Would you swap Elmo for Anelka now?
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34763
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Would you swap Elmo for Anelka now?
No more than fleeting bits when he was at Depor - and pretty much every game he played for us.East Lower wrote:Did you see him play for any of those clubs?Worthy4England wrote:No - his pedegree was "largely does fcuk all".East Lower wrote:Exactly, an excellent pedigree. Just a shame that his manager(s) didn't have any faith in him
Let's look at this a little
Roma - Joined Jan 07 - fairly low buy-out option - 3m Euro - They didn't bother at the end of the season
Us - Joined Aug 07 - no idea if we had a buy out clause - generally didn't manage to beat any fcuker - I've seen Matt Taylor go round more defenders. We didn't retain him until the end of his loan period - to give this some perspective, he was hardly a likely Megson signing.
Loaned to Depor who didn't bother after the end of the same season he was supposed to be with us for 12 months for.
All this time he was at Nantes - who kept trying to park him basically anywhere.
Agree with Enfield - his missus was alright though.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Would you swap Elmo for Anelka now?
I seem to remember there being a clause where had he played 20 games for us then we were obliged to sign him - obviously from your point of view that was a good thing.
I remember seeing him first when he was with Anderlecht and he was genuinely exciting to watch, and when we signed him I remember we were crying out for someone with a bit of pace which seemed to be the only attribute that the lad had. Shame that he wasn't more of a success because I really looking forward to seeing him return to some of his pre-Nantes form.
I remember seeing him first when he was with Anderlecht and he was genuinely exciting to watch, and when we signed him I remember we were crying out for someone with a bit of pace which seemed to be the only attribute that the lad had. Shame that he wasn't more of a success because I really looking forward to seeing him return to some of his pre-Nantes form.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34763
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Would you swap Elmo for Anelka now?
I seem to remember there was a clause like that too. Fortunately we didn't get even half-way near it.East Lower wrote:I seem to remember there being a clause where had he played 20 games for us then we were obliged to sign him - obviously from your point of view that was a good thing.
I remember seeing him first when he was with Anderlecht and he was genuinely exciting to watch, and when we signed him I remember we were crying out for someone with a bit of pace which seemed to be the only attribute that the lad had. Shame that he wasn't more of a success because I really looking forward to seeing him return to some of his pre-Nantes form.
I didn't knock his record at Anderlecht or pre-Anderlecht. Seemed to go off the boil when he went to Nantes. I was excited when we signed him (and Braaten to be honest) because I agree we needed some pace. Don't think at the time we signed Wilhelmsson he was either at the peak of his ability, nor particularly suited to the typs of game Megson wanted to bore the arse off us all with.
Either way, he hardly ripped up any trees anywhere since Anderlecht.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14516
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Would you swap Elmo for Anelka now?
Wilhelmsson and to an extent Braaten, may have done okay had we had somebody like Coyle at the helm at that time. But looking through that squad we had under Lee, it's a bloody good job Megson went back to basicsWorthy4England wrote:I seem to remember there was a clause like that too. Fortunately we didn't get even half-way near it.East Lower wrote:I seem to remember there being a clause where had he played 20 games for us then we were obliged to sign him - obviously from your point of view that was a good thing.
I remember seeing him first when he was with Anderlecht and he was genuinely exciting to watch, and when we signed him I remember we were crying out for someone with a bit of pace which seemed to be the only attribute that the lad had. Shame that he wasn't more of a success because I really looking forward to seeing him return to some of his pre-Nantes form.
I didn't knock his record at Anderlecht or pre-Anderlecht. Seemed to go off the boil when he went to Nantes. I was excited when we signed him (and Braaten to be honest) because I agree we needed some pace. Don't think at the time we signed Wilhelmsson he was either at the peak of his ability, nor particularly suited to the typs of game Megson wanted to bore the arse off us all with.
Either way, he hardly ripped up any trees anywhere since Anderlecht.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Would you swap Elmo for Anelka now?
Just a minute while I ask a Leeds fan about Thomas Brolin!Svenia wrote:Every club in the EPl should have at least one swedish player
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34763
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Would you swap Elmo for Anelka now?
Bruce Rioja wrote:Just a minute while I ask a Leeds fan about Thomas Brolin!Svenia wrote:Every club in the EPl should have at least one swedish player

Re: Would you swap Elmo for Anelka now?
