Smackems v The Trotters

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by plymouth wanderer » Sat Dec 18, 2010 9:55 pm

just been reading on the sunderland forum most of them are sticking up for are away attendence
not that we have nothing to be ashamed of but just nice to hear
again i wish them well for the rest of the season apart from the return fixture
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

norm the jedi
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:11 pm
Location: Near a Shandy
Contact:

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by norm the jedi » Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:15 pm

hisroyalgingerness wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Ianmooreslovechild wrote:Didn't think it was Jussi's fault.Can't see us keeping a clean sheet this season.I'll say nowt about Cahill and Knight as a centre half pairing,it's already been said.
The defending for their goal was shite all round.

I still don't know what Jussi was doing though. Surely he time to react better than that? He must of been expecting a near post shot when Bent got himself in that position!
I thought he handled the Bent shot quite well, Sunderland were still second favourites with the rebound, and still managed to score.
Bigger question for me WTF was Cahill doing, Stand up and stick a leg out - job done - engage in some bizarre twisty diving header move - 1 - 0 pretty harsh too put it on Jussi who just got unlucky with where the rebound off him ended up..
Are we in League 2 yet - Three seasons and we'll be away to Chesham

hisroyalgingerness
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by hisroyalgingerness » Sat Dec 18, 2010 11:09 pm

Yeah I agree with that, falling forward rather than sticking a leg out as you say.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by Lord Kangana » Sat Dec 18, 2010 11:53 pm

I blame the Bish.

His boundless, groundless optimism, and claiming being a top 10 team at christmas would go in our favour when the transfer window opened.

Bish. Are you reading?

Its.

All.

Your.

Fault.

I hope you understand.

From now on we will lose every game 10-0 and we are doooomed. Understand?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by thebish » Sun Dec 19, 2010 9:08 am

I's agree with you - except my match preview concluded we were doooooooooooooomed - it seems the damage was already done..

I blame you, LK, for your months-long campaign of frisky perkiness at the appointment of Coyle - persuading me that things were actually going to get better... 8)

Ianmooreslovechild
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1741
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by Ianmooreslovechild » Sun Dec 19, 2010 10:36 am

Having looked again on MotD no way you can blame Jussi for the goal( infact he was pretty flawless all round today) Cahill reaction was very funny especially as the ball appeared to be hitting the back of the net at the point he was doing his strange twisty heady thing. We were a standard Klasnic finish away from a point at one of the most effective home teams in the country so no need to be down.
Coyle left his full on attacking switch a little late possibly out of fear for Sunderlands ability to break quickly.In summation we still look dodgy at the back,Elmo looks a bit tired and I'd like to see our sharpest wide player get a bit more than 7 mins to do his thing.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by Lord Kangana » Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:28 am

thebish wrote:I's agree with you - except my match preview concluded we were doooooooooooooomed - it seems the damage was already done..

I blame you, LK, for your months-long campaign of frisky perkiness at the appointment of Coyle - persuading me that things were actually going to get better... 8)
Coyle Out!
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13656
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by Hoboh » Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:54 am

Watching the game yesterday (On 'putor i didn't go) then highlights, what I find sad is had we got a goal in the second half I am totally, totally convinced Sunderland would have folded and we would have run out winners by 3 or 4 goals. Our sharpness in front of goal is waining a little and we need to get back on track if we are to sustain our nose bleeds!!!

NQsDiscoPants
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:01 pm

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by NQsDiscoPants » Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:15 pm

Hoboh wrote:Watching the game yesterday (On 'putor i didn't go) then highlights, what I find sad is had we got a goal in the second half I am totally, totally convinced Sunderland would have folded and we would have run out winners by 3 or 4 goals. Our sharpness in front of goal is waining a little and we need to get back on track if we are to sustain our nose bleeds!!!
Yes, because we've shown a real tendency to "fold" at home haven't we?

NQsDiscoPants
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:01 pm

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by NQsDiscoPants » Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:16 pm

thebish wrote:
hi there, i'm chris wrote:That Sunderland Forum is hilarious in parts, especially the stick they gave to Jussi. Apparently he's dropped a few clangers in his time at the Reebok. This is probably the reason we let a great goalkeeper in Ali Al-Habsi go to Wigan.

A club that paid £9million for Craig Gordon has no business laughing at Jussi!!
Well, that's ironic now isn't it?!?!

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by Lord Kangana » Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:46 pm

Bish already knows its all his fault. He doesn't need an interloper to point it out. Thats just gloating.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

Choppers
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 711
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: twitter.com/jebusf
Contact:

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by Choppers » Sun Dec 19, 2010 5:39 pm

The only player at fault for their goal (imho) was Zat Knight. Cahill got caught between trying not to handball and misjudging the angle it was approaching at. However, if Zat had done his job it'd have never fallen to Wellbeck.

He absolutely fell asleep, literally stood still until he saw the runner (the eventual goalscorer) and just failed to track the attacker. He's done really well lately, but when he falls asleep like that, it can (and did) decide a game.

