to Barry Horne.thebish wrote:I disagree - I was there - Southampton wouldn't have scored had we played all week...BWFC_Insane wrote: No I agree but my point was we weren't looking "solid" and inpenetrable at Southampton.
Nor have we since.

May the bridges I burn light your way
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: truewhite15 and 20 guests