Yes I would if Anelka wanted to play for us as I wouldn't keep Elmander if he doesn't want to comntinue to play for us, I'd sell him now. His ego is getting to big for his head because of his few good games. Very sad situation for me.
Depression is just a state of mind, supporting Bolton is also a state of mind hence supporting Bolton must be depressing QED
Re: Would you swap Elmo for Anelka now?
I'm sorry I haven't been reading the articles on other teams wanting Elmander but is there any evidence or quotes that seem to indicate Elmander's ego is getting too big for his head or are you just making this up? Has there even been any indications of frustration from the club regarding this contract matter or is your assumption based upon rumour gossip caused by our financial situation, the fact we are a small, club, and other clubs are in desparate need of a striker and he is in form and in the last year of a contract. Oh and that the rags in England love making up gossip to sell papers.FaninOz wrote:Yes I would if Anelka wanted to play for us as I wouldn't keep Elmander if he doesn't want to comntinue to play for us, I'd sell him now. His ego is getting to big for his head because of his few good games. Very sad situation for me.
I'm not saying he doesn't have a big ego right now but I haven't heard anything of the slightest indicating that, then again I haven't been reading very much regarding the matter.
- truewhite15
- Passionate
- Posts: 3037
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm
Re: Would you swap Elmo for Anelka now?
FiO is making it up as he goes along. There haven't been any stories anywhere that suggest an increase in the size of Elmo's ego, and all contract talks thus far, as reported, are being conducted through his agent. From what I've heard, Elmo hasn't even seen anything yet.seanworth wrote:I'm sorry I haven't been reading the articles on other teams wanting Elmander but is there any evidence or quotes that seem to indicate Elmander's ego is getting too big for his head or are you just making this up? Has there even been any indications of frustration from the club regarding this contract matter or is your assumption based upon rumour gossip caused by our financial situation, the fact we are a small, club, and other clubs are in desparate need of a striker and he is in form and in the last year of a contract. Oh and that the rags in England love making up gossip to sell papers.FaninOz wrote:Yes I would if Anelka wanted to play for us as I wouldn't keep Elmander if he doesn't want to comntinue to play for us, I'd sell him now. His ego is getting to big for his head because of his few good games. Very sad situation for me.
I'm not saying he doesn't have a big ego right now but I haven't heard anything of the slightest indicating that, then again I haven't been reading very much regarding the matter.
Re: Would you swap Elmo for Anelka now?
FaninOz wrote:Yes I would if Anelka wanted to play for us as I wouldn't keep Elmander if he doesn't want to comntinue to play for us, I'd sell him now. His ego is getting to big for his head because of his few good games. Very sad situation for me.
where on earth is there even a shred of evidence for this ludicrous claim????
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34763
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Would you swap Elmo for Anelka now?
Do you not watch it on the telly - it's quite apparent from the replays at some angles.thebish wrote:FaninOz wrote:Yes I would if Anelka wanted to play for us as I wouldn't keep Elmander if he doesn't want to comntinue to play for us, I'd sell him now. His ego is getting to big for his head because of his few good games. Very sad situation for me.
where on earth is there even a shred of evidence for this ludicrous claim????
Re: Would you swap Elmo for Anelka now?
Worthy4England wrote:Do you not watch it on the telly - it's quite apparent from the replays at some angles.thebish wrote:FaninOz wrote:Yes I would if Anelka wanted to play for us as I wouldn't keep Elmander if he doesn't want to comntinue to play for us, I'd sell him now. His ego is getting to big for his head because of his few good games. Very sad situation for me.
where on earth is there even a shred of evidence for this ludicrous claim????

Re: Would you swap Elmo for Anelka now?
Wilhelmsson has the opposite personality of Elmander. A troublemaker that can be very good with the wind in his back and when the sun shines.In other words he is not PLmaterial. I guess whoever was coach in Bolton at the time realized this after he had met him.Worthy4England wrote: I didn't knock his record at Anderlecht or pre-Anderlecht. Seemed to go off the boil when he went to Nantes. I was excited when we signed him (and Braaten to be honest) because I agree we needed some pace. Don't think at the time we signed Wilhelmsson he was either at the peak of his ability, nor particularly suited to the typs of game Megson wanted to bore the arse off us all with.
