TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thread

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Locked
malcd1
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3608
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 5:33 pm

Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr

Post by malcd1 » Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:11 pm

The Mirror suggesting that Coyle is trying to get Sturridge on loan again next season.

http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Ch ... 28154.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Of course we tried this with Wilshere at the start of this season and failed. Worth a try though especially as young Danny will probably be fifth choice striker at Chelsea.
Do not trust atoms. They make up everything.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr

Post by thebish » Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:16 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
jmjhb wrote:Players from potentially relegated teams who I wouldn't be averse to signing:

Blackpool - Adam, Vaughan, Matt Phillips, possibly DJ Campbell
Wolves - Jarvis (unlikely), O'Hara, Fletcher, Hammill
Wigan - Cleverley, McCarthy, Watson, N'Zogbia (unlikely), Rodallega
West Ham - Hitzlsperger, Ba, Parker (unlikely), Keane, maybe Obinna and Piquionne
Blackburn - Samba, Phil Jones (unlikely), Santa Cruz, N'Zonzi, Kalinic

Hmmm. Right, so, let me get this right, you name half of the first team players that are currently playing for clubs that are currently facing relegation as being good enough for us.

A couple of questions here;

Has it not ocurred to as to why they're all staring relegation in the face?

Should we not be setting our sights a little higher?
I'm not sure I'd rule out a player simply because his club got relegated (if West Ham got relegated, Scott Parker wouldn't suddenly by crap and beneath us...) as for sights being set higher - nice idea - but depends upon available funds, surely?

the higher-sight players might be loanees - which Coyle has so far managed very well - in fact - as I have suggested before, it would do us no harm at all to promote ourselves as a finishing school for excellent top-4 club loanees - Chelsea and Arsenal must now both have some positive vibes about loaning us players...

the non-loanees, I suspect, will come from such a list as the one jmjhb offers - OR a list of out-of-contracts... Holden aside, Coyle hasn't shown a talent for pulling cheap foreign starlets out of a hat... (though - Holden is a pretty big aside and if he only pulled one more Holden out of a hat - then he'd be ahead!)

I have a feeling this will be a very interesting summer...

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:17 pm

We signed Muamba from a relegated side

That hasn't worked out too well as of yet

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr

Post by Lord Kangana » Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:20 pm

:fishing:
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr

Post by Bruce Rioja » Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:29 pm

thebish wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
jmjhb wrote:Players from potentially relegated teams who I wouldn't be averse to signing:

Blackpool - Adam, Vaughan, Matt Phillips, possibly DJ Campbell
Wolves - Jarvis (unlikely), O'Hara, Fletcher, Hammill
Wigan - Cleverley, McCarthy, Watson, N'Zogbia (unlikely), Rodallega
West Ham - Hitzlsperger, Ba, Parker (unlikely), Keane, maybe Obinna and Piquionne
Blackburn - Samba, Phil Jones (unlikely), Santa Cruz, N'Zonzi, Kalinic

Hmmm. Right, so, let me get this right, you name half of the first team players that are currently playing for clubs that are currently facing relegation as being good enough for us.

A couple of questions here;

Has it not ocurred to as to why they're all staring relegation in the face?

Should we not be setting our sights a little higher?
I'm not sure I'd rule out a player simply because his club got relegated (if West Ham got relegated, Scott Parker wouldn't suddenly by crap and beneath us...)
I'm not. I'm ruling out the notion that half their team would be good enough for us. Is that not clear? OK, twice in as many days I need to clarify my point. Clearly I'm difficult to follow and I'll try harder in future.

For me then, let's look at the clubs mentioned and I'll tell you who I think would be a worthwhile addition - as good as/better than what we already have.

Blackpool - Charlie Adam
Wolves - No-one.
Wigan - N'Zogbia
West Ham - Parker
Blackburn - No-one.
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr

Post by TANGODANCER » Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:36 pm

malcd1 wrote:The Mirror suggesting that Coyle is trying to get Sturridge on loan again next season
It would be very nice if it happened but Sturridge, just like Wilshire, will want to get back swimming with the sharks a.s.a.p. Very ambitious and sure of his ability and wants to play at the very top level. Probably eying the top salary level too but can't blame him for that. That's football. I'll be very surprised if he's back here next season. If Chelsea can't ofer him a place he'll get some real attention elsewhere. Hope I'm wrong, but that's how it looks.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

a1
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3427
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:11 pm

Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr

Post by a1 » Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:41 pm

spend 20-odd mil on sturridge

jmjhb
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3506
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 2:52 pm
Location: Xanadu

Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr

Post by jmjhb » Tue Apr 26, 2011 12:45 am

Bruce Rioja wrote:
jmjhb wrote:Players from potentially relegated teams who I wouldn't be averse to signing:

Blackpool - Adam, Vaughan, Matt Phillips, possibly DJ Campbell
Wolves - Jarvis (unlikely), O'Hara, Fletcher, Hammill
Wigan - Cleverley, McCarthy, Watson, N'Zogbia (unlikely), Rodallega
West Ham - Hitzlsperger, Ba, Parker (unlikely), Keane, maybe Obinna and Piquionne
Blackburn - Samba, Phil Jones (unlikely), Santa Cruz, N'Zonzi, Kalinic

Hmmm. Right, so, let me get this right, you name half of the first team players that are currently playing for clubs that are currently facing relegation as being good enough for us.

A couple of questions here;

Has it not ocurred to as to why they're all staring relegation in the face?

Should we not be setting our sights a little higher?
Not particularly, most of the players on the list have impressed me at one point or the other, and I feel they would be a decent addition to the squad. I'm trying to be realistic here, which is why I haven't named random European big-name players as 'realistic signings' like deluded Newcastle/Sunderland fans have been doing since the transfer window closed, or saying we should spend £10M+ on a single player when we all know that kind of money isn't going to be there. Clearly, we're going to use the loan market again, but a couple of these listed would further supplement the squad.

If we're setting our sights higher, then obviously there's no point discussing potential targets from the Championship like Pratley then, is there? F*ck it, let's just sign Messi and be done with it.
Last edited by jmjhb on Tue Apr 26, 2011 1:05 am, edited 3 times in total.

Armchair Wanderer
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1967
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am

Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr

Post by Armchair Wanderer » Tue Apr 26, 2011 12:52 am

Bruce Rioja wrote:For me then, let's look at the clubs mentioned and I'll tell you who I think would be a worthwhile addition - as good as/better than what we already have.

Blackpool - Charlie Adam
Wolves - No-one.
Wigan - N'Zogbia
West Ham - Parker
Blackburn - No-one.
Samba at Blackburn as we'll need CB cover/competition.

Also, some Birmingham defenders should they go down and Fellaini at Everton just so we can wear ridiculous wigs.
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.

User avatar
HMX
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2851
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 6:29 pm

Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr

Post by HMX » Tue Apr 26, 2011 12:54 am

Armchair Wanderer wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:For me then, let's look at the clubs mentioned and I'll tell you who I think would be a worthwhile addition - as good as/better than what we already have.

Blackpool - Charlie Adam
Wolves - No-one.
Wigan - N'Zogbia
West Ham - Parker
Blackburn - No-one.
Samba at Blackburn as we'll need CB cover/competition.

Also, some Birmingham defenders should they go down and Fellaini at Everton just so we can wear ridiculous wigs.
But the Campo wig is still acceptable :)

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Tue Apr 26, 2011 7:40 am

If we signed Samba he'd automatically become our best defender

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38826
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue Apr 26, 2011 8:04 am

Bruce Rioja wrote:
thebish wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
jmjhb wrote:Players from potentially relegated teams who I wouldn't be averse to signing:

Blackpool - Adam, Vaughan, Matt Phillips, possibly DJ Campbell
Wolves - Jarvis (unlikely), O'Hara, Fletcher, Hammill
Wigan - Cleverley, McCarthy, Watson, N'Zogbia (unlikely), Rodallega
West Ham - Hitzlsperger, Ba, Parker (unlikely), Keane, maybe Obinna and Piquionne
Blackburn - Samba, Phil Jones (unlikely), Santa Cruz, N'Zonzi, Kalinic

Hmmm. Right, so, let me get this right, you name half of the first team players that are currently playing for clubs that are currently facing relegation as being good enough for us.

A couple of questions here;

Has it not ocurred to as to why they're all staring relegation in the face?

Should we not be setting our sights a little higher?
I'm not sure I'd rule out a player simply because his club got relegated (if West Ham got relegated, Scott Parker wouldn't suddenly by crap and beneath us...)
I'm not. I'm ruling out the notion that half their team would be good enough for us. Is that not clear? OK, twice in as many days I need to clarify my point. Clearly I'm difficult to follow and I'll try harder in future.

For me then, let's look at the clubs mentioned and I'll tell you who I think would be a worthwhile addition - as good as/better than what we already have.

