The Trotters v The Potters
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:54 pm
Re: The Trotters v The Potters
Dibble....I've actually been away for a while but you make a fair point. I accept that I don't post as often when we are doing well (although I do occasionally....), for me its a bit pointless posting well done, keep it going etc...that's why I don't tend to
But I go to most home games & the odd 1 or 2 away, and I enjoyed most games during the first half of the season (although I think we where very fortunate at times and I knew that we had over achieved - but enjoyed it at the time !) However, when we are struggling I try to offer 'my opinion' as to the reasons why and accept that most probably don't agree, because they are IMO either a little 'blinkered' or don't want to say anything to upset the masses.
I'm Bolton through & through but that doesn't mean that I have to agree with everything the club, manager or other fans say...life would be a tad dull if we all agreed with each other and had the same opinions, after all football is about individual opinions !
But I go to most home games & the odd 1 or 2 away, and I enjoyed most games during the first half of the season (although I think we where very fortunate at times and I knew that we had over achieved - but enjoyed it at the time !) However, when we are struggling I try to offer 'my opinion' as to the reasons why and accept that most probably don't agree, because they are IMO either a little 'blinkered' or don't want to say anything to upset the masses.
I'm Bolton through & through but that doesn't mean that I have to agree with everything the club, manager or other fans say...life would be a tad dull if we all agreed with each other and had the same opinions, after all football is about individual opinions !
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The Trotters v The Potters
Mate - it's feck all to do with blinkered or upsetting the masses.Peter Thompson wrote:However, when we are struggling I try to offer 'my opinion' as to the reasons why and accept that most probably don't agree, because they are IMO either a little 'blinkered' or don't want to say anything to upset the masses.
You posted drop Davo, Jussi, Taylor.
That would leave us playing Chelsea for 90 mins, with:
Bogdan,
Ricketts, Cahill, Knight, Robinson,
Mavies, Holden, Muamba, Petrov (?),
Elmander, Rodrigo (?)
That looks a bit fecking scary to me. It's alright trying to oust some of the oldies, but you've got to replace them with something better.
Re: The Trotters v The Potters
Is Riga available?
http://www.godisageek.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; | A Videogame Site With A Difference
http://www.twitter.com/jebusf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; | Twitter
http://www.twitter.com/jebusf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; | Twitter
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:54 pm
Re: The Trotters v The Potters
That's what transfer windows are there for....is it not ?Worthy4England wrote:Mate - it's feck all to do with blinkered or upsetting the masses.Peter Thompson wrote:However, when we are struggling I try to offer 'my opinion' as to the reasons why and accept that most probably don't agree, because they are IMO either a little 'blinkered' or don't want to say anything to upset the masses.
You posted drop Davo, Jussi, Taylor.
That would leave us playing Chelsea for 90 mins, with:
Bogdan,
Ricketts, Cahill, Knight, Robinson,
Mavies, Holden, Muamba, Petrov (?),
Elmander, Rodrigo (?)
That looks a bit fecking scary to me. It's alright trying to oust some of the oldies, but you've got to replace them with something better.
Why do we we have to play 4-4-2, why couldn't we play a 4-3-3 or 4-5-1 with the same back four (although I'd bring Stiensson back) with Holden, Muamba & M Davies in the middle with Elmander upfront & Rodrigo & Petrov wide. Or if SWP joins on loan (although highly unlikely) why couldn't he replace M Davies in your 4-4-2.
I'll stick to what I said at this moment in time I'd drop Jussi, Taylor & KD to the bench and try something different (which doesn't involve M Davies wide right), again it is only my opinion - and we have over a week to bring 1 or 2 in even if only on loan.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The Trotters v The Potters
You're right. Transfer windows are for signing players in - thanks for pointing that out to me, I'd missed it until now. We'll replace Jussi, SKD and Taylor with this windows signings of. Oh, errr, wait a minute, we've not signed anyone yet. If we were to sign a forward (maybe Vela) I'm still not sure he'd be a shoe-in to replace Davo.Peter Thompson wrote:That's what transfer windows are there for....is it not ?Worthy4England wrote:Mate - it's feck all to do with blinkered or upsetting the masses.Peter Thompson wrote:However, when we are struggling I try to offer 'my opinion' as to the reasons why and accept that most probably don't agree, because they are IMO either a little 'blinkered' or don't want to say anything to upset the masses.