Either way, he hardly ripped up any trees anywhere since Anderlecht.
But he did actually play consistently on his loans spells in Roma och Deportivo and if it was just about playing skills then I think he should have got more chances in Bolton.
Brolin was also a troublemaker in Leeds.He refused to play on the position given to him since he was promised to be playing in a playmaker role.Instead he had to play as a winger and an attacker.
However I saw most of Brolins games in Leeds and he wasn't half as bad as people seems to think ( even if he wasn't anywhere near the form that gave him a place in the world team 1994.)Especially not if you compare him to many other Leeds players.
But it is understandable that people had a biased opinion about him, because had a huge ego, was fat as a ***, and cost Leeds a big transfer sum.
He didn't care much for Leeds either though since he paid Leeds from his own pocket so he could go back to Parma.
Re: Would you swap Elmo for Anelka now?
Why? I have a view and a perception and on opinion, as do you and everyone else on here. You and others think my and others views that they don't agree with are such that you/they try and insult me/them. Sticks and stones etc .......CAPSLOCK wrote:FiO
You really are a bitter owd fcuker
Whilst I respect your and others views and don't resort to personal insults even when I may believe that people are talking dog excrement.
Views are views they don't have to be right or wrong, its a free world and you, I and others are allowed to have them and to express them without having people like you resort to personal insults. You have a right to believe that of me and write it but its cheap, nasty, unecessary, unhelpful, pointless, pathetic, etc, etc, etc and has nothing to do with and doesn't contribute anything positive to the thread.
But back to the thread, why would Elmander and his agent be acting as they are over the contract renewal if they both didn't believe that he was now "god's gift to football" and that many other clubs would pay him a fortune to play for them? Isn't that a form of unjustified bigheadedness after two years of underperformance followed by 14 games of excellent performance?
He may be right but shouldn't he respect what Bolton and Coyle have done for him, in standing by him and helping him to his current exhaulted and potentially temporary position, by signing a new contract? If these other clubs do believe that he is worth having they will still want him and he could then help Bolton to get a good price for him, just like Anelka did!
Depression is just a state of mind, supporting Bolton is also a state of mind hence supporting Bolton must be depressing QED
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Would you swap Elmo for Anelka now?
Whilst I might agree with you about Elmander's agent and his motivation, I'm afraid I've seen nothing in the last three years to suggest Elmander has an "ego".
Indeed, I think thats directly linked to his previous problems, enough to suggest that you haven't a clue what you're talking about.
Indeed, I think thats directly linked to his previous problems, enough to suggest that you haven't a clue what you're talking about.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: Would you swap Elmo for Anelka now?
Pointless and irrelevant comment, one could say that about any post on this site, and doesn't contribute anything helpful to the debate.Lord Kangana wrote:Whilst I might agree with you about Elmander's agent and his motivation, I'm afraid I've seen nothing in the last three years to suggest Elmander has an "ego".
Indeed, I think thats directly linked to his previous problems, enough to suggest that you haven't a clue what you're talking about.
Depression is just a state of mind, supporting Bolton is also a state of mind hence supporting Bolton must be depressing QED
Re: Would you swap Elmo for Anelka now?
If Mandy had an ego problem you'd hear it here first
I will admit I worry what will happen with him if he gets a long term 3yr + contract, 2 years would be the max for me, take it or leave it.

I will admit I worry what will happen with him if he gets a long term 3yr + contract, 2 years would be the max for me, take it or leave it.
Re: Would you swap Elmo for Anelka now?
Anelka 'helped' us get a good price by signing an extended contract on more money than he was onFaninOz wrote:he could then help Bolton to get a good price for him, just like Anelka did!
I though the crux of this was that the club weren't in a position/willing to offer such a deal to Elmander
So, just how do you propose Elmander helps Bolton 'like' Anelka did
Sto ut Serviam
Re: Would you swap Elmo for Anelka now?
According to all we know, we've offered him a hefty pay-cut and/or a short term deal.
Because he hasn't crawled over broken glass to sign it immediately, he's an egomaniac who thinks he's Pele.
FiO you take some unneccesary stick at times, but that's fecking bonkers.
Because he hasn't crawled over broken glass to sign it immediately, he's an egomaniac who thinks he's Pele.
FiO you take some unneccesary stick at times, but that's fecking bonkers.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 9 guests