The Politics Thread

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply

Who will you be voting for?

Labour
13
41%
Conservatives
12
38%
Liberal Democrats
2
6%
UK Independence Party (UKIP)
0
No votes
Green Party
3
9%
Plaid Cymru
0
No votes
Other
1
3%
Planet Hobo
1
3%
 
Total votes: 32

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Sun Oct 31, 2010 8:57 pm

a1 wrote:she could have just called him a bigot like they normally do, insteada trying to come up with wierd analogies.
I suspect she really wanted to call him a ginger "something else" but reigned that back and settled on "rodent". Quite what "ginger" is doing as part of an insult has always evaded me...

hisroyalgingerness
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Post by hisroyalgingerness » Sun Oct 31, 2010 9:36 pm

William the White wrote:
hisroyalgingerness wrote:She's trying to persuade the Scottish voters in the national elections to (bore off) vote Labour and not Tories and not Lib Dems
Did you feel hurt personally?
Not really, no. But let's not get into the "ginger - is it a form of racism or not" debate, it's a Sunday night. It just has extra amusement for me with it being Harperson herself

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Tue Nov 02, 2010 5:32 pm

Dave and Nick appear to have swapped off our troops and stuff to the french for a baguette and a bag of onions... unless I've read it wrong... :wink:

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Post by Bruce Rioja » Tue Nov 02, 2010 7:24 pm

I shall put this in here. Quite a strange story regarding one of the coppers that shot that solicitor in Chelsea sneaking song titles into his evidence. You'd have thought that he'd have managed to get A View to a Kill in there, wouldn't you?! Bloody amateur. :whack:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-11672840
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24842
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Post by Prufrock » Tue Nov 02, 2010 7:35 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:I shall put this in here. Quite a strange story regarding one of the coppers that shot that solicitor in Chelsea sneaking song titles into his evidence. You'd have thought that he'd have managed to get A View to a Kill in there, wouldn't you?! Bloody amateur. :whack:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-11672840
Unbelievably crass if true. The cnut.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

a1
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3427
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:11 pm

Post by a1 » Wed Nov 03, 2010 12:31 am

Bruce Rioja wrote:I shall put this in here. Quite a strange story regarding one of the coppers that shot that solicitor in Chelsea sneaking song titles into his evidence. You'd have thought that he'd have managed to get A View to a Kill in there, wouldn't you?! Bloody amateur. :whack:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-11672840
or this

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34778
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Post by Worthy4England » Wed Nov 03, 2010 7:12 am

Bruce Rioja wrote:I shall put this in here. Quite a strange story regarding one of the coppers that shot that solicitor in Chelsea sneaking song titles into his evidence. You'd have thought that he'd have managed to get A View to a Kill in there, wouldn't you?! Bloody amateur. :whack:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-11672840
We have been known to offer bonus points for similar type activities during various "customer interactions", so wouldn't surprise me if this was true - but rather difficult to prove I'd have thought, unless they had a leaderboard accompanying it.

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Post by Bruce Rioja » Wed Nov 03, 2010 9:18 am

Worthy4England wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:I shall put this in here. Quite a strange story regarding one of the coppers that shot that solicitor in Chelsea sneaking song titles into his evidence. You'd have thought that he'd have managed to get A View to a Kill in there, wouldn't you?! Bloody amateur. :whack:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-11672840
We have been known to offer bonus points for similar type activities during various "customer interactions", so wouldn't surprise me if this was true - but rather difficult to prove I'd have thought, unless they had a leaderboard accompanying it.
Indeed - a round of 'meeting bingo' definitely helps the whole dreary experience, and I seem to remember the England World Cup squad of 98 slipping song titles into TV interviews too.
May the bridges I burn light your way

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Wed Nov 03, 2010 9:34 am

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/w_KqQZETfR0?fs ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/w_KqQZETfR0?fs=1&hl=en_GB" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Thu Nov 04, 2010 6:54 pm

some - but not all - may enjoy this by Charlie Brooker:

a taster:
Nick Clegg is proving to be perhaps the most useful tool in the government's shed. Not because he says or does anything particularly inspiring, but because he functions as a universal disappointment sponge for disenchanted voters.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... nick-clegg

another snippet... (just cos I am nice!)
At times Clegg sounds like a once-respected stage actor who's taken the Hollywood dollar and now finds himself sitting at a press junket, patiently telling a reporter that while, yes, on the face of it, his role as the Fartmonster in Guff Ditch III: Fartmonster's Revenge may look like a cultural step down from his previous work with the Royal Shakespeare Company, if you look beyond all the scenes of topless women being dissolved by clouds of acrid methane, the Guff Ditch trilogy actually contains more intellectual sustenance than King Lear, and that all the critics who've seen the film and are loudly claiming otherwise are misguided, partisan naysayers hell- bent on cynically misleading the public – which is ethically wrong.