You posted drop Davo, Jussi, Taylor.
That would leave us playing Chelsea for 90 mins, with:
Bogdan,
Ricketts, Cahill, Knight, Robinson,
Mavies, Holden, Muamba, Petrov (?),
Elmander, Rodrigo (?)
That looks a bit fecking scary to me. It's alright trying to oust some of the oldies, but you've got to replace them with something better.
Why do we we have to play 4-4-2, why couldn't we play a 4-3-3 or 4-5-1 with the same back four (although I'd bring Stiensson back) with Holden, Muamba & M Davies in the middle with Elmander upfront & Rodrigo & Petrov wide. Or if SWP joins on loan (although highly unlikely) why couldn't he replace M Davies in your 4-4-2.
I'll stick to what I said at this moment in time I'd drop Jussi, Taylor & KD to the bench and try something different (which doesn't involve M Davies wide right), again it is only my opinion - and we have over a week to bring 1 or 2 in even if only on loan.
We don't have to play 4-4-2. That team looks even scarier as a 4-3-3. I might have been tempted to play 4-5-1 against Stoke away, but I'm not sure from the personnel we have who fits in wide right nor whether Mavies is good enough as attacking centre mid - that's before we get to Davo up front.
I'll stick to what I said - just now, I wouldn't make the changes you're on about.
At the minute, I have more problems with the way Knight, Robinson, Muamba and Mavies are playing to be honest. Way out in front of lets drop SKD and Jussi. Taylor, I think I'm not too fussed about one way or t'other at the moment. He adds defensively over Petrov but we lose attacking threat.
Like BWFCI, personally I'd be looking for CM and CD signings. We probably think this, because we don't want to upset the masses, rather than it's where we have obvious problems at the minute.
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: The Trotters v The Potters
Usually, when we win well, match threads run to a hell of a lot less than if we losePeter Thompson wrote:Dibble....I've actually been away for a while but you make a fair point. I accept that I don't post as often when we are doing well (although I do occasionally....), for me its a bit pointless posting well done, keep it going etc...that's why I don't tend to
But I go to most home games & the odd 1 or 2 away, and I enjoyed most games during the first half of the season (although I think we where very fortunate at times and I knew that we had over achieved - but enjoyed it at the time !) However, when we are struggling I try to offer 'my opinion' as to the reasons why and accept that most probably don't agree, because they are IMO either a little 'blinkered' or don't want to say anything to upset the masses.
I'm Bolton through & through but that doesn't mean that I have to agree with everything the club, manager or other fans say...life would be a tad dull if we all agreed with each other and had the same opinions, after all football is about individual opinions !
But thats football
Same with fanzines - what do you fill it with when you are winning all the time, ergo they disappear! (only part of the story I know)
Re: The Trotters v The Potters
Not much point in continuing to make a contribution then I guess if my opinion and reasoning whilst sitting sunning myself in Australia are considered to be unsound, incorrect, unfounded, negative, without feeling and unwelcome.officer_dibble wrote:FIO
It's not a one view site, it's just no-one agrees with you. Wonder why?![]()
No Coyle doesn't walk on water. There are things he does that I disagree with - bringing Steinsson in against WBA for Ricketts, failing to rotate our strike line dependant on opposition, his sometimes late use of subs (though little complaint on this recently)....though lets face it short of getting Jose Mourinhio we have the best manager available. He's the best we can get. I, along with most, didn't think Megson was the best we could get at the time but he did a reasonable job for a while before f*cking it up right royally. There are also things I think we need to sort as a team (our inability to beat a 'big 4' team when every other bugger can being one). I have confidence in Coyle to do that, and am convinced he will, given time, which most of us on here will, cos we are pleased with the entertainment on offer.
I think you are the same but you just need to learn to express your views a bit better. Why just because people don't like my phraseology
Oh and most people jump straight on you cos all you do is slate the fans when you are sat on your arse in Australia.