Aside from that, Petrov hasn't played a good full 90 minutes for me yet, and Muamba had his worst ever game for us. He looked devoid of anything, tackling was off and he stood still half the time. But for the booking and one run early on you wouldn't have known he was playing, and that puts enormous pressure on Holden to do double the work.

Petrov though was awful, always looking to shoot from wherever. His signing has kicked Taylor up the arse (though I rated him before anyway) and Taylor should be ahead of him right now. So wasteful and for someone who is supposed to have pace I didn't see him attempt to beat a man yesterday once.

Rodrigo looks okay though, excellent cross for Klasnic's eventual miss. I thought Coyle made the subs too late. We had a small bit of pressure on them so he didn't make the subs, but it really was clear we weren't going to score with the 11 on the field.

Chris Foy though, what a c*nt. No question Cattermole should have had yet another sending off for two yellows but he bottled it completely. Other than that, the amount of free kicks he gave for incidents that were simply NOT FOULS was shocking. He seemed completely influenced by the crowd (at one point he gave a late decision after the fans reared up) and Steve Bruce's constant outside of the technical area moaning.

We've gone from being rough to being too nice, there was an incident where if our player had been dishonest and gone down, we'd probably have gotten a penalty. I'm not advocating diving, but every other feck* does it, especially the Sunderland nancyboys who should be utterly ashamed of themselves at their play acting for the entire 90 minutes.

All that said, perhaps the 1-0 was a fair scoreline as we looked really devoid of attacking ideas yesterday and I think we could have played for 5 hours and not scored.

As for Sunderland, I thought Wellbeck was far and away their best player, he troubled us all the time and we couldn't cope with him. I noted that the commentary team said how Petrov and Taylor had swapped wings to try something different attacking wise, but it was clear to me that they'd swapped so that Taylor could help Ricketts out with Wellbeck.

Gyan looked decent too and I was surprised to see him come off. Cattermole is still a thug, just like he was before he joined Sunderland and if I were a Mackems fan I'd fecking loathe him being our captain.

Oh, I nearly forgot. I wasn't a fan of the signing of Paul Robinson, but this guy is fecking great. A masterclass of leadership from the back imho and is vital to the team at the moment. Coyle gives me the impression his players would run through walls for him and Robinson is the "on-the-field" embodyment of that.
Last edited by Choppers on Sun Dec 19, 2010 5:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
http://www.godisageek.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; | A Videogame Site With A Difference
http://www.twitter.com/jebusf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; | Twitter

seanworth
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4049
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 1:07 pm
Location: thailand/canada

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by seanworth » Sun Dec 19, 2010 5:47 pm

Welcome aboard Choppers. Introduce yourself in the new members. Oh and nice post.

swc
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:27 pm

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by swc » Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:37 pm

plymouth wanderer wrote:just been reading on the sunderland forum most of them are sticking up for are away attendence
not that we have nothing to be ashamed of but just nice to hear
again i wish them well for the rest of the season apart from the return fixture
For a club who attract around 20,000 home fans give or take then 250 away fans to Sunderland is a bit embarrassing for a team sitting 6th :( That works out about 125 fans for every 10,000 who are hardcore

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by CAPSLOCK » Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:39 pm

I wasn't embarrassed

I was, however, warm and a ton better off
Sto ut Serviam

swc
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:27 pm

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by swc » Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:46 pm

Bolton brought around 300 on boxing day a few year back during our shit season and there wasn't any snow in sight. Apart from blackburn at £10 a pop do they take any half decent numbers anywhere. :lol: Didn't they 137 to Arsenal last season for the postponed game

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by Lord Kangana » Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:50 pm

I've been to Sunderland away several times. I'm just trying to place the season you talk about, I might have been there.

You say it was a shit season. Are there any other features that might distinguish it a bit more from all the rest you have had?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

hisroyalgingerness
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by hisroyalgingerness » Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:54 pm

I think we're going to have to re-develop our away end in preparation for Sunderland coming. I don't know how we'll cope with accommodating such a massive club, with a massive fanbase and all the folk they're going to bring. We should pinch ourselves really we're allowed to rub shoulders at all :roll:

NorthernSoulBWFC
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:38 pm

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by NorthernSoulBWFC » Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:56 pm

swc wrote:
plymouth wanderer wrote:just been reading on the sunderland forum most of them are sticking up for are away attendence
not that we have nothing to be ashamed of but just nice to hear
again i wish them well for the rest of the season apart from the return fixture
For a club who attract around 20,000 home fans give or take then 250 away fans to Sunderland is a bit embarrassing for a team sitting 6th :( That works out about 125 fans for every 10,000 who are hardcore
I couldn't care less about what you think of our attendance. Well done with your maths skills though.
Keep The Faith

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by William the White » Sun Dec 19, 2010 8:18 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:I've been to Sunderland away several times. I'm just trying to place the season you talk about, I might have been there.

You say it was a shit season. Are there any other features that might distinguish it a bit more from all the rest you have had?


yeah... was it the shit season when we had a tedious 0-0 draw?

Or the shit season when JJ taught them more about football in 45 mins than they'd seen in their team since the 1950s?

Or the shit season we had them on toast 4-1 in Elmander's last purple patch?

So many shit seasons to choose from... Still, massive club...

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 28 guests