Gravedigger
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1144
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:26 pm
Location: North London, originally Farnworth

Post by Gravedigger » Thu Nov 04, 2010 10:02 pm

USAF Fairford now run down as an operational base with consequent damage to local economy. This is a strange one as, should the shuttle need to divert within 14 minutes of launch then Fairford is the airbase chosen. Apparently there'll have to be a 26% increase in business rates to cover the shortfall. I'd have thought it would have been cheaper to move Lyneham and Brize Norton ops to Fairford. On a more pleasant note, for plane spotters, RIAT will still be at Fairford, though it'll cost a bomb , no pun intended, to put operational staff back for this once a year do. 8)
Don't try to be a great man. Just be a man and let history make up its own mind.

superjohnmcginlay
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3057
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:21 pm

Post by superjohnmcginlay » Fri Nov 05, 2010 12:17 pm

Re-run for Oldham n Saddleworth.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11699888

Naughty boy.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:17 pm

Have I got this right? Prisoners will get guaranteed worthwhile jobs for which they will be paid the minimum wage. The long-term unemployed will get enforced unpaid work litter-picking. The council street-care workers who would normally do the litter-picking will get made redundant - and if they remain unemployed, will eventually be made to do it unpaid?

can one of you tory/lib-dem boys explain how this works?

Zulus Thousand of em
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5043
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
Location: 200 miles darn sarf

Post by Zulus Thousand of em » Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:52 pm

Be sure and let me know when you make your first convert - Labour Boy! :D
God's country! God's county!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?

COME ON YOU WHITES!!

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:01 pm

Zulus Thousand of em wrote:Be sure and let me know when you make your first convert - Labour Boy! :D
and the question? tory-boy? any answer - even a little one? :wink:

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Post by Bruce Rioja » Mon Nov 08, 2010 8:39 am

thebish wrote:Have I got this right? Prisoners will get guaranteed worthwhile jobs for which they will be paid the minimum wage. The long-term unemployed will get enforced unpaid work litter-picking. The council street-care workers who would normally do the litter-picking will get made redundant - and if they remain unemployed, will eventually be made to do it unpaid?

can one of you tory/lib-dem boys explain how this works?
Given the amount of litter, discarded chewing gum etc. that I see washing around the place I don't think anyone'll be being made redundant. Is that your left knee that's jerking? :wink:
May the bridges I burn light your way

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Mon Nov 08, 2010 8:41 am

Bruce Rioja wrote:
thebish wrote:Have I got this right? Prisoners will get guaranteed worthwhile jobs for which they will be paid the minimum wage. The long-term unemployed will get enforced unpaid work litter-picking. The council street-care workers who would normally do the litter-picking will get made redundant - and if they remain unemployed, will eventually be made to do it unpaid?

can one of you tory/lib-dem boys explain how this works?
Given the amount of litter, discarded chewing gum etc. that I see washing around the place I don't think anyone'll be being made redundant. Is that your left knee that's jerking? :wink:

plenty of street-care people will be made redundant - local council budgets are being cut by 25.6%

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Post by Bruce Rioja » Mon Nov 08, 2010 8:53 am

thebish wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
thebish wrote:Have I got this right? Prisoners will get guaranteed worthwhile jobs for which they will be paid the minimum wage. The long-term unemployed will get enforced unpaid work litter-picking. The council street-care workers who would normally do the litter-picking will get made redundant - and if they remain unemployed, will eventually be made to do it unpaid?

can one of you tory/lib-dem boys explain how this works?
Given the amount of litter, discarded chewing gum etc. that I see washing around the place I don't think anyone'll be being made redundant. Is that your left knee that's jerking? :wink:

plenty of street-care people will be made redundant - local council budgets are being cut by 25.6%
Is a 'street-care person' a road-sweep? I once spoke to a bloke who was a flagger - he described himself as being a 'Street Mason'.
May the bridges I burn light your way

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Mon Nov 08, 2010 9:01 am

Bruce Rioja wrote:
thebish wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
thebish wrote:Have I got this right? Prisoners will get guaranteed worthwhile jobs for which they will be paid the minimum wage. The long-term unemployed will get enforced unpaid work litter-picking. The council street-care workers who would normally do the litter-picking will get made redundant - and if they remain unemployed, will eventually be made to do it unpaid?

can one of you tory/lib-dem boys explain how this works?
Given the amount of litter, discarded chewing gum etc. that I see washing around the place I don't think anyone'll be being made redundant. Is that your left knee that's jerking? :wink:

plenty of street-care people will be made redundant - local council budgets are being cut by 25.6%
Is a 'street-care person' a road-sweep? I once spoke to a bloke who was a flagger - he described himself as being a 'Street Mason'.

a street-mason is one of the levels of expertise (not in sweeping - but usually in road-work/excavation etc..) it's one down from the Ganger and one up from the Roadworker.

I was using the phrase "steet-care" to cover the whole range of street-care services as council might provide, a bit wider than sweeping - the following are the street-care service categories in my own council:

* Animal fouling
* Dead animals
* Fly tipping
* Graffiti
* Grass cutting
* Litter
* Road spillages
* Syringes
* Vandalism

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Post by Lord Kangana » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:09 am

superjohnmcginlay wrote:Re-run for Oldham n Saddleworth.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11699888

Naughty boy.
Perhaps he can whip up a few extra votes whilst he's inside?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests