The Politics Thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
OK - so how does this one work?
Every prisoner will work a 40-hour week and be paid the minimum wage - these will be proper jobs manufacturing and other... (s we are told) - proper jobs - not punitive chain-gang rock breaking...
so...
is that 100,000 guaranteed jobs for convicted criminals that could have been taken by hard-working non-ciminal unemployed people?
Every prisoner will work a 40-hour week and be paid the minimum wage - these will be proper jobs manufacturing and other... (s we are told) - proper jobs - not punitive chain-gang rock breaking...
so...
is that 100,000 guaranteed jobs for convicted criminals that could have been taken by hard-working non-ciminal unemployed people?
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Exactly as it should be, too.Worthy4England wrote:I'm sure mine more than cover the fact I currently get child benefit.Bruce Rioja wrote:I'm sure my parents contributions more than covered that.Worthy4England wrote:No doubt you'll be offering to pay back the amounts your parents recieved for you (index linked of course)Bruce Rioja wrote:Exactly, and we're right back to - if you want kids why should anyone else pick up their tab?H. Pedersen wrote:Why is anybody getting paid to bring another person into this overpopulated world?![]()

May the bridges I burn light your way
Ian dunkin doughnut is addressing the tories...
he started with his "contract with workers"
then part two was his "contract with the poor" - and there was such a massive obvious "now I'm switching to my caring voice" moment that I nearly vomit..
(also - he spoke to man on a glasgow council estate once - and this makes it a personal journey for him)
he started with his "contract with workers"
then part two was his "contract with the poor" - and there was such a massive obvious "now I'm switching to my caring voice" moment that I nearly vomit..
(also - he spoke to man on a glasgow council estate once - and this makes it a personal journey for him)
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38872
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Was it as bad as "I met a black man once and even he hates all them foreign folk"????thebish wrote:Ian dunkin doughnut is addressing the tories...
he started with his "contract with workers"
then part two was his "contract with the poor" - and there was such a massive obvious "now I'm switching to my caring voice" moment that I nearly vomit..
(also - he spoke to man on a glasgow council estate once - and this makes it a personal journey for him)
BWFC_Insane wrote:Was it as bad as "I met a black man once and even he hates all them foreign folk"????thebish wrote:Ian dunkin doughnut is addressing the tories...
he started with his "contract with workers"
then part two was his "contract with the poor" - and there was such a massive obvious "now I'm switching to my caring voice" moment that I nearly vomit..
(also - he spoke to man on a glasgow council estate once - and this makes it a personal journey for him)
to be fair to IDS - I DO suspect that he has had some kind of Damascus Road experience over poverty - except he is trapped in the Tory Party and must cast his words very carefully in that company - and knows that 99% of his findings will never get past the Cameron/Clegg portcullis...
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34766
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
So are you saying I should get child benefit or not then? is the bit about whether your contibutions "cover" the benefit just a bit of smoke and mirrors?Bruce Rioja wrote:Exactly as it should be, too.Worthy4England wrote:I'm sure mine more than cover the fact I currently get child benefit.Bruce Rioja wrote:I'm sure my parents contributions more than covered that.Worthy4England wrote:No doubt you'll be offering to pay back the amounts your parents recieved for you (index linked of course)Bruce Rioja wrote: Exactly, and we're right back to - if you want kids why should anyone else pick up their tab?![]()


-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
I think Labour lied to us as it sought to find an excuse for war in Iraq. It went beyond dissembling as it repeatedly manipulated the evidence in order to sell an illegal war to the British people.BWFC_Insane wrote:
Labour "lied for years".
Oh really. That must have passed me by.
Seems to me the only ones lying are the Tories and Lib Dems, repeatedly doing precisely what they said they would NOT in their manifesto's and pledges.
Hundreds of thousands have died in Iraq since. A few dozen of them our citizens.
Ed Miliband has only now made an attempt at self criticism - years after the event.
It is, admittedly, unusual for hoboh's meanderings to approach accuracy with a bargepole but on this one he's correct. Probably by accident.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1163
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 6:44 pm
- Location: Up, around the bend...
To be fair to IDS, when he lost the leadership of the party he went out and took a look at sink estates in the north and Scotland. I can't remember which program it was on but I'll never forget the look on his face when he went into one of the estates. He just kept saying over and over again, "How do people live like this?"
One more thing about socialism and the left. They don't have a monopoly on caring. They like to think they do but they don't. For the socially liberal right it's another way of trying to alleviate poverty from a different angle. Without bankrupting the country in the process.
One more thing about socialism and the left. They don't have a monopoly on caring. They like to think they do but they don't. For the socially liberal right it's another way of trying to alleviate poverty from a different angle. Without bankrupting the country in the process.
Here I stand foot in hand...talkin to my wall....I'm not quite right at all...am I?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
And what does this 'other way' consist of? And what is the 'different angle'?InsaneApache wrote:To be fair to IDS, when he lost the leadership of the party he went out and took a look at sink estates in the north and Scotland. I can't remember which program it was on but I'll never forget the look on his face when he went into one of the estates. He just kept saying over and over again, "How do people live like this?"
One more thing about socialism and the left. They don't have a monopoly on caring. They like to think they do but they don't. For the socially liberal right it's another way of trying to alleviate poverty from a different angle. Without bankrupting the country in the process.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1163
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 6:44 pm
- Location: Up, around the bend...
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34766
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
I remember the program myself, without recalling what it was called.InsaneApache wrote:To be fair to IDS, when he lost the leadership of the party he went out and took a look at sink estates in the north and Scotland. I can't remember which program it was on but I'll never forget the look on his face when he went into one of the estates. He just kept saying over and over again, "How do people live like this?"
One more thing about socialism and the left. They don't have a monopoly on caring. They like to think they do but they don't. For the socially liberal right it's another way of trying to alleviate poverty from a different angle. Without bankrupting the country in the process.
I remember wondering if he'd go back and tell his other caring buddies in the Tory party what he'd seen - they obviously had no concept of it in the 1980's/
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
We've followed two economic models since the second world war.
Neo-Keynsian (largely built around state capitalism) from 1945-79
Neo Liberalism/monetarism from 1979 to now.
We can dance round the edges as much as we like, but if people wish to believe the fairy story that any other party would have done things much differently over the past 13 years, they're on crack.
This does not exonerate Brown (or that Shark Blair) from presiding over this mess, more pointing out that this mess was inevitable because of the system we have.
Neo-Keynsian (largely built around state capitalism) from 1945-79
Neo Liberalism/monetarism from 1979 to now.
We can dance round the edges as much as we like, but if people wish to believe the fairy story that any other party would have done things much differently over the past 13 years, they're on crack.
This does not exonerate Brown (or that Shark Blair) from presiding over this mess, more pointing out that this mess was inevitable because of the system we have.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
InsaneApache wrote:To be fair to IDS, when he lost the leadership of the party he went out and took a look at sink estates in the north and Scotland. I can't remember which program it was on but I'll never forget the look on his face when he went into one of the estates. He just kept saying over and over again, "How do people live like this?"
didn't I just say this?

-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34766
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests