Wanderers v Liverpool
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Wanderers v Liverpool
I seem to recall Kev Davies writing on Twitter last week that McCann has retired
-
- Promising
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 3:09 pm
Re: Wanderers v Liverpool
Maybe he was too badly injured then.East Lower wrote:I seem to recall Kev Davies writing on Twitter last week that McCann has retired
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Wanderers v Liverpool
That, and also that he's fookin' shite.t_o_molloy wrote:Got injured in training.Tombwfc wrote:What's happened to Joey O? He was angling for a move out on loan not that long ago, so presumably he must be fit enough to sit on the bench.
May the bridges I burn light your way
Re: Wanderers v Liverpool
i think i know this , someone told me the answer when megson did the 4 on the bench thing at arsenal ,t_o_molloy wrote: Also why does Coyle keep saying we have the smallest squad in the league? Chelsea do. They only have 19 players in their 25 man squad and they still manage to fill the bench every week with players like McEachran etc.
apparantly its -
if he puts some kid on the bench - the kid then get first team wages/bonus/whatever . i assume it upgrades their contract somehow. if the kid's not gonna touch the first team again for ages its wasting money.
-
- Promising
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 3:09 pm
Re: Wanderers v Liverpool
Makes sense, but;a1 wrote:i think i know this , someone told me the answer when megson did the 4 on the bench thing at arsenal ,t_o_molloy wrote: Also why does Coyle keep saying we have the smallest squad in the league? Chelsea do. They only have 19 players in their 25 man squad and they still manage to fill the bench every week with players like McEachran etc.
apparantly its -
if he puts some kid on the bench - the kid then get first team wages/bonus/whatever . i assume it upgrades their contract somehow. if the kid's not gonna touch the first team again for ages its wasting money.
Connolly, Sheridan, O'Halloran and Eaves are all on professional contracts anyway.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Wanderers v Liverpool
It is a bit of a funny 'un. Historically managers have preferred to expose young players to the whole first-team matchday experience by sticking them on the bench. Under Coyle it seems that they have to earn the right.t_o_molloy wrote:Makes sense, but;a1 wrote:i think i know this , someone told me the answer when megson did the 4 on the bench thing at arsenal ,t_o_molloy wrote: Also why does Coyle keep saying we have the smallest squad in the league? Chelsea do. They only have 19 players in their 25 man squad and they still manage to fill the bench every week with players like McEachran etc.
apparantly its -
if he puts some kid on the bench - the kid then get first team wages/bonus/whatever . i assume it upgrades their contract somehow. if the kid's not gonna touch the first team again for ages its wasting money.
Connolly, Sheridan, O'Halloran and Eaves are all on professional contracts anyway.
May the bridges I burn light your way
Re: Wanderers v Liverpool
Or he's putting pressure on the board, which is plausible considering these days he mentions our small squad like he's David O'Leary.
Either way I'm not that worried about it. I can't see us getting into any kind of mess during a game that would require us playing Sheridan and the like.
Either way I'm not that worried about it. I can't see us getting into any kind of mess during a game that would require us playing Sheridan and the like.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Wanderers v Liverpool
Maybe OC's just being bluntly honest with everybody. The playing squad has been reduced considerably by the long-term injuries to JOB, Sean Davies and Ricky Gardner and the demise of fading players like McCann, Andy O,Brien etc, plus our loanees, Tamir Cohen on compassionate leave and Chung Yong on international duty. Add that to the financial status of the club, lowered attendences etc, and it can't be easy to keep it all together.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: Wanderers v Liverpool
Seems like some achievement to blame some of the financial results on our inability to offload senior players and still have our boss claiming to have one of the smallest squads in the league.
http://www.twitter.com/dan_athers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Promising
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:21 am
Re: Wanderers v Liverpool
I've got a good feeling about this.™
Even though I've got a bad feeling in my head.
Even though I've got a bad feeling in my head.
I'd rather support Bolton than be you.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1448
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:57 am
Re: Wanderers v Liverpool
This is correct, I was chatting to someone close to the club last season and they pay £10k to an emerging player who makes it onto the bench for 1st team game. It's not a lot of cash in these times but significant enough to think about the merits of doing it or not.a1 wrote:i think i know this , someone told me the answer when megson did the 4 on the bench thing at arsenal ,t_o_molloy wrote: Also why does Coyle keep saying we have the smallest squad in the league? Chelsea do. They only have 19 players in their 25 man squad and they still manage to fill the bench every week with players like McEachran etc.
apparantly its -
if he puts some kid on the bench - the kid then get first team wages/bonus/whatever . i assume it upgrades their contract somehow. if the kid's not gonna touch the first team again for ages its wasting money.
The Voice Of Reason
Re: Wanderers v Liverpool
Salford Trotter wrote:
This is correct, I was chatting to someone close to the club last season and they pay £10k to an emerging player who makes it onto the bench for 1st team game. It's not a lot of cash in these times but significant enough to think about the merits of doing it or not.
bloody norah!! no wonder we're in debt... that's half of what I'd get paid in a whole year - just for sitting on a bench in your tracksuit watching 90mins of football....
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Wanderers v Liverpool
Biggest worry/hope today is that wecan keep it together as a team and that our formula isn't lost. Robinson out, both Holden and Steinsson very doubtful, Chung Yong gone off to Korea and now the mental stress KD must be living with right now. All gone a bit pear-shaped but we still need the belief. COME ON YOU WHITES.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: Wanderers v Liverpool
Only four on the bench... 

-
- Promising
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:34 pm
- Location: Seoul
Re: Wanderers v Liverpool
I'd have felt good about this one if we had our regular squad. Hopefully we can still pull it together with what we have.
I'm going for a 1-2 with SKD heading in the late winner! COYW!
I'm going for a 1-2 with SKD heading in the late winner! COYW!
Re: Wanderers v Liverpool
Jussi,
Ricketts, Cahil, Knight, Alonso
Moreno, M Davies, Muamba, Taylor
K Davies, Elmander
Subs: Bogdan, Petrov, Klasnic, Blake
Ricketts, Cahil, Knight, Alonso
Moreno, M Davies, Muamba, Taylor
K Davies, Elmander
Subs: Bogdan, Petrov, Klasnic, Blake
http://www.godisageek.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; | A Videogame Site With A Difference
http://www.twitter.com/jebusf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; | Twitter
http://www.twitter.com/jebusf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; | Twitter
-
- Promising
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 1:58 pm
- Location: Westhoughton
Re: Wanderers v Liverpool
Really, really hope for the best. Surely, surely it can't be an unlucky one-nil with a Stevie G dive or deflected shot. That sort of thing just couldn't happen to us.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Wanderers v Liverpool
Hope to fxxk we don't get any defenders carded.Choppers wrote: Subs: Bogdan, Petrov, Klasnic, Blake


Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Promising
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 3:09 pm
Re: Wanderers v Liverpool
I know about this 10k thing but surely we could have put Connolly there just in case.TANGODANCER wrote:Hope to fxxk we don't get any defenders carded.Choppers wrote: Subs: Bogdan, Petrov, Klasnic, BlakeGo OC, attack em and fxxk it!.
Re: Wanderers v Liverpool
There is not a single other defender at the football club who could sit on that bench?
Seems a reckless way to prove a point.
Seems a reckless way to prove a point.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 14 guests