Same with PT, he made some reasonable points I thought, but he only seems to appear when we are beaten!
So my parting comments are, that I can remember all Bolton Managers from Bill Ridding onwards, they all had good and bad points as does Coyle. My view is that he is inexperienced and it's starting to show, he has fantastic potential but has yet to prove that he has what it takes for the long haul when things are going bad for him and the team. I hope that he proves to be what a large number on here already believe that he is, only time will tell but I wont be here to enjoy that success or failure with you all.
So you can have your ball and continue to play with yourselves, as you don't seem to like people to express an alternative view without abusing them, whilst I continue my almost 60 years of supporting Bolton in splendid isolation.
Depression is just a state of mind, supporting Bolton is also a state of mind hence supporting Bolton must be depressing QED
Re: The Trotters v The Potters
that's entirely up to you...FaninOz wrote: Not much point in continuing to make a contribution then I guess if my opinion and reasoning whilst sitting sunning myself in Australia are considered to be unsound, incorrect, unfounded, negative, without feeling and unwelcome.
i don't think anyone disagrees with you that managers have good and bad points - that's what's called a tactic of distracion from the actual point - a straw man - it's a nice way of distracting attention from the things people DO actually disagree with you about - and for which you appear to have no answer - preferring to hide behind a persecution defense...FaninOz wrote:So my parting comments are, that I can remember all Bolton Managers from Bill Ridding onwards, they all had good and bad points as does Coyle.
again - entirely up to you - but again - classic straw man. this is a forum where debate happens - if you offer a view - as you do - then part of the deal is that you have to accept that it will be discussed and debated. this is also a football forum - and you might reasonably expect that some of that debate/discussion will happen with hyperbole and some robust posturing... the mods effectively prevent the extremes - that's how it is.FaninOz wrote:So you can have your ball and continue to play with yourselves, as you don't seem to like people to express an alternative view without abusing them, whilst I continue my almost 60 years of supporting Bolton in splendid isolation.
enjoy your splendid isolation, tho, you are always welcome to post when you have summat to say.
Last edited by thebish on Sun Jan 16, 2011 2:34 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Trotters v The Potters
FIO the issue that exists here is that you're trying to suggest that Coyle is at fault for a congested and away heavy fixture list we're currently experiencing. Which manager do you think would have done significantly better with the players we have against Liverpool, Chelsea, Stoke, Sunderland all on their own patches?FaninOz wrote:Not much point in continuing to make a contribution then I guess if my opinion and reasoning whilst sitting sunning myself in Australia are considered to be unsound, incorrect, unfounded, negative, without feeling and unwelcome.officer_dibble wrote:FIO
It's not a one view site, it's just no-one agrees with you. Wonder why?![]()
No Coyle doesn't walk on water. There are things he does that I disagree with - bringing Steinsson in against WBA for Ricketts, failing to rotate our strike line dependant on opposition, his sometimes late use of subs (though little complaint on this recently)....though lets face it short of getting Jose Mourinhio we have the best manager available. He's the best we can get. I, along with most, didn't think Megson was the best we could get at the time but he did a reasonable job for a while before f*cking it up right royally. There are also things I think we need to sort as a team (our inability to beat a 'big 4' team when every other bugger can being one). I have confidence in Coyle to do that, and am convinced he will, given time, which most of us on here will, cos we are pleased with the entertainment on offer.
I think you are the same but you just need to learn to express your views a bit better. Why just because people don't like my phraseology
Oh and most people jump straight on you cos all you do is slate the fans when you are sat on your arse in Australia.
Same with PT, he made some reasonable points I thought, but he only seems to appear when we are beaten!
So my parting comments are, that I can remember all Bolton Managers from Bill Ridding onwards, they all had good and bad points as does Coyle. My view is that he is inexperienced and it's starting to show, he has fantastic potential but has yet to prove that he has what it takes for the long haul when things are going bad for him and the team. I hope that he proves to be what a large number on here already believe that he is, only time will tell but I wont be here to enjoy that success or failure with you all.