Blackpool - Charlie Adam
Wolves - No-one.
Wigan - N'Zogbia
West Ham - Parker
Blackburn - No-one.
You've had a bit of a mare there Bruce. Doyle or Jarvis from Wolves would both be good additions. Ba at West Ham looks handy and Noble would be a Coyle type player, from Blackburn Samba, Phil Jones, Hoilett, Pedersen?, wouldn't surprise me either if Coyle wasn't interested in McCarthy from Wigan and quite possibly Vaughan from Blackpool should they go down.

I think the notion of not signing relegated players is flawed. If you're not going to take a proven premiership player like Samba, simply because Blackburn have been fooked over royally by new owners leaving them with someone you've never heard of before in charge, then who would you sign? Championship prospects are risks as are foreign imports.

We won't sign Samba anyways, I expect Blackburn to scrape to safety, especially after we do our usual get a team who hasn't won in ages out of trouble trick there on Saturday. But the point is that relegated teams sometimes have an abundance of decent players who have just been mismanaged or injuries hit the side during the season.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr

Post by thebish » Tue Apr 26, 2011 8:44 am

Bruce Rioja wrote: Is that not clear? OK, twice in as many days I need to clarify my point. Clearly I'm difficult to follow and I'll try harder in future.

don't fret too much about it Bruce - I often have to clarify my point - it's just evidence of a vastly superior brain! 8)

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr

Post by Lord Kangana » Tue Apr 26, 2011 9:38 am

I'm not sure a Samba type player is what we need if we have to repalce Cahill. We've already got a couple of big trundlers, we need someone a bit more like, say, Sam Ricketts. But better. I have a feeling that we already have our centre halves for next year, and regardless of Cahill going will not add to them.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38826
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue Apr 26, 2011 9:41 am

Lord Kangana wrote:I'm not sure a Samba type player is what we need if we have to repalce Cahill. We've already got a couple of big trundlers, we need someone a bit more like, say, Sam Ricketts. But better. I have a feeling that we already have our centre halves for next year, and regardless of Cahill going will not add to them.
Ricketts won't be back till September at the earliest. I can't see us going into the season with only two centre backs. We'll need cover.

Of course it won't be Samba as he'll be very expensive (and is miles better than anything we've got but should he be available will be in demand). But we'll definitely need some sort of cover there, presumably a younger player?

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31638
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Tue Apr 26, 2011 9:44 am

Lord Kangana wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:10 mil mentioned for Cole plus his wages. Have to offload decently to make it a good buy.
They "bought" him on a Bosman ... but I can only imagine his salary.
His salary was the reason he ended up at Liverpool. (...) Lord knows what he thinks now of that spectacularly inept display of brinksmanship.
I'm of a mind to not necessarily dismiss 4 and a half million pounds a year as spectacularly inept. Maybe not what he was hoping for....
By most accounts he could have had £75kpw (£3.9m) at Spurs, his childhood heroes, who have had what might be comfortably described as a better season. He must have been watching those Champions League games through fingers bloodied from punching himself in the face.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31638
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Tue Apr 26, 2011 9:51 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:I expect Blackburn to scrape to safety, especially after we do our usual get a team who hasn't won in ages out of trouble trick there on Saturday.
Like we did on Sunday? :wink:
Tombwfc wrote:To spend up to £10mil of the money we get for Cahill on N'Zogbia or Cole would be bordering on negligence. We have two big earning left wingers under contract, but would need at least one striker and a centre half.
Entirely correct up to a certain point. The point being central midfield.

Our squad needs additions in key areas, as well as replacements. The teams going down may have good players in them who can be maximised under a better manager – much like the 10 Wanderers selected against Arsenal who had looked relegation possibilities under Megson. If we didn't look to supposedly inferior teams for pluckable talent, we wouldn't have Stuart Holden.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr

Post by Lord Kangana » Tue Apr 26, 2011 9:56 am

The difficulty in trying to predict who we'll sign is the uncertainty of who's staying. If we can keep the overwhelming majority of this squad together, we won't need a vast line-up of signings. Just some better squad palyers, and a first teamer, maybe two.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38826
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue Apr 26, 2011 10:02 am

Lord Kangana wrote:The difficulty in trying to predict who we'll sign is the uncertainty of who's staying. If we can keep the overwhelming majority of this squad together, we won't need a vast line-up of signings. Just some better squad palyers, and a first teamer, maybe two.
I suspect Cahill will be the only one we sell for money (possibly Habsi but that doesn't affect much) and that we'll lose the out of contracts in the main.

Elmander is the question mark I guess.

Either way we'll have a bit of money to spend and some space on the wage bill, hopefully!

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr

Post by CAPSLOCK » Tue Apr 26, 2011 10:20 am

We might even sign somebody who gets in the first team
Sto ut Serviam

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 29 guests