Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
That'd be the one where Ashley Young was running full pace, unchallenged, up against an exposed Wheater?
Zat Knight is the sort of bloke I wouldn't want with me in the trenches - soft as shit..I'd put him in the same drawer as Samuel
Last season at Stoke, I was on one of the front rows and watching his attempts to avoid getting hurt when we were defending high balls was embarrassing
The fact Wheater is better on the ball, too, makes it an easy call for me
Zat Knight is the sort of bloke I wouldn't want with me in the trenches - soft as shit..I'd put him in the same drawer as Samuel
Last season at Stoke, I was on one of the front rows and watching his attempts to avoid getting hurt when we were defending high balls was embarrassing
The fact Wheater is better on the ball, too, makes it an easy call for me
Sto ut Serviam
Re: Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
Regardless of Knight's good performance, I'm still going for Wheater. Height wise there isn't much in it, and Wheater is considerably better in the air, which is very important against Stoke. I also feel that everytime Knight gets the ball that it's either going straight to the opposition's attackers or up on the roof and thing if we are going to win, we need to outplay Stoke.
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
Wheater is harder, he's the man for Stoke. Reckon Coyle knows it as well (though odd he didn't make the bench yesterday).
He's better as well...not by much but he is.
He's better as well...not by much but he is.
Re: Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
Running at full pace? No. Unchallenged? Obviously, Wheater is there to make the challenge. Exposed? Yes.CAPSLOCK wrote:That'd be the one where Ashley Young was running full pace, unchallenged, up against an exposed Wheater?
Zat Knight is the sort of bloke I wouldn't want with me in the trenches - soft as shit..I'd put him in the same drawer as Samuel
Last season at Stoke, I was on one of the front rows and watching his attempts to avoid getting hurt when we were defending high balls was embarrassing
The fact Wheater is better on the ball, too, makes it an easy call for me
He had a fair few options and, much like Zat against Stoke, he chose the suicidal one.
Like I said, toss a coin for all I care.
- tell ben im him
- Hopeful
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 1:32 pm
- Location: very close
Re: Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
Hope it's not knight for me, more prone to mistakes no better in the air, although taller not as good on the floor, switches off at times, seems to have concentration problems had a good game Saturday and a smashing lad to talk to, but feel jones will knock him allover place if he plays Sunday so it's wheater for me.
am i right or am i right?
Re: Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
Robinson was 30 yards behind YoungTombwfc wrote:Running at full pace? No. Unchallenged? Obviously, Wheater is there to make the challenge. Exposed? Yes.CAPSLOCK wrote:That'd be the one where Ashley Young was running full pace, unchallenged, up against an exposed Wheater?
Zat Knight is the sort of bloke I wouldn't want with me in the trenches - soft as shit..I'd put him in the same drawer as Samuel
Last season at Stoke, I was on one of the front rows and watching his attempts to avoid getting hurt when we were defending high balls was embarrassing
The fact Wheater is better on the ball, too, makes it an easy call for me
He had a fair few options and, much like Zat against Stoke, he chose the suicidal one.
Like I said, toss a coin for all I care.
Young had all the cards
Wheater didn't have a a chance against one of the better players in the League
Sto ut Serviam
Re: Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
Well the poll is pretty close, still not sure as to who I would play though.
I went with Knight initially but my mind changes every day.
I went with Knight initially but my mind changes every day.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
Doesn't matter - they're much of a muchness - I don't trust either
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14516
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
I can't believe it's close... Wheater all day, every day.
Because Knight is shit, everyone get's excited when he has 1 good game after 3 shit ones.. Let's not forget how he got injured in the first place. Bullied, out-thought and out-stripped by the most average of average cloggers.
The bloke hardly ever has his back to Jussi.. He's always sprinting towards his own goal, which is feckin' poor
Because Knight is shit, everyone get's excited when he has 1 good game after 3 shit ones.. Let's not forget how he got injured in the first place. Bullied, out-thought and out-stripped by the most average of average cloggers.
The bloke hardly ever has his back to Jussi.. He's always sprinting towards his own goal, which is feckin' poor
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- tell ben im him
- Hopeful
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 1:32 pm
- Location: very close
Re: Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
Spot on the only thing that surprises me is that some people think he is quite good.boltonboris wrote:I can't believe it's close... Wheater all day, every day.
Because Knight is shit, everyone get's excited when he has 1 good game after 3 shit ones.. Let's not forget how he got injured in the first place. Bullied, out-thought and out-stripped by the most average of average cloggers.
The bloke hardly ever has his back to Jussi.. He's always sprinting towards his own goal, which is feckin' poor

am i right or am i right?
Re: Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
whether it was his fault or not i carnt remember but the dude injured himself for the team. he couldve just strugged his shoulders. or got shot by the germans.boltonboris wrote:I can't believe it's close... Wheater all day, every day.
Because Knight is shit, everyone get's excited when he has 1 good game after 3 shit ones.. Let's not forget how he got injured in the first place. Bullied, out-thought and out-stripped by the most average of average cloggers.
The bloke hardly ever has his back to Jussi.. He's always sprinting towards his own goal, which is feckin' poor
that said dude that replaced him did well. he's been rested and will get the first xi place on sunday.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14516
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
He got caught in two minds wether to commit or not, got absolutely skinned by the Nigerian lad. Luckily the Nigerian lad had a short touch when he was looking to shoot, which gave Knight the opportunity to get in a(nother) last ditch tackle of his own doinga1 wrote:whether it was his fault or not i carnt remember but the dude injured himself for the team. he couldve just strugged his shoulders. or got shot by the germans.boltonboris wrote:I can't believe it's close... Wheater all day, every day.
Because Knight is shit, everyone get's excited when he has 1 good game after 3 shit ones.. Let's not forget how he got injured in the first place. Bullied, out-thought and out-stripped by the most average of average cloggers.
The bloke hardly ever has his back to Jussi.. He's always sprinting towards his own goal, which is feckin' poor
that said dude that replaced him did well. he's been rested and will get the first xi place on sunday.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Re: Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
I suspect people are often fooled into thinking Knight is superior because he pulls off quite a few last-ditch tackles with those looooooong legs that look exciting...
however - it'd be a better recommendation if he didn't get himself in the position where those tackles HAVE to be last-ditch in the first place.
I'm not convinced that EITHER knight or wheater is MILES ahead of the other - but, for my money, wheater possibly shades it at the moment. FWIW I don't think the wheater/knight conundrum will be the make or break choice....
however - it'd be a better recommendation if he didn't get himself in the position where those tackles HAVE to be last-ditch in the first place.
I'm not convinced that EITHER knight or wheater is MILES ahead of the other - but, for my money, wheater possibly shades it at the moment. FWIW I don't think the wheater/knight conundrum will be the make or break choice....
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
I quite like the sound of a shoulder strug.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
the make or break choice is whether to moan like feck at the referee every time they get a throw in. tapping their watches.thebish wrote:I suspect people are often fooled into thinking Knight is superior because he pulls off quite a few last-ditch tackles with those looooooong legs that look exciting...
however - it'd be a better recommendation if he didn't get himself in the position where those tackles HAVE to be last-ditch in the first place.
I'm not convinced that EITHER knight or wheater is MILES ahead of the other - but, for my money, wheater possibly shades it at the moment. FWIW I don't think the wheater/knight conundrum will be the make or break choice....
the answers yes.
Re: Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
The two Bolton centre halves are going to be bombarded by throw-ins and crosses at every opportunity. We need the player who is best at heading so Wheater would be my choice.
Do not trust atoms. They make up everything.
Re: Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
and moan like feck at the ref whenever they get one.malcd1 wrote:The two Bolton centre halves are going to be bombarded by throw-ins and crosses at every opportunity. We need the player who is best at heading so Wheater would be my choice.
"come on ! ive got get home before it goes dark ! "
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
I've disabled auto-translate.
Can anyone help?
Can anyone help?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
Let's just play Wheater, Knight and Cahill then
Re: Wembley - Knight or Wheater?
Clearly you have forgotten, but it's 50 seconds into this video.boltonboris wrote:I can't believe it's close... Wheater all day, every day.
Because Knight is shit, everyone get's excited when he has 1 good game after 3 shit ones.. Let's not forget how he got injured in the first place. Bullied, out-thought and out-stripped by the most average of average cloggers.
The bloke hardly ever has his back to Jussi.. He's always sprinting towards his own goal, which is feckin' poor
http://www.101greatgoals.com/videodispl ... n-8487668/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Bullied and out-thought? What exactly would Wheater have done better? Utilised his awesome pace?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: knobpolisher and 16 guests