Smackems v The Trotters

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by TANGODANCER » Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:35 pm

Game over Mackems, move on back up there. If Bruce is a good manager and Sunderland are a good side I'll come on your forum at season's end when that's proven and congratulate you.
We have other games to think about. Good luck against United.... :wink:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

a1
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3427
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:11 pm

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by a1 » Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:43 pm

i dont get why certain sunderland fans think because a team has x number of fans less than them should be x certain place in the league behind them.

if you did that, wouldnt they be behind newcastle all the time ?

.. in somethin' like 10th and never ever qualifying for europe ?

forever ?

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by Lord Kangana » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:18 am

William the White wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:I've been to Sunderland away several times. I'm just trying to place the season you talk about, I might have been there.

You say it was a shit season. Are there any other features that might distinguish it a bit more from all the rest you have had?


yeah... was it the shit season when we had a tedious 0-0 draw?

Or the shit season when JJ taught them more about football in 45 mins than they'd seen in their team since the 1950s?

Or the shit season we had them on toast 4-1 in Elmander's last purple patch?

So many shit seasons to choose from... Still, massive club...
I remember us giving them a lesson in football at Roker around Christmas 94/95. We pissed all over them just couldn't finish them off, and one of the 7 players called Gray in their team scored from a cross that the wind got hold of and dropped into the far corner past a despairing Branagan. 1-1. Theres absolutley no justice in footbal that it wasn't at least 1-7.

We even did the conga on their terrace. And I left my flask.

The home end was full though. So a moral victory to them then.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by William the White » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:36 am

Lord Kangana wrote:
William the White wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:I've been to Sunderland away several times. I'm just trying to place the season you talk about, I might have been there.

You say it was a shit season. Are there any other features that might distinguish it a bit more from all the rest you have had?


yeah... was it the shit season when we had a tedious 0-0 draw?

Or the shit season when JJ taught them more about football in 45 mins than they'd seen in their team since the 1950s?

Or the shit season we had them on toast 4-1 in Elmander's last purple patch?

So many shit seasons to choose from... Still, massive club...
I remember us giving them a lesson in football at Roker around Christmas 94/95. We pissed all over them just couldn't finish them off, and one of the 7 players called Gray in their team scored from a cross that the wind got hold of and dropped into the far corner past a despairing Branagan. 1-1. Theres absolutley no justice in footbal that it wasn't at least 1-7.

We even did the conga on their terrace. And I left my flask.

The home end was full though. So a moral victory to them then.
Yeah, I was there that day - was it Scott Green scored ours? Roker was such a feckin palace n all... :roll:

seanworth
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4049
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 1:07 pm
Location: thailand/canada

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by seanworth » Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:30 am

I think the main reason they go on about attendance is that it is the only thing for them to brag about. Let's face it they haven't accomplished much for a long time. Last season in the 2nd half they started to turn things around a bit, and this season are starting to play some good football, although I hope the flopping around like some circus seal act doesn't continue. If they keep improving they may be able to move on from the attendance fixation and boast about some real accomplishments. Right now though they have only just moved ahead of us in the table. Whether Bruce will stay is another matter though.

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:02 am

I should think they would be 6th, considering the many many millions that they've spent. Amazing though that their ground is so empty, only 70% full. Shocking, really, especially when a small club like ours managed to get 85% for the last home one.

youwhat
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:29 am

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by youwhat » Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:33 am

East Lower wrote:I should think they would be 6th, considering the many many millions that they've spent. Amazing though that their ground is so empty, only 70% full. Shocking, really, especially when a small club like ours managed to get 85% for the last home one.
You haven't really thought about this one before posting have you?

Your last game was a local derby which attracted around 5,000 travelling Blackburn Rovers fans. Really, you should have sold out. On Saturday, Bolton managed to muster up around 300, it doesn't exatcly help us does it?

Providing the away end is even remotely full (3,000 - should be expected in this league), our attendance would have been around 40,000 which is quite fantastic considering the game was live on telly at 12:45 and so close to Christmas.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by Lord Kangana » Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:35 am

Oh jesus.

Re-read that last sentence.

F*ck sake, wheres the Turks.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:35 am

Even at 40,000 you'd still be 20% short, which considering your catchment area and massive heritage etc must be a disappointment to you.

ratbert
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3067
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:15 pm

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by ratbert » Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:51 am

http://www.the-wanderer.co.uk/bolton/its-snow-joke" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Attendance petty squabbles aside a moment; here's ginge's match report.

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:52 am

From the Grauniad
Bolton Wanderers lost a game of football on Saturday. Remarkably the world is still spinning on its axis. So they lost to Sunderland? Fair enough. Sunderland are a fine side, especially at home. Perhaps Owen Coyle might fret that Johan Elmander and Kevin Davies are both without a goal since 20 November. OK, that's slight cause for concern, but Elmander has eight goals already this season. He'll fancy his chances when West Brom visit on Boxing Day. No need to worry and it would be churlish to criticise him. Their supporters, too, will probably grumble about Ivan Klasnic's meltdown when presented with a glorious opportunity to equalise in stoppage time. Big deal. It happens, and he's rescued Bolton on more than one occasion. Sometimes the desire to analyse a football match to within an inch of its life cannot be justified; a defeat can be acceptable.

