Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Post by Bruce Rioja » Thu May 05, 2011 4:15 pm

General Mannerheim wrote:even Big Sam calls it the barclayspremierleague in his punditry!? are they all on a bonus for every mention?
Possibly. When I worked in the drinks industry it was common knowledge that footballers were on £60 a go from SKB everytime they took a swig out of those turquoise Lucozade bottles (it'll be a lot more now) during post-match interviews, despite them being full of water.
May the bridges I burn light your way

BwfcDan
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 588
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:48 pm
Location: Garstang

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Post by BwfcDan » Thu May 05, 2011 4:26 pm

Lofthouse Lower wrote:She's late!
Appalling
"Im a big fish in a small pond"... "Your not a big fish! Your not even a fish!"

Salford Trotter
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1448
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:57 am

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Post by Salford Trotter » Fri May 06, 2011 12:45 am

I'm in the Nat Lofthouse Suite for this one, lording it up with the privileged :drink:
The Voice Of Reason

jmjhb
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3503
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 2:52 pm
Location: Xanadu

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Post by jmjhb » Fri May 06, 2011 1:01 am

Do Sunderland have any players left? They all seem to be injured.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Post by boltonboris » Fri May 06, 2011 8:59 am

Our home form is excellent.

Sunderland haven't won for 11 years.



0-2 Sunderland then
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38814
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri May 06, 2011 9:53 am

boltonboris wrote:Our home form is excellent.

Sunderland haven't won for 11 years.


0-2 Sunderland then
Beat Wigan last game but one did they not?

seanworth
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4049
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 1:07 pm
Location: thailand/canada

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Post by seanworth » Fri May 06, 2011 10:11 am

Thought we lost to Sunderland at home last year under the management of the M word.

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7067
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Post by TKIZ! » Fri May 06, 2011 11:19 am

seanworth wrote:Thought we lost to Sunderland at home last year under the management of the M word.
Aye, 1-0. Darren Bent, first game of the season
Pfffft.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Post by boltonboris » Fri May 06, 2011 11:46 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
boltonboris wrote:Our home form is excellent.

Sunderland haven't won for 11 years.


0-2 Sunderland then
Beat Wigan last game but one did they not?
Okay.. They've won once in the last 11 years
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

Tombwfc
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2912
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 5:37 pm

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Post by Tombwfc » Fri May 06, 2011 11:47 am

Just seems odd that we'd go a whole season without losing to a shit team at home (Hodgson's Liverpool not withstanding). Like that Reading home game a few years ago.

Would be fairly embarrasing if they beat us though, given their complete lack of options.

seanworth
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4049
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 1:07 pm
Location: thailand/canada

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Post by seanworth » Fri May 06, 2011 11:55 am

boltonboris wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
boltonboris wrote:Our home form is excellent.

Sunderland haven't won for 11 years.


0-2 Sunderland then
Beat Wigan last game but one did they not?
Okay.. They've won once in the last 11 years
Oops sorry I read that incorrectlly. Thought you meant that they hadn't won at Bolton in 11 years. Missed the sarcasm entirely.

ratbert
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3067
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:15 pm

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Post by ratbert » Fri May 06, 2011 1:08 pm

http://www.the-wanderer.co.uk/bolton/gillingham-to-win" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Match preview...

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Fri May 06, 2011 2:37 pm

Sunderland will be without Kieran Richardson and Lee Cattermole for the final three games of the season.

Richardson, 26, has a stress fracture in his left leg and fellow midfielder Cattermole, 23, has a back injury.

They will both miss Premier League matches against Bolton, Wolves and West Ham, with Richardson's injury the more worrying.

CrazyHorse
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 10572
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
Location: Up above the streets and houses

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Post by CrazyHorse » Fri May 06, 2011 2:39 pm

Can't say I'm the slightest bit worried about Richardson's injury.
Businesswoman of the year.

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Post by plymouth wanderer » Fri May 06, 2011 4:12 pm

1 there recent form is worse than ours

2 have got no strikers hardly any midfield

3 steve bruce is a snotty nosed cvnt

4 they havint won away since january

SO i am sure we can help them out
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Post by thebish » Fri May 06, 2011 4:20 pm

plymouth wanderer wrote:1 there recent form is worse than ours

2 have got no strikers hardly any midfield

3 steve bruce is a snotty nosed cvnt

4 they havint won away since january

SO i am sure we can help them out

pretty much what I said in the preview! 8)

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Post by plymouth wanderer » Fri May 06, 2011 4:21 pm

thebish wrote:
plymouth wanderer wrote:1 there recent form is worse than ours

2 have got no strikers hardly any midfield

3 steve bruce is a snotty nosed cvnt

4 they havint won away since january

SO i am sure we can help them out

pretty much what I said in the preview! 8)





what steve bruce is a snotty nosed cvnt
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Post by Bruce Rioja » Fri May 06, 2011 8:20 pm

TKIZ! wrote:
seanworth wrote:Thought we lost to Sunderland at home last year under the management of the M word.
Aye, 1-0. Darren Bent, first game of the season
Aye. Playing 4-5-1 at home against a team that we'd dicked 4-0 in one of the last games of the season before. :roll:
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
officer_dibble
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15295
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Post by officer_dibble » Fri May 06, 2011 8:29 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:
seanworth wrote:Thought we lost to Sunderland at home last year under the management of the M word.
Aye, 1-0. Darren Bent, first game of the season
Aye. Playing 4-5-1 at home against a team that we'd dicked 4-0 in one of the last games of the season before. :roll:
Oh aye, awful game

Anyway depends on how much we want it tomorrow....they only have 10 fit first teamers.

If steiner isn't fit I'd much rather see a specialist right back play so that means the kid from the reserves. Think we may have a couple of kids on the bench actually, Connoly has been making a bi of noise this week, could be on purpose the club let him out into the spotlight? Anyway be interesting...Catermole will be key for them, could dominate a midfield with Cohen and Gardner or whoever in.

Sturridge should play anyway so that will be a big plus for us.

Struggling to work up enthusiasm for it anyway, a bit like the players!

Beefheart
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2918
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:36 pm

Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread

Post by Beefheart » Fri May 06, 2011 9:08 pm

officer_dibble wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:
seanworth wrote:Thought we lost to Sunderland at home last year under the management of the M word.
Aye, 1-0. Darren Bent, first game of the season
Aye. Playing 4-5-1 at home against a team that we'd dicked 4-0 in one of the last games of the season before. :roll:
Oh aye, awful game

Anyway depends on how much we want it tomorrow....they only have 10 fit first teamers.

If steiner isn't fit I'd much rather see a specialist right back play so that means the kid from the reserves. Think we may have a couple of kids on the bench actually, Connoly has been making a bi of noise this week, could be on purpose the club let him out into the spotlight? Anyway be interesting...Catermole will be key for them, could dominate a midfield with Cohen and Gardner or whoever in.

Sturridge should play anyway so that will be a big plus for us.

Struggling to work up enthusiasm for it anyway, a bit like the players!
I believe Cattermole is also injured :D

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], malcd1, Prufrock and 39 guests