Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
Possibly. When I worked in the drinks industry it was common knowledge that footballers were on £60 a go from SKB everytime they took a swig out of those turquoise Lucozade bottles (it'll be a lot more now) during post-match interviews, despite them being full of water.General Mannerheim wrote:even Big Sam calls it the barclayspremierleague in his punditry!? are they all on a bonus for every mention?
May the bridges I burn light your way
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
AppallingLofthouse Lower wrote:She's late!
"Im a big fish in a small pond"... "Your not a big fish! Your not even a fish!"
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1448
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:57 am
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
I'm in the Nat Lofthouse Suite for this one, lording it up with the privileged 

The Voice Of Reason
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
Do Sunderland have any players left? They all seem to be injured.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
Our home form is excellent.
Sunderland haven't won for 11 years.
0-2 Sunderland then
Sunderland haven't won for 11 years.
0-2 Sunderland then
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38814
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
Beat Wigan last game but one did they not?boltonboris wrote:Our home form is excellent.
Sunderland haven't won for 11 years.
0-2 Sunderland then
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
Thought we lost to Sunderland at home last year under the management of the M word.
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
Aye, 1-0. Darren Bent, first game of the seasonseanworth wrote:Thought we lost to Sunderland at home last year under the management of the M word.
Pfffft.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
Okay.. They've won once in the last 11 yearsBWFC_Insane wrote:Beat Wigan last game but one did they not?boltonboris wrote:Our home form is excellent.
Sunderland haven't won for 11 years.
0-2 Sunderland then
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
Just seems odd that we'd go a whole season without losing to a shit team at home (Hodgson's Liverpool not withstanding). Like that Reading home game a few years ago.
Would be fairly embarrasing if they beat us though, given their complete lack of options.
Would be fairly embarrasing if they beat us though, given their complete lack of options.
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
Oops sorry I read that incorrectlly. Thought you meant that they hadn't won at Bolton in 11 years. Missed the sarcasm entirely.boltonboris wrote:Okay.. They've won once in the last 11 yearsBWFC_Insane wrote:Beat Wigan last game but one did they not?boltonboris wrote:Our home form is excellent.
Sunderland haven't won for 11 years.
0-2 Sunderland then
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
http://www.the-wanderer.co.uk/bolton/gillingham-to-win" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Match preview...
Match preview...
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
Sunderland will be without Kieran Richardson and Lee Cattermole for the final three games of the season.
Richardson, 26, has a stress fracture in his left leg and fellow midfielder Cattermole, 23, has a back injury.
They will both miss Premier League matches against Bolton, Wolves and West Ham, with Richardson's injury the more worrying.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
Can't say I'm the slightest bit worried about Richardson's injury.
Businesswoman of the year.
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
1 there recent form is worse than ours
2 have got no strikers hardly any midfield
3 steve bruce is a snotty nosed cvnt
4 they havint won away since january
SO i am sure we can help them out
2 have got no strikers hardly any midfield
3 steve bruce is a snotty nosed cvnt
4 they havint won away since january
SO i am sure we can help them out
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
plymouth wanderer wrote:1 there recent form is worse than ours
2 have got no strikers hardly any midfield
3 steve bruce is a snotty nosed cvnt
4 they havint won away since january
SO i am sure we can help them out
pretty much what I said in the preview!

- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
thebish wrote:plymouth wanderer wrote:1 there recent form is worse than ours
2 have got no strikers hardly any midfield
3 steve bruce is a snotty nosed cvnt
4 they havint won away since january
SO i am sure we can help them out
pretty much what I said in the preview!
what steve bruce is a snotty nosed cvnt
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
Aye. Playing 4-5-1 at home against a team that we'd dicked 4-0 in one of the last games of the season before.TKIZ! wrote:Aye, 1-0. Darren Bent, first game of the seasonseanworth wrote:Thought we lost to Sunderland at home last year under the management of the M word.

May the bridges I burn light your way
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
Oh aye, awful gameBruce Rioja wrote:Aye. Playing 4-5-1 at home against a team that we'd dicked 4-0 in one of the last games of the season before.TKIZ! wrote:Aye, 1-0. Darren Bent, first game of the seasonseanworth wrote:Thought we lost to Sunderland at home last year under the management of the M word.
Anyway depends on how much we want it tomorrow....they only have 10 fit first teamers.
If steiner isn't fit I'd much rather see a specialist right back play so that means the kid from the reserves. Think we may have a couple of kids on the bench actually, Connoly has been making a bi of noise this week, could be on purpose the club let him out into the spotlight? Anyway be interesting...Catermole will be key for them, could dominate a midfield with Cohen and Gardner or whoever in.
Sturridge should play anyway so that will be a big plus for us.
Struggling to work up enthusiasm for it anyway, a bit like the players!
Re: Can Wanderers Mackem pay? - Official Match Thread
I believe Cattermole is also injuredofficer_dibble wrote:Oh aye, awful gameBruce Rioja wrote:Aye. Playing 4-5-1 at home against a team that we'd dicked 4-0 in one of the last games of the season before.TKIZ! wrote:Aye, 1-0. Darren Bent, first game of the seasonseanworth wrote:Thought we lost to Sunderland at home last year under the management of the M word.
Anyway depends on how much we want it tomorrow....they only have 10 fit first teamers.
If steiner isn't fit I'd much rather see a specialist right back play so that means the kid from the reserves. Think we may have a couple of kids on the bench actually, Connoly has been making a bi of noise this week, could be on purpose the club let him out into the spotlight? Anyway be interesting...Catermole will be key for them, could dominate a midfield with Cohen and Gardner or whoever in.
Sturridge should play anyway so that will be a big plus for us.
Struggling to work up enthusiasm for it anyway, a bit like the players!
