Klasnic arrested

TKIZ! · Post by **TKIZ!** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:11 pm

The question should be, what were they doing out on a work night?

Armchair Wanderer · Post by **Armchair Wanderer** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:12 pm

Meeting females in pubs is risky enough for us normal folk, must be 100x worse for famous people. That's why they get encouraged to get married ASAP.

P.O.S. · Post by **P.O.S.** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:18 pm

Armchair Wanderer wrote:Meeting females in pubs is risky enough for us normal folk, must be 100x worse for famous people. That's why they get encouraged to get married ASAP.

Because getting married stops them!

ohjimmyjimmy · Post by **ohjimmyjimmy** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:32 pm

mikegarbz6 wrote:i saw klasnic with stuart holden last night walking down deansgate at about 2am. Klasnic wasnt as eager as stuart holden to stop and chat

Hmm, a famous footballer not wanting to stop and chat with random stranger at 2am on Deansgate...

Shocking.

Odelay · Post by **Odelay** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:34 pm

mikegarbz6 wrote:i saw klasnic with stuart holden last night walking down deansgate at about 2am. Klasnic wasnt as eager as stuart holden to stop and chat

I spoke to a girl who is mates with him about 3 weeks ago. Apparently him and Stu are good mates and hit the town quite regularly. She seemed to think Klas was a pretty sound bloke, so strange he's gotten himself in this mess. Hopefully it's just a desperate at money or attention from some dirty slag.

ohjimmyjimmy · Post by **ohjimmyjimmy** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:36 pm

Odelay wrote:
mikegarbz6 wrote:i saw klasnic with stuart holden last night walking down deansgate at about 2am. Klasnic wasnt as eager as stuart holden to stop and chat
I spoke to a girl who is mates with him about 3 weeks ago. Apparently him and Stu are good mates and hit the town quite regularly. She seemed to think Klas was a pretty sound bloke, so strange he's gotten himself in this mess. Hopefully it's just a desperate at money or attention from some dirty slag.

What mess?

Has anything been proved yet?

Salford Trotter · Post by **Salford Trotter** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:46 pm

Just be careful what is said in this thread given we don't know the facts of the case and we wouldn't want any unnecessary scrutiny from a over-zealous lawyer, would we?

Lofthouse Lower · Post by **Lofthouse Lower** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:47 pm

Salford Trotter wrote:Just be careful what is said in this thread given we don't know the facts of the case and we wouldn't want any unnecessary scrutiny from a over-zealous lawyer, would we?

Are we not allowed to say that he is often seen out and about in Manchester?

ohjimmyjimmy · Post by **ohjimmyjimmy** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:04 pm

East Lower wrote:
Salford Trotter wrote:Just be careful what is said in this thread given we don't know the facts of the case and we wouldn't want any unnecessary scrutiny from a over-zealous lawyer, would we?
Are we not allowed to say that he is often seen out and about in Manchester?

Doesn't make for much of a thread though, unless we have a 'spotted' thread.

And then add in small print that seeing such and such a person out on the town does not mean they were involving themselves in illegal activites.

Zulus Thousand of em · Post by **Zulus Thousand of em** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:07 pm

Or I can just lock this thread.

Lofthouse Lower · Post by **Lofthouse Lower** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:09 pm

ohjimmyjimmy wrote:
East Lower wrote:
Salford Trotter wrote:Just be careful what is said in this thread given we don't know the facts of the case and we wouldn't want any unnecessary scrutiny from a over-zealous lawyer, would we?
Are we not allowed to say that he is often seen out and about in Manchester?
Doesn't make for much of a thread though, unless we have a 'spotted' thread.

And then add in small print that seeing such and such a person out on the town does not mean they were involving themselves in illegal activites.

Doesn't sound like much fun to me! Unless we have an autosig for every poster carrying a thousand disclaimers. The world we live in, eh?

Salford Trotter · Post by **Salford Trotter** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:18 pm

East Lower wrote:
Salford Trotter wrote:Just be careful what is said in this thread given we don't know the facts of the case and we wouldn't want any unnecessary scrutiny from a over-zealous lawyer, would we?
Are we not allowed to say that he is often seen out and about in Manchester?

I was referring to the initial story and the inferences thereafter, that's all. If you want to comment on who you see around town feel free mister.

Zulus Thousand of em · Post by **Zulus Thousand of em** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:23 pm

East Lower wrote:
Doesn't sound like much fun to me! Unless we have an autosig for every poster carrying a thousand disclaimers. The world we live in, eh?

When you have your own website you'll be able to post as many libellous comments as you like. I'm sure that you will be impervious to litigation. In the meantime you'll just have to abide by the sensible rules which apply here.

That's the world you currently live in. Shame!

Lofthouse Lower · Post by **Lofthouse Lower** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:24 pm

Zulus Thousand of em wrote:
East Lower wrote:
Doesn't sound like much fun to me! Unless we have an autosig for every poster carrying a thousand disclaimers. The world we live in, eh?
When you have your own website you'll be able to post as many libellous comments as you like. I'm sure that you will be impervious to litigation. In the meantime you'll just have to abide the sensible rules which apply here.

That's the world you currently live in. Shame!

Absolutely agree, my friend. I wasn't criticising this site and the approach it takes, more of a criticism of the world in general in which this sort of thing becomes an issue. My website isn't half as interesting as this one - it's full of pictures of me fishing in the States!

Zulus Thousand of em · Post by **Zulus Thousand of em** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:27 pm

Good.

ohjimmyjimmy · Post by **ohjimmyjimmy** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:32 pm

Does anybody else feel as though they sound like a total tw*t when they try and say the word 'litigious' ?

Its just one of those words that doesnt sound cool, no matter who says it.

Lofthouse Lower · Post by **Lofthouse Lower** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:32 pm

ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Does anybody else feel as though they sound like a total tw*t when they try and say the word 'litigious' ?

Its just one of those words that doesnt sound cool, no matter who says it.

ohjimmyjimmy · Post by **ohjimmyjimmy** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:36 pm

Not sure what else to say on this topic now, i don't want to be sued.

Anyone fancy a pint?

Worthy4England · Post by **Worthy4England** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:38 pm

ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Not sure what else to say on this topic now, i don't want to be sued.

Anyone fancy a pint?

As long as it's just a pint....

Don't want any of this "fancy another round at mine" when I'm a bit tipsy...

ohjimmyjimmy · Post by **ohjimmyjimmy** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:40 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Not sure what else to say on this topic now, i don't want to be sued.

Anyone fancy a pint?
As long as it's just a pint....

Don't want any of this "fancy another round at mine" when I'm a bit tipsy...

Hahhh....not on your nelly

Connect with your social network account

Klasnic arrested

Who is online