So you can have your ball and continue to play with yourselves, as you don't seem to like people to express an alternative view without abusing them, whilst I continue my almost 60 years of supporting Bolton in splendid isolation.
The issue is that when a manager has a few defeats and a team goes through a "sticky patch" is that the manager has "LOST IT" or "BEEN FOUND OUT" its just classic reactionary bullshit.
All a manager can do is keep the spirit, keep the lads together, manage their workload and do his best to get results outta them. And of course do well in the market. Coyle isn't vastly experienced but we're going through the same slump we've experienced around abouts the same time every fooking year under 3 different managers at a time of year when small squads get stretched and those with fewer resources struggle.
Perhaps just perhaps there is little Coyle or any other manager can do about it at a club like ours.
And lets remember how we came out of these slumps in the past. It wasn't replacing half the time, chucking out the old boys or making wholesale changes to the playing staff. It was plugging away with what we had, maybe a couple of decent additions, but basically it was keeping the faith and seeing it out.
Last edited by BWFC_Insane on Sun Jan 16, 2011 4:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: The Trotters v The Potters
We need a different plan when playing away from home. I'd put 5 in midfield, we just look too open sometimes, especially away from home.
it's slightly tanned
Re: The Trotters v The Potters
yeah - but what about when we are away from home?getraw wrote:We need a different plan when playing away from home. I'd put 5 in midfield, we just look too open sometimes, especially away from home.
-
- Promising
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:21 am
Re: The Trotters v The Potters
Results have gone our way today, draws all round. Still in 7th!
Woo
Woo
I'd rather support Bolton than be you.
Re: The Trotters v The Potters
So all we have to do next week is beat Chelsea and will be able to hold on to that position for another week.
-
- Promising
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:21 am
Re: The Trotters v The Potters
seanworth wrote:So all we have to do next week is beat Chelsea and will be able to hold on to that position for another week.
True, but I'd rather go through my week knowing we're in 7th come-what-may, not any lower.
Guess you're a glass three-quarters empty kinda chap?
I'd rather support Bolton than be you.
Re: The Trotters v The Potters
RobbieSavagesLeg wrote:seanworth wrote:So all we have to do next week is beat Chelsea and will be able to hold on to that position for another week.
True, but I'd rather go through my week knowing we're in 7th come-what-may, not any lower.
Guess you're a glass three-quarters empty kinda chap?


- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Trotters v The Potters
Make "Do it for Nat" the rallying cry.seanworth wrote:So all we have to do next week is beat Chelsea and will be able to hold on to that position for another week.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2479
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:23 pm
- Location: Dr. Alban's
Re: The Trotters v The Potters
If I could, "Do It For Nat" should be a message resounding around the Reebok throughout the rest of the season. Particularly in the FA Cup.TANGODANCER wrote:Make "Do it for Nat" the rallying cry.seanworth wrote:So all we have to do next week is beat Chelsea and will be able to hold on to that position for another week.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: The Trotters v The Potters
Get a grip. Ya big tart. One thing 60 years of supporting Bolton should give you is a thick skin.FaninOz wrote:Not much point in continuing to make a contribution then I guess if my opinion and reasoning whilst sitting sunning myself in Australia are considered to be unsound, incorrect, unfounded, negative, without feeling and unwelcome.
So my parting comments are, that I can remember all Bolton Managers from Bill Ridding onwards, they all had good and bad points as does Coyle. My view is that he is inexperienced and it's starting to show, he has fantastic potential but has yet to prove that he has what it takes for the long haul when things are going bad for him and the team. I hope that he proves to be what a large number on here already believe that he is, only time will tell but I wont be here to enjoy that success or failure with you all.
So you can have your ball and continue to play with yourselves, as you don't seem to like people to express an alternative view without abusing them, whilst I continue my almost 60 years of supporting Bolton in splendid isolation.
Businesswoman of the year.
Re: The Trotters v The Potters
http://www.the-wanderer.co.uk/bolton/tonked-on-trent" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Calm down and read the match report you lot!!
Calm down and read the match report you lot!!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Abdoulaye's Twin, DJBlu, Google [Bot], The_Gun and 34 guests