Knight or Wheater - the poll
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Knight or Wheater - the poll
I think thats a bit harsh on Knight but then so is being critical of Wheater against Villa
Couple of bad moments for DW on Saturday but so far he's well in credit
Can't get my head around how anybody can be voting Knight
Couple of bad moments for DW on Saturday but so far he's well in credit
Can't get my head around how anybody can be voting Knight
Sto ut Serviam
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:17 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Knight or Wheater - the poll

- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Knight or Wheater - the poll
Agree with thisclapton is god wrote:Its Wheaters to lose at the moment.
Wheater has made a couple of mistakes, but overall performances have been better than Knight of recent. Two decent premiership centre halves who are probably about our limit, without investing and polishing a diamond (and who is to say Wheater won't be one).
He's definitely not done owt disastrous to warrant losing his spot has Wheater, so he keeps it for me.
-
- Promising
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:34 pm
- Location: Seoul
Re: Knight or Wheater - the poll
Yes I did. Which is why I'd like to see him play more and actually take a proper one.martin1877coywm wrote:LOl did you see his effort in the last FA Cup game?midnitefooty wrote:Wheater.
I don't get as nervous when he has the ball at his feet. Zat scares me when he tries to dribble or pass it on the ground. Which is why I'm sure he just boots it.
Plus, I want to see Wheater score from a FK.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Knight or Wheater - the poll
But if Cahill is better, then how are they are limit? Surely the limit is playing next to them?officer_dibble wrote:clapton is god wrote:
Wheater has made a couple of mistakes, but overall performances have been better than Knight of recent. Two decent premiership centre halves who are probably about our limit, without investing and polishing a diamond (and who is to say Wheater won't be one).
.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: Knight or Wheater - the poll
Would like to see both Wheater and Knight together for a game or so. No disrespect to Cahill but this might be the line up for next season.
Re: Knight or Wheater - the poll
hmmm... but if cahill is going - makes more sense to get as much out of him as we can while we have him - and, who knows - he might even stay.seanworth wrote:Would like to see both Wheater and Knight together for a game or so. No disrespect to Cahill but this might be the line up for next season.
if he goes in the summer - then wheater and knight would have a whole pre-season to get to know each other.
Re: Knight or Wheater - the poll
I only wouldn't mind seeing a trial for one or two games only not for all the remaining games. If they are not compatable it gives us time for search out other options if possible.thebish wrote:hmmm... but if cahill is going - makes more sense to get as much out of him as we can while we have him - and, who knows - he might even stay.seanworth wrote:Would like to see both Wheater and Knight together for a game or so. No disrespect to Cahill but this might be the line up for next season.
if he goes in the summer - then wheater and knight would have a whole pre-season to get to know each other.
Re: Knight or Wheater - the poll
i personally think wheater is the less of two evils.as has been said; its his place to lose. knight was on the slide (all puns intended) before he got injured.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Knight or Wheater - the poll
Wheater is immeasurably better than Knight
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Re: Knight or Wheater - the poll
not if you measure it in england capsboltonboris wrote:Wheater is immeasurably better than Knight
:/
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Knight or Wheater - the poll
When Knight gor his cap, they were giving them out with a litre of petrol at Texacoa1 wrote:not if you measure it in england capsboltonboris wrote:Wheater is immeasurably better than Knight
:/
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Re: Knight or Wheater - the poll
I said so earlier but those 2 together would probably make me cry. Even at their best they're too slow to cope with any kind of pacy striker, each works better with a smaller, quicker guy next to him.seanworth wrote:Would like to see both Wheater and Knight together for a game or so. No disrespect to Cahill but this might be the line up for next season.
And then I have the images in my head of them playing together when they both have a bad day filled with mistakes (which both are highly capable of). I just see them running into each other, fouling constantly, getting mixed up with high balls in and quick balls behind - like some sort of horrific bumbling comedy duo.
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: Knight or Wheater - the poll
Don't worry - Ricketts will be back....cophilie wrote:I said so earlier but those 2 together would probably make me cry. Even at their best they're too slow to cope with any kind of pacy striker, each works better with a smaller, quicker guy next to him.seanworth wrote:Would like to see both Wheater and Knight together for a game or so. No disrespect to Cahill but this might be the line up for next season.
And then I have the images in my head of them playing together when they both have a bad day filled with mistakes (which both are highly capable of). I just see them running into each other, fouling constantly, getting mixed up with high balls in and quick balls behind - like some sort of horrific bumbling comedy duo.

"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
Re: Knight or Wheater - the poll
Ah well in that case we're sortedMontreal Wanderer wrote:Don't worry - Ricketts will be back....cophilie wrote:I said so earlier but those 2 together would probably make me cry. Even at their best they're too slow to cope with any kind of pacy striker, each works better with a smaller, quicker guy next to him.seanworth wrote:Would like to see both Wheater and Knight together for a game or so. No disrespect to Cahill but this might be the line up for next season.
And then I have the images in my head of them playing together when they both have a bad day filled with mistakes (which both are highly capable of). I just see them running into each other, fouling constantly, getting mixed up with high balls in and quick balls behind - like some sort of horrific bumbling comedy duo.

- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Knight or Wheater - the poll
We signed Cahill when his reputation probably placed him lower in the football pecking order than Zat Knight. Thats the polishing a rough diamond thing I was getting at.Lord Kangana wrote:But if Cahill is better, then how are they are limit? Surely the limit is playing next to them?officer_dibble wrote:clapton is god wrote:
Wheater has made a couple of mistakes, but overall performances have been better than Knight of recent. Two decent premiership centre halves who are probably about our limit, without investing and polishing a diamond (and who is to say Wheater won't be one).
.
Signing a twenty five year old plus centre half - Zat Knights our level.
Sign a sub 25 year old we could well sign someone potentially better.
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 12:14 am
- Location: Las Vegas, USA
Re: Knight or Wheater - the poll
lmaocophilie wrote:I said so earlier but those 2 together would probably make me cry. Even at their best they're too slow to cope with any kind of pacy striker, each works better with a smaller, quicker guy next to him.seanworth wrote:Would like to see both Wheater and Knight together for a game or so. No disrespect to Cahill but this might be the line up for next season.
And then I have the images in my head of them playing together when they both have a bad day filled with mistakes (which both are highly capable of). I just see them running into each other, fouling constantly, getting mixed up with high balls in and quick balls behind - like some sort of horrific bumbling comedy duo.

Re: Knight or Wheater - the poll
On games I've seen Zat seems to play much better when not partnered with Cahill. No idea why. Wheater according to Midd fans says when he has a solid partner he is an excellent defender. When partnered with someone inferior his game falls apart. I would like to see if that will be the case, although certainly not this week. Will Zat step up and how will Wheater play?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 17 guests