Context shapes our take on such matters. If, for example, this was Bolton's fifth defeat in a row and left them bottom of the table, legitimate questions would have to be asked. However, trumping most people's pre-season expectations, they will be seventh on Christmas Day, above Liverpool, Aston Villa and Everton. It is difficult to find reasons to be negative. If this all sounds gratuitously glib, banal even, that's because football is sometimes precisely that. This is not a snippy comment on the tedium of the Premier League. After all, Bolton were not atrocious on Saturday, just slightly off their game and denied a point by one of the saves of the season from Craig Gordon. Sometimes a minor setback really is worth nothing more than a casual shrug of the shoulders.
:pray:

seanworth
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4049
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 1:07 pm
Location: thailand/canada

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by seanworth » Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:24 am

Lord Kangana wrote:Oh jesus.

Re-read that last sentence.

F*ck sake, wheres the Turks.
Surprised he didn't add the weather conditions to further back up his argument. :lol:
Almost too funny.

BwfcDan
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 588
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:48 pm
Location: Garstang

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by BwfcDan » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:44 pm

youwhat wrote:
East Lower wrote:I should think they would be 6th, considering the many many millions that they've spent. Amazing though that their ground is so empty, only 70% full. Shocking, really, especially when a small club like ours managed to get 85% for the last home one.
You haven't really thought about this one before posting have you?

Your last game was a local derby which attracted around 5,000 travelling Blackburn Rovers fans. Really, you should have sold out. On Saturday, Bolton managed to muster up around 300, it doesn't exatcly help us does it?

Providing the away end is even remotely full (3,000 - should be expected in this league), our attendance would have been around 40,000 which is quite fantastic considering the game was live on telly at 12:45 and so close to Christmas.
Is this a piss take :lol:
"Im a big fish in a small pond"... "Your not a big fish! Your not even a fish!"

User avatar
HMX
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2851
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 6:29 pm

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by HMX » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:53 pm

Lol'd at the '3,000 should be expected in this league'.

Didn't get the memo about this?

as
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 973
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 1:28 pm

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by as » Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:17 pm

We can take 5k to Wiggin, and only a few hundred to Blunderland.

It says a lot about your 'club' that away fans just arern't interested in going to the SOL. Why bother with Sunderland when there are bigger games out there......

How many empty seats in the home end yesterday then? I could have swore your stadium was almost a quarter empty :lol:

Sod off back to Durham, whoppers.
Troll and proud of it.

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by plymouth wanderer » Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:42 pm

youwhat wrote:
East Lower wrote:I should think they would be 6th, considering the many many millions that they've spent. Amazing though that their ground is so empty, only 70% full. Shocking, really, especially when a small club like ours managed to get 85% for the last home one.
You haven't really thought about this one before posting have you?

Your last game was a local derby which attracted around 5,000 travelling Blackburn Rovers fans. Really, you should have sold out. On Saturday, Bolton managed to muster up around 300, it doesn't exatcly help us does it?

Providing the away end is even remotely full (3,000 - should be expected in this league), our attendance would have been around 40,000 which is quite fantastic considering the game was live on telly at 12:45 and so close to Christmas.



bet you are wanking over the fought of takin thousands to c the rags
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

User avatar
Gary the Enfield
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8610
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Enfield

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by Gary the Enfield » Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:48 pm

Like the game on Saturday, Sunderland only just shade the 'better attendances'

S.O.L. capacity: 49000 Average attendance (this season) 38,342 which is 78.25% of capacity.

Reebok capacity: 28,723 Average attendance (this season) 22,359 which is 77.84% of capacity.

Considering we have, in the premiership alone, competition from Wigan, Blackburn, Blackpool, Everton, Man Utd, Man City and Liverpool whereas they have, um, Newcastle, I'd say any dick waving re: attendances is precarious to say the least.

youwhat
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:29 am

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by youwhat » Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:51 pm

as wrote:We can take 5k to Wiggin, and only a few hundred to Blunderland.

It says a lot about your 'club' that away fans just arern't interested in going to the SOL. Why bother with Sunderland when there are bigger games out there......

How many empty seats in the home end yesterday then? I could have swore your stadium was almost a quarter empty :lol:
Actually I think it says a lot more about you as a supporter. I don't go to see a new stadium/opposition team, I go to support my side.

Which is basically what the Reebock has been like since it opened. How many sell-outs have you had??? And this could only be achieved by offering 5,000 away tickets.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by Lord Kangana » Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:52 pm

I'm interested now. How many sell outs have we had youwhat?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

BwfcDan
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 588
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:48 pm
Location: Garstang

Re: Smackems v The Trotters

Post by BwfcDan » Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:45 pm

youwhat wrote:
as wrote:We can take 5k to Wiggin, and only a few hundred to Blunderland.

It says a lot about your 'club' that away fans just arern't interested in going to the SOL. Why bother with Sunderland when there are bigger games out there......

How many empty seats in the home end yesterday then? I could have swore your stadium was almost a quarter empty :lol:
Actually I think it says a lot more about you as a supporter. I don't go to see a new stadium/opposition team, I go to support my side.

Which is basically what the Reebock has been like since it opened. How many sell-outs have you had??? And this could only be achieved by offering 5,000 away tickets.
Show's you know feck all about Bolton now go home...
"Im a big fish in a small pond"... "Your not a big fish! Your not even a fish!"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Prufrock and